Abstract
The Democracy in Europe Movement (DiEM25) entered European politics in 2016 as a progressive, left, cosmopolitan, pan-European reaction to the post-crisis austerity politics adopted by the EU. In terms of core ideas, the movement challenges the contemporary neoliberal status quo and links it to the various crises at hand. While the movement has been thoroughly analyzed in terms of its populist and transnational dimensions, insufficient attention has been paid to its economic visions and critique. The exploration of DiEM’s creative inputs concerning European integration and proposed solutions of contemporary challenges contributes to the discussion of a post-crisis development of neoliberalism, broadens the understanding of critique on the current form of European integration, and sheds more light on DiEM’s core ideas, goals, and future trajectories. This chapter explores DiEM’s economic visions and critiques through a qualitative exploration of official documents and participants’ perspectives. Thus, it captures the official positions and the dynamic, continuously negotiated ideas that the movement formulates and politicizes. This approach reveals that the movement faces clashes between the various discourses it mobilizes (progressivism, left-wing, radical, humanist, pragmatic) and encounters tensions between various levels upon which it operates (local, national, transnational, elite, participant).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Other important contexts shaping the data (co-)creation include the following. The interviews were collected by different members of the research team over the span of three years. Each researcher may have shaped the data by emphasizing topics of her/his interest. Some of the interviews were collected in various national contexts. These included, mainly, but not exclusively, Germany, Czech Republic, and Italy. The selection was made to cover various perspectives across geographical regions with varying historical experiences (western, eastern/post-socialist, southern), but was also based on practical reasons (residence of research team members). Some of the interviews were collected at the DiEM25 Assembly in Prague in 2019. It could be reasonably assumed that more privileged participants were able to travel there due to time and financial costs. The most important conclusion is that the sample did not include working-class representatives. However, this is in line with DiEM’s own reflection of the absence of working-class ranks (field notes).
References
Agustín, Ó. G. (2017). European counterpublics? DiEM25, Plan B and the agonistic European public sphere. Journal of Civil Society, 13(3), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2017.1360233.
Blokker, P. (2019). Varieties of populist constitutionalism: The transnational dimension. German Law Journal, 20(3), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.19.
Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2007). Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism and neocorporatism: Towards transnational capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe. West European Politics, 30(3), 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701276287.
Bonfert, B. (2020). ‘We need to organise millions of people’—How alter Summit and DiEM25 struggle to create a European ‘modern prince.’ Globalizations, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1850615.
Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2017). Actually existing neoliberalism. Damien Cahill, Melinda Cooper, Martijn Konings, & David Primrose (Ed.), 1–29.
Crouch, C. (2015). Governing social risks in post-crisis Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.
De Cleen, B., Moffitt, B., Panayotu, P., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2020). The Potentials and Difficulties of Transnational Populism: The Case of the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25). Political Studies, 68(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719847576.
European New Deal. (n.d.). DiEM25. Retrieved April 14, 2021, from https://diem25.org/diem25-unveils-its-european-new-deal-an-economic-agenda-for-european-recovery/.
European New Deal Complete Policy Paper. (n.d). [text]. DiEM25. Retrieved April 25, 2021, from https://diem25.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/03/European-New-Deal-Complete-Policy-Paper.pdf.
Hernández, E., & Kriesi, H. (2016). The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12122.
Hilgers, M. (2011). The three anthropological approaches to neoliberalism. International Social Science Journal, 61(202), 351–364.
Joseph, J. (2013). Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience, 1(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.765741.
Kuyper, J., & Moffitt, B. (2020). Transnational populism, democracy, and representation: Pitfalls and potentialities. Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric, 12(2), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.12.02.208.
Moffitt, B. (2017). Transnational populism? Representative claims, media and the difficulty of constructing a transnational “people.” Javnost—The Public, 24(4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330086.
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a Left populism. Verso Books.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Souliotis, N., & Alexandri, G. (2017). From embedded to uncompromising neoliberalism: Competitiveness policies and European Union interscalar relations in the case of Greece. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24(3), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776416630582.
Venugopal, R. (2015). Neoliberalism as concept. Economy and Society, 44(2), 165–187.
Worth, O. (2016). The battle for hegemony: Resistance and neoliberal restructuring in post-crisis Europe. Comparative European Politics, 17.
Online Sources
A European Green Deal. (n.d.). [Text]. European Commission—European Commission. Retrieved April 26, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
Capitalism has become Technofeudalism. (2021, February 24). DiEM25. https://diem25.org/capitalism-has-become-technofeudalism/.
Campaigns. (n.d.). DiEM25. Retrieved April 15, 2021, from https://diem25.org/campaigns/.
Democratising Europe: By taxation or by debt?—Manon Boujou, Lucas Chancel, Anne-Laure Delatte, Thomas Piketty, Guillaume Sacriste, Stéphanie Hennette and Antoine Vauchez. (2019, February 11). Social Europe. https://www.socialeurope.eu/democratising-europe.
DiEM TV: The Green New Deal for Europe with James K. Galbraith and David Adler—YouTube. (n.d.). Retrieved April 3, 2021, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2RlSgZw66U&ab_channel=DiEM25.
EU climate action and the European Green Deal. (2019, October 23). [Text]. Climate Action—European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/eu-climate-action_en.
Manifesto (long). (n.d.). DiEM25. Retrieved April 15, 2021, from https://diem25.org/manifesto-long/.
The Green New Deal for Europe. (n.d.). DiEM25. Retrieved April 15, 2021, from https://diem25.org/campaign/green-new-deal/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Šrám, K. (2021). Winds of Change, or Fighting the Windmills: Exploring the Economic Visions of the Pan-European Movement DiEM25. In: Blokker, P. (eds) Imagining Europe . Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81369-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81369-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81368-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81369-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)