Skip to main content

Disability as Smart Equality: Inclusive Technology in a Digitally Advanced Nation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Vulnerable People and Digital Inclusion

Abstract

This chapter makes a two-fold argument concerning disability and digital inclusion. Firstly, it builds upon and extends existing research and conceptualizations of disability and digital inclusion, now recognized as an area that merits sustained attention by policymakers and practitioners. Secondly, it suggests that disability in its diversity and intersectionality offers many insights, as well as practical, design, conceptual and policy ideas, for rethinking digital inclusion to meet the new challenges of emerging technologies and their social coordinates. We call this approach “smart equality” and outline the ways in which disability helps us develop this concept. Our chapter is based on a study of disability and digital inclusion in Singapore, a country that prides itself on being a leader in social experiments in technology. We mobilize “smart equality” to think about how disability can be used to think through the implementation of digital inclusion in the case of Singapore and elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckett, A. E. (2006). Citizenship and vulnerability: Disability and issues of social and political engagement. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Building and Construction Authority (BCA). (2019, July). Code on accessibility in the built environment 2019. [Online]. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/universaldesign/accessibilitycode2019.pdf?sfvrsn=ec47172e_2

  • Chua, B. H. (1995). Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, B. H. (2017). Liberalism disavowed: Communitarism and state capitalism in Singapore. NUS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., Rodriguez, C. Bolin, G., Cohen, J., Volkmer, I., Goggin, G., Kraidy, M., Iwabuchi, K., Qiu, J. L., Wasserman, H., Zhao, Y., Rincón, O., Magallanes-Blanco, C., Thomas, P., Koltsova, O., Rakhmani, I., & Lee, K.-S. (2018). Media and communications. In International Panel on Social Progress (IPSP) (Ed.), Rethinking society for the 21st Century: Report of the International Panel on Social Progress (Vol. 2, pp. 523–562). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J. (2002). Bending over backwards. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2016). Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics, 58, 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellcessor, E. (2006). Restricted access: Media, disability, and the politics of participation. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K. (2016). Media work. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K. (2019). Disability and digital television cultures. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K. (2020, April 24). Remote digital access to work and life is a human right. Critical Disability Studies Blog. The Australian Sociological Association. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.tasa.org.au/content.aspx?page_id=2507&club_id=671860&item_id=2172

  • Ellis, K., & Goggin, G. (2015). Disability and the media. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, B. (1999). Geographies of disability. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G. (2018a). Afterword: Why digital inclusion now? In M. Ragnedda & B. Mutsvairo (Eds.), Digital inclusion: An international comparative analysis. Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G. (2018b). Disability and digital inequalities: Rethinking digital divides with disability theory. In M. Ragnedda & G. Muschert (Eds.), Theorizing digital divides (pp. 63–74). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G. (2022). Disability, internet, and digital inequality: The research agenda. In E. Hargittai (Ed.), Handbook on digital inequality (pp. 255–273). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G., & Ellis, K. (2020). Disability, communication and life itself in the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Sociology Review. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2020.1784020

  • Goggin, G., & McLelland, M. (2016). Introduction: Global coordinates of internet histories. In G. Goggin & M. McLelland (Eds.), Routledge companion to global internet histories (pp. 1–21). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2006). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G., Ellis, E., & Hawkins, W. (2019). Disability at the Centre of digital inclusion: Assessing a new moment in technology and rights. Communication Research & Practice, 5(3), 290–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C. B. (2013). Technology and entrepôt colonialism in Singapore. ISEAS Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2016). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • GovTech. (2018). Digital services standards. GovTech. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.tech.gov.sg/digital-service-standards/

  • Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K. L., King, J. L., Jarman, S., Dedrick, J., Raman, K. S., & Yap, C. S. (1990). Government as the driving force toward the information society: National computer policy in Singapore. The Information Society, 7(2), 155–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamnett, S., & Yuen, B. (Eds.). (2019). Planning Singapore: The experimental city. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamraie, A. (2017). Building access: Universal design and the politics of disability. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamraie, A., & Fritsch, K. (2019). Crip technoscience manifesto. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 5(1), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, C. H., & Walker, A. (2011). Promoting multi-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary ageing research in the United Kingdom. Ageing and Society, 31(1), 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, P. T. (2012). Disability and the internet: Confronting a digital divide. Lynne Rieger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A. (2013). Disability as vulnerability: Redistributing precariousness in democratic ways. Journal of Politics, 76(1), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V., & Yeo, S. (2020, April 18). How home-based learning shows up inequality in Singapore—A look at three homes. The Straits Times. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/how-home-based-learning-hbl-shows-up-inequality-in-singapore-a-look-at-three-homes

  • Lim, S. C., & Guo, L. (2015). Digital inclusion: The Singapore perspective. In K. Andreasson (Ed.), Digital divides: The new challenges and opportunities of e-inclusion (pp. 149–162). Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, Y. A.-C., & Chib, A. (2019). Tackling social inequality in development: Beyond access to appropriation of ICTs for employability. Information Technology for Development, 25(3), 532–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M. (in press). On the phone: Deafness and communication engineering. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI). (2015). Infocomm media 2025. Singapore Ministry of Communications and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI). (2018). Digital readiness blueprint. Singapore Ministry of Communications and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Finance (MOF) & Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA). (2000). eGov action plan I (2000–2003). Singapore Ministry of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF). (2017). In Singapore Ministry of Social and Family Development (Ed.), 3rd enabling masterplan 2017–2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2015). The biopolitics of disability: Neoliberalism, ablenationalism, and peripheral embodiment. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister’s Office (PMO). (2014, November 24). Transcript of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s speech at Smart Nation launch. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.pmo.gov.sg/newsroom/transcript-prime-minister-lee-hsien-loongs-speech-smart-nation-launch-24-november

  • Puar, J. K. (2017). The right to maim: Debility, capacity, disability. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, G. (2011). Design meets disability. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roulstone, A. (2016). Disability and technology: International and interdisciplinary perspectives. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satz, A. B. (2015). Vulnerability. In R. Adams, B. Reiss, & D. Serlin (Eds.), Keywords (pp. 185–186). New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, J. L. (2013). Disability and vulnerability: On bodies, dependence, and control. In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp. 204–221). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Government. (2016, June 30). Implementation of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Initial report submitted by states parties under article 35 of the convention. Singapore. United Nations. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.dpa.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Singapore-Country-Level-Report-MSF.pdf

  • Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. A., & Langford, M. (Eds.). (2019). Disability social rights. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, J. (2018, February 18). On a mission to remove wheelchair roadblocks in the CBD. Straits Times. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/wheelchair-roadblocks-in-the-cbd

  • Tan, K. S. Y., & Chan, C. M. L. (2018). Unequal access: Applying Bourdieu’s practice theory to illuminate the challenges of ICT use among senior citizens in Singapore. Journal of Aging Studies, 47, 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, Y. Y. (2011). Neoliberal morality in Singapore: How family policies make state and society. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, Y. Y. (2018). This is what inequality looks like. Ethos Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. (2006). Vulnerability and human rights. Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, M. E. (2012). Avoiding the digital divide: Rethinking ICT inclusion in Singapore. Proceedings of iCREATe ‘12: 6th rehabilitation engineering & assistive technology conference 2012 (pp. 1–4). Article no. 17. ACM Digital Library. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2501134.2501154

  • Wong, R., & Wong, M. E. (2015). Social impact of policies for the disabled in Singapore. In D. Chan (Ed.), 50 years of social issues in Singapore (pp. 147–166). World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeoh, G. (2020, April 25). Circuit breaker tough on special needs children, but parents find creative ways to cope. CNA. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/cnainsider/circuit-breaker-special-needs-children-parents-find-ways-to-cope-12675766?

  • Yu, H., Goggin, G., Fisher, K., & Li, B. (2019). Introduction: Disability participation in the digital economy. Information, Communication & Society, 22(4), 467–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, K. V. (2010). Enabling the Singapore story: Writing a history of disability. In B. Lockhart & T. S. Lim (Eds.), Studies in Malaysian and Singapore history: Mubin Sheppard memorial essays (pp. 37–72). Monograph 42. Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (MBRAS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, K. V. (2016). Inclusion in Singapore: A social model analysis of disability policy. Disability & Society, 31, 622–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, K. V. (2020). At the margins of society: Disability rights and inclusion in 1980s Singapore. Disability in the Global South, 7(1), 1813–1829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, K. V. (2021). The included subject: Disability-led arts within inclusion in Singapore. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 15(4), 471–487.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerard Goggin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Goggin, G., Zhuang, K.V. (2022). Disability as Smart Equality: Inclusive Technology in a Digitally Advanced Nation. In: Tsatsou, P. (eds) Vulnerable People and Digital Inclusion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94122-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics