Abstract
The collaborative planning literature emphasises the value of trust in collective action while refraining from dwelling on the institutional/political environment that constructs or at least affects the foundation of trust needed in collective action. On the other hand, the quality of government narration and the institutional environment view of social capital establishes the link between government systems, trust and collective action. As planning is largely a public domain, this chapter brings the state back into the collaborative planning discourse by linking government systems with trust and collective action. It shows that contrary to the quality of government narration or the institutional environment literature, the effect of local government systems in Amdework on generalised trust and collective action at town and project levels varies. The basic minimum level of generalised trust needed for collective action exists in the town despite undemocratic and partial local government systems. And unlike the narrations in the collaborative literature, it is lack of confidence in government created by partial and undemocratic government systems rather than trust that motivates people to participate in collective action convened by government entities. At the project level, practical experiences of bias and patronage enabled by partial and undemocratic government systems destroys trust in the community and generalised others and changes the motivation from engaging in collective action to the protection of personal interest. In addition to changing the values of participants, the chapter shows that government systems penetrate and structure planning processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
See for instance, the Ethiopian Constitution; Urban Development Policy; Urban Good Governance Program; Urban Planning Proclamation no. 574/2008; Participation Manual for Urban Planning; and Strategy for Preparation and Implementation of the Urban Plan.
- 2.
There are different levels of administrative units (zone, woreda and kebele). Kebele is the smallest administrative unit.
- 3.
Iddirs are indigenous insurance associations organised to cope with high funeral costs based on reciprocal norms.
- 4.
See for instance, the Ethiopian Constitution, Proclamation no. 455/2005 for the Expropriation of Landholdings for Public Purposes and Payment of Compensation, Council of Ministers and Regulation no. 135/2007 for the Payment of Compensation for Property Situated on Landholding Expropriated for Public Purpose and Urban Land Lease Holding Proclamation no. 721/2011.
- 5.
See for instance, the revised Amhara National Regional State Urban Land Lease Holding Regulation no. 103/2012, the revised Amhara National Regional State Directive for the Compensation Payment for Private Property on Land Expropriated for Public Purposes no. 35/2007, Directive for the transfer of Private Property and Urban Landholding, Urban Land Lease Directive no. 1/2013, Regularisation Directive no. 2/2013.
References
Aalen L, Tronvoll K (2009) The 2008 Ethiopian local elections: the return of electoral authoritarianism. Afr Affairs 108(430):111–120
Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2001) Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Polit Soc 29(4):485–514
Albrechts L (2004) Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environ Plann B 31(5):743–758
Albrechts L (2013) Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective. Plan Theor 12(1):46–63
Ansell C, Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Publ Adm Res Theor 18(4):543–571
Arriola L, Lyons T (2016) The 100% election. J Democr 27(1):76–88
Booher D, Innes J (2002) Network power in collaborative planning. J Plan Educ Res 21(3):221–236
Booher D, Innes J (2005) Living in the house of our predecessors: The demand for new institutions for public participation. Plan Theory Pract 6(3):431–435
Brand R, Gaffikin F (2007) Collaborative planning in an uncollaborative world. Plan Theor 6(3):282–313
Citrin J (1974) Comment: the political relevance of trust in government. Am Polit Sci Rev 68(3):973–988
Cohen F (2013) Dialogue on private property. Private and common property. Routledge, New York, pp 21–52
Coleman J (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:S95–S120
Delhey J, Newton K (2004) Social trust: global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP I 2004–202. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44134. WZB. Berlin
Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S (2012) An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Publ Adm Res Theor 22(1):1–29
Evans P (1989) Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: a comparative political economy perspective on the third world state. Sociol Forum 4(4):561–587
Evans P (1997) State structures, government-business relations, and economic transformation. In: Maxfield S, Schneider B (eds) Business and the state in developing countries. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 63–87
Freitag M, Bühlmann M (2009) Crafting trust: the role of political institutions in a comparative perspective. Comp Polit Stud 42(12):1537–1566
Freitag M, Traunmüller R (2009) Spheres of trust: an empirical analysis of the foundations of particularised and generalised trust. Eur J Polit Res 48(6):782–803
Glaeser E, Laibson D, Scheinkman J, Soutter C (2000) Measuring trust. Q J Econ 115(3):811–846
Hagmann T, Abbink J (2011) Twenty years of revolutionary democratic Ethiopia, 1991 to 2011. J East Afr Stud 5(4):579–695
Healey P (1996) The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environ Plann B 23(2):217–234
Healey P (1998) Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environ Plann A 30(9):1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301531
Hillier J (2002) Direct action and agonism in democratic planning practice. In: Tewdwr-Jones M, Allmendinger P (eds) Planning futures: new directions for planning theory. Routledge, London, pp 110–135
Hodgson G (2006) What are institutions? J Econ Issues 40(1):1–25
Huxley M, Yiftachel O (2000) New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. J Plan Educ Res 19(4):333–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900402
Hydén G (1983) No shortcuts to progress: African development management in perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley
Immergut E (1998) The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Polit Soc 26(1):5–34
Innes J, Booher D (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. J Am Plann Assoc 65(4):412–423
Innes J, Booher D (2004) Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Plan Theory Pract 5(4):419–436
Kebede T (1998) Tenants of the state: the limitations of revolutionary agrarian transformation in Ethiopia, 1974–1991 (Lund Dissertations in Sociology, vol 23). Lund University Press. Lund
Keele L (2007) Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. Am J Polit Sci 51(2):241–254
Knack S (2002) Social capital and the quality of government: evidence from the states. Am J Polit Sci 46(4):772–785
Lawal G (2007) Corruption and development in Africa: challenges for political and economic change. Humanity and Social Sciences Journal 2(1):1–7
Markovsky B, Willer D, Patton T (1988) Power relations in exchange networks. Am Sociol Rev 53(2):220–236
Migdal J, Kohli A, Shue V (eds) (1994) State power and social forces: domination and transformation in the Third World. (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174268
MUDC (2011) Urban land development and management policy, implementation strategy and capacity building framework. Unpublished Document. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Urban Development and Construction, Addis Ababa
MUDHC (2014) Strategy for preparation and implementation of urban plan. Unpublished Document. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Urban Development, Housing and Construction, Addis Ababa
North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
North D (2006) Understanding the process of economic change. Academic Foundation, Gurgaon
O’Donnell G (1993) On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: a Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Dev 21(8):1355–1369
Ostrom E (1986) An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48(1):3–25
Paxton P (2002) Social capital and democracy: an interdependent relationship. Am Sociol Rev 67(2):254–277
Pierson P, Skocpol T (2002) Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. Polit Sci 3:693–721
Plummer J (2012) Diagnosing corruption in Ethiopia: perceptions, realities, and the way forward for key sectors. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC
Powell W, DiMaggio P (1991) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Putnam R (1995) Bowling Alone. J Democr 6(1):65–78
Rahmato D (1992) The land question and reform policy: issues for debate. Dialogue 1(1):43–57
Robbins B (2011) Neither government nor community alone: a test of state-centered models of generalized trust. Ration Soc 23(3):304–346
Rothstein B (2009) Creating political legitimacy: electoral democracy versus quality of government. Am Behav Sci 53(3):311–330
Rothstein B (2013) Corruption and social trust: why the fish rots from the head down. Soc Res 80(4):1009–1032
Rothstein B, Stolle D (2002) How political institutions create and destroy social capital: an institutional theory of generalized trust. Paper given at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August–September
Rothstein B, Teorell J (2008) What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21(2):165–190
Schiffer E (2007) The power mapping tool: a method for the empirical research of power relations. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
Skocpol T (1985) Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research. In: Evans P, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T (eds) Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–37
Steinmo S, Thelen K, Longstreth F (eds) (1992) Structuring politics: historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Uslaner E (1999) Democracy and social capital. In: Uslaner E, Warren M (eds) Democracy and trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 121–150
Tuomela R (1995) The importance of us: a philosophical study of basic social notions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
Tyler T (2003) Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime Justice 30:283–357
Warren M (ed) (1999) Democracy and trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Watson V (2014) Co-production and collaboration in planning–the difference. Plan Theory Pract 15(1):62–76
Wikipedia (n.d.) Hailemariam Desalegn. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hailemariam_Desalegn&oldid=936633439, Accessed 17 Jan 2020
Yiftachel O (1998) Planning and social control: exploring the dark side. J Plan Lit 12(4):395–406
Záhořík J (2017) Reconsidering Ethiopia’s ethnic politics in the light of the Addis Ababa Master Plan and anti-governmental protests. J Middle East Africa 8(3):257–272
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woldetsadik, L.G. (2021). The Government Systems-Trust-Collective Action Nexus: The Case of Amdework. In: Faldi, G., Fisher, A., Moretto, L. (eds) African Cities Through Local Eyes. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84906-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84906-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84905-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84906-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)