Skip to main content

Zhuangzi’s “Three Words”: Text and Authority

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dao Companion to the Philosophy of the Zhuangzi

Part of the book series: Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy ((DCCP,volume 16))

Abstract

The “Three Words” (sanyan 三言) passage of the Zhuangzi has always had particular authority for traditional and modern exegetes. Not only does it seem to announce and describe Zhuangzi’s rhetorical method, it contains the first extant usage of the term “imputed words” (yuyan 寓言), the trope with which Zhuangzi is particularly identified. And much of the language of the passage has definite intertextual linkages with the most authoritative passages from the “Discourse on Making Things Equal” (Qiwulun 齊物論) in the inner chapters, thereby apparently giving the text the appearance of direct sourcing from Zhuang Zhou himself. Because so many commentators have discussed the passage in philosophical terms, this essay does not try to offer a new argument about the proper meaning of the passage as a hermeneutical tool with which to approach the rest of the Zhuangzi. Instead, it uses the tools of textual criticism to both trace the nature of links with other portions of the text, and to examine the ways in which the passage’s textual history may have been both affected and shaped by its own thematic content. In particular, it argues that the anxiety over authority which is the central theme of the passage is also what brought it to the forefront of Zhuangzi exegesis, as readers sought to ground their own interpretations in a passage seemingly closest to expressing the compositional “intention” of Zhuang Zhou.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Chinese title of this section, Yuyan 寓言, has been given many translations, befitting the complex history of interpretation. For example, Watson translated it as “Imputed Words” (Watson 1968: 303), Graham as “Saying from a lodging place” (Graham 1981: 25), and Ziporyn as “Words Lodged Elsewhere” (Ziporyn 2009: 114). Translations of the main texts discussed here are my own, adapted from Fried 2007.

  2. 2.

    It has occasionally even been suggested that this first section of the “Entrusted Words” chapter was a deliberately composed postscript of Zhuang Zhou (Yang 1986: 36).

  3. 3.

    For interested readers, a good introduction to the various points of contention is in Cui 2012: 734–8.

  4. 4.

    Taking 期 as 斯, as per Gao Heng (Cui 2012: 737).

  5. 5.

    It should be noted that this was never a major reading advanced by classical exegetes; Cheng Xuanying, for example, held that the wu should be read in the voice of the fictional father being invoked in the metaphor of the matchmaker (Wang S. 1988: 1091).

  6. 6.

    “案意在此。而言寄於彼。” (Wang X. 1988: 66); “寓言者。意在此。而言乃寄之於彼。” (Hu 1988: 237).

  7. 7.

    Zhang Caimin’s argument on this point is admittedly clever and novel, arguing that a Zhuangzian semiotics sees fit to use any image as a vehicle for meaning, because all objects are carriers of the Way.

  8. 8.

    “Common people of the age all like people similar to themselves, and hate those different from themselves. This desiring of the same as themselves, and not desiring those different from themselves they do not desire, comes from a mind to be different from the many.” 世俗之人,皆喜人之同乎己,而惡人之異於己也。同於己而欲之、異於己而不欲者,以出乎眾為心也。

  9. 9.

    This understanding of the passage may actually date to Sima Qian; without any reference to percentages, he wrote that Zhuangzi “wrote over 100,000 words, the majority of which were ‘entrusted words’” (其著書十余万言,大抵率寓言也) (Wang S. 1988: 1090). However, it is not universal: from at least Cheng Xuanying’s Tang edition, an alternate reading has suggested that the numbers here meant “nine-tenths” are believed by readers (Cui 2012: 735).

  10. 10.

    Unless, of course, these are written by Zhuang Zhou’s disciples or later writers and attributed to him! However, naïve contemporary understandings of “allegory” as “story with a philosophical message” do not arise from textual critics. This is the point: yuyan is about attribution and authority, not the rhetorical form of a literary trope.

  11. 11.

    Several commentators, ancient and modern, have suggested or implied this position. Perhaps the most succinct and clear in this regard is Wang Xianqian 王先謙 (Wang S. 1988: 1090).

  12. 12.

    For example, the phrase, “惡乎然?然於然。惡乎不然?不然於不然…物固有所然,物固有所可,無物不然,無物不可。” is taken essentially verbatim from the “pointing and horses” critique of the Gongsun Longzi that appears in the “Discourse on Making Things Equal”.

  13. 13.

    There is an implication in the word 自 of self-so-ness, or what in some cases is referred to as Heaven 天, but an explicit explanation is not to be found in such brief phrases.

References

  • Chen Guying 陳鼓應. 2014a. Zhuangzi in Modern Notation and Translation 莊子今註今譯. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju. (A major contemporary commentary by one of China’s foremost Zhuangzi scholars.)

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014b. New Essays on Lao-Zhuang. 老莊新論. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan. (Collected essays on various topics related to the interpretation of early Daoism.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, Waiwai. 2015. “Goblet Words and Indeterminacy: A Writing Style That Is Free of Commitment.” Frontiers of Philosophy in China 10.2: 255–272. https://login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bas&AN=BAS881641&site=eds-live&scope=site (Argues for a conception of zhiyan as a trope of deliberate obscurantism, with the rhetorical purpose of creating multiple interpretations.)

  • Chong, Kim-Chong. 2006. “Zhuangzi and the Nature of Metaphor.” Philosophy East and West. 56.3: 370–391. https://login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.4488033&site=eds-live&scope=site (Applies contemporary theories of metaphor to its usage in the Zhuangzi, especially as relating to the content of Zhuangzi’s thought.)

  • Coutinho, Steve. 2004. Zhuangzi and Early Chinese Philosophy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. (Summarizing assessment of the philosophy of Zhuangzi, with respect both to other pre-Qin schools, and to postmodern Western philosophy.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui Dahua 崔大華. 2012. Differential Explanations of Zhuangzi 莊子岐解. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju. (Not exactly a neutral variorum edition of Zhuangzi, this balances discussion of various exegetical options with Cui’s own assessments.)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Man, Paul. 1978. “The Epistemology of Metaphor.” Critical Inquiry 5.1: 13–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1342975.

  • Fried, Daniel. 2007. “A Never-Stable Word: Zhuangzi’s Zhiyan and Tipping-Vessel Irrigation.” Early China 31: 145–170. (An assessment of the origin of zhiyan in “tipping-vessel” irrigation, based on textual and archaeological sources.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A.C. 1981. Chuang-tzu. London: George Allen and Unwin. (One of the first fully modern full-length studies of Zhuangzi in English.)

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1989. Disputers of the Tao. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press. (Classic English-language survey of early Chinese philosophy.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Yuanjun 胡遠濬. 1988. Zhuangzi Exegesis 莊子詮詁 Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju. (Reprint edition of Hu’s 1931 commentary; patterns of insight and mistakes common to Republican era scholarship.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Shuen-fu. 1988. “Confucius in the ‘Inner Chapters’ of the Chuang Tzu”. Tamkang Review. 18.4: 379–401. (An attempt to theorize the appropriative use of Confucius as a character in the voicing of Zhuangzi’s own philosophy.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Gusheng. 劉固盛. 2009. Research on the Texts and Thoughts of Lao-Zhuang Studies 老莊學文獻及其思想研究. Changsha: Yuelu Shushe. (Collected essays on disparate aspects of the Lao-Zhuang textual and philosophical legacy.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xiaogan. 1994. Classifying the Zhuangzi Chapters. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. (A partial translation of Liu’s Chinese monograph 《莊子哲學及其演變》, focusing on the identification and dating of various strata in the formation of the Zhuangzi)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Kirill Ole. 2008. “Zhuangzi and the Quest for Certainty” In East-West Interculture: Toward the Philosophy of World Integration: Essays on Wu Kuang-ming’s Thinking. Ed. Jay Goulding. New York: Global Scholarly Publications. (Argues for the continuing relevance of Zhuangzi in its refusal to stake out claims or propose philosophical theses, instead demonstrating the false bases of other systems.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Bo 王博. 2013. The Philosophy of Zhuangzi 莊子哲學. Beijing: Peking University Press. (Scholarly survey of the various aspects of Zhuangzi’s philosophical system.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Shumin 王叔岷. 1988. Zhuangzi Edited and Interpreted 莊子校詮. Taipei: Academia Sinica. (A highly influential modern commentary on the Zhuangzi)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Xianqian 王先谦. 1988. Collected Interpretations of Zhuangzi 莊子集解. Chengdu: Chengdu Guji Shudian. (Reprint edition of Wang’s variorum, including his own commentary.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Burton, trans. 1968. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press. (A classic translation of the full text of the Zhuangzi)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Kuang-Ming. 1982. Chuang-Tzu: World Philosopher at Play. New York: Crossroad. (A study focusing on introducing the basic philosophical themes of the text, with special emphasis on the ludic character of the work.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Kuang-Ming. 1988. “Goblet Words, Dwelling Words, Opalescent Words—Philosophical Methodology of Chuang Tzu.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 15.1: 1–8. (Discussion of the “triple speech” problem in the context of Wu’s reading of Zhuangzi’s philosophical system.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Liuqiao 楊柳橋. 1986. “Attempted Comments on Zhuangzi’s ‘Triple Speech’” 莊子‘三言’試論. In Research on Zhuangzi 庄子研究. Shanghai: Fudan University Publishing House. (Systematizing approach to the “triple speech” problem.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Caimin 張采民. 2011. Research on Zhuangzi 《莊子》研究. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju. (Collection of Zhang’s essays on different aspects of the Zhuangzi.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Hongxing 張洪興. 2011. Research on Zhuangzi’s “Triple Speech” 《莊子》“三言”研究. Beijing: Xueyuan Chubanshe. (Monograph-length discussion of the different evidence for various interpretations of the “three speech” model.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Songhui 張松輝. 2007. Examination and Distinction of the Disputed Meanings of Zhuangzi 莊子疑義考辨. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju. (Collected discussions of the evidence for differential readings of disputed points in the Zhuangzi.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziporyn, Brook. 2009. Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings, with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett. (A solid contemporary partial translation, distinguished from competitors by the inclusion of samples of traditional commentary.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Fried .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fried, D. (2022). Zhuangzi’s “Three Words”: Text and Authority. In: Chong, Kc. (eds) Dao Companion to the Philosophy of the Zhuangzi. Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92331-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics