Skip to main content

The Government Systems-Trust-Collective Action Nexus: The Case of Amdework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
African Cities Through Local Eyes

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 314 Accesses

Abstract

The collaborative planning literature emphasises the value of trust in collective action while refraining from dwelling on the institutional/political environment that constructs or at least affects the foundation of trust needed in collective action. On the other hand, the quality of government narration and the institutional environment view of social capital establishes the link between government systems, trust and collective action. As planning is largely a public domain, this chapter brings the state back into the collaborative planning discourse by linking government systems with trust and collective action. It shows that contrary to the quality of government narration or the institutional environment literature, the effect of local government systems in Amdework on generalised trust and collective action at town and project levels varies. The basic minimum level of generalised trust needed for collective action exists in the town despite undemocratic and partial local government systems. And unlike the narrations in the collaborative literature, it is lack of confidence in government created by partial and undemocratic government systems rather than trust that motivates people to participate in collective action convened by government entities. At the project level, practical experiences of bias and patronage enabled by partial and undemocratic government systems destroys trust in the community and generalised others and changes the motivation from engaging in collective action to the protection of personal interest. In addition to changing the values of participants, the chapter shows that government systems penetrate and structure planning processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for instance, the Ethiopian Constitution; Urban Development Policy; Urban Good Governance Program; Urban Planning Proclamation no. 574/2008; Participation Manual for Urban Planning; and Strategy for Preparation and Implementation of the Urban Plan.

  2. 2.

    There are different levels of administrative units (zone, woreda and kebele). Kebele is the smallest administrative unit.

  3. 3.

    Iddirs are indigenous insurance associations organised to cope with high funeral costs based on reciprocal norms.

  4. 4.

    See for instance, the Ethiopian Constitution, Proclamation no. 455/2005 for the Expropriation of Landholdings for Public Purposes and Payment of Compensation, Council of Ministers and Regulation no. 135/2007 for the Payment of Compensation for Property Situated on Landholding Expropriated for Public Purpose and Urban Land Lease Holding Proclamation no. 721/2011.

  5. 5.

    See for instance, the revised Amhara National Regional State Urban Land Lease Holding Regulation no. 103/2012, the revised Amhara National Regional State Directive for the Compensation Payment for Private Property on Land Expropriated for Public Purposes no. 35/2007, Directive for the transfer of Private Property and Urban Landholding, Urban Land Lease Directive no. 1/2013, Regularisation Directive no. 2/2013.

References

  • Aalen L, Tronvoll K (2009) The 2008 Ethiopian local elections: the return of electoral authoritarianism. Afr Affairs 108(430):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2001) Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Polit Soc 29(4):485–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrechts L (2004) Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environ Plann B 31(5):743–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrechts L (2013) Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective. Plan Theor 12(1):46–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell C, Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Publ Adm Res Theor 18(4):543–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arriola L, Lyons T (2016) The 100% election. J Democr 27(1):76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booher D, Innes J (2002) Network power in collaborative planning. J Plan Educ Res 21(3):221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booher D, Innes J (2005) Living in the house of our predecessors: The demand for new institutions for public participation. Plan Theory Pract 6(3):431–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand R, Gaffikin F (2007) Collaborative planning in an uncollaborative world. Plan Theor 6(3):282–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citrin J (1974) Comment: the political relevance of trust in government. Am Polit Sci Rev 68(3):973–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen F (2013) Dialogue on private property. Private and common property. Routledge, New York, pp 21–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman J (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:S95–S120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey J, Newton K (2004) Social trust: global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP I 2004–202. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44134. WZB. Berlin

  • Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S (2012) An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Publ Adm Res Theor 22(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans P (1989) Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: a comparative political economy perspective on the third world state. Sociol Forum 4(4):561–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans P (1997) State structures, government-business relations, and economic transformation. In: Maxfield S, Schneider B (eds) Business and the state in developing countries. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 63–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag M, Bühlmann M (2009) Crafting trust: the role of political institutions in a comparative perspective. Comp Polit Stud 42(12):1537–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitag M, Traunmüller R (2009) Spheres of trust: an empirical analysis of the foundations of particularised and generalised trust. Eur J Polit Res 48(6):782–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, Laibson D, Scheinkman J, Soutter C (2000) Measuring trust. Q J Econ 115(3):811–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagmann T, Abbink J (2011) Twenty years of revolutionary democratic Ethiopia, 1991 to 2011. J East Afr Stud 5(4):579–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (1996) The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environ Plann B 23(2):217–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (1998) Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environ Plann A 30(9):1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier J (2002) Direct action and agonism in democratic planning practice. In: Tewdwr-Jones M, Allmendinger P (eds) Planning futures: new directions for planning theory. Routledge, London, pp 110–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson G (2006) What are institutions? J Econ Issues 40(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley M, Yiftachel O (2000) New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. J Plan Educ Res 19(4):333–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydén G (1983) No shortcuts to progress: African development management in perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Immergut E (1998) The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Polit Soc 26(1):5–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes J, Booher D (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. J Am Plann Assoc 65(4):412–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes J, Booher D (2004) Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Plan Theory Pract 5(4):419–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kebede T (1998) Tenants of the state: the limitations of revolutionary agrarian transformation in Ethiopia, 1974–1991 (Lund Dissertations in Sociology, vol 23). Lund University Press. Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele L (2007) Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. Am J Polit Sci 51(2):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack S (2002) Social capital and the quality of government: evidence from the states. Am J Polit Sci 46(4):772–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawal G (2007) Corruption and development in Africa: challenges for political and economic change. Humanity and Social Sciences Journal 2(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky B, Willer D, Patton T (1988) Power relations in exchange networks. Am Sociol Rev 53(2):220–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migdal J, Kohli A, Shue V (eds) (1994) State power and social forces: domination and transformation in the Third World. (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174268

  • MUDC (2011) Urban land development and management policy, implementation strategy and capacity building framework. Unpublished Document. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Urban Development and Construction, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • MUDHC (2014) Strategy for preparation and implementation of urban plan. Unpublished Document. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Urban Development, Housing and Construction, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North D (2006) Understanding the process of economic change. Academic Foundation, Gurgaon

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell G (1993) On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: a Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Dev 21(8):1355–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1986) An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48(1):3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton P (2002) Social capital and democracy: an interdependent relationship. Am Sociol Rev 67(2):254–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P, Skocpol T (2002) Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. Polit Sci 3:693–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer J (2012) Diagnosing corruption in Ethiopia: perceptions, realities, and the way forward for key sectors. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Powell W, DiMaggio P (1991) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R (1995) Bowling Alone. J Democr 6(1):65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmato D (1992) The land question and reform policy: issues for debate. Dialogue 1(1):43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins B (2011) Neither government nor community alone: a test of state-centered models of generalized trust. Ration Soc 23(3):304–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein B (2009) Creating political legitimacy: electoral democracy versus quality of government. Am Behav Sci 53(3):311–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein B (2013) Corruption and social trust: why the fish rots from the head down. Soc Res 80(4):1009–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein B, Stolle D (2002) How political institutions create and destroy social capital: an institutional theory of generalized trust. Paper given at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August–September

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein B, Teorell J (2008) What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21(2):165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer E (2007) The power mapping tool: a method for the empirical research of power relations. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol T (1985) Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research. In: Evans P, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T (eds) Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo S, Thelen K, Longstreth F (eds) (1992) Structuring politics: historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner E (1999) Democracy and social capital. In: Uslaner E, Warren M (eds) Democracy and trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 121–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela R (1995) The importance of us: a philosophical study of basic social notions. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler T (2003) Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime Justice 30:283–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren M (ed) (1999) Democracy and trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson V (2014) Co-production and collaboration in planning–the difference. Plan Theory Pract 15(1):62–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (n.d.) Hailemariam Desalegn. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hailemariam_Desalegn&oldid=936633439, Accessed 17 Jan 2020

  • Yiftachel O (1998) Planning and social control: exploring the dark side. J Plan Lit 12(4):395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Záhořík J (2017) Reconsidering Ethiopia’s ethnic politics in the light of the Addis Ababa Master Plan and anti-governmental protests. J Middle East Africa 8(3):257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lia G. Woldetsadik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Woldetsadik, L.G. (2021). The Government Systems-Trust-Collective Action Nexus: The Case of Amdework. In: Faldi, G., Fisher, A., Moretto, L. (eds) African Cities Through Local Eyes. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84906-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84906-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84905-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84906-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics