Skip to main content

Conflict in Supply Chain Relationships: A Review, Conceptualization, and Future Research Agenda

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Supply Chain Management

Abstract

Conflict in buyer–supplier relationships is a regular occurrence and, therefore, understanding its emergence, consequences, management, and resolution is a vital area for academics and managers alike. In recent times, studies have given more consideration to whether and how conflict in these relationships leads to (dys-)functional outcomes, but plenty of questions remain unanswered. Based on an analysis of 124 papers, and drawing upon core assumptions that underpin supply chain relationships, we present descriptive and thematic analyses and synthesis to highlight what has been explored to date. Building on these analyses, we position a future research agenda by outlining key research avenues by which to advance our understanding of and insights into conflicts in supply chain relationships. We focus on four key themes: (i) conflict conceptualization; (ii) conflict antecedents; (iii) conflict management and resolution; and (iv) conflict outcomes. For each theme, gaps in prior study are outlined before identifying the opportunities for future research that will serve to address these lacunas in our knowledge and practice. Thus, we articulate fruitful research questions for each of these themes and discuss the significant managerial implications of current and future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai, X., Sheng, S., & Li, J. J. (2016). Contract governance and buyer–supplier conflict: The moderating role of institutions. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3), 216–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobot, L. (2011). Functional and dysfunctional conflicts in retailer-supplier relationships. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 39(1), 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouazzaoui, M., Wu, H.-J., Roehrich, J. K., Squire, B., & Roath, T. (2020). Justice in inter-organizational relationships: A literature review and future research agenda. Industrial Marketing Management, 87, 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Cheng, J., Shi, H., & Feng, T. (2020). The impact of organisational conflict on green supplier integration: The moderating role of governance mechanism. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, S., Jun, M., & Yang, Z. (2017). The effects of boundary spanners’ personal relationships on interfirm collaboration and conflict: A study of the role of guanxi in China. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(3), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, N., Roehrich, J. K., & George, G. (2017). Social value creation and relational coordination in public-private collaborations. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 906–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carton, A. M., & Tewfik, B. A. (2016). Perspective—A new look at conflict management in work groups. Organization Science, 27(5), 1125–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, F. R., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshghi, K., & Ray, S. (2021). Conflict and performance in channels: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(2), 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, J. F. (1984). The theory of power and conflict in channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach, G. T., & Cadotte, E. R. (1994). Exchange interdependence and interfirm interaction: Research in a simulated channel setting. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(4), 516–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, C. M., & Roehrich, J. K. (2022). Systems levels in purchasing and supply chain management (PSCM) research: Exploring established and novel theories to address PSCM problems and challenges. In W. L. Tate, L. M. Ellram, & L. Bals (Eds.), A handbook of theories for purchasing, supply chain and management research (pp. 63–79). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingley, M. (2001). Relationship management in the supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(2), 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. (2010). The effects of conflict asymmetry on work group and individual outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 596–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K., Rispens, S., Jonsen, K., & Greer, L. (2013). Conflict contagion: A temporal perspective on the development of conflict within teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24(4), 352–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, R. E., & Lacoste, S. (2016). An exploration of the ‘dark side’ associations of conflict, power and dependence in customer–supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 59, 76–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., Roehrich, J. K., Chakkol, M., & Davies, A. (2021). Reconciling and reconceptualising servitization research: Drawing on modularity, platforms, ecosystems, risk and governance to develop mid-range theory. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 41(5), 465–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalra, J., Lewis, M. A., & Roehrich, J. K. (2021). Manifestation of coordination failures in service triads. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 26(3), 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaba, F., Roehrich, J. K., Conway, S., & Turner, J. (2022). Information sharing in public-private relationships: The role of boundary objects in contracts. Public Management Review, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2065344

  • Krafft, M., Goetz, O., Mantrala, M., Sotgiu, F., & Tillmanns, S. (2015). The evolution of marketing channel research domains and methodologies: An integrative review and future directions. Journal of Retailing, 91(4), 569–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, P. K., & Chin, K. S. (2004). Project factors influencing conflict intensity and handling styles in collaborative NPD. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Nguyen, H., Larimo, J., & Ali, T. (2016). How do ownership control position and national culture influence conflict resolution strategies in international joint ventures? International Business Review, 25(2), 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. Y. (2001). Power, conflict and satisfaction in IJV supplier—Chinese distributor channels. Journal of Business Research, 52(2), 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, L. C., Aykol, B., Fotiadis, T. A., Christodoulides, P., & Zeriti, A. (2017). Betrayal in international buyer-seller relationships: Its drivers and performance implications. Journal of World Business, 52(1), 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, L. C., Barnes, B. R., & Talias, M. A. (2006). Exporter–importer relationship quality: The inhibiting role of uncertainty, distance, and conflict. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(5), 576–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 794–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Huang, Y., Luo, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2012). How does justice matter in achieving buyer–supplier relationship performance? Journal of Operations Management, 30(5), 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Yang, Q. (2017). A diagnostic model of private control and collective control in buyer-supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumineau, F., & Oliveira, N. (2018). A pluralistic perspective to overcome major blind spots in research on interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 440–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumineau, F., Eckerd, S., & Handley, S. (2015). Inter-organizational conflicts: Research overview, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 1(1), 42–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Liu, Y., & Xue, J. (2009). Relationship investment and channel performance: An analysis of mediating forces. Journal of Management Studies, 46(7), 1113–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F. (1976). Channel conflict-its impact on retailer operating performance. Journal of Retailing, 52(2), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., Zhang, Z., & Kim, J. (2018). Effects of conflict asymmetry on team conflict-performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1) https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.14699abstract

  • McCarthy, I. P., Lawrence, T. B., Wixted, B., & Gordon, B. R. (2010). A multidimensional conceptualization of environmental velocity. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 604–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, S., Bowen, D., & Johnston, R. (2009). Why service recovery fails: Tensions among customer, employee, and process perspectives. Journal of Service Management, 20(3), 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, E. N., & Clegg, S. (2017). Conceptions of conflict in organizational conflict research: Toward critical reflexivity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(2), 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murfield, M. L. U., Esper, T. L., Tate, W. L., & Petersen, K. J. (2016). Supplier role conflict: An investigation of its relational implications and impact on supplier accommodation. Journal of Business Logistics, 37(2), 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndubisi, N. O. (2011). Conflict handling, trust and commitment in outsourcing relationship: A Chinese and Indian study. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(1), 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, T. A., McLarnon, M. J. W., Hoffart, G. C., Woodley, H. J. R., & Allen, N. J. (2015). The structure and function of team conflict state profiles. Journal of Management, 44(2), 811–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olekalns, M., Caza, B. B., & Vogus, T. J. (2020). Gradual drifts, abrupt shocks: From relationship fractures to relational resilience. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W., Roehrich, J. K., & Kapletia, D. (2022a). Responding to information asymmetry in crisis situations: Innovation in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Management Review, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1960737

  • Phillips, W., Roehrich, J. K., Kapletia, D., & Alexander, E. (2022b). Global value chain reconfiguration and COVID-19: Investigating the case for more resilient redistributed models of production. California Management Review, 64(2), 71–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulles, N. J., & Loohuis, R. P. (2020). Managing buyer-supplier conflicts: The effect of buyer openness and directness on a supplier's willingness to adapt. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 56(4), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, L., Rothman, N. B., Lehavy, R., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2013). The ambivalent mind can be a wise mind: Emotional ambivalence increases judgment accuracy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 360–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, H. (2008). Surface and deep level faultlines and network ties in multicultural teams. [Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University]. Penn State University Libraries. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/2347

  • Ren, H., Gray, B., & Kim, K. (2009). Performance of international joint ventures: What factors really make a difference and how? Journal of Management, 35(3), 805–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrich, J. K., & Kivleniece, I. (2022). Creating and distributing sustainable value through public-private collaborative projects. In G. George, M. R. Hass, H. Joshi, A. McGahan, & P. Tracey (Eds.), Handbook on the business of sustainability: The organization, implementation, and practice of sustainable growth (pp. 473–499). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrich, J. K., Lewis, M. A., & George, G. (2014). Are public-private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review. Social Science & Medicine, 113, 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehrich, J. K., Selviaridis, K., Kalra, J., van der Valk, W., & Fang, F. (2020). Inter-organisational governance: A review, conceptualisation and extension. Production Planning and Control, 31(6), 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehrich, J. K., Tyler, B. B., Kalra, J., & Squire, B. (2021). The decision process of contracting in supply chain management. In T. Choi, J. Li, D. Rogers, J. Rungtusanatham, T. Schoenherr, & S. Wagner (Eds.), Handbook of supply chain management (pp. 562–586). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaha, S. A., Palmatier, R. W., & Dant, R. P. (2011). Poisoning relationships: Perceived unfairness in channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schul, P. L., & Babakus, E. (1988). An examination of the interfirm power-conflict relationship. Journal of Retailing, 64(4), 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad, K., Ali, T., Kohtamäki, M., & Takala, J. (2020). Enabling roles of relationship governance mechanisms in the choice of inter-firm conflict resolution strategies. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 35(6), 957–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, R., Janardhanan, N. S., Greer, L. L., Conlon, D. E., & Edwards, J. R. (2016). Skewed task conflicts in teams: What happens when a few members see more conflict than the rest? Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7), 1045–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarmeas, D. (2006). The role of functional conflict in international buyer–seller relationships: Implications for industrial exporters. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(5), 567–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strutton, D., Pelton, L. E., & Lumpkin, J. R. (1993). The influence of psychological climate on conflict resolution strategies in franchise relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(3), 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangpong, C., Hung, K.-T., & Ro, Y. K. (2010). The interaction effect of relational norms and agent cooperativeness on opportunism in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 398–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. M., & Adler, S. (1984). Personality and organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, J., Chen, Y., Hua, Y., & Wang, W. (2019). The efficacy of contractual governance on task and relationship conflict in inter-organisational transactions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 30(1), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., & Zhang, M. (2013). Guanxi, communication, power, and conflict in industrial buyer-seller relationships: Mitigations against the cultural background of harmony in China. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 20(2), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4333–4355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens K. Roehrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bouazzaoui, M., Squire, B., Lewis, M.A., Roehrich, J.K. (2022). Conflict in Supply Chain Relationships: A Review, Conceptualization, and Future Research Agenda. In: Sarkis, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Supply Chain Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89822-9_99-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89822-9_99-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89822-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89822-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics