Keywords

2.1 Introduction

The use of digital technology has had great impact on our lives. Its influence in the management of an orthodontic patient is no different.

The chapter has been divided into three sections:

  1. 1.

    The digital workflow in an orthodontic office.

  2. 2.

    Clinical indications and applications for early orthodontic treatment aided with digital technology.

  3. 3.

    Concluding remarks including a discussion on the pitfalls and an overreliance of digital technology.

The following are certain definitions of terms to be used in this chapter which may be helpful:

  • Digital technology – this is an all-encompassing term used nowadays. But its roots lie in the fact that such technology is able to convert information into numbers (a binary format of zero and one) for machines to assimilate and use this information (Fig. 2.1).

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) – this uses algorithms and digitized patterns to mimic the cognitive function of the human mind to “learn” and “solve problems” (Fig. 2.2).

  • CAD-CAM (computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing) – introduced to dentistry in the 1970s, the use of CAD-CAM in orthodontics has exponentially increased in the last 20 years with changes in treatment philosophies and modalities. For example, the use of appliances from 3-D printed models. Figure 2.3 illustrates such an example.

Fig. 2.1
figure 1

The computer’s ability to use the numerical binary format (circuits being turned on/off) enables the assimilation of information by machines

Fig. 2.2
figure 2

Artificial Intelligence uses this information in an attempt to replicate the cognitive functions of the human mind

Fig. 2.3
figure 3

A simple orthodontic example of CAD-CAM is the simulated movement of teeth, the subsequent manufacturing of appliances, and the resultant movement of the teeth

2.2 The Digital Workflow in an Orthodontic Clinic

Emerging technology has improved the digital workflow, resulting in increased patient engagement, time efficiency, and better data acquisition, within the orthodontic office (Christensen 2017) (Fig. 2.4).

Fig. 2.4
figure 4

An illustration of the digital workflow in an orthodontic office

Logs of staff, patients, and visitors are kept in a central computer (Fig. 2.5) to monitor attendance and body temperature (a new requirement at our office, ever since the COVID-19 pandemic).

Fig. 2.5
figure 5

A facial recognition scanner with clinic’s Quick Reader (QR) code (for contact tracing by patients) along with an infrared temperature scanner

Digital records and attendance keep a log of patient’s information and treatment progress. Patients’ attendance (including time in and out) is an important tool nowadays as well.

Having the ability to view patient records remotely gives flexibility (Fig. 2.6).

Fig. 2.6
figure 6

Notes and patient’s payment log can be stored digitally

Digital data acquisition has enabled efficient means of accessing information. Radiographs and CBCTs can be remotely accessed (Fig. 2.7).

Fig. 2.7
figure 7

Digital radiographs (of varying types) have enabled easy processing of films and access and transfer of data

Digital scanners, both intraorally and extraorally, are convenient and a clinically acceptable way for record-keeping and transmitting information. Cloud-based information can be accessed easily and saves on physical storage space (Fig. 2.8).

Fig. 2.8
figure 8

Digital extraoral scan. Good for integration with CBCTs when planning dentofacial corrections. Picture courtesy of Professor Dhirawat Jotikasthira

Digital scans and subsequent simulations, when properly executed, can be used to engage patients, manage expectations, and aid in treatment planning. An example of such a simulation is shown in Fig. 2.9.

Fig. 2.9
figure 9

An example of dental simulation (TRIOS treatment simulator) using 3-Shape TRIOS scanning software with actual before and after scans of same patient. Note the scissor bite correction on the patient’s right and the mandibular displacement

Radiograph algorithms can be used to predict certain conditions (Hunter 1966). An example of this is the study of determining the growth and development of an individual using the stages of the cervical vertebra (Bacetti et al. 2002) (Fig. 2.10).

Fig. 2.10
figure 10

Cervical vertebra stage determination in order to predict growth. For instance, in these two cases of skeletal class III patients both aged 12 but with very different skeletal maturity. Researchers are looking at algorithms (Kok et al. 2019), with the aid of landmarks, to help determine this

The integration of scans can be used to give a more predictive treatment outcome. Surgical cases especially benefit from such outcomes. An example of this is shown in Fig. 2.11.

Fig. 2.11
figure 11

CBCT/dental scan integration for a more predictive outcome. It also aids in the fabrication of both the intermediate and final surgical splints. Images courtesy of Dr. Andrew Ow

Monitoring the progress of cases will increase in demand. The use of phone apps along with highly innovative phone cameras enable orthodontists to monitor their patients remotely (Fig. 2.12). In view of the COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for tele-dentistry and distance diagnosis has become a need more than a luxury (Barenghi et al. 2020). Apps can be used to monitor patient compliance, progress, and oral conditions and hygiene.

Fig. 2.12
figure 12

Monitoring the progress of patients has become more urgent (Hansa et al. 2020). Actual pictures taken during the COVID-19 pandemic enquiring about dental infection and orthodontic progress

Transfer portals and storage of data are important in today’s digital setting. Cloud-based portals enable safer storage and management of data as well as good accessibility of such data. Storage and transfer of such data is far more hygienic as well. These scans can also be transferred via such portals to laboratories and coworkers reducing physical material handling and improving infection control (Figs. 2.13 and 2.14).

Fig. 2.13
figure 13

Transfer of scans between software for management of cases are made convenient by secure cloud-based portals. An example using the 3-shape communicate platform

Fig. 2.14
figure 14

Easy access (e.g., via mobile apps) to cases for review and discussion is also a huge advantage (phone screen shots taken from the 3-shape communicate mobile app)

2.3 Clinical Indications and Application for Early Orthodontic Treatment-Aided Digital Technology

Intraoral scanning has made many processes much easier and safer (Chalmers et al. 2016) than impression materials including applications beyond the original scope of the device use such as scanning infants and young patients (Fig. 2.15).

Fig. 2.15
figure 15

Easily acceptable scans rid the patient of the discomfort of impression materials (Chaudhari & Kharbanda 2017) and overcome the problems of mobile teeth. (a) Cleft case, picture courtesy of Professor Dhirawat Jotikasthira. (b) The second example shows a patient in the mixed dentition with highly mobile first and second primary molars that were removed and a digital study model taken immediately. An alginate impression for both cases would have been very uncomfortable and difficult to undertake

Removable appliances—design and production have benefited greatly from digital technology (Fig. 2.16). Dedicated laboratory software has enabled in-house and lab-based manufacture of simple to custom-made appliances with a faster turnaround time.

Fig. 2.16
figure 16

From the intraoral scan, sketch for laboratory technician to follow design, to 3-D printing for fit into the patient’s mouth

Fixed appliances—prescription brackets and wires along with jig placement could change the way we manage our fixed appliance cases (Fig. 2.17).

Fig. 2.17
figure 17

CAD-CAM technology can provide us with customized prescriptions and customized arch wires. Pictures show treatment planning with the Insignia system

Customized appliance fabrication can result in personalized tailor-fitted appliances. Force delivery and application can be more precise (Fig. 2.18).

Fig. 2.18
figure 18

Customized appliance for expansion. Made with the aid of digital technology (Graf 2017). Picture courtesy of Dr. Nikhilesh Vaid

Functional appliances—the augmentation of clear aligners to include mandibular advancement components (Giancotti et al. 2020) is a very interesting avenue to be explored (Fig. 2.19).

Fig. 2.19
figure 19

Functional appliance: the present or could the future be more efficient? (a) Present-day twin block appliance with lab-based support. (b) Mandibular advancement along with dental alignment with clear aligners (Courtesy of Invisalign)

Clear aligners have been one of the two technologies (the other being temporary anchorage devices) in orthodontics that have revolutionized the way we approach the management of our patients (Fig. 2.20).

Fig. 2.20
figure 20

The integration from records to treatment execution has improved by leaps and bounds with regard to the application in clear aligners (Keim 2018). Algorithms have also been refined and data bases increased to present a more predictable treatment option. An example below using Invisalign

Retainers have been another avenue where digital technology can improve. More accurate retainers and shorter manufacturing time would greatly improve retention protocols (Fig. 2.21 and 2.22).

Fig. 2.21
figure 21

Removable retainers using digital technology. Cloud-based transfer to laboratory for 3-D print. Customized fabrication and delivery to patient

Fig. 2.22
figure 22

Fixed retainers using digital technology. Memotain by Ormco is a CAD-CAM retainer made by precision cuts of nickel-titanium alloy (Kravitz et al. 2017) to fit exactly into the anatomy of the teeth

2.4 Pitfalls and Overreliance of Digital Technology

I carefully worded the title of this chapter as an aid to orthodontic management. Such technology, though extremely helpful, cannot replace the clinician (see Fig. 2.23).

Fig. 2.23
figure 23

Shortfalls and inability for digital technology to accomplish

When dealing with patients, health-care workers have long since recognized that human communication and compassion play a key role in the management of the disease. The dead pan responses of technology cannot replicate this (Dunbar et al. 2014).

Detection and the implication of systemic and oral diseases also require a dental surgeon’s input.

AI, although extremely good at helping to determine an ideal method in obtaining tooth movement, is unable, as yet, to integrate facial forms and bony anatomy completely. Patients also exhibit differing permutations of malocclusion and respond differently to similar treatment modalities. Fine tuning and tailor-made plans are inevitable. Patients’ needs and mental makeup also determine an appropriate treatment plan and goal (Faber et al 2019). Algorithms, as yet, cannot accomplish these requirements.

Finally, one must always be aware that the medicolegal implications of using such technology do not absolve the user from responsibilities.