Skip to main content

Conclusion: Dark Mirrors? German Science Fiction in the Twenty-First Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on Contemporary German Science Fiction

Part of the book series: Studies in Global Science Fiction ((SGSF))

Abstract

This concluding chapter explores the dominant paradigm of contemporary German SF, but it also anticipates, and argues for, new directions. German SF in the twenty-first century tends to see the dystopian form as the ideal vehicle to explore the social and psychological consequences of scientific and technological progress. There is no point in denying that the ‘dystopian turn’ reflects the mood of our time, and that the first two decades of the new millennium have given rise to fears and misgivings about increasingly porous boundaries, conceptual paradigm shifts, and persistent global challenges that make our scientific and technological advances feel hollow. At the same time, one may wonder whether the endless depiction of depressing futures in recent SF may not in fact yield diminishing returns in terms of the intended warning function and instead convince its audiences to give up hope altogether. In this chapter I look at recent German SF novels (Thomas von Steinaecker’s Die Verteidigung des Paradieses and Sibylle Berg’s GRM: Brainfuck), to analyze why and how they establish their dystopian worldview. But, in contrast to most of the contributions to this volume, I am also looking at the green shoots of positive visions (Tom Hillenbrand’s Qube, Andreas Brandhorst’s Die Eskalation, Judith and Christian Vogt’s Wasteland, and Andreas Eschbach’s Eines Menschen Flügel). These give us glimpses of “concrete utopias” even as they contemplate the destructive impact of human activity on our planet. I argue that these latter works demonstrate a radical rethinking of the purpose of writing SF in the twenty-first century, offering a “progressive fantastic,” and a new hope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    “For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known” (1 Corinthians, Chap. 13, verse 12).

  2. 2.

    For example: Thomas Lehr’s 42 (2005), Joachim Zelter’s Die Schule der Arbeitslosen (The School of the Jobless, 2006), Christian Kracht’s Ich werde hier sein im Sonnenschein und im Schatten (I will be here in Sunshine and in Shadow, 2008), Dietmar Dath’s Die Abschaffung der Arten (The Abolition of Species, 2008), Juli Zeh’s Corpus Delicti (The Method, 2009), Benjamin Stein’s Replay (2012), Reinhard Jirgl’s Nichts von euch auf Erden (Nothing of You on Earth, 2013), Valerie Fritsch’s Winters Garten (Winter’s Garden, 2015), or Karen Duve’s Macht (The Prepper Room, 2016).

  3. 3.

    All translations of German original texts are mine.

  4. 4.

    Barbara Korte and Christian Mair (2021, 2) point to the many ways the AI’s role in the novel can be interpreted: “[the] artificial intelligence pervades the novel even before readers become aware of its presence—and, arguably, not only through the character profiles. Many reviews of the novel noted its strange narrative tone in which even seemingly internal passages are always overlaid by an authorial voice. This might be the voice of a heterodiegetic narrator (or perhaps even a metaleptic presence of Berg as author, as a literary grime MC performing a 600-page novel), but perhaps it is also the voice of the AI.”

  5. 5.

    I suggest the term Zukunftsbewältigung for this endeavor (Cornils 2020, 1–12).

  6. 6.

    Recent examples from Germany include Tom Hillenbrand’s Drohnenland (Drone State, 2014), Marc-Uwe Kling’s Qualityland (2017), Andreas Brandhorst’s Ewiges Leben (Eternal Life, 2018), Frank Schätzing’s Die Tyrannei des Schmetterlings (The Tyranny of a Butterfly, 2018), Bijan Moini’s Der Würfel (The Cube, 2018), Andreas Eschbach’s Nationales Sicherheits -Amt (National Security Ministry, 2018), Theresa Hannig’s Die Optimierer (The Optimizers, 2017) and Die Unvollkommenen (The Imperfect, 2019), as well as Raphaela Edelbauer’s Dave (2021).

  7. 7.

    In Germany also known as the Trisolaris trilogy: The Three-Body Problem (2006/2014), The Dark Forest (2008/2015), Death’s End (2010/2016).

  8. 8.

    This holds true even for more empathetic explorations like Ian McEwan’s ‘Adam’ in Machines Like Me (2019), or the ‘artificial friend’ in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Klara and the Sun (2021).

References

  • Balasopoulos, Antonis. 2006. Anti-Utopia and Dystopia: Rethinking the Generic Field. In Utopian Project Archive 2006-2010, ed. V. Vlastaras, 59–67, Athens: School of Fine Arts Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Sibylle. 2019. GRM: Brainfuck. Cologne: K&W.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielskyte, Monika. 2019. Protopia: A New Framework. https://xynteo.com/insights/latest/prototypia-new-framework-monika-bielskyte-xynteo-exchange-2019. Accessed 1 May 2021.

  • Brandhorst, Andreas. 2020. Die Eskalation. München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claeys, Gregory. 2016. Dystopia: A Natural History. Oxford: OUP

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cornils, Ingo. 2020. Beyond Tomorrow: German Science Fiction and Utopian Thought in the 20th and 21st Centuries. Rochester: Camden House.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dath, Dietmar. 2019. Niegeschichte: Science Fiction als Kunst- und Denkmaschine. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschbach, Andreas. 2020. Eines Menschen Flügel. Köln: Lübbe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esselborn, Hans. 2019. Die Erfindung der Zukunft in der Literatur: Vom technisch-utopischen Zukunftsroman zur deutschen Science-Fiction. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellman, Barton. 2020. Dark Mirror: Edward Snowden and the American Surveillance State. New York: Penguin Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, Tom. 2020. Qube. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Eva. 2018 [2014]. The Future as Catastrophe: Imagining Disaster in the Modern Age, transl. Valentine Pakis. New York: Columbia UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houfkova, Katerina. 2019. The Warning Function of Post-Apocalyptic Science Fiction. In Messages, Sages and Ages 6.1: 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Edward. 2003. Utopias and Anti-Utopias. In The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction, eds. Edward James and Farah Mendlesohn, 219–229, Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte, Barbara, and Christian Mair. 2021. Brainfucked about Britain: Sibylle Berg’s Transnational Novel GRM. In Open Library of Humanities 7.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswitz, Kurd. 1899. Weltuntergang. In Wirklichkeiten: Beiträge zum Weltverständnis, Leipzig: Elischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, Jill. 2017. A Golden Age for Dystopian Fiction. In New Yorker, June 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, Ruth. 1990. Educated Hope: Ernst Bloch on Abstract and Concrete Utopia. In Utopian Studies 1:2. 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löchel, Rolf. 2020. Mit den Krallen einer Frau. Judith C. Vogt und Christian Vogt bringen mit ihrem SF-Roman „Wasteland“ den Hopepunk nach Deutschland. In literaturkritik.de, April 24. https://literaturkritik.de/vogt-vogt-wasteland,26656.html. Accessed 09 April 2022..

  • März, Ursula. 2019. Ein Buch wie ein Sprengsatz. In Die Zeit, April 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meza, Ed. 2021 Uncharted Territory, Bavaria Fiction Soaring into Outer Space with ‘Orion.’ In Variety, March 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, Andrew, and J.R. Burgmann. 2018. Climate Fiction: A World-Systems Approach. In Cultural Sociology 12.1: 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moylan, Tom. 2000. Scraps of Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia, Boulder: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moylan, Tom, and Raffaella Baccolini, eds. 2003. Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltermann, Philip. 2019. German sci-fi fans lap up dystopian tales of Brexit Britain. In The Observer, June 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, Lyman Tower. 1994. The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited. In Utopian Studies 5.1: 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skult, Petter. 2019. The End of the World as We Know It: Theoretical Perspectives on Apocalyptic Science Fiction. Abo: Abo Akademi UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Eric. “The Black Mirror” 2008 [1983]. In The Black Mirror and Other Stories: An Anthology of Science Fiction from Germany and Austria, ed. Franz Rottensteiner, 186–94, Middletown: Wesleyan UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Steinaecker, Thomas. 2016. Die Verteidigung des Paradieses, Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, James A., and Judith Vogt. 2020. Lasst uns Progressive Phantastik schreiben! TOR Online, August 16. https://www.toronline.de/feature/buch/2020/08/lasst-uns-progressive-phantastik-schreiben/. Accessed 9 April 2022.

  • Thaler, Mathias. 2019. Bleak Dreams, Not Nightmares: Critical Dystopias and the Necessity of Melancholic Hope. In Constellations 26.4: 607–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timm, Uwe. 2020. Der Verrückte in den Dünen. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vint, Sherryl. 2014. Science Fiction: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, Judith, and Christian Vogt. 2019. Wasteland. München: Knaur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, Judith. 2019. Ihr seid Hopers. November 11. http://www.jcvogt.de/ihr-seid-hopers/. Accessed 1 May 2021.

  • Weninger, Robert. 2017. Sublime Conclusions: Last Man Narratives from Apocalypse to Death of God. Cambridge: Legenda.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, Juli. 2020. Fragen zu Corpus Delicti. München: btb.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingo Cornils .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cornils, I. (2022). Conclusion: Dark Mirrors? German Science Fiction in the Twenty-First Century. In: Schmeink, L., Cornils, I. (eds) New Perspectives on Contemporary German Science Fiction . Studies in Global Science Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95963-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics