Skip to main content

Adaptive Learning Algorithms and Platforms: A Concise Overview

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information, Communication and Cybersecurity (ICI2C 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 357))

Abstract

The distance education has become an indispensable teaching method, especially after the situation of Covid-19. For this reason, educational institutions are looking for e-learning platforms that offer better course management, ease of administration, user friendly, and achieving the learning objectives. Adaptive learning is considered an active research area, it enables to detect learning style of learners based on their behaviors and learning purposes in order to recommend relevant course materials. The objective of this article is to present an overview of personalization in the traditional learning system and the new developed systems as well as the approaches used to understand the learner’s individual needs. Furthermore, this work analyzes the problems in these systems and presents the prospect of development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almaiah, M.A., Al-Khasawneh, A., Althunibat, A.: Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25, 5261–5280 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ueda, H., Furukawa, M., Yamaji, K., Nakamura, M.: SCORMAdaptiveQuiz: implementation of adaptive e-learning for moodle. Proc. Comput. Sci. 126, 2261–2270 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., Budimac, Z.: E-learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Comput. Educ. 56(3), 885–899 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vesin, B., Mangaroska, K., Giannakos, M.: Learning in smart environments: user-centered design and analytics of an adaptive learning system. Smart Learn. Environ. 5(1), 1–21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0071-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Knutov, E., De Bra, P., Pechenizkiy, M.: Ah 12 years later: a comprehensive survey of adaptive hypermedia methods and techniques. New Rev. Hypermed. Multimed. 15(1), 5–38 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Self, J., et al.: The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research: ITSs care, precisely. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 10(3–4), 350–364 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brusilovsky, P., Somyürek, S., Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Zadorozhny, V., Durlach, P.J.: Open social student modeling for personalized learning. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 4(3), 450–461 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vesin, B., Budimac, Z., et al.: Applying recommender systems and adaptive hypermedia for e-learning personalization. Comput. Inform. 32(3), 629–659 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brusilovsky, P., Millán, E.: User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) The Adaptive Web. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 3–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Buche, C., Querrec, R., De Loor, P., Chevaillier, P.: MASCARET: a pedagogical multi-agent system for virtual environments for training. Int. J. Dist. Educ. Technol. (IJDET) 2(4), 41–61 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, M., et al.: Automatically structuring domain knowledge from text: an overview of current research. Inf. Process. Manag. 48(3), 552–568 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alshammari, M., Anane, R., Hendley, R.J.: Adaptivity in e-learning systems. In: 2014 Eighth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, pp. 79–86. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brusilovsky, P.: Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. In: Kobsa, A., Vassileva, J. (eds.) Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 1–43. Springer, Dordrecht (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0617-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive hypermedia. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 11(1), 87–110 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hambleton, R.K., Shavelson, R.J., Webb, N.M., Swaminathan, H., Rogers, H.J.: Fundamentals of Item Response Theory, vol. 2. Sage (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H.: Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, F.H.: Application of componential IRT model for diagnostic test in a standard-conformant eLearning system. In: Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006), pp. 237–241. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Felder, R.M., Silverman, L.K., et al.: Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng. Educ. 78(7), 674–681 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 4(4), 253–278 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pardos, Z.A., Heffernan, N.T.: KT-IDEM: introducing item difficulty to the knowledge tracing model. In: Konstan, J.A., Conejo, R., Marzo, J.L., Oliver, N. (eds.) UMAP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6787, pp. 243–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22362-4_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Yudelson, M.V., Koedinger, K.R., Gordon, G.J.: Individualized Bayesian knowledge tracing models. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 171–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Hawkins, W.J., Heffernan, N.T., Baker, R.S.J.D.: Learning Bayesian knowledge tracing parameters with a knowledge heuristic and empirical probabilities. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 150–155. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Badrinath, A., Wang, F., Pardos, Z.: pyBKT: an accessible python library of Bayesian knowledge tracing models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.00385 (2021)

  24. Pavlik Jr, P.I., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Performance factors analysis–a new alternative to knowledge tracing. Online Submission (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cen, H., Koedinger, K., Junker, B.: Learning factors analysis – a general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 164–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Gong, Y., Beck, J.E., Heffernan, N.T.: Comparing knowledge tracing and performance factor analysis by using multiple model fitting procedures. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 35–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Özyurt, Ö., Özyurt, H., Baki, A.: Design and development of an innovative individualized adaptive and intelligent e-learning system for teaching-learning of probability unit: details of UZWEBMAT. ESWA 40(8), 2914–2940 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Scalise, K., Allen, D.D.: Use of open-source software for adaptive measurement: Concerto as an R-based computer adaptive development and delivery platform. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 478–496 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Oppl, S., Reisinger, F., Eckmaier, A., Helm, C.: A flexible online platform for computerized adaptive testing. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 14(1), 1–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0039-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Piech, C., et al.: Deep knowledge tracing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.05908 (2015)

  31. Rosen, Y., et al.: Adaptive learning open source initiative for MOOC experimentation. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10948, pp. 307–311. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_57

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosen, Y., et al.: The effects of adaptive learning in a massive open online course on learners’ skill development. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, pp. 1–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Karagiannis, I., Satratzemi, M.: An adaptive mechanism for Moodle based on automatic detection of learning styles. Educ. Inf. Technol. 23(3), 1331–1357 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Arsovic, B., Stefanovic, N.: E-learning based on the adaptive learning model: case study in Serbia. Sādhanā 45(1), 1–13 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trifa, A., Hedhili, A., Chaari, W.L.: Knowledge tracing with an intelligent agent, in an e-learning platform. Educ. Inf. Technol. 24(1), 711–741 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9792-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cai, W., et al.: Bandit algorithms to personalize educational chatbots. Mach. Learn. 110(9), 2389–2418 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-021-05983-y

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Nye, B.D., Pavlik, P.I., Windsor, A., Olney, A.M., Hajeer, M., Hu, X.: SKOPE-IT: overlaying natural language tutoring on an adaptive learning system for mathematics. Int. J. STEM Educ. 5(1), 12 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. MasteryPaths in canvas LMS. https://community.canvaslms.com. Accessed 13 June 2021

  39. Zhang, J., Shi, X., King, I., Yeung, D.Y.: Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 765–774 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ruan, S., et al.: QuizBot: a dialogue-based adaptive learning system for factual knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wambsganss, T., Kueng, T., Soellner, M., Leimeister, J.M.: ArgueTutor: an adaptive dialog-based learning system for argumentation skills. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Al-Khawarizmi Program funding by Morocco’s Ministry of Education, Ministry of Industry and the Digital Development Agency (ADD) under Project No. 451/2020 (Smart Learning).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayoub Ait Lahcen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mezin, H., Kharrou, S.Y., Lahcen, A.A. (2022). Adaptive Learning Algorithms and Platforms: A Concise Overview. In: Maleh, Y., Alazab, M., Gherabi, N., Tawalbeh, L., Abd El-Latif, A.A. (eds) Advances in Information, Communication and Cybersecurity. ICI2C 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 357. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91738-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics