Skip to main content

Evaluating the Consistency Indices of Pairwise Comparisons Based on Fuzzy Evaluations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques for Emerging Conditions and Digital Transformation (INFUS 2021)

Abstract

Consistency studies are an important step in making correct evaluations in the decision-making process. Consistency is a measure value that reflects whether pairwise comparison operations are done correctly. Evaluation tools used by decision makers in pairwise comparison evaluations are of great importance in achieving consistency. Crisp scales restrict decision makers’ ability to make pairwise evaluations and also remain incapable to reflect their opinions. Fuzzy scales, which give decision makers the opportunity to make a more comfortable assessment, are used as an important tool in reflecting pairwise comparisons more accurately. The success of commonly used fuzzy evaluation scales in pairwise comparison is examined in the study. Fuzzy and crisp evaluation scales are compared using different inconsistency indices, and the most appropriate scale for pairwise comparisons is determined. The study attempts to demonstrate the help of fuzzy judgements in expressing uncertainties for pairwise comparisons. The results show that the use of fuzzy terms based on linguistic expressions in the decision-making process allows decision-makers to make a more comfortable and easy evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B., Sarı, İU., Turanoğlu, E.: Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowl.-Based Syst. 59, 48–57 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, Y., Eckert, C.M., Earl, C.: A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Syst. Appl. 161, 113738 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brunelli, M.: A survey of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 47, 751–771 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Alonso, J.A., Lamata, M.T.: Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 14, 445–459 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liao, H., Xu, Z., Zeng, X.-J.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23, 1343–1355 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kahraman, C., Onar, S.C., Oztaysi, B.: Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 8, 637–666 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1, 83–98 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crawford, G.B.: The geometric mean procedure for estimating the scale of a judgement matrix. Math. Model. 9, 327–334 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saaty, T.L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15, 234–281 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Uygun, Ö., Kaçamak, H., Kahraman, Ü.A.: An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techniques for evaluation and selection of outsourcing provider for a telecommunication company. Comput. Ind. Eng. 86, 137–146 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendel, J.M., John, R.B.: Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10, 117–127 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Büyüközkan, G., Göçer, F., Karabulut, Y.: A new group decision making approach with IF AHP and IF VIKOR for selecting hazardous waste carriers. Measurement 134, 66–82 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ding, X.-F., Liu, H.-C., Shi, H.: A dynamic approach for emergency decision making based on prospect theory with interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic variables. Comput. Ind. Eng. 131, 57–65 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Du, Y., Hou, F., Zafar, W., Yu, Q., Zhai, Y.: A novel method for multiattribute decision making with interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic information. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 32, 1085–1112 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ayhan, M.B., Kilic, H.S.: A two stage approach for supplier selection problem in multi-item/multi-supplier environment with quantity discounts. Comput. Ind. Eng. 85, 1–12 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kar, A.K.: A hybrid group decision support system for supplier selection using analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy set theory and neural network. J. Computat. Sci. 6, 23–33 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., Gold, S.: Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195, 106–117 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veysel Çoban .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Çoban, V., Kahraman, C. (2022). Evaluating the Consistency Indices of Pairwise Comparisons Based on Fuzzy Evaluations. In: Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Tolga, A.C., Sari, I.U. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques for Emerging Conditions and Digital Transformation. INFUS 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 307. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85626-7_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics