Skip to main content

Development of Educational Scenarios for Child-Robot Interaction: The Case of Learning Disabilities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robotics in Education (RiE 2021)

Abstract

During the last decade, there has been an increased interest in research on the use of social robots in education, both in typical education as well as in special education. Despite the demonstrated advantages of robot-assisted tutoring in typical education and the extensive work on robots in supporting autism therapy-related scenarios, little work has been published on how social robots may support children with Learning Disabilities (LD). The purpose of this paper is to present a comprehensive experimental protocol where a social robot is directly involved in specially designed intervention strategies, which are currently underway. These strategies are designed to address reading comprehension and other learning skills through child-robot interaction, aiming at improving the academic performance of the children diagnosed with learning disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: a review. Sci. Robot. 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954

  2. Ivanov, S.: Will robots substitute teachers? In: 12th International Conference “Modern Science, Business and Education”, Varna, Bulgaria, pp. 42–47 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220903185605

  3. Kaburlasos, V.G., Vrochidou, E.: Social robots for pedagogical rehabilitation: trends and novel modeling principles. In: Dimitrova, M., Wagatsuma, H. (eds.) Cyber-Physical Systems for Social Applications. Advances in Systems Analysis, Software Engineering, and High Performance Computing (ASASEHPC), pp. 1–21. IGI Global, Hershey (2019). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7879-6.ch001

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, L., Brown, A.L.: Metacognitive skills and reading. In: Pearson, P.D. (ed.) Handbook of Research in Reading, pp. 353–395. Longman, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matarić, M.: Socially assistive robotics. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction - HRI 2014, p. 333. ACM Press, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2560043

  6. Jacq, A., Lemaignan, S., Garcia, F., Dillenbourg, P., Paiva, A.: Building successful long child-robot interactions in a learning context. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 239–246. IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451758

  7. Barco, A., Albo-Canals, J., Garriga, C.: Engagement based on a customization of an iPod-LEGO robot for a long-term interaction for an educational purpose. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI 2014, pp. 124–125. ACM Press, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2563697

  8. Aslam, S., Shopland, N., Standen, P.J., Burton, A., Brown, D.: A comparison of humanoid and non humanoid robots in supporting the learning of pupils with severe intellectual disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Interactive Technologies and Games EduRob Conjunction with iTAG 2016, iTAG 2016, pp. 7–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/iTAG.2016.9

  9. Li, J.: The benefit of being physically present: a survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 77, 23–37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Scassellati, B.: Personalizing robot tutors to individuals’ learning differences. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 423–430. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559671

  11. Jones, A., Castellano, G.: Adaptive robotic tutors that support self-regulated learning: a longer-term investigation with primary school children. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 10(3), 357–370 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0458-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramachandran, A., Huang, C.-M., Gartland, E., Scassellati, B.: Thinking aloud with a tutoring robot to enhance learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI 2018, pp. 59–68. ACM Press, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171250

  13. Sweet, A.P., Snow, C.E.: Rethinking Reading Comprehension. Guilford Publications, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vellutino, F.R.: Individual differences as sources of variability in reading comprehension in elementary school children. In: Sweet, A.P., Snow, C.E. (eds.) Rethinking Reading Comprehension, pp. 51–81. Guilford Publications, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paris, S.G.: Children’s Reading Comprehension and Assessment. Routledge, Milton Park (2005). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612762

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Nicholson, T.: Reading comprehension processes. In: Thompson, B.G., Nicholson, T. (eds.) Learning to Read: Beyond Phonics and Whole Language, pp. 127–149. Teachers College Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L.S., Williams, J.P., Baker, S.: Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: a review of research. Rev. Educ. Res. (2007). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vaughn, S., et al.: Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psych. Rev. 39, 3–21 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lytridis, C., et al.: Distance special education delivery by social robots. Electronics 9, 1034 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9061034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Papakostas, G.A., Strolis, A.K., Panagiotopoulos, F., Aitsidis, C.: Social robot selection: a case study in education. In: 2018 26th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), Split, Croatia, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.23919/SOFTCOM.2018.8555844

  21. Baxter, P., Ashurst, E., Read, R., Kennedy, J., Belpaeme, T.: Robot education peers in a situated primary school study: Personalisation promotes child learning. PLoS ONE 12, e0178126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research has been co‐financed by the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH – CREATE – INNOVATE (project code: T1EDK-00929).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George A. Papakostas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karageorgiou, E. et al. (2022). Development of Educational Scenarios for Child-Robot Interaction: The Case of Learning Disabilities. In: Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1359. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82544-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics