Skip to main content

Patient Involvement in Health Care: Conceptualisation, Measurement, Uptake and Future Improvement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Justice over the Course of Life
  • 150 Accesses

Abstract

The topic of patient involvement (PI) is gaining increasing importance in health services research, health policy and service delivery (Mockford et al. 2012). In the US, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) was established three years ago specifically to bolster research focusing more on patients’ needs. PCORI funded research requires patients and other stakeholders to be involved in all phases of the study (Selby and Lipstein 2014). In the UK, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) funded research is not as prescriptive but does require applicants to describe in detail how patients are involved in different stages of research and implementation, a recommendation shared by the American Hospital Association (American Hospital Association 2005). At EU level, the Council of the European Union emphasizes the need for health care to become more patient centred and strengthen the involvement, in particular, of chronically ill patients (Council of the European Commission 2010). The Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research, a newly established partnership of academic institutions and health services providers in the UK that aim at identifying new ways of service provision and bringing new evidence faster into practice, too, emphasize the importance of PI (Renedo et al. 2014).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2004. Literacy and health outcomes. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Hospital Association (AHA). 2005. Patient- and Family-Centred Care: A Hospital Self-Assessment Inventory. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balik, B., J. Conway, L. Zipperer, and J. Watson. 2011. Achieving an Exceptional Patient and Family Experience of Inpatient Hospital Care. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA.: Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Balint, E. 1969. The possibilities of patient-centred medicine. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 17: 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 2004. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education and Behavior 31 (2): 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, D. M. 2009. What ‘Patient-Centered’ Should Mean: Confessions Of An Extremist. Health Affairs 28 (4): https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w555.

  • Boivin, A., K. Currie, B. Fervers, J. Graica, M. James, C. Marshall, C. Sakala, S. Sanger, J. Strid, V. Thomas, T. van der Weijden, R. Grol, J. Burgers, and G-I-N Public. 2010. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Quality and Safety in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.034835.

  • Boyer, L., P. Francois, E. Doutre, G. Weil, and J. Labarere. 2006. Perception and use of the results of patient satisfaction surveys by care providers in a French teaching hospital. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 18: 359–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Campen, C., H. Sixma, R. D. Friele, J. J. Kerssens, and L. Peters. 1995. Quality of care and patient satisfaction: a review of measuring instruments. Medical Care Research and Review 52 (1): 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. 2008. Patients and families: powerful new partners for healthcare and caregivers. Healthcare Executive 23 (1): 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, A., and J. Ellins. 2007. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. British Medical Journal 335: 24–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, A., and C. Jenkinson. 2005. European patients’ views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. European Journal of Public Health 15 (4): 355–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of European Commission. 2010. Innovative approaches for chronic diseases in public health and healthcare systems. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/lsa/118282.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2021.

  • Crawford, M. J., D. Rutter, C. Manley, T. Weaver, K. Bhui, N. Fulop, and P. Tyrer. 2002. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. British Medical Journal 325: 1263–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, E., and P. D. Cleary. 2005. Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement. Quality and Safety in Health Care 14 (6): 428–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. E., M. Koutantji, and C. A. Vincent. 2008. How willing are patients to question healthcare staff on issues related to the quality and safety of their healthcare? An exploratory study. Quality and Safety in Health Care 17 (2): 90–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (DH) 2008. High quality care for all: NHS Next Stage Review final report. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. L. 1977. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 196: 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, N., C. D. Wolfe, and C. McKevitt. 2008. Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study. British Medical Journal 336: 313–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerteis, M., S. Edgman-Levitan, J. Daley, and T. L. Delbanco (eds). 1993. Through the Patient's Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groene, O., K. Lombarts, N. Klazinga, J. Alonso, A. Thompson, and R. Suñol. 2009. Is patient-centredness in European hospitals related to existing quality improvement strategies: analysis of a cross-sectional survey (MARQuIS Project). Quality and Safety in Health Care 18: i44–i50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groene O, Klazinga N, Wagner C, Arah OA, Thompson A, Bruneau C, Suþol R. 2010. Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe Research Project. Investigating organizational quality improvement systems, patient empowerment, organizational culture, professional involvement and the quality of care in European hospitals: the 'Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE)' project. BMC Health Serv Res. Sep 24;10:281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-281.

  • Han, E., S. H. Scholl, S. Morton, C. Bechte, and R. Kessler. 2013. Survey Shows That Fewer Than A Third Of Patient-Centered Medical Home Practices Engage Patients In Quality Improvement. Health Affairs 32 (2): 368–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, J. H., E. R. Mahoney, J. Stockard, and M. Tusler. 2005. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Services Research 40: 1918–1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildon, Z., D. Allwood, and N. Black. 2012. Impact of format and content of visual display of data on comprehension, choice and preference: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 24 (1): 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Patient and Family Centred Care (IPFCC). 2009. Developing and Sustaining a Patient and Family Advisory Council. Washington (D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (D.C.): National Academies Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. 2000. Toward better research on stress and coping. American Psychologist 55 (6): 665–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, W., A. Kao, A. Kuby, and R. A. Thisted. 2005. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20 (6): 531–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, S. A., Z. C. Skea, V. A. Entwistle, M. Zwarenstein, and J. Dick. 2001. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4): CD003267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkus, I. M., G. Samsa, and B. K. Rimer. 2001. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making 21: 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorig, K. R., P. L. Ritter, A. Dost, K. Plant, D. D. Laurent, and I. McNeil. 2008. The Expert Patients Programme online, a 1-year study of an Internet-based self-management programme for people with long-term conditions. Chronic Illness 4 (4): 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luxford, K., D. G. Safran, and T. Delbanco. 2011. Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience. International Journal of Quality in Health Care 23 (5): 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, E. N. 2006. The silent epidemic – the health effects of illiteracy. The New England Journal of Medicine 355 (4): 339–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. 2013. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. Chaired by Robert Francis QC. Executive summary. London: The Stationery Office. http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/sites/default/files/report/Executive%20summary.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2021.

  • Mockford, C., S. Staniszewska, F. Griffiths, and S. Herron-Marx. 2012. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. International Journal of Quality in Health Care 24 (1): 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, E., J. Hibbard, P. Slovic, and N. Dieckmann. 2007. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Affairs (Millwood) 26 (3): 741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, H. 2004. Organisationsentwicklung und Organisationslernen im Krankenhaus [Organisational development and organisational learning in hospitals]. In Gesundheitsökonomie, Qualitätsmanagement und Evidence-based Medicine. Eine systematische Einführung [Health economics, quality management and evidence-based medicine. A systematic introduction](in German), eds. K. Lauterbach, and M. Schrappe, pp. 328–334. Stuttgart, New York: Schattauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., and C. C. DiClemente. 1983. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 51: 390–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renedo, A., C. A. Marston, D. Spyrindonidis, and J. Barlow. 2014. Patient and public involvement in health care quality improvement: How organizations can help patients and professionals to collaborate. Public Management Review 17 (1): 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.881535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D., and S. Larson. 2002. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Education and Counseling 46 (4): 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, C., R. Osborn, P.T. Huynh, M. Doty, K. Zapert, J. Peugh, and K. Davis. 2005. Taking the pulse of health care systems: experiences of patients with health problems in six countries. Health Affairs (Milwood): W5–509–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secanell, M., O. Groene, O. A. Arah, M. A. Lopez, B. Kutryba, H. Pfaff, N. Klazinga, C. Wagner, S. Kristensen, P. D. Bartels, P. Garel, C. Bruneau, A. Escoval, M. França, N. Mora, R. Suñol, and DUQuE Project Consortium. 2014. Deepening our understanding of quality improvement in Europe (DUQuE): overview of a study of hospital quality management in seven countries. International Journal of Quality in Health Care 26 (1): 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selby, J. V., and S. H. Lipstein. 2014. PCORI at 3 Years — Progress, Lessons, and Plans. The New England Journal of Medicine 370: 592–595. doi:370:592-595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiner, D. L., and G. R. Norman. 2003. Health measurement scales. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R., and R. H. Thaler. 2003. Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review 70: 1159–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. G. H. 2007. The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy. Social Science and Medicine 64: 1297–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, C., M. Khanji, P. E. Cotter, O. Dunne, and S. T. O'Keeffe. 2008. Preferences of acutely ill patients for participation in medical decision-making. Quality and Safety in Health Care 17 (2): 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, S., M. Storm, K. Aase, M. T. Gjestsen, M. Solheim, S. Harthug, G. Robert, N. Fulop, and QUASER team. 2013. Investigating the use of patient involvement and patient experience in quality improvement in Norway: rhetoric or reality? BMC Health Services Research 13: 206.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). 2011. Patients for Patient Safety – How patient engagement became a priority. Geneva http://www.who.int/patientsafety/patients_for_patient/PFPS_brochure_2013.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Gröne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gröne, O. (2022). Patient Involvement in Health Care: Conceptualisation, Measurement, Uptake and Future Improvement. In: Schmitz-Luhn, B., Woopen, C. (eds) Justice over the Course of Life. Schriften zu Gesundheit und Gesellschaft - Studies on Health and Society, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86449-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86449-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86448-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86449-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics