Skip to main content

Freaks and Not Freaks: Theatre and the Making of Crip Identity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analysing Gender in Performance
  • 430 Accesses

Abstract

On some level it seems obvious that some disabled actors will want to explore the history of freak show performances. To replicate a performance form that neither performer nor audience has experienced has the frisson of a historical re-enactment. Somewhere, people who looked like you were stared at as freaks by the audience. What would that have been like? For the freaks? For the spectator? This essay is an attempt to engage with the multiple possibilities of engagement and identity that are bound up in the idea of freak shows, acting and spectatorship.

From their earliest days, UK based Graeae Theatre Company, artistically led by disabled people, have explored and used freak show images: their first piece, Sideshow, played wittily and angrily with the ways in which disabled people are enfreaked in their everyday lives. A later piece, The Last Freak Show engages with disability as a performance tradition. Disability theatre has developed a relationship with the freak show, and this has been explored in many performances in the UK and the USA. The freak show has also been used theatrically outside the boundaries of disability theatre, and the essay looks at Tennessee Williams’s atmospheric freak show play The Mutilated (1965) to explore the possibilities of the connections between theatre, stigma, and the proto-crip identity.

The freak show is cited and quoted in the work of disabled performers, and this essay considers the uses of the cultural trope of the freak show in disability theatre. It considers the ways in which disability and freaks mutually alter each other. The essay claims that the notion of the freak show has implications for a performative elaboration of disabled bodies and also speculates about the possibility that disability theatre formalises the relationship between performer and spectator, overwriting more difficult, problematic, contingent relationships in favour of a performative construction of the disabled person and the disabling society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ipc-athletics.paralympic.org/Classi"cation/

  2. 2.

    The posters are available to see at http://www.designtosell.co.uk/advertising/paralympics-2012-posters/

Bibliography

  • Bogden, R. (1988) Freak Show: Presenting Human Oddities for Amusement and Profit, (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, T. (1932) Freaks. Directed by Tod Browning. Produced by MGM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemers, M. M. (2008) Staging Stigma: A Critical Examination of the American Freak Show (New York: Palgrave).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (2009) Staring: How We Look (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1990) Stigma: Notes on the Management of a Spoiled Identity (First published 1963). 2nd ed. (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (1996) ‘Intolerable Ambiguity: Freaks as/at the Limit’, in Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body ed. by Rosemarie Garland-Thomson (New York: New York University Press), pp. 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. (2002) The Last Freak Show in Graeae Plays One ed. by Jenny Sealy (London: Aurora Metro Books), pp. 223–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, R. (2006) Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, M. (2002) Embodying the Monster: Encounters with the Vulnerable Self (London: Sage).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (2009) Against Interpretation and Other Essays (London: Penguin), pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (2002) Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and its Metaphors. 3rd ed. (London: Penguin), pp. 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (2000) The Mutilated in Plays 1957–1980 ed. by Kenneth Holditch and Mel Gussow (New York: Library of America), pp. 583–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (2006) And Tell Sad Stories of the Death of Queens in Mister Paradise and Other One Act Plays (London: Penguin), pp. 187–220, p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colette Conroy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Conroy, C. (2022). Freaks and Not Freaks: Theatre and the Making of Crip Identity. In: Halferty, J.P., Leeney, C. (eds) Analysing Gender in Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85574-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics