Abstract
Land and water resources management are essential for the future sustainability of the environment. The studies on land and water resources require basic geo-referenced data, such as land use-land cover (LULC), soil maps, and digital elevation models (DEMs) for capturing the spatio-temporal variations of thematic layers. These data can be easily obtained from remote sensing images and limited ground truth. Hydro-meteorological data, such as precipitation, air, land surface temperature, solar radiation, evapotranspiration, soil moisture, river and lakes water levels, river discharge, and terrestrial water storage, can also be derived from remote sensing as well as from point-based ground instruments. Then, studies can be carried out at various spatio-temporal scales.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1.1 Introduction to Geospatial Technology
Remote Sensing, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and Global Positioning System (GPS) form a revolutionary combination often referred to as Geospatial Technologies. Geospatial Technologies is the most powerful and transformational modern-day technologies used extensively to address real-time problems on the earth’s surface. The conjunctive use of remote sensing and GIS has proved to be highly effective to analyze diverse phenomena on the earth’s surface (Davis et al. 1991; Lo et al. 1997; Huggel et al. 2003; Kaab et al. 2005; Pandey et al. 2007; Patel and Srivastava, 2013; Calera et al. 2017; Chae et al. 2017; Borrelli et al. 2017). The capability of satellites and sensors for earth observations through numerous spectral bands has enhanced the umbrella of applications manifold. Analysis of land and water resources using vast volumes of data demands a robust database management system. GIS serves as a perfect platform for storing, managing, and analyzing voluminous spatial and non-spatial data (Chang 2008). It provides a robust computing environment and platform for re-scaling models and supports handling complex data-method relationships (Pandey et al. 2016b). Groot (1989) defined geospatial technology or geoinformatics as “the science and technology dealing with the structure and character of spatial information, its capture, its classification and qualification, its storage, processing, portrayal, and dissemination, including the infrastructure necessary to secure optimal use of this information.” Various applications of this technology can be broadly categorized into two significant domains, namely land resources and water resources. These two domains cover many applications in natural resources management, where geospatial technology serves as a very effective decision-making tool in these applications. This technology is being extensively used for effective and sustainable planning, management, and development of natural resources (Verbyla 1995).
Land resources form the core of sustainable existence and development in critical challenges, like agriculture, food production, poverty, and climate change impacts (Muller and Munroe 2014). Issues like improving agricultural production, soil conservation, deforestation, land degradation, and climate change require repeated observations of the nature, extent, and spatial variations of the earth surface with a high spatial resolution (Buchanan et al. 2008; Pandey et al. 2011; Yang et al. 2013; Calvao and Pessoa 2015; Huang et al. 2018; Pandey and Palmate 2018; Pandey et al. 2021a). Rapid geospatial technology advancements have revolutionized land resources mapping, monitoring, and management (Velmurugan and Carlos 2009). This technology also facilitates the generation of time-series databases enabling the scientists and researchers to derive meaningful results, recommendations, and action plans for the decision-makers at various implementation levels.
Water, the most precious natural resource, experiences immense pressure due to overexploitation to satisfy the ever-growing population’s needs (Wang et al. 2021). Moreover, factors like urbanization, globalization, infrastructural developments, and climate change have posed a massive threat to the limited freshwater resources available on earth (Chapagain and Hoekstra 2008; Giacomoni et al. 2013; Nair et al. 2013). Geospatial technology plays an instrumental role in analyzing, modeling, and simulating water quality, water availability, water supply management, floods, and droughts under various climate change scenarios. There are numerous applications of this technology addressing sustainable water resources management viz. assessment of groundwater recharge potential; integrated watershed management and development (Pandey et al. 2004); design flood estimation (Sharma et al. 2021); flood modeling (Patro et al. 2009); flood inundation and hazard mapping (Singh and Pandey 2021); sediment dynamic modeling (Pandey et al. 2016b).
Remote sensing forms the most integral component of the geospatial technology serving the purpose of a data source. Remote sensing has a unique capability of observing the earth’s surface in numerous spectral bands covering different wavelength ranges (Lillesand et al. 2015). Optical remote sensing uses visible, near-infrared, and short-wave infrared sensors to form images of the earth’s surface by detecting the solar radiation reflected from targets on the ground (Lillesand et al. 2015). Different materials reflect and absorb differently at different wavelengths. Thus, the targets can be differentiated by their spectral reflectance signatures in remotely sensed images.
There are few open source satellites that provide solutions to geospatial technologies with easier access to the user. Remote sensing satellite sensors gather information from space and generate a large number of datasets that are difficult to manage and analyze using software packages or applications that may require significant time and labor. The cloud computing systems, such as Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google Earth Engine (GEE), have been developed to address this issue. Although cloud computing platforms and other emerging technologies have demonstrated their significant potential for monitoring land and water resources management, they have not been appropriately examined and deployed for RS applications until recently. Users can access various data sets on those platforms without having to download anything. Both GEE and AWS offer similar features, such as automatic parallel processing and a fast computational platform for successfully dealing with substantial data processing or time-series analysis in a quick interval.
1.2 Cutting Edge—Techniques and Applications of Geospatial Technologies in Land and Water Resources Management
Various types of geospatial technologies have been made accessible to end users in recent years for use in a variety of applications in land and water and other emerging applications.
-
1.
Remote Sensing—High-resolution satellite imagery is acquired from space using a camera or sensor platforms mounted to the spacecraft. There were fewer high-resolution satellite images with centimeter resolution accuracy needed for monitoring in many applications, to meet human requirements and study the earth’s climate.
-
2.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS)—An application or software package for analyzing or mapping satellite data and performing additional operations, such as geo-referencing and geocoding, if the particular location of the earth’s surface is known. The model can then be used to do various analyses through the use of different techniques.
-
3.
Global Positioning System (GPS)—The discipline of earth monitoring has grown significantly in recent years. It has three basic components: the space segment, the control segment, and the user segment. It is a cutting edge technology capable of providing greater accuracy, less than a millimeter or meter. In the application to land and water resources, the most important requirement is to gather the geographical coordinates of any object present on the earth’s surface and gain information from the object features with geographical data, which was acquired in real time and directly from the field at a reasonable cost.
-
4.
Internet Mapping Technologies—Cloud computing platforms, such as Google Earth Engine, Microsoft Virtual Earth, Amazon Web Services, as well as other web features, are gradually improving how geographical data is analyzed and disseminated. With the availability of many modern technologies to users and other agencies, began analyzing data for satellite photos without prior experience or any pre-processing processes. By comparison, traditional GIS procedures are limited to highly skilled individuals for analyzing satellite data and mapping data for a variety of applications. As a result, internet mapping offers more opportunities to users who are willing to invest efforts in complex algorithms.
There are numerous uses for land and water resources, such as rainfall, land cover, snow cover extent, surface water extent, soil moisture, and hydrological cycle. All of these application parameters are quantified using various approaches including satellite data. Surface water bodies can be identified using remote sensing techniques; meteorological variables, such as temperature and precipitation can be estimated; hydrological state variables, such as soil moisture and land surface features can be estimated; and fluxes, such as evapotranspiration can be estimated. Availability of different sensors which directly gather information from land water bodies provides significant information in modeling algorithms. Moreover, it can be applied to crop inventory and forecasts; drought and flood damage assessment; and land use monitoring and management. Today, India is one of the major providers of earth observation data in the world in a variety of spatial, spectral, and temporal resolutions, meeting the needs of many applications of relevance to national development.
Based on multiple spectral bands used in the imaging process, optical remote sensing systems are categorized into three basic groups viz. panchromatic (single band), multispectral and hyperspectral systems. Table 1.1 offers many Indian and global panchromatic and multispectral satellite data products extensively utilized to address land and water resources management challenges. Table 1.2 shows a list of hyperspectral satellite data products.
Microwave remote sensing is very popular in the research community to map and monitor water resources primarily because of the capability of microwaves to accurately detect water (Ulaby 1977; Engman 1991) due to its all-weather ability. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) has been one of the most prominently used microwave remote sensing data products to address water-related applications. Table 1.3 presents a list of SAR and other satellite data products available in the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum (Brisco et al. 2013; Singh and Pandey 2021).
1.3 Methodology Development in Land Resources Management
Geospatial technologies play a pivotal role in monitoring and managing land resources. One of the most widely exploited applications is Digital Terrain Modeling (DTM), which characterizes the topography of any area using digital elevation models (DEMs) (Zhou et al. 2007). DEM products of different spatial resolutions are extensively used for topographic mapping, relief mapping, and terrain analysis (Yang et al. 2011). They also serve as a preliminary input in various hydrological studies (Nagaveni et al. 2019; Himanshu et al. 2015). A list of several DEM products available for use is presented in Table 1.4.
DEMs are processed and analyzed in a GIS environment to derive numerous indices, which enable understanding various environmental processes (Gajbhiye et al. 2015; Rao et al. 2019). Additionally, DEMs are also extensively used in morphometric characterization of watersheds (Wang et al. 2010). Parameters like slope, aspect, contours, curvature are effectively derived from the DEMs (Gajbhiye et al. 2014).
Soil resources mapping is another major application under the gamut of land resources management powered by geospatial technologies. The satellite image interpretation and image classification techniques are employed to identify and map different land uses and vegetation types (Robertson and King 2011). Remote sensing and GIS are effectively used for crop mapping, inventory, and management (Wardlow et al. 2007). This domain features serve many purposes, such as crop acreage estimation, condition assessment, yield forecasting, cropping system analysis, and precision farming. Crop type mapping, acreage, and condition assessment are mainly carried out using image interpretation and digital image processing, wherein the spectral response of crop types is analyzed. The variations in the signatures of different wavelength bands help with discrimination among additional features (Foerster et al. 2012).
Additionally, image classification supported with ground truth information helps generate land use maps spatially. Medium and high-resolution time-series satellite data are beneficial for discriminating and monitoring various crops periodically. Assessment and monitoring of droughts are one of the most critical food security issues of concern globally (Swain et al. 2021). Significantly, agrarian countries are primarily dependent on their agricultural production, which is a significant economic driver. Climate change and water availability pose a substantial threat to the world’s agricultural sector (Tarquis et al. 2010).
Geospatial technology has extensive scope for drought monitoring and assessment. Satellite remote sensing enables the monitoring of crops at various growth stages. Additionally, remote sensing data is used to compute spectral indices such as normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and normalized difference water index (NDWI), which provide essential inputs for drought assessment and monitoring (Pandey et al. 2010).
Soil erosion is a serious problem that poses a threat to agricultural land and infrastructure globally. One of the most popular methods used for soil erosion assessment and soil loss estimation is the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) (Pandey et al. 2009b). This method involves the computation of rainfall erosivity factor (R), soil erodibility factor (K), topographic factor (LS), crop management factor (C), and conservation supporting practice factor (P). GIS provides a platform to prepare and analyze the spatial layers of each of these factors to estimate the average annual soil loss rate (Dabral et al. 2008). Subsequently, researchers across the globe have employed the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) to assess the soil loss status (Pandey et al. 2021b).
Land use/land cover data is a standard input used in sediment yield modeling (Pandey et al. 2007, 2009a, b). Satellite data is being very efficiently used in reservoir sedimentation assessment studies (Pandey et al. 2016a). The change in water spread area is assessed using satellite image processing at different times using indices like NDVI and NDWI, and deposition of sediments is evaluated. Consequently, loss in the live storage of reservoirs due to sedimentation is estimated (Jain et al. 2002).
1.4 Methodology Development in Water Resources Management
Water resources can be undoubtedly argued to be the most benefitted domain from the advent of geospatial technologies. These advanced technologies play a key role in conducting hydrological studies for rainfall estimation, soil moisture estimation and modeling, streamflow estimation, rainfall-runoff modeling, rainfall forecasting, water balance modeling, hydrological modeling, hydraulic and hydrodynamic modeling (Milewski et al. 2009; Singh et al. 2015, 2019; Himanshu et al. 2017, 2021; Jaiswal et al. 2020). Application of remote sensing and GIS in water resources also extends in identifying suitable sites for soil and water conservation structures, sediment yield modeling, reservoir sedimentation, watershed characterization, and management plan (Pandey et al. 2011; Pandey et al. 2016b; Dayal et al. 2021).
Satellite data for rainfall estimation has been one of the most popular applications, especially in the data-scarce regions or lack of adequate ground-based instrumentation for measuring rainfall. Numerous operational satellite-based rainfall products provide rainfall estimates at various spatial and temporal resolutions (Table 1.5). Numerous studies have been carried out to evaluate the performance of these data products before and after bias correction and were used in many hydrological studies (Behrangi et al. 2011; Himanshu et al. 2018).
Soil moisture estimation using remote sensing data is another rapidly evolving application in the water resources domain (Srivastava et al. 2009; Singh et al. 2015). Soil moisture is a crucial parameter used in various hydrological, land surface modeling, and meteorological studies (Albergel et al. 2013; Wanders et al. 2014). Interestingly, satellite-derived soil moisture products are also used to monitor and predict natural disaster events (Abelen et al. 2015). Additionally, these products also find application in climate variability studies (Loew et al. 2013).
The microwave band of the electromagnetic spectrum is exclusively used for soil moisture estimation. Table 1.6 presents a list of remote sensing-based soil moisture products available for use. Apart from the advantages of all-weather and day-night coverage, passive microwave sensors provide soil moisture estimation capability with good temporal resolution. In contrast, active microwave sensors provide finer, more satisfactory spatial resolutions (Singh et al. 2015).
The majority of the water resources management projects or research, especially at small and medium scales, are carried out at the watershed level (Sivapalan 2003). At this level, the analysis demands operational tools for simulating various processes and interactions associated with water resources (Hingray et al. 2014). Therefore, watershed modeling becomes essential to understand and analyze the interactions between nature, climate, and human interventions. The distributed models employed for watershed modeling are data-intensive, and in data-scarce areas, geospatial technology plays a prominent role in addressing data gaps (Stisen et al. 2008). The topography data is one of the essential datasets in any watershed modeling assignment. The most widely available source of topographic data is open source DEMs. Advanced data capture techniques, such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), are being deployed to gather higher-accuracy terrain information. Table 1.7 lists a few LiDAR datasets exclusively available for the USA.
Climate data specifically, temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, and wind speed, are the primary inputs required to analyze the hydrology of any watershed. All these parameters are being monitored repeatedly using various satellite sensors. Additionally, the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) provides the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) data in a gridded format to be conveniently used for watershed modeling applications (Fadil and Bouchti 2020).
Satellite altimetry is a unique application of geospatial technology in water resources management. Altimetry provides a means to monitor the water level of rivers and reservoirs using satellite observations. Moreover, repeated observations allow evaluation of change in water storage in reservoirs and overcome the limitation of the spare in-situ network of gauge stations. The water levels from altimetry can also be used to calibrate and validate hydrological and hydrodynamic models (Thakur et al. 2021). Table 1.8 presents a list of some radar altimetry data products.
1.5 Conclusions
The application of geospatial technologies for land use-land cover analysis and mapping, digital terrain modeling, soil resource inventory, crop monitoring, and mapping, estimation of evapotranspiration, soil moisture measurement, morphometric parameter analysis, drought monitoring, soil erosion modeling, watershed management, agricultural land use planning, water quality assessment, reservoir sedimentation, flood mapping, monitoring reservoir/lake water levels, river discharge, and spatial modeling have revolutionized the assessment, mapping, and monitoring of land and water resources. The case studies provided in this book will serve as a valuable resource for scientists and researchers involved in planning and managing land and water resources sustainably.
This book offers an overview of geospatial technologies in land and water resources management. It consists of four main sections: land use land cover dynamics, agricultural water management, water resources assessment and modeling, and natural disasters. From leading institutions, such as the IITs and ISRO, the authors have shared their experiences and offered case studies to provide insights into the application of geospatial technologies for land and water resources management.
References
Abelen S, Seitz F, Abarca-del-Rio R, Güntner A (2015) Droughts and floods in the La Plata basin in soil moisture data and GRACE. Remote Sens 7(6):7324–7349
Albergel C, Dorigo W, Balsamo G, Muñoz-Sabater J, de Rosnay P, Isaksen L, Brocca L, De Jeu R, Wagner W (2013) Monitoring multi-decadal satellite earth observation of soil moisture products through land surface reanalyses. Remote Sens Environ 138:77–89
Behrangi A, Khakbaz B, Jaw TC, AghaKouchak A, Hsu K, Sorooshian S (2011) Hydrologic evaluation of satellite precipitation products over a mid-size basin. J Hydrol 397(3–4):225–237
Borrelli P, Robinson DA, Fleischer LR, Lugato E, Ballabio C, Alewell C, Meusburger K, Modugno S, Schütt B, Ferro V, Bagarello V (2017) An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nat Commun 8(1):1–13
Brisco B, Schmitt A, Murnaghan K, Kaya S, Roth A (2013) SAR polarimetric change detection for flooded vegetation. Int J Digit Earth 6(2):103–114
Buchanan GM, Butchart SH, Dutson G, Pilgrim JD, Steininger MK, Bishop KD, Mayaux P (2008) Using remote sensing to inform conservation status assessment: estimates of recent deforestation rates on New Britain and the impacts upon endemic birds. Biol Cons 141(1):56–66
Calera A, Campos I, Osann A, D’Urso G, Menenti M (2017) Remote sensing for crop water management: from ET modelling to services for the end users. Sensors 17(5):1104
Calvao T, Pessoa MF (2015) Remote sensing in food production—a review. Emirates J Food Agric 27(2(SI)):138–151
Chae BG, Park HJ, Catani F, Simoni A, Berti M (2017) Landslide prediction, monitoring and early warning: a concise review of state-of-the-art. Geosci J 21(6):1033–1070
Chang KT (2008) Introduction to geographic information systems, vol 4. McGraw-Hill, Boston
Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY (2008) The global component of freshwater demand and supply: an assessment of virtual water flows between nations as a result of trade in agricultural and industrial products. Water Int 33(1):19–32
Dabral PP, Baithuri N, Pandey A (2008) Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of North Eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manage 22(12):1783–1798
Davis F, Quattrochi D, Ridd M, Lam N, Walsh SJ, Michaelsen JC, Franklin J, Stow DA, Johannsen CJ, Johnston CA (1991) Environmental analysis using integrated GIS and remotely sensed data—some research needs and priorities. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 57(6):689–697
Dayal D, Gupta PK, Pandey A (2021) Streamflow estimation using satellite-retrieved water fluxes and machine learning technique over monsoon-dominated catchments of India. Hydrol Sci J 66(4):656–671
Engman ET (1991) Applications of microwave remote sensing of soil moisture for water resources and agriculture. Remote Sens Environ 35(2–3):213–226
Fadil A, El Bouchti A (2020) Global data for watershed modeling: the case of data scarcity areas. In: Geospatial Technology. Springer, Cham, pp 1–14
Foerster S, Kaden K, Foerster M, Itzerott S (2012) Crop type mapping using spectral–temporal profiles and phenological information. Comput Electron Agric 89:30–40
Gajbhiye S, Mishra SK, Pandey A (2014) Prioritizing erosion-prone area through morphometric analysis: an RS and GIS perspective. Appl Water Sci 4(1):51–61
Gajbhiye S, Mishra SK, Pandey A (2015) Simplified sediment yield index model incorporating parameter curve number. Arab J Geosci 8(4):1993–2004
Giacomoni MH, Kanta L, Zechman EM (2013) Complex adaptive systems approach to simulate the sustainability of water resources and urbanization. J Water Resour Plan Manag 139(5):554–564
Groot R (1989) Meeting Educational Requirements in Geomatics. ITC J 1:1–4
Himanshu SK, Pandey A, Shrestha P (2017) Application of SWAT in an Indian river basin for modeling runoff, sediment and water balance. Environ Earth Sci 76:3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6316-8
Himanshu SK, Pandey A, Dayal D (May 2018) Evaluation of satellite-based precipitation estimates over an agricultural watershed of India. In: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2018: watershed management, irrigation and drainage, and water resources planning and management. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 308–320
Himanshu SK, Pandey A, Dayal D (2021) Assessment of multiple satellite-based precipitation estimates over Muneru watershed of India. In: Water management and water governance. Springer, Cham, pp 61–78
Himanshu SK, Pandey A, Palmate SS (2015) Derivation of Nash model parameters from geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph for a Himalayan river using ASTER DEM. In: Proceedings of international conference on structural architectural and civil engineering, Dubai
Hingray B, Picouet C, Musy A (2014) Hydrology: a science for engineers. CRC Press
Huang Y, Chen ZX, Tao YU, Huang XZ, Gu XF (2018) Agricultural remote sensing big data: management and applications. J Integr Agric 17(9):1915–1931
Huggel C, Kääb A, Haeberli W, Krummenacher B (2003) Regional-scale GIS-models for assessment of hazards from glacier lake outbursts: evaluation and application in the Swiss Alps. Nat Hazard 3(6):647–662
Jain SK, Singh P, Seth SM (2002) Assessment of sedimentation in Bhakra reservoir in the western Himalayan region using remotely sensed data. Hydrol Sci J 47(2):203–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660209492924
Jaiswal RK, Yadav RN, Lohani AK et al (2020) Water balance modeling of Tandula (India) reservoir catchment using SWAT. Arab J Geosci 13:148
Kaab A, Huggel C, Fischer L, Guex S, Paul F, Roer I, Salzmann N, Schlaefli S, Schmutz K, Schneider D, Strozzi T (2005) Remote sensing of glacier-and permafrost-related hazards in high mountains: an overview. Nat Hazard 5(4):527–554
Lillesand T, Kiefer RW, Chipman J (2015) Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley
Lo CP, Quattrochi DA, Luvall JC (1997) Application of high-resolution thermal infrared remote sensing and GIS to assess the urban heat island effect. Int J Remote Sens 18(2):287–304
Loew A, Stacke T, Dorigo W, Jeu RD, Hagemann S (2013) Potential and limitations of multidecadal satellite soil moisture observations for selected climate model evaluation studies. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(9):3523–3542
Milewski A, Sultan M, Yan E, Becker R, Abdeldayem A, Soliman F, Gelil KA (2009) A remote sensing solution for estimating runoff and recharge in arid environments. J Hydrol 373(1–2):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.002
Muller D, Munroe DK (2014) Current and future challenges in land-use science. J Land Use Sci 9(2):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2014.883731
Nagaveni C, Kumar KP, Ravibabu MV (2019) Evaluation of TanDEMx and SRTM DEM on watershed simulated runoff estimation. J Earth Syst Sci 128(1):1–11
Nair RS, Bharat DA, Nair MG (2013) Impact of climate change on water availability: case study of a small coastal town in India. J Water Clim Change 4(2):146–159
Pandey A, Palmate SS (2018) Assessments of spatial land cover dynamic hotspots employing MODIS time-series datasets in the Ken river basin of Central India. Arab J Geosci 11(17):1–8
Pandey A, Bishal KC, Kalura P, Chowdary VM, Jha CS, Cerdà A (2021a) A soil water assessment tool (SWAT) modeling approach to prioritize soil conservation management in river basin critical areas coupled with future climate scenario analysis. Air, Soil Water Res 14:11786221211021396
Pandey A, Chaube UC, Mishra SK, Kumar D (2016a) Assessment of reservoir sedimentation using remote sensing and recommendations for desilting Patratu reservoir, India. Hydrol Sci J 61(4):711–718
Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2004) Morphological analysis and watershed management using GIS. Hydrol J (India) 27(3–4):71–84
Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2007) Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manage 21(4):729–746
Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2009a) Sediment yield modelling of an agricultural watershed using MUSLE, remote sensing and GIS. Paddy Water Environ 7(2):105–113
Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC, Dabral PP (2011) Remote sensing and GIS for identification of suitable sites for soil and water conservation structures. Land Degrad Dev 22(3):359–372
Pandey A, Gautam AK, Chowdary VM, Jha CS, Cerdà A (2021b) Uncertainty assessment in soil erosion modeling using RUSLE, multisource and multiresolution DEMs. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 49(7):1689–1707
Pandey A, Himanshu SK, Mishra SK, Singh VP (2016b) Physically based soil erosion and sediment yield models revisited. CATENA 147:595–620
Pandey A, Mathur A, Mishra SK, Mal BC (2009b) Soil erosion modeling of a Himalayan watershed using RS and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 59(2):399–410
Pandey RP, Pandey A, Galkate RV, Byun HR, Mal BC (2010) Integrating hydro-meteorological and physiographic factors for assessment of vulnerability to drought. Water Resour Manage 24(15):4199–4217
Patel DP, Srivastava PK (2013) Flood hazards mitigation analysis using remote sensing and GIS: correspondence with town planning scheme. Water Resour Manage 27(7):2353–2368
Patro S, Chatterjee C, Mohanty S, Singh R, Raghuwanshi NS (2009) Flood inundation modeling using MIKE FLOOD and remote sensing data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37(1):107–118
Rao KD, Alladi S, Singh A (2019) An integrated approach in developing flood vulnerability index of India using spatial multi-criteria evaluation technique. Curr Sci 117(1):80
Robertson L, King DJ (2011) Comparison of pixel-and object-based classification in land cover change mapping. Int J Remote Sens 32(6):1505–1529
Sharma I, Mishra SK, Pandey A (2021) A simple procedure for design flood estimation incorporating duration and return period of design rainfall. Arab J Geosci 14(13):1–15
Singh G, Pandey A (2021) Mapping Punjab flood using multi-temporal open-access synthetic aperture radar data in Google earth engine. In: Hydrological extremes. Springer, Cham, pp 75–85
Singh G, Srivastava HS, Mesapam S, Patel P (2015) Passive microwave remote sensing of soil moisture: a step-by-step detailed methodology using AMSR-E data over Indian sub-continent. Int J Adv Remote Sens GIS 4(1):1045–1063
Singh G, Srivastava HS, Mesapam S, Patel P (2019) An attempt to investigate change in crop acreage with soil moisture variations derived from passive microwave data. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2019: watershed management, irrigation and drainage, and water resources planning and management. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 83–90
Sivapalan M (2003) Process complexity at hillslope scale, process simplicity at watershed scale: is there a connection? In: EGS-AGU-EUG joint assembly, p 7973
Srivastava HS, Patel P, Sharma Y, Navalgund RR (2009) Large-area soil moisture estimation using multi-incidence-angle RADARSAT-1 SAR data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47(8):2528–2535
Stisen S, Jensen KH, Sandholt I, Grimes DI (2008) A remote sensing driven distributed hydrological model of the Senegal river basin. J Hydrol 354(1–4):131–148
Swain S, Mishra SK, Pandey A (2021) A detailed assessment of meteorological drought characteristics using simplified rainfall index over Narmada river basin, India. Environ Earth Sci 80(6):1–15
Tarquis A, Gobin A, Semenov MA (2010) Preface. Clim Res 44:1–2. https://doi.org/10.3354//cr00942
Thakur PK, Garg V, Kalura P, Agrawal B, Sharma V, Mohapatra M, Kalia M, Aggarwal SP, Calmant S, Ghosh S, Dhote PR (2021) Water level status of Indian reservoirs: a synoptic view from altimeter observations. Adv Space Res 68(2):619–640
Ulaby FT (1977) Microwave remote sensing of hydrologic parameters
Velmurugan A, Carlos GG (2009) Soil resource assessment and mapping using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37(3):511–525
Verbyla DL (1995) Satellite remote sensing of natural resources, vol 4. CRC Press
Wanders N, Bierkens MF, de Jong SM, de Roo A, Karssenberg D (2014) The benefits of using remotely sensed soil moisture in parameter identification of large-scale hydrological models. Water Resour Res 50(8):6874–6891
Wang D, Hubacek K, Shan Y, Gerbens-Leenes W, Liu J (2021) A review of water stress and water footprint accounting. Water 13(2):201
Wang D, Laffan SW, Liu Y, Wu L (2010) Morphometric characterisation of landform from DEMs. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(2):305–326
Wardlow BD, Egbert SL, Kastens JH (2007) Analysis of time-series MODIS 250 m vegetation index data for crop classification in the US central great plains. Remote Sens Environ 108(3):290–310
Yang J, Gong P, Fu R, Zhang M, Chen J, Liang S, Xu B, Shi J, Dickinson R (2013) The role of satellite remote sensing in climate change studies. Nat Clim Chang 3(10):875–883
Yang L, Meng X, Zhang X (2011) SRTM DEM and its application advances. Int J Remote Sens 32(14):3875–3896
Zhou H, Sun J, Turk G, Rehg JM (2007) Terrain synthesis from digital elevation models. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 13(4):834–848
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pandey, A., Singh, G., Chowdary, V.M., Behera, M.D., Prakash, A.J., Singh, V.P. (2022). Overview of Geospatial Technologies for Land and Water Resources Management. In: Pandey, A., Chowdary, V.M., Behera, M.D., Singh, V.P. (eds) Geospatial Technologies for Land and Water Resources Management. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 103. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90479-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90479-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90478-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90479-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)