Skip to main content

IT Management and Governance Framework for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2020) (AI2SD 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1418))

  • 1367 Accesses

Abstract

IT Governance and IT Management can drive Digital Transformation; they improve and optimize business investment in ICT. From this point of view, this paper explores the relationship between IT Governance, IT Management, and Digital Strategy. In this regard, it presents how to take advantage of existing IT frameworks to build an integrative framework for governing Digital Transformation. It proposes a comparative study between COBIT, ITIL, CMMI, BSC, and EFQM and explains how to take advantage of the best practices and processes of these frameworks to build a holistic digital transformation framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Preittigun, A., Chantatub, W., Vatanasakdakul, S.: A comparison between IT governance research and concepts in COBIT 5. Int. J. Res. Manag. Technol. 2(6), 581–590 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Watanabe, T.: A framework of information technology supported intelligent learning environment. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication - IMCOM 2016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2857546.2857549

  3. Korachi, Z., Bounabat, B.: Data driven maturity model for assessing smart cities. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2nd International Conference on Smart Digital Environment, ICSDE 2018, 18–20 October 2018, Rabat, Morocco, pp. 140–147. Association for Computing Machinery; ACM (2018). ISBN 978-1-4503-6507-9/18/10; ENSIAS Rabat; Morocco. https://doi.org/10.1145/3289100.3289123

  4. Johanes, F.A., James, S., Christian, S., Dela, H.: Evaluation and recommendation IT governance in hospital base on COBIT framework. Int. J. Open Inf. Technol. 7(5) (2019). ISSN 2307-8162

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gunawan, W., Kalensun, E.P., Fajar, A.N., Sfenrianto: Applying COBIT 5 in higher education. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 420, 012108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/420/1/012108

  6. Dhiya, A.: A framework for the strategic management of information technology. Am. J. Bus. Manag. 7(1), 14–43 (2018). https://doi.org/10.11634/216796061807918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spremic, M.: Governing digital technology–how mature IT governance can help in digital transformation? Int. J. Econ. Manag. Syst. 2 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Korachi, Z., Bounabat, B.: Integrated methodological framework for digital transformation strategy building (IMFDS). Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (IJACSA) 10(12) (2019). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0101234

  9. De Haes, S., Caluwe, L., Huygh, T., Joshi, A.: Governing Digital Transformation. Management for Professionals (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30267-2 

  10. Percheiro, I., Almeida, R., Pinto, P.L., da Silva, M.M.: Towards conceptual meta-modeling of ITIL and COBIT 5. In: Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V. (eds.) EMCIS 2017. LNBIP, vol. 299, pp. 478–491. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gehrmann, M.: Combining ITIL, COBIT and ISO/IEC 27002 for structuring comprehensive information technology for management in organizations. Navus - Revista de Gestão e Tecnologia 2(2), 66–77 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghazouani, M., Medromi, H., Sayouti, A., Faris, S.: An integrated use of BSC, COBIT, ITIL, PMBOOK and ISO27002 frameworks for information systems governance (ISG) based on multi-agents system. In: International Conference on Engineering Education and Research, 1 July–5 July 2013, Marrakesh (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peterson, R.: Crafting information technology governance. Inf. Syst. Manag. 21(4), 7–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/44705.21.4.20040901/84183.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raymond, L., Bergeron, F., Croteau, A.-M., Uwizeyemungu, S.: Determinants and outcomes of IT governance in manufacturing SMEs: a strategic IT management perspective. Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 35, 100422 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weill, P.: Don’t just lead govern: how top-performing firms govern IT. MIS Q. Exec. 3(1), 1–17 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Haes, S., Grembergen, V.W.: IT governance and its mechanisms. Inf. Syst. Control J. 1, 27–33 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peterson, R.: Information Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance. Strategies for Information Technology Governance. Idea Group Publishing, Pennsylvania (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Catalin, P., Alina, P.: Information technology management. J. Knowl. Manag. Econ. Inf. Technol. 1(2), 1–7 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kabanda, G.: Trends in Information Technology Management. GRIN Verlag, Munich (2019). https://www.grin.com/document/491408. ISBN 9783668986374

  20. Ross, J.W., Sebastian, I.M., Beath, C., Mocker, M., Moloney, K., Fonstad, N.: Designing and executing digital strategies. In: ICIS. Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O.A., Pavlou, P.A., Venkatraman, N.: Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Q. Exec. 37(2), 471–482 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schallmo, D., Williams, C., Lohse, J.: Clarifying digital strategy-detailed literature review of existing approaches. In: The XXIX ISPIM Innovation Conference – Innovation, The Name of the Game, Sweden, Stockholm, 17–20 June 2018 (2018). The publication is available to ISPIM members at www.ispim.org

  23. Woodard, C.J., Ramasubbu, N., Tschang, F.T., Sambamurthy, V.: Design capital and design moves: the logic of digital business strategy. MIS Q. 37(2), 537–564 (2013). Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School of Business

    Google Scholar 

  24. Braga Tadeu, H.F., de Castro Moura Duarte, A.L., Taurion, C., Jamil, G.L.: Digital transformation: digital maturity applied to study brazilian perspective for industry 4.0. In: García Alcaraz, J.L., Rivera Cadavid, L., González-Ramírez, R.G., Leal Jamil, G., Chong Chong, M.G. (eds.) Best Practices in Manufacturing Processes, pp. 3–27. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99190-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Korachi, Z., Bounabat, B.: General approach for formulating a digital transformation strategy. J. Comput. Sci. 16(4), 493–507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.493.507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Korachi, Z., Bounabat, B.: Towards a maturity model for digital strategy assessment. In: Ezziyyani, M. (ed.) AI2SD 2019. AISC, vol. 1105, pp. 456–470. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36674-2_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Peña, S., José, J., Vicente, F.E., Ocaña, M.A.: ITIL, COBIT and EFQM: can they work together? IJCOPI 4(1), 54–64 (2013). EDITADA. ISSN 2007-1558

    Google Scholar 

  28. Michalska, J.: Using the EFQM excellence model to the process assessment. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 27(2), 203–206 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ho, S.K.: TQM an Integrated Approaching - Implementing Total Quality through Japanese 5S and ISO 9000. Kogan Page, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Michalska, J., Szewieczek, D.: The improvement of the quality management by the activity-based costing. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 21(1), 91–94 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sunthonwutinun, W., Chooprayoon, V.: A proposed model for studying information technology governance, management, and services of an enterprise: an integrated framework of COBIT 5, ITIL®V3, and BSC. Int. J. Comput. Theory Eng. 8(2), 140–144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.7763/IJCTE.2016.V8.1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sahibudin, S., Sharifi, M., Ayat, M.: Combining ITIL, COBIT and ISO/IEC 27002 in order to design a comprehensive IT framework in organizations. In: 2008 Second Asia International Conference on Modelling & Simulation (AMS) (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ams.2008.145

  33. Hill, P., Turbitt, K.: Combine ITIL and COBIT to meet business challenges. BMC Software (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vicente, M., Gama, N., da Silva, M.M.: Using archimate to represent ITIL metamodel. In: IEEE International Conference on Business Informatics (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hanna, A., Windebank, J., Adams, S., Sowerby, J., Rance, S., Cartlidge, A.: ITIL V3 Foundation Handbook (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hochstein, A., Zarnekow, R., Brenner, W.: ITIL as common practice reference model for IT service management: formal assessment and implications for practice. In: IEEE International Conference on eTechnology eCommerce and eService, Nagoya, Japan, vol. 21, pp. 704–710 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Goeken, M., Alter, S.: Towards conceptual metamodeling of IT governance frameworks approach - use - benefits. In: 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nastase, P., Nastase, F., Ionescu, C.: Challenges generated by the implementation of the IT standards COBIT 4.1, ITIL v3 and ISO/IEC 27002 in enterprises. Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 43(1), 16 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sharifi, M., Ayat, M., Rahman, A.A., Sahibudin, S.: Lessons learned in ITIL implementation failure. In: Information Technology (ITSim) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ayyagari, M., Atoum, I.: CMMI-DEV implementation simplified. IJACSA 10(4) (2019). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100455

  41. Valverde, L., Mira da Silva, M., Gonçalves, M.R.: CMMI-DEV v1.3 reference model in ArchiMate. In: Panetto, H., Debruyne, C., Proper, H.A., Ardagna, C.A., Roman, D., Meersman, R. (eds.) OTM 2018. LNCS, vol. 11230, pp. 191–208. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02671-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., Debreceny, R.S.: COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: building blocks and research opportunities. J. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 307–324 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mataracioglu, T., Ozkan, S.: Governing information security in conjunction with COBIT and ISO 27001. Int. J. Netw. Secur. Appl. 3, 4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pereira, R., da Silva, M.M.: A literature review: guidelines and contingency factors for IT governance. In: 16th IEEE International EDOC Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Looso, S., Goeken, M.: Application of best-practice reference models of IT governance. In: ECIS (Paper 129) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pardo, C., Pino, F.J., Garc´ıa, F., Piattini, M., Baldassarre, M.T.: An ontology for the hamonization of multiple standards and models. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 34, 48–59 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cater-Steel, A., Tan, W.G., Toleman, M.: Challenges of adopting multiple process improvement frameworks. In: 14th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ula, M., Ismail, Z., Sidek, Z.M.: A framework for the governance of information security in banking system. J. Inf. Assur. Cyber Secur. 2011, 1–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Garsoux, M.: COBIT 5 ISACA’s new framework for IT Governance, Risk, Security and Auditing An overview. ISACA Whitepapers, vol. 39 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Almeida, R., Pinto, P.L., da Silva, M.M.: Using ArchiMate to integrate COBIT and COSO metamodels. In: European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, Krakow, Poland, p. 5 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Neto, J.S., Neto, A.N.F.: Metamodel of the IT governance framework COBIT. JISTM 10(3), 521–540 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752013000300004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Carlos, Landazuri, R.: COBIT®5: Enabling Processes (2012). ISBN 978-1-60420-241-0. Printed in the United States of America, © 2012 ISACA. https://vdocuments.site/cobit5-enabling.html

  53. Chaudhary, M., Chopra, A.: CMMI for Development: Implementation Guide. Apress (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2529-5

  54. IT Business Experts. ITIL®4 Reference Guide. Ibexexperts.com (2019). https://ibexexperts.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ITL-OVR-2019-IBEX.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2019

  55. Joe the IT Guy. ITIL 4: An A – Z Guide | Joe The IT Guy. Joe The IT Guy. Joe the IT Guy | 21 March 2019 (2019). https://www.joetheitguy.com/2019/03/21/itil-4-an-a-z-guide/. Accessed 23 Sept 2019

  56. De Andrade Guerra, J.B.S.O., Garcia, J., de Andrade Lima, M., Barbosa, S.B., Heerdt, M.L., Berchin, I.I.: A proposal of a balanced scorecard for an environmental education program at universities. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 1674–1690 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ahn, H.: Applying the balanced scorecard concept: an experience report. Long Range Plan. 34, 441–461 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Brewer, P.: Putting strategy into the balanced scorecard. Strategic Finance Magazine 83(7), 44–52 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lohman, C., Fortuin, L., Wouters, M.: Designing a performance measurement system: a case study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156, 267–286 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Strategy Management Group. Balanced Scorecard 9 Steps to Success | Strategic Management | Strategic Planning. Scribd. Balanced Scorecard Institute (2013). https://www.scribd.com/document/126157573/Balanced-Scorecard-9-Steps-to-Success. Accessed 23 Sept 2019

  61. Pristavka, M., Findura, P., Kangalov, P., Malaga-Tobola, U., Kubon, M.: Using the EFQM Model in selected organization. Agric. Forest Transp. Mach. Technol. 5(1), 74-82 (2018). ISSN 2367-5888

    Google Scholar 

  62. Savard, C., Sari, A., Venet, P., Nikulina, A., Dupuis, J.: The EFQM method to compare battery performance. Global J. Bus. Econ. Manag.: Current Issues 9(1), 041–054 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S.: A research journey into enterprise governance of IT, business/IT alignment and value creation. In: Business Strategy and Applications in Enterprise IT Governance, pp. 1–13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lema, L., Calvo-Manzano, J.A., Colomo-Palacios, R., Arcilla, M.: ITIL in small to medium-sized enterprises software companies: towards an implementation sequence. J. Softw. Evol. Process 27(8), 528–538 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Dos Santos, J.H., Todesco, J.L., Fileto, R.: ITIL ontology-based model for IT governance: a prototype demonstration (2010). https://files.stample.co/browserUpload/898ccad5-c40f-43f6-88b9-22d34592b375. Accessed 23 Sept 2019

  66. Lubis, A., Torong, Z.B., Muda, I.: The urgency of implementing balanced scorecard system on local government in North Sumatra – Indonesia. Int. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. Res. 14(11), 7575–7590 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Muda, I., Erlina, Yahya, I., Arif Nasution, A.: Performance audit and balanced scorecard perspective. Int. J. Civil Eng. Technol. (IJCIET) 9(5), 1321–1333 (2018). Article ID: IJCIET_09_05_146. http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=9&IType=5. ISSN Print 0976- 6308 and ISSN Online 0976-6316

  68. Keyes, J.: Implementing the IT Balanced Scorecard, 1st edn (2005). eBook Published 19 April 2016. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420031348. eBook: ISBN 9780429117039

  69. Korachi, Z., Bounabat, B.: Integrated methodological framework for smart city development. In: Proceedings of the International Conferences ICT, Society, And Human Beings 2019; Connected Smart Cities 2019; And Web Based Communities And Social Media 2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.33965/csc2019_201908l030

  70. Korachi, Z., Bounabat, B.: Towards a platform for defining and evaluating digital strategies for building smart cities. In: 2019 3rd International Conference on Smart Grid and Smart Cities (ICSGSC), Berkeley, CA, USA, 2019, pp. 32–40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGSC.2019.00-22

  71. Korachi, Z., Bounabat, B.: Towards a frame of reference for smart city strategy development and governance. J. Comput. Sci. 16(10), 1451–1464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.1451.1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zineb Korachi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Korachi, Z., Bounabat, B. (2022). IT Management and Governance Framework for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy. In: Kacprzyk, J., Balas, V.E., Ezziyyani, M. (eds) Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2020). AI2SD 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1418. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90639-9_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics