Abstract
This study aims at deconstructing a conceptual muddle surrounding the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) that results when the concept is used. To achieve this aim, the study adopted the analytical approach commonly used in analytical philosophy, and “deconstruction of conceptual muddle”. The study concludes that there is a conceptual muddle related to the many concepts used, synonymously or differently with (CSR). There is also a conceptual muddle due to (CSR) emergence, its advantages and disadvantages. In addition, conceptual muddle noted due several index selected for measurement (CSR). The main conceptual muddle resulted from the failure to define “corporate responsibility”, whether corporate responsibility towards maximizing the profits of their shareholders, or towards society and environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zorn, T., Collins, E.: Is sustainability sustainable? Corporate social responsibility, sustainable business, and management fashion. In: May, S., et al. (eds.) The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 405–416. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
Woodman, H., et al.: An evaluation of the state of the CSR field in Australia: perspectives from the banking and a mining sectors. In: Information Resources Management Association Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications, pp. 833–860. IGI Global, USA (2018)
Suman, S., Das, S.: Corporate environmentalism, epistemological review & ontological position. In: Mitra, N., Schmidpeter, R. (eds.) Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, pp. 199–214. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24444-6_11
May, S., et al. (eds.): The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
Siegel, D., Vitaliano, D.: An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 16(3), 773–792 (2007)
Garriga, E., Melé, D.: Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J. Bus. Ethics 53(1–2), 51–71 (2004)
Ifzal, A., Mujtaba, A.: The dark side of corporate social responsibility: evidence from a public sector oil company. NUML Int. J. Bus. Manag. 12(1), 15–27 (2017)
Rubenstein, D.: The Good Corporate Citizen: A Practical Guide. Wiley, New Jersey (2004)
Newell, A. (ed.): Corporate Social Responsibility: Challenges, Benefits and Impact on Business Performance (Business Economics in a Rapidly-changing World), Nova Science Publishers, UK (2014)
Galant, A., Cadez, S.: Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: a review of measurement approaches. Econ. Res.-Ekonomska Istraživanja 30(1), 676–693 (2017)
Hopkins, M.: Corporate Social Responsibility and International Development: Is Business The solution? Earthsacn, London (2007)
Žukauskas, P., et al.: Management Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility. Intech Open, London (2018)
Idowu, S., Filho, W.: Foreward. In: Idowu, S., Filho, W. (eds.) Professionals' perspectives of corporate social responsibility. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Farndale, E., et al.: Corporate social responsibility and talent management in turkey. In: Association, M., Resources, I. (eds.) Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, pp. 1228–1242. IGI Global, USA (2019)
Eichar, D.: The Rise and Fall of Corporate Social Responsibility. Routledge, New York (2017)
Goudam, S., et al.: Corporate Social Responsibility in India. Trends, Issues and Strategies. Anchor Academic Publishing, Hamburg (2017)
Bagnoli, M., Watts, S.: Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 12(3), 419–445 (2003)
Luo, X., Bhattacharya, C.B.: Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. J. Mark. 70(4), 1–18 (2006)
Wood, D.: Corporate social performance revisited. Acad. Manag. Rev. 16(4), 691–718 (1991)
Dashwood, H.: The Rise of Global Corporate Social Responsibility: Mining and the Spread of Global Norms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)
Grane, A. et al.: The emergence of corporate citizenship: historical development and alternative perspectives. In: Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G. (eds.) Handbook of research on Global Corporate Citizenship, pp. 25–50. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008)
Selvik, K.: Business and social responsibility in the Arab world: the Zakat vs CSR models. Syria Dubai Comp. Soc. 12(1), 95–123 (2013)
Panayiotou, N., Aravosis, K.: Supply chain management. In: Idowu, S., Louche, C. (eds.) Theory and Practice of Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 55–72. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16461-3_4
Banerjee, S.: Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2007)
Whitehouse, L.: Corporate social responsibility as citizenship and compliance: initiatives on the domestic. Eur. Glob. Level J. Corp. Citizensh. 11, 85–98 (2003)
Liel, B.: Creating Shared Value as Future Factor of Competition: Analysis and Empirical Evedence. Springer VS, Wesbaden (2016)
Jamali, D.: CSR in deeloping countries through an institutional lens. In: Eweje, G. (ed.) Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: Emerging Trends in Developing Economies, pp. 21–44. Emerald, UK (2014)
Williams, O.: Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Business in Sustainable Development. Routledge, Ney York (2014)
Zu, L.: Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Restructuring and Firm’s Performance. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Weeden, C.: Smart Giving Is Good Business: How Corporate Philanthropy Can Benefit Your Company and Society? Wily: Jossey Bass, Hoboken (2011)
Keinert, C.: Corporate Social Responsibility as an International Strategy. Physica-Verlag Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Alhouti, S., D’Souza, G.: Benefits of corporate social responsibility. J. Consum. Mark. 35(3), 277–286 (2018)
Carroll, A., Buchholtz, A.: Business & Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and stakeholder Management, 9. Cengage Learning, USA (2015)
Harris, D., et al.: Marketing for Stakeholders 2008–2009. Elsevier, Oxford (2008)
Waddock, S.: The dark- side paradoxes of success. In: May, S., et al. (eds.) The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 74–87, Oxford University Press, New York (2007)
Waddock, S.: Corporate citizenship: the dark-side paradoxes of success. In: Flynn, G. (eds.) Leadership and Business Ethics. Issues in Business Ethics, vol. 25, pp. 258–268. Springer, Dordrecht (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8429-4_16
Tencati, A.: Corporate reporting frameworks. In: Aras, G., Crowther, D. (eds.) A Handbook of Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility, pp. 413–436. Gower, Fanham (2010)
Benn, S., Bolton, D.: Key Concepts in Corporate Social Responsibility. Sage, London (2011)
Hopkins, M.: Measurement of corporate social responsibility. Int. J. Manag. Decis. Mak. 6(3/4), 213–231 (2005)
Camilleri, M.A.: Corporate social responsibility policy in the United States of America. In: Idowu, S., Vertigans, S., Schiopoiu Burlea, A. (eds.) Corporate Social Responsibility in Times of Crisis. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52839-7_7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abu Zaher, N. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility: Deconstructing a Conceptual Muddle. In: Musleh Al-Sartawi, A.M.A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Finance and Sustainable Technology. ICGER 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 423. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93464-4_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93464-4_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93463-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93464-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)