Abstract
Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a sporadic, congenital, neurocutaneous disorder caused in most cases by an activating R183Q somatic mutation in GNAQ. The condition is usually defined by two or three of the following symptoms: a port-wine birthmark (PWB) in the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve, a vascular malformation in the brain (leptomeningeal angiomatosis), and/or abnormal blood vessels in the eye causing increased ocular pressure (glaucoma). About 10% of cases of SWS have the typical brain involvement without the port-wine birthmark. Sturge-Weber syndrome is also linked to seizures, stroke-like episodes, hemiparesis, growth hormone deficiency, and visual field cuts, along with cognitive impairment. This cognitive deficit can manifest in a range of impairments from the mildest of symptoms, such as mild attention deficit disorder to severe neurological deterioration. The genetics, etiology, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, therapy options, prognosis, and future prospects are described in this chapter.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Sturge-Weber syndrome
- Port-wine birthmarks
- Glaucoma
- Leptomeningeal angiomatosis
- Activating somatic mutation
- GNAQ
Introduction
Sturge-Weber syndrome occurs in an estimated 1 in every 20,000–50,000 live births, while facial capillary malformations (PWB) occur in 3 in 1000 lives births [1]. It occurs in all ethnic and racial backgrounds and in both males and females. Familial inheritance of SWS has never been documented. Identical twins have been reported in which one twin was affected and the other twin was not [2, 3].
As predicted [4], the cause of SWS was determined to be a somatic mosaic mutation (see Chap. 1). An activating R183Q somatic mosaic mutation in GNAQ was originally reported [5] and accounts for about 90–95% of cases so far studied. Since then other less common GNAQ somatic mutations have been described, and mutations in the paralogue GNA11 have been reported to cause phakomatosis pigmentovascularis and extensive dermal melanocytosis [6] and to much less commonly underlie SWS [7, 8] (see Chap. 1).
GNAQ codes for the protein Gαq [5]. Gαq is an alpha subunit of a heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein that interacts with a subset of seven transmembrane-spanning G protein-coupled receptors. It is known to couple with several GCPRs (including certain serotonin and glutamate receptors, and endothelin-1, angiotensin 2 receptor type I, alpha-1 adrenergic receptors, vasopressin types 1A and 1B) important to vascular development and function. The R183Q SWS mutation is predicted to impair the ability of the guanine nucleotide protein to return to the deactivated state and complex with its GPCR [9]; the mutation therefore likely results in constitutive overactivation of downstream pathways, although any cellular compensatory responses to this hyperactivation are not understood. When mutant constructs were transfected into HEK 293T cells, increased phosphorylated ERK was noted compared to cells transfected with wild-type construct [5]. The downstream effectors of Gαq include p38, ERK, JNK, and Trio [10, 11] which regulate gene expression important in many cell functions, including cell proliferation and differentiation. Studies to date point to the endothelial cells being enriched in the GNAQ mutation [12, 13]; however these results are from cell sorting experiments and depend upon the mutant cells expressing typical cell markers. There is evidence of expression in multiple other cell types as well [14].
Clinical Characteristics
Skin Involvement
Port-wine birthmarks are the most common early identifier of Sturge-Weber syndrome [15, 16]. When a baby is born and has a port-wine birthmark that is on the forehead, temple region, and/or on the upper or lower eyelids [17,18,19] (Fig. 5.1), it is recommended that the infant be checked for Sturge-Weber brain and eye involvement. Depending on whether the birthmark is on one side or both, and how large the birthmark is (larger, segmental birthmark has higher risk), the chance that a child has SWS with a port-wine birthmark varies from 10% to about 50% [1, 20]. At birth the birthmark is flat and red [21] and can be mistaken for a bruise related to birth. Over the next few months, it can fade somewhat to a pink color. A port-wine birthmark grows commensurate with the child and does not spread; it also does not usually resolve without treatment. Soft and bony hypertrophy can develop later in adolescence and adulthood to varying degrees and is associated with larger birthmarks, particularly those affecting the lips and central face [22, 23].
Eye Involvement
Glaucoma, the most common ophthalmologic issue, occurs in 30–70% of SWS patients [15, 21]. The dilation of abnormal venous vessels in the eye contributes to the impaired venous drainage and glaucoma which can cause blindness and pain. Dilation of the venous vessels can cause increased intraocular pressure and, combined with the anterior chamber irregularities, may interfere with the proper draining of the eye [24, 25]. Eye pressure should be monitored in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome beginning at birth, for glaucoma can begin any time, and early treatment may prevent vision loss (see Chap. 47). Treatments include various eye drops to decrease fluid and pressure in the eye, and if this is unsuccessful, then surgical interventions are carried out to improve eye drainage and reduce eye pressure [26]. In addition to glaucoma, patients with choroidal involvement are at risk for retinal detachment, either associated with surgery or as a spontaneous consequence of their eye involvement [27].
Brain Involvement
Patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome often have seizures; they occur in 72–97% of SWS patients [28,29,30]. Most seizures are focal motor seizures and begin in infancy [30] (see Chap. 50). These seizures may be hard for parents to spot, for they don’t generally present as generalized convulsions or fulfill the usual perception of what a seizure is; anticipatory education is therefore helpful. These seizures present as focal rhythmic twitching or tapping, eyes deviated or jerking to a side, or other subtle signs such as staring and twitching of one side of the mouth. Other types of seizures SWS patients tend to have are partial seizures with impaired consciousness or more rarely infantile spasms or drop seizures [31]. Seizures are thought to exacerbate neurological deficits, so aggressive treatment is highly recommended [32]. Seizures can be triggered by everyday factors such as sleep deprivation, illness, or stress but also by migraines or stroke-like episodes. During prolonged or repetitive seizures, there is a significant decrease of blood flow to the side of the brain that’s seizing; this seems to be correlated to worsening of brain function in patients with SWS and probably harms the brain by contributing to strokes and brain atrophy and calcification [32] (see Chap. 4).
The neurological symptoms in Sturge-Weber syndrome such as seizures or migraines can evolve as the patient ages [28, 33, 34]. There is a relationship between seizures and migraines, with seizures triggering migraines and migraines triggering seizures. Another severe neurological symptom is stroke-like episodes [35], which, unlike a Todd’s paralysis after a seizure, lasts days to weeks after an event. Afterward the patient’s weakness may be temporary or permanent; if the hemiparesis is permanent, then the patient is said to have had a stroke, rather than a stroke-like episode. Stroke-like episodes are more common in young children and infants with Sturge-Weber syndrome [36]. Other less obvious impairments can include a visual gaze preference or early handedness.
Chronic functional disability can develop over time. Patients with hemiparesis are of a higher likelihood to have cognitive deficits [37]. Referral for a medical rehabilitation evaluation of the young infant or child is important so that physical, occupational, and speech/language therapy services can be provided if warranted [38, 39]. Around 67% of patients have psychomotor deficits, while 30–50% suffer from mental disability. Common behavioral signs are aggression, depression, and attention deficit disorders [40]. Neuropsychological testing is suggested at the ages of 3–4 years, particularly if they have some degree of hemiparesis, for this evaluation will help bring to light any other impairments not found previously [37]. A recent study in England noted autism spectrum disorder and social impairments to be very common in SWS [41]; it is not clear that this is the case in every population.
Endocrine Involvement
There are hormonal imbalances associated with SW syndrome including growth hormone deficiency [42] and central hypothyroidism [43, 44]. The rate of growth hormone deficiency in patients with SWS, while still low, is 18 times greater than in the general population [42]. While the cause of the deficiency is unknown, nevertheless it is important to make the diagnosis where present as it is treatable. Treatment should be pursued with caution as in some patients it has resulted in seizure relapse [45]. Untreated growth hormone deficiency in adults may result in depression and organ dysfunction; therefore even in adult patients it is important to make the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency and offer treatment where present. Central hypothyroidism is also more prevalent in patients with SWS than in the average population: we noted a 2.4% prevalence at our SWS Center, compared to a 0.0002–0.0005% of the general population [43]. While anticonvulsant medications may contribute to the risk of central hypothyroidism, Sturge-Weber patients are also at additional risk of central hypothyroidism because of the disruptions in their central nervous system, which could cause hypothalamic-pituitary issues. Testing for central hypothyroidism is extremely important and must be done by testing free T4 by equilibrium dialysis method [44], and if patients have low thyroxine hormones, they should be started on levothyroxine. Partial hypopituitarism has also been described; therefore cortisol and estrogen/testosterone levels should also be evaluated where concerns exist [46].
Pathology (See Chap. 4)
Brain involvement in SW syndrome consists of abnormal leptomeningeal vessels (Fig. 5.2) and dilated deep venous vessels, resulting in impaired venous drainage of the brain [47,48,49]. This impaired drainage creates compromised arterial perfusion. Injury to various brain cells can cause the calcification seen in Sturge-Weber patients; this is particularly seen around blood vessels on the cortex [50, 51]. The cortex can be atrophied and numbers of cortical draining vessels are decreased; calcification becomes apparent as the hemisphere atrophies. Therefore, calcification, neuronal loss, and gliosis are also probably secondary to brain injury due to impaired brain perfusion. Cortical dysgenesis has been noted in surgical brain samples [52], including focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type IIa near the region of leptomeningeal angiomatosis, cortical dysplasia, and polymicrogyria [53]. Modestly increased proliferative index within the leptomeningeal blood vessels suggests ongoing vascular remodeling [54]. Increased VEGF expression in cortical neurons and glia underlying the abnormal leptomeningeal vessels and increased VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, HIF-1α, and HIF-2α expression in endothelial cells of the abnormal leptomeningeal vessels suggest that chronic tissue hypoxia and VEGF may drive ongoing vascular remodeling [54]. The Ra-Raf-MEK-ERK pathway can increase both VEGF [55] and HIF activity [54]; therefore the SWS somatic mutation in GNAQ may contribute to the vascular remodeling. Indeed, increased p-ERK expression has been noted in abnormal leptomeningeal vessels of surgical brain samples from patients with SWS [56].
Diagnosis
Sturge-Weber syndrome is a spectrum disorder ranging from brain involvement alone to skin involvement only; the full presentation consists of typical brain, skin, and eye involvement; however individuals on the spectrum can include those who have only brain and skin involvement or those who have only skin and eye involvement. The precise manifestation of the spectrum likely depends on when in fetal development the somatic mutation occurs. Diagnosis of a SWS port-wine birthmark is usually straightforward; it is present at birth, unlike a hemangioma, and is usually off midline, unlike a nevus flammeus nuchae (angel’s kiss, stork bite) birthmark. On occasion the port-wine birthmark is located midline forehead, and this has been associated with more severe neurologic prognosis [57]; it is differentiated in this case from the nevus flammeus nuchae by not being associated with symmetric upper eyelid involvement typically seen with the other benign birthmark. Occasionally the diagnosis is unclear and requires the input of a dermatologist or expert.
Diagnosis of Sturge-Weber syndrome brain involvement is made by MRI with and without contrast (Fig. 5.3); post-contrast flair [58] and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) [59] and quantitative ADC analysis [60] can help increase the sensitivity of the imaging, yet MRI can have low sensitivity in early infancy or under the age of 1 [17]. Contrast is required to reveal the leptomeningeal angiomatosis, atrophy may be seen if injury has occurred, and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) may demonstrate an increase in abnormal deep draining vessels. Calcification is best demonstrated on CT [61] (Fig. 5.4) but may also be seen on MRI if extensive (see Chap. 3). A scan that is negative for SWS brain involvement in an infant under the age of 1 does not rule out the possibility that the child has Sturge-Weber; a study demonstrated that early MRI only has a sensitivity of about 25% [17]. Imaging should be repeated after a year of age both to exclude brain involvement and, if the brain is involved, to determine the full extent of brain involvement. Other evaluations which can be helpful in the first year of life include a careful history, repeated exams, EEG looking for slowing, decreased amplitude, frequent sharps or spikes [62], and quantitative EEG evaluating [16] for a decrease in power on the affected side (see Chap. 50). Examinations should be performed as soon as possible after birth to evaluate for eye involvement and glaucoma risk and should be repeated every few months for the first few years of life and then at least yearly thereafter.
Indications for DNA testing are evolving. The most common genotype in published cases is R183Q GNAQ [63]; however the phenotype spectrum has been reported with other mutations in GNAQ [6, 63] and with GNA11 mutations [7, 8]. Capillary malformation and glaucoma can also be seen with PIK3CA mutations [64]. These other mutations can have implications for tumor risk, tissue overgrowth, and other vascular anomalies. Genetic testing can begin with blood particularly in patients with multiple birthmarks; however frequently skin or other abnormal tissue is required for testing; this situation does not lend itself to prenatal testing. Since the same mutation is found in both, DNA testing of skin tissue from the port-wine birthmark will not distinguish an infant with an isolated birthmark from one who has SWS brain and/or eye involvement (see Chap. 1).
Therapy
The gold standard treatment for port-wine birthmarks is flashlamp-pumped pulse dye laser treatment, often in combination with other older laser technologies. This will often lighten the birthmark and may also reduce the effects of physical impairments from the birthmark, as well as the risk of hypertrophy. It is recommended that treatments begin in infancy as the birthmark responds best to treatment while still flat and pink and small infants tolerate the treatments well without the need for general anesthesia [65, 66]. Six to 12 treatments are generally required to maximally lighten the port-wine birthmark, periodic maintenance treatments are usually required, and some birthmarks are resistant to laser treatment. Most birthmarks are not fully cleared with current treatment. Treatments, although brief, are painful, and the question of how best to manage this aspect ranges from topical anesthetics to oral sedation and to treatments done under anesthesia; the ethics of this are controversial. As a result, new treatment approaches are being researched and developed including topical and oral anti-angiogenesis treatments currently being studied in combination with laser treatment [67], and current practice emphasizes early, frequent treatment which usually obtains good results [65, 66] (see Chap. 50).
The goal of glaucoma treatment is control of intraocular pressure (IOP) to prevent optic nerve injury. This can sometimes be achieved with the following agents: beta-antagonist eye drops and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors which are both used to decrease the production of aqueous fluid and adrenergic eye drops and miotic eye drops which are used to promote drainage of aqueous fluid from the eye and thereby reduce eye pressure. However, for some patients surgery may be needed to reduce the eye pressure. There are many different types of surgeries which can be applied including goniotomy, trabeculotomy, trabeculectomy, and argon laser trabeculoplasty [68,69,70] (see Chap. 47). Choroidal involvement can lead to retinal detachment, which if symptomatic may be treated with photodynamic therapy or external beam radiotherapy [71].
The primary treatment for seizures in Sturge-Weber syndrome comprises the use of anticonvulsants [72] (see Chap. 50). These medications provide seizure control in about 50% of patients [73, 74]. However, if treatment with different anticonvulsants has been found unsuccessful, a patient may require surgery. First-line anticonvulsants, typically oxcarbazepine and levetiracetam [72], should be given aggressively at the first focal seizure. Other commonly used anticonvulsants include topiramate, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine [72]. These may be added if a single treatment has been unsuccessful. After a patient with Sturge-Weber has passed 3 months of age, parents are instructed to give rectal diazepam to abort seizures lasting longer than 3–5 min or clusters of seizures [45] (see Chap. 50).
Low-dose aspirin is becoming more accepted and used in the treatment of SWS but remains controversial, and further studies are needed. In a recent investigation of 58 patients with brain involvement, 49 children (84%) had no significant side effects to the aspirin. Six of the nine patients who reported side effects had minor complications [75]. Also, according to an online survey, low-dose aspirin significantly decreased the frequency of stroke-like episodes and seizures [76]. This corresponds with Udani’s results of fewer seizures and stroke-like episodes of six SWS patients after starting low-dose aspirin [77] and Maria’s data of 14 patients, 65% of which had reduced stroke-like episodes on low-dose aspirin [61]. The modified Atkins diet and the ketogenic diet are also prescribed to patients with SWS to help prevent seizures. This diet consists of low daily carbohydrates but calls for high-protein and high (unsaturated)-fat foods. The modified Atkins diet is much less restrictive than the ketogenic diet, which also regulates calories and fluids. These diets are successful in around 50% of subjects with SWS [78] but are very difficult to maintain except in infants.
Hemispherectomies and focal brain resections are surgical options for many patients with unilateral Sturge-Weber syndrome. Candidates for surgery are the patients who have tried multiple anticonvulsants (and often low-dose aspirin), been on treatment for 6 months prior to surgery, don’t have bilateral brain involvement, and have frequent seizures and classical SWS symptoms. It may yield more successful results to perform the hemispherectomy earlier on in childhood, but this is controversial and not all studies bear out this hypothesis [79,80,81,82]; surgery under a year of age increases the risk of inappropriately attempting surgery in a patient thought to be unilaterally involved, but who in fact is bilaterally involved and may have a higher risk of morbidity (see Chap. 48). Hemispherectomies are riskier, but more patients have fewer seizures after this type of surgery than with focal resection surgery. One study of 32 hemispherectomies performed worldwide found that 81% of subjects didn’t have a decline in their motor function and were without seizures [81]. For unilaterally involved patients, surgery should be considered for those who have failed two or more anticonvulsants combined with low-dose aspirin [80, 81]. The decision to proceed with surgery is easier in those patients who also have hemiparesis and a significant visual field deficit in addition to impairing, medically refractory seizures. Surgery should also be seriously considered in patients whose cognitive development is progressively falling behind normal. The extensively bilaterally affected child with Sturge-Weber syndrome and severe brain involvement has the highest risk of very poor neurologic and cognitive outcome. For these infants, very aggressive treatment with anticonvulsants and low-dose aspirin is warranted. Hemispherectomy has only been recommended in bilaterally affected children with very severe disabling seizures primarily coming from one hemisphere, and the surgery is considered palliative rather than potentially curative [83] (see Chap. 48).
Headaches frequently start at an early age in patients with SWS and can be very severe. Headaches frequently happen along with seizures; other triggers include minor blows to the head [84]. Medications such as topiramate, gabapentin, and valproate may provide both seizure and migraine prevention. Migraine treatment can be an essential part of seizure management since migraines can trigger seizures [33]. Over-the-counter anti-inflammatory medications and triptans are common abortive migraine medications helpful to these patients [33]. The greater cognitive impairment a child has, the higher likelihood of behavioral problems. Stimulants may be used to treat attention deficit disorders with high success in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome [85]. Individualized or special educational classes or programs can also be beneficial, along with behavioral psychology therapy.
Prognosis
There is an extremely wide range of outcomes in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Predictive variables include their age of onset and controllability of seizures and unilateral vs. bilateral brain involvement. Genetic predisposition to seizures, strokes, and migraines likely plays an important, though undefined, role as well; a family history of epilepsy is associated with early onset of seizures in SWS [86], which in turn is associated with worse neurologic outcome. Therefore, each patient is unique and prognosis is difficult to predict. Sturge-Weber syndrome is progressive, in the usual sense, in some, but not in all, patients. Some patients can attend regular mainstream schooling, and some receive extra assistance in school; many of these patients are able to move on to higher education and can complete college and beyond. Other patients require special education services, while a subset are trainable or require full care. Many patients with SWS receive some sort of school accommodation. Some patients live with their parents and families of origin into adulthood, while others can live independently and start families of their own. Need for assistance with transportation is common because of epilepsy and vision issues.
Recent Treatment Trials and Future Prospects
It is to be hoped that with the discovery of the underlying somatic mosaic mutation and a new understanding of the pathogenesis of Sturge-Weber syndrome in the not too distant future, target treatment options will become available which will effectively treat the vascular basis of SWS and effectively alleviate its neurologic, ophthalmologic, dermatologic, and endocrine manifestations. Early progress has been made recently in the publication of the first prospective treatment trials of Sturge-Weber syndrome which have pioneered the application of several outcome measures and suggested the usefulness of cannabidiol (Epidiolex) [87] and rapamycin (mTOR inhibitor/sirolimus) [88] for the neurologic treatment of Sturge-Weber syndrome. Furthermore, because seizures exacerbate blood flow impairments in SW syndrome and increase the risk of venous hypertension, stroke, and brain injury particularly in infants and young children, presymptomatic treatment (prior to the onset of seizures) is gradually being evaluated [89,90,91].
References
Tallman B, Tan OT, Morelli JG, et al. Location of port-wine stains and the likelihood of ophthalmic and/or central nervous system complications. Pediatrics. 1991;87:323–32.
Pedailles S, Martin N, Launay V, et al. [Sturge-Weber-Krabbe syndrome. A severe form in a monozygote female twin]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1993;120:379–82.
Panteliadis CP, Benjamin R, Cremer H-J, et al., editors. Neurocutaneous disorders—haemangiomas—a clinical and diagnostic approach. London: Anshan; 2007.
Happle R. Lethal genes surviving by mosaicism: a possible explanation for sporadic birth defects involving the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;16:899–906.
Shirley MD, Tang H, Gallione CJ, et al. Sturge-Weber syndrome and port-wine stains caused by somatic mutation in GNAQ. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1971–9.
Thomas AC, Zeng Z, Rivière JB, et al. Mosaic activating mutations in GNA11 and GNAQ are associated with phakomatosis pigmentovascularis and extensive dermal melanocytosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136:770–8.
Polubothu S, Al-Olabi L, Carmen Del Boente M, et al. GNA11 mutation as a cause of Sturge-Weber syndrome: expansion of the phenotypic spectrum of G(α/11) mosaicism and the associated clinical diagnoses. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140:1110–3.
Thorpe J, Frelin LP, McCann M, et al. Identification of a mosaic activating mutation in GNA11 in atypical Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141:685–8.
Martins L, Giovani PA, Rebouças PD, et al. Computational analysis for GNAQ mutations: new insights on the molecular etiology of Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Mol Graph Model. 2017;76:429–40.
Nance MR, Kreutz B, Tesmer VM, et al. Structural and functional analysis of the regulator of G protein signaling 2-galphaq complex. Structure. 2013;21:438–48.
Vaque JP, Dorsam RT, Feng X, et al. A genome-wide RNAi screen reveals a Trio-regulated Rho GTPase circuitry transducing mitogenic signals initiated by G protein-coupled receptors. Mol Cell. 2013;9:94–108.
Couto JA, Huang L, Vivero MP, et al. Endothelial cells from capillary malformations are enriched for somatic GNAQ mutations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(1):77e–82e.
Huang L, Couto JA, Pinto A, et al. Somatic GNAQ mutation is enriched in brain endothelial cells in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2017;67:59–63.
Tan W, Nadora DM, Gao L, et al. The somatic GNAQ mutation (R183Q) is primarily located within the blood vessels of port wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:380–3.
Enjolras O, RicheM C, Merland JJ. Facial port-wine stains and Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatrics. 1985;76:48–51.
Ewen JB, Kossoff EH, Crone NE, et al. Use of quantitative EEG in infants with port-wine birthmark to assess for Sturge-Weber brain involvement. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1433–40.
Zallmann M, Mackay MT, Leventer RT, et al. Retrospective review of screening for Sturge-Weber syndrome with brain magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography in infants with high-risk port-wine stains. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018;35(5):575–81.
Boos MD, Bozarth XL, Sidbury R, et al. Forehead location and large segmental pattern of facial port-wine stains predict risk of Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;3:1110–7.
Ha A, Kim JS, Baek SU, et al. Facial port-wine stain phenotypes associated with glaucoma risk in neonates. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;220:183–90.
Dutkiewicz AS, Ezzedine K, Mazereeuw-Hautier J, et al. A prospective study of risk for Sturge-Weber syndrome in children with upper facial port-wine stain. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:473–80.
Piram M, Lorette G, Sirinelli D, et al. Sturge-Weber syndrome in patients with facial port-wine stain. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012;29:32–7.
Greene AK, Taber SF, Ball KL, et al. Sturge-Weber syndrome: soft-tissue and skeletal overgrowth. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(Suppl 1):617–21.
Irving ND, Lim JH, Cohen B, Ferenc LM, Comi AM. Sturge-Weber syndrome: ear, nose, and throat issues and neurologic status. Pediatr Neurol. 2010;43:241–4.
Ikeda N, Ikeda T, Nagata M, Mimura O. Ciliochoroidal effusion syndrome secondary to Sturge-Weber syndrome. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003;47:233–4.
Arora KS, Quigley HA, Comi AM, et al. Increased choroidal thickness in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:1216–9.
Karaconji T, Ting ER, Zagora SL, et al. Surgical treatment for SWS glaucoma: experience from a tertiary referral pediatric hospital. J Glaucoma. 2020;29:1132–7.
Chiou CA, Gragoudas E. Retinal detachment in a 40-year-old man with Sturge-Weber syndrome. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(5):581–2.
Bebin EM, Gomez MR. Prognosis in Sturge-Weber disease: comparison of unihemispheric and bihemispheric involvement. J Child Neurol. 1988;3(3):181–4.
Sujansky E, Conradi S. Outcome of Sturge-Weber syndrome in 52 adults. Am J Med Genet. 1995;57:35–45.
Sujansky E, Conradi S. Sturge-Weber syndrome: age of onset of seizures and glaucoma and the prognosis for affected children. J Child Neurol. 1995;10:49–58.
Ewen JB, Comi AM, Kossoff EH. Myoclonic-astatic epilepsy in a child with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2007;36:115–7.
Namer IJ, Battaglia F, Hirsch E, et al. Subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI (SISCOM) in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Clin Nucl Med. 2005;30:39–40.
KossoffE H, Balasta M, HatfieldL M, et al. Self-reported treatment patterns in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome and migraines. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:720–6.
Zolkipli Z, Aylett S, Rankin PM, Neville BG. Transient exacerbation of hemiplegia following minor head trauma in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:697–9.
Maria BL, Neufeld JA, RosainzL C, et al. High prevalence of bihemispheric structural and functional defects in Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Child Neurol. 1998;13:595–605.
Tillmann RP, Ray K, Aylett SE. Transient episodes of hemiparesis in Sturge Weber syndrome—causes, incidence and recovery. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2020;25:90–6.
Reesman J, Gray R, Suskauer SJ, et al. Hemiparesis is a clinical correlate of general adaptive dysfunction in children and adolescents with Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2009;24:701–8.
Suskauer SJ, Trovato MK, Zabel TA, Comi AM. Physiatric findings in individuals with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89:323–30.
Zabel TA, Reesman J, Wodka EL, et al. Neuropsychological features and risk factors in children with Sturge-Weber syndrome: four case reports. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;24:841–9.
Turin E, Grados MA, Tierney E, et al. Behavioral and psychiatric features of Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010;198:905–13.
Gittins S, Steel D, Brunklaus A, et al. Autism spectrum disorder, social communication difficulties, and developmental comorbidities in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;88:1–4.
Miller RS, Ball KL, Comi AM, Germain-Lee EL. Growth hormone deficiency in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:340–1.
Comi AM, Bellamkonda S, Ferenc LM, et al. Central hypothyroidism and Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2008;39:58–62.
Siddique L, Sreenivasan A, Comi AM, Germain-Lee EL. Importance of utilizing a sensitive free thyroxine assay in Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2013;28:269–74.
Comi AM. Presentation, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment of the neurological features of Sturge-Weber syndrome. Neurologist. 2011;17(4):179–84.
Bachur CD, Comi AM, Germain-Lee EL. Partial hypopituitarism in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;3:e5–6.
Di Trapani G, Di Rocco C, Abbamondi AL, et al. Light microscopy and ultrastructural studies of Sturge-Weber disease. Childs Brain. 1982;9:23–36.
Lin DD, Barker PB, Hatfield LA, Comi AM. Dynamic MR perfusion and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in Sturge-Weber syndrome: correlation with neurological symptoms. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;4:274–81.
Okudaira Y, Arai H, Sato K. Hemodynamic compromise as a factor in clinical progression of Sturge-Weber syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. 1997;13:214–9.
Bye AM, Andermann F, Robitaille Y, et al. Cortical vascular abnormalities in the syndrome of celiac disease, epilepsy, bilateral occipital calcifications, and folate deficiency. Ann Neurol. 1993;34:399–403.
Guseo A. Ultrastructure of calcification in Sturge-Weber disease. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1975;366:353–6.
Murakami N, Morioka T, Suzuki SO, et al. Focal cortical dysplasia type IIa underlying epileptogenesis in patients with epilepsy associated with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Epilepsia. 2012;53:e184–e8.
Wang DD, Blümcke I, Coras R, et al. Sturge-Weber syndrome is associated with cortical dysplasia ILAE Type IIIc and excessive hypertrophic pyramidal neurons in brain resections for intractable epilepsy. Brain Pathol. 2015;25:248–55.
Comati A, Beck H, Halliday W, et al. Upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha and HIF-2alpha in leptomeningeal vascular malformations of Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007;66:86–97.
Sun Y, Jin K, Xie L, et al. VEGF-induced neuroprotection, neurogenesis, and angiogenesis after focal cerebral ischemia. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1843–51.
Wellman RJ, Cho SB, Singh P, et al. Galphaq and hyper-phosphorylated ERK expression in Sturge-Weber syndrome leptomeningeal blood vessel endothelial cells. Vasc Med. 2019;24:72–5.
Dymerska M, Kirkorian AY, Offermann EA, et al. Size of facial port-wine birthmark may predict neurologic outcome in Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Pediatr. 2017;188:205–209.e201.
Griffiths PD, Coley SC, Romanowski CA, et al. Contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging for leptomeningeal disease in children. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:719–23.
Hu J, Yu Y, Juhasz C, et al. MR susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) complements conventional contrast enhanced T1 weighted MRI in characterizing brain abnormalities of Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:300–7.
Pinto AL, Ou RY, Sahin M, Grant PE. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient mapping may predict seizure onset in children with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2018;84:32–8.
Maria BL, Neufeld JA, Rosainz LC, et al. Central nervous system structure and function in Sturge-Weber syndrome: evidence of neurologic and radiologic progression. J Child Neurol. 1998;13:606–18.
Kossoff EH, Bachur CD, Quain AM, et al. EEG evolution in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Epilepsy Res. 2014;108:816–9.
Nakashima M, Miyajima M, Sugano H, et al. The somatic GNAQ mutation c.548G>A (p.R183Q) is consistently found in Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Hum Genet. 2014;59:691–3.
Abdolrahimzadeh S, Scavella V, Felli L, et al. Ophthalmic alterations in the Sturge-Weber syndrome, Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome, and the phakomatosis pigmentovascularis: an independent group of conditions? Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:786519.
Chapas AM, Eickhorst K, Geronemus RG. Efficacy of early treatment of facial port-wine stains in newborns: a review of 49 cases. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39:563–8.
Jeon H, Bernstein LJ, Belkin DA, et al. Pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stains in infancy without the need for general anesthesia. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:435–41.
Chen JK, Ghasri P, Aguilar G, et al. An overview of clinical and experimental treatment modalities for port-wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:289–304.
Budenz DL, Sakamoto D, Eliezer R, et al. Two-staged Baerveldt glaucoma implant for childhood glaucoma associated with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2000;07:2105–10.
Patrianakos TD, Nagao K, Walton DS. Surgical management of glaucoma with the sturge weber syndrome. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2008;48:63–8.
Rebolleda G, Munoz-Negrete FJ. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy for Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2152–3.
Randon M, Lévy-Gabriel C, Abbas R, et al. Results of external beam radiotherapy for diffuse choroidal hemangiomas in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Eye (Lond). 2018;32:1067–73.
Smegal LF, Sebold AJ, Hammill AM, et al. Multicenter research data of epilepsy management in patients with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;119:3–10.
Kramer U, Kahana E, Shorer Z, et al. Outcome of infants with unilateral Sturge-Weber syndrome and early onset seizures. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42:756–9.
Kossoff EH, Ferenc L, Comi AM. An infantile-onset, severe, yet sporadic seizure pattern is common in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Epilepsia. 2009;50:2154–7.
Lance EI, Sreenivasan AK, Zabel TA, et al. Aspirin use in Sturge-Weber syndrome: side effects and clinical outcomes. J Child Neurol. 2013;28:213–8.
Bay MJ, Kossoff EH, Lehmann CU, Zabel TA, Comi AM. Survey of aspirin use in Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2011;26:692–702.
Udani V, Pujar S, Munot P, Maheshwari S, Mehta N. Natural history and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up in 9 Sturge-Weber syndrome patients and clinical correlation. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:479–83.
Kossoff EH, Borsage JL, Comi AM. A pilot study of the modified Atkins diet for Sturge-Weber syndrome. Epilepsy Res. 2010;92:240–3.
Hoffman HJ, Hendrick EB, Dennis M, Armstrong D. Hemispherectomy for Sturge-Weber syndrome. Childs Brain. 1979;5(3):233–48.
Arzimanoglou AA, Andermann F, Aicardi J, et al. Sturge-Weber syndrome: indications and results of surgery in 20 patients. Neurology. 2000;55:1472–9.
Kossoff EH, Buck C, Freeman JM. Outcomes of 32 hemispherectomies for Sturge-Weber syndrome worldwide. Neurology. 2002;59:1735–8.
Maton B, Krsek P, Jayakar P, et al. Medically intractable epilepsy in Sturge-Weber syndrome is associated with cortical malformation: implications for surgical therapy. Epilepsia. 2010;51:257–67.
TuxhornI E, PannekH W. Epilepsy surgery in bilateral Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2002;26:394–7.
Arkush L, Prabhakar P, Scott RC, et al. Headache in children with Sturge-Weber syndrome—prevalence, associations and impact. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2020;27:43–8.
Lance EI, Lanier KE, Zabel TA, Comi AM. Stimulant use in patients with sturge-weber syndrome: safety and efficacy. Pediatr Neurol. 2014;51:675–80.
Day AM, McCulloch CE, Hammill AM, et al. Physical and family history variables associated with neurological and cognitive development in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2019;96:30–6.
Kaplan EH, Offermann EA, Sievers JW, Comi AM. Cannabidiol treatment for refractory seizures in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2017;71:18–23.e12.
Sebold AJ, Day AM, Ewen J, et al. Sirolimus treatment in Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 2020;115:29–40.
Day AM, Hammill AM, Juhász C, et al. Hypothesis: presymptomatic treatment of Sturge-Weber syndrome with aspirin and antiepileptic drugs may delay seizure onset. Pediatr Neurol. 2019;90:8–12.
Bar C, Pedespan JM, Boccara O, et al. Early magnetic resonance imaging to detect presymptomatic leptomeningeal angioma in children with suspected Sturge-Weber syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62:227–33.
Sun B, Han T, Wang Y, et al. Sirolimus as a potential treatment for Sturge-Weber syndrome. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32:257–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Comi, A.M. (2022). Sturge-Weber Syndrome. In: Panteliadis, C.P., Benjamin, R., Hagel, C. (eds) Neurocutaneous Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87893-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87893-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87892-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87893-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)