Skip to main content

ABS in Australia: A Story of Early Success and Faltering Progress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Transformations in the Use of Biodiversity for Research and Development

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 95))

  • 309 Accesses

Abstract

Australia was the first Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) country to introduce Access and Benefit-sharing (ABS) laws to implement the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) article 15—Access to Genetic Resources. To do so, it followed a path of legal and operational innovation, contributed to the further international evolution of ABS through the development of world’s best ABS practice—the CBD Bonn Guidelines on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising out of their Utilization (Bonn Guidelines) and later contributed to the development of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Nagoya Protocol). Yet eight years after signing the Protocol Australia has yet to ratify the treaty. This chapter outlines Australia’s development and progress on ABS, describes its innovations and contribution to the global ABS system, identifies the remaining steps needed to fulfil its obligations prior to ratification and suggests why progress has stalled. It will, moreover, identify increasing signs that Australia’s State Governments and its research community are losing patience with this delay and have begun taking concrete steps to achieve compliance with the Nagoya Protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See https://www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/national-location-information/dimensions/oceans-and-seas.

  2. 2.

    See https://www.australianwildlife.org/wildlife.

  3. 3.

    See http://www.australasianscience.com.au/article/science-and-technology/when-did-aboriginal-people-first-arrive-australia.html.

  4. 4.

    See https://aiatsis.gov.au/explore/articles/land-rights.

  5. 5.

    In 2019, Australia was the world’s 14th largest economy at US$1.4 trillion and a per capita income of US$54,000.00. See https://www.austrade.gov.au/International/Invest/Resources/Benchmark-Report.

  6. 6.

    See https://www.ausbiotech.org/biotechnology-industry/fast-facts.

  7. 7.

    See https://www.cbd.int/doc/measures/abs/msr-abs-au4-en.pdf, p. 26.

  8. 8.

    Section 301 of the Act, see https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2018C00440/Download.

  9. 9.

    See the Voumard Report.

  10. 10.

    See National Strategy for the Conservation of Australia’s Biological Diversity, p. 35.

  11. 11.

    Executive staff of the Inquiry headed the Australian delegations to CBD discussions and negotiations on international cooperation on ABS.

  12. 12.

    Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900.

  13. 13.

    This principle is enacted at sub-section 51 (31) of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900. See https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Constitution.aspx.

  14. 14.

    Native Title: put simply, native title is the application of the principle in British common law that if land is possessed and possession has not been defeated, then the possessor owns the land. Thus, if indigenous Australians maintain possession of the land then they have native title to it. When native title is recognized, any acquisition by the Commonwealth requires compensation on just terms. See section 18 of the Native Title Act 1993, https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017C00178.

  15. 15.

    The Voumard Report.

  16. 16.

    The failure to promptly identify Fire Ants has incurred substantial eradication costs, with AU$28 million spent in 2001 and, by 2016, this figure had risen to AU$328 million. See Consultancy Report for the Steering Committee for the National Red Imported Fire Ant Eradication Program, p. 19.

  17. 17.

    Over the intervening period, this approval rate does not seem to have changed appreciably. See https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2019/05/09/the-latest-on-drug-failure-and-approval-rates.

  18. 18.

    The Treaty was adopted on 3 November 2001 after 7 years of negotiations. See http://www.fao.org/3/Y2650e/Y2650e01.htm#3.

  19. 19.

    See https://www.upov.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/upov_pub_423.pdf.

  20. 20.

    See the Voumard Report, pp. 6–12.

  21. 21.

    The principles outlined were the product of extensive discussions by the author and other Inquiry staff with members of the Expert Reference Group and with officials of the Commonwealth Attorney Generals Department. They underpin the Voumard Report recommendations.

  22. 22.

    The author was responsible for the development of the draft regulations from the drafting instructions.

  23. 23.

    Council of Australian Governments’ nationally consistent approach for access to and the utilization of Australia’s native genetic and biochemical resources.

  24. 24.

    See ibid.

  25. 25.

    See http://www.environment.gov.au/node/14439, and https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2014C00950.

  26. 26.

    Burton (2009). This sets out a line-by-line analysis of the congruence between the regulations and the provisions of the Bonn Guidelines.

  27. 27.

    Section 8A.01 “Purpose of Part 8”, p. 55, https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2014C00950.

  28. 28.

    Sections 8A.07 to 8A.10 refers to legal protections for indigenous providers. See https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2014C00950.

  29. 29.

    Example of model agreement, http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/pages/e3584028-d083-4aec-acdd-c0aa635a529f/files/commonwealth-and-access-party-model-benefit-sharing-agreement-2012.pdf.

  30. 30.

    Department of Environment and Energy 2018/19 Annual Report.

  31. 31.

    See https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2014C00950.

  32. 32.

    Australia decided to confine ABS to its native species to avoid deriving benefits from foreign species and thus encouraging countries to obtain benefits from utilization of Australian native species found in their own jurisdictions. Author was director of Australian Access Task Force from 1999 to 2006.

  33. 33.

    Article 2 of the Nagoya Protocol defines ‘utilization of genetic resources’ as: “means to conduct research and development on the genetic and/or biochemical composition of genetic resources, including through the application of biotechnology as defined in Article 2 of the Convention”.

  34. 34.

    Copies of all permits issued since 2006, http://www.environment.gov.au/resource/list-permits-issued.

  35. 35.

    The author had discussions at the time with representatives of other Governments and foreign companies about their experiences with accusations of biopiracy.

  36. 36.

    All such permits issued year by year, https://environment.gov.au/resource/science-and-research-permits-2019.

  37. 37.

    The International Certificate of Compliance can only be created when a party to the NP sends its permit to the ABS Clearing-House Mechanism.

  38. 38.

    A copy can be found on the World Intellectual Property Organization Contractual Data Base.

  39. 39.

    The term “boiler plate clauses” refers to commonly used and accepted terms in contracts dealing with common issues and requirements.

  40. 40.

    See Regulations 8A.08 “Benefit-sharing agreements” and 8A.10 “Informed consent”, https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2020C00778.

  41. 41.

    See http://www.environment.gov.au/topics/science-and-research/australias-biological-resources/permits.

  42. 42.

    The Act and penalty provision, https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2004C00189.

  43. 43.

    See https://www.environment.gov.au/science/abrs/about.

  44. 44.

    It is a condition of patent approval that an invention must be able to be made from the description given in the patent application. For an invention whose starting point is a living organism, it is essential that the organism is properly identified. Otherwise replication is not possible. Misidentification can lead to patent invalidity and substantial economic losses.

  45. 45.

    The Australia Virtual Herbarium changed its name to the Australasian Virtual Herbarium with the addition of New Zealand. The term ‘Australasian’ means Australia and New Zealand and sometimes other islands in the region as well.

  46. 46.

    See https://avh.ala.org.au/#tab_simpleSearch.

  47. 47.

    See https://www.ala.org.au/.

  48. 48.

    A copy of the PMSEIC Report has been removed and can no longer be found at the PMSEIC website but can be found at http://absbonn.pbworks.com/f/Australia+biodiscovery+report+2005.pdf.

  49. 49.

    The author was policy advisor to the PMSEIC Working Group.

  50. 50.

    https://www.allens.com.au/insights-news/insights/2014/05/australia-releases-model-for-implementing-the-nagoya/.

  51. 51.

    See http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/pages/9fc06ac0-f5af-4b47-a80f-d9378088d743/files/nagoya-factsheet.pdf.

  52. 52.

    Interviews conducted in July 2019 by the author with officials—not named for privacy reasons.

  53. 53.

    Copy of the Independent Review of the EPBC Act Interim Report https://epbcactreview.environment.gov.au/resources/interim-report/executive-summary.

  54. 54.

    See Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Streamlining Environmental Approvals) Bill 2020.

  55. 55.

    Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment Annual Report 2019–20.

  56. 56.

    Refusal to sign, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/australia-is-refusing-to-sign-a-global-pledge-to-protect-earth-s-biodiversity.

  57. 57.

    Informal discussions with the author.

  58. 58.

    See https://www.legislation.wa.gov.au/legislation/statutes.nsf/law_s50938.html.

  59. 59.

    See https://environment.des.qld.gov.au/licences-permits/plants-animals/biodiscovery/biodiscovery-act-reform#:~:text=A%20suite%20of%20priority%20amendments%20to%20the%20Biodiscovery,for%20the%20use%20of%20traditional%20knowledge%20in%20biodiscovery.

  60. 60.

    Ibid.

References

Book Chapter

  • Burton G (2009) In: Kamau, Winter (eds) Genetic resources, traditional knowledge and the law. Solutions for access and benefit sharing. Earthscan, London, pp 271–310

    Google Scholar 

Legislations

    Commonwealth of Australia

    State

      Western Australia

      Queensland

      Reports/Inquiries

      Website Links

      Download references

      Author information

      Authors and Affiliations

      Authors

      Corresponding author

      Correspondence to Geoffrey C. Burton .

      Editor information

      Editors and Affiliations

      Rights and permissions

      Reprints and permissions

      Copyright information

      © 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

      About this chapter

      Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

      Cite this chapter

      Burton, G.C. (2022). ABS in Australia: A Story of Early Success and Faltering Progress. In: Chege Kamau, E. (eds) Global Transformations in the Use of Biodiversity for Research and Development. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 95. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88711-7_13

      Download citation

      • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88711-7_13

      • Published:

      • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

      • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88710-0

      • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88711-7

      • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

      Publish with us

      Policies and ethics