Abstract
This chapter discusses the welfare deservingness model, one of the most influential theoretical frameworks in the welfare attitude literature. This theoretical framework is used to understand the ‘who should get what and why’ question that underlies debates about solidarity and social justice in the welfare state. The welfare deservingness model formulates different deservingness criteria (control, attitude, reciprocity, identity and need) on which people ‘score’ target groups of welfare provisions (e.g., the elderly, the unemployed), resulting in groups being perceived as more or less deserving of support (‘deservingness perceptions’). Moreover, the model acknowledges that people prioritize and weigh these criteria differently (‘deservingness valuations’). We show how contextual and individual circumstances influence deservingness perceptions and valuations in a social policy context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarøe, L., & Petersen, M. B. (2014). Crowding out culture: Scandinavians and Americans agree on social welfare in the face of deservingness cues. The Journal of Politics, 76(3), 684–697.
Buss, C. (2019). Public opinion towards targeted labour market policies: A vignette study on the perceived deservingness of the unemployed. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 228–240.
Cook, F. (1979). Who should be helped? Public support for social services. Sage.
Davies, G. (2018). Has the Court changed, or have the cases? The deservingness of litigants as an element in Court of Justice citizenship adjudication. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1442–1460.
De Coninck, D., Swicegood, G., & Matthijs, K. (2021). Does the concept of deservingness apply to migrant settlement? In T. Laenen, B. Meuleman, A. Otto, F. Roosma, & W. Van Lancker (Eds.), Leading social policy analysis from the front. Essays in honour of Wim van Oorschot (pp. 263–274). Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven.
De Wilde, M. (2017). Deservingness in social assistance administrative practice: A factorial survey approach. In W. van Oorschot, F. Roosma, B. Meuleman, & T. Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness (pp. 225–240). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gielens, E., Roosma, F., & Achterberg, P. (2019). Deservingness in the eye of the beholder: A vignette study on the moderating role of cultural profiles in supporting activation policies. International Journal of Social Welfare, 24(4), 442–453.
Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media and the politics of anti-poverty policy. The University of Chicago Press.
Gollust, S. E., & Lynch, J. (2011). Who deserves health care? The effects of causal attributions and group cues on public attitudes about responsibility for health care costs. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 36(6), 1061–1095.
Heuer, J., & Zimmermann, K. (2020). Unravelling deservingness: Which criteria do people use to judge the relative deservingness of welfare target groups? A vignette-based focus group study. Journal of European Social Policy, 30(4), 389–403.
Jeene, M. (2015). Who should get what and why, under which conditions? Descriptions and explanations of public deservingness opinions. Ridderprint.
Jeene, M., van Oorschot, W., & Uunk, W. (2013). Popular criteria for the welfare deservingness of disability pensioners: The influence of structural and cultural factors. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1103–1117.
Jeene, M., van Oorschot, W., & Uunk, W. (2014). The dynamics of welfare opinions in changing economic, institutional and political contexts: An empirical analysis of Dutch deservingness opinions, 1975–2006. Social Indicators Research, 115(2), 731–749.
Jensen, C., & Petersen, M. B. (2017). The deservingness heuristic and the politics of health care. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 68–83.
Katz, M. (1989). The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. Pantheon Books.
Kootstra, A. (2017). Us versus them: Examining the perceived deservingness of minority groups in the British welfare state using a survey experiment. In W. van Oorschot, F. Roosma, B. Meuleman, & T. Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness (pp. 263–280). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Laenen, T. (2018). Do institutions matter? The interplay between income benefit design, popular perceptions, and the social legitimacy of targeted welfare. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(1), 4–17.
Laenen, T. (2020). Welfare deservingness and welfare policy. Popular deservingness opinions and their interaction with welfare state policies. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Laenen, T., & Meuleman, B. (2017). A universal rank order of deservingness? Geographical, temporal and social-structural comparisons. In W. van Oorschot, F. Roosma, B. Meuleman, & T. Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Laenen, T., & Meuleman, B. (2019). Public support for the social rights and social obligations of the unemployed: Two sides of the same coin? International Journal of Social Welfare, 28(4), 454–467.
Larsen, C. A. (2006). The institutional logic of welfare attitudes. How welfare regimes influence public support. Ashgate Publishing.
Larsen, C. A. (2008). The political logic of labour market reforms and popular images of target groups. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(1), 50–63.
Meuleman, B., Roosma, F., & Abts, K. (2020). Welfare deservingness opinions from heuristic to measurable concept: The CARIN deservingness principles scale. Social Science Research, 85, 1–15.
Meuleman, B., Roosma, F., & van Oorschot, W. (2017). Evaluating the fruitfulness of deservingness theory. In W. van Oorschot, F. Roosma, B. Meuleman, & T. Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness (pp. 335–351). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Petersen, M. B. (2012). Social welfare as small-scale help: Evolutionary psychology and the deservingness heuristic. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 1–16.
Roosma, F., & Jeene, M. (2017). The deservingness logic applied to public opinions concerning work obligations for benefit claimants. In W. van Oorschot, F. Roosma, B. Meuleman, & T. Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness (pp. 189–205). Edward Elgar Publishing.
van Oorschot, W. (2000). Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics, 28(1), 33–48.
van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23–42.
van Oorschot, W., & Meuleman, B. (2014). Popular deservingness of the unemployed in the context of welfare state policies, economic conditions and cultural climate. In S. Kumlin & I. Stadelmann- Steffen (Eds.), How welfare states shape the democratic public. Policy feedback, participation, voting, and attitudes (pp. 245–267). Edward Elgar Publishing.
van Oorschot, W., & Roosma, F. (2017). The social legitimacy of targeted welfare and welfare deservingness. In W. van Oorschot, F. Roosma, B. Meuleman, & T. Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness (pp. 3–33). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wendt, C., Mischke, M., & Pfeifer, M. (2011). Welfare states and public opinion. Perceptions of healthcare systems, family policy and benefits for the unemployed and poor in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Will, J. A. (1993). The dimensions of poverty: Public perceptions of the deserving poor. Social Science Research, 22(3), 312–332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laenen, T., Roosma, F. (2022). Who Should Get What and Why? Insights from Welfare Deservingness Theory. In: Yerkes, M.A., Bal, M. (eds) Solidarity and Social Justice in Contemporary Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93795-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93795-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93794-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93795-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)