Abstract
The engineering systems covered by this book are complex socio-technical systems. Their complexity results from two key characteristics: the technical complexity in their physical manifestations and the elaborate processes, usually operated by people, needed to realise, use, and support such systems through life. Although engineering design tends to focus on technical aspects of these physical manifestations, it is the delivery of the associated processes, e.g., realisation, use, and through-life support, which create value (or frustration) for stakeholders. For this reason, understanding the needs of stakeholders who participate in these processes is critical to the success of the overall system. In this chapter, we consider how one might go about understanding stakeholder needs and formulating engineering system design goals. Three overarching approaches to the design of engineering systems (user-driven design, designer-driven design, and systems engineering) are introduced, and examples of their application to practical design work are provided through three design case studies. One case study relates to the design of a surgical device and the second to the design of a knowledge management system, and the third considers how the approaches introduced in this chapter might be applied when designing in response to sustainable development goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agouridas V, Marshall A, McKay A, De Pennington A (2006a) Establishing stakeholder needs for medical devices. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, September 10–13, Philadelphia
Agouridas V, Winand H, McKay A, De Pennington A (2006b) Early alignment of design requirements with stakeholder needs. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 220:1483–1507
Agouridas V, McKay A, Winand H, De Pennington A (2008) Advanced product planning: a comprehensive process for systemic definition of new product requirements. Requir Eng 13:19–48
Anon (2018) Johnson: crossrail project is costing £600m more than initial budget. Railway Technology
Bahn S, Lee C, Nam CS, Yun MH (2009) Incorporating affective customer needs for luxuriousness into product design attributes. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 19(2):105–127.
Baxter G, Sommerville I (2011) Socio-technical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interact Comput 23:4–17
Blanchard BS, Fabrycky WJ (2011) Systems engineering and analysis. Pearson
Brandt E (2006) Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in participatory design? Proceedings of the 9th participatory design conference, pp 57–66
Brandt E, Messeter J, Binder T (2008) Formatting design dialogues – games and participation. CoDesign 4:51–64
Cai Y, Starly B, Cohen P, Lee YS (2017) Sensor data and information fusion to construct digital-twins virtual machine tools for cyber-physical manufacturing. Proc Manuf 10:1031–1042
Challenger R, Clegg CW, Robinson MA (2010) Understanding crowd behaviours, vol 2. Supporting evidence. Cabinet Office, London
Challenger R, Clegg CW, Shepherd C (2013) Function allocation in complex systems: reframing an old problem. Ergonomics 56(7):1051–1069
Checkland P (2000) Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst Res Behav Sci 17:S11–S58
Checkland P, Holwell S (1997) Information, systems and information systems: making sense of the field. Wiley, London
Checkland P, Scholes (1999) Soft systems methodology: a 30-year retrospective. Wiley, London
Clegg CW (1979) The process of job redesign: signposts from a theoretical orphanage? Hum Relat 32(12):999–1022
Clegg CW (2000) Sociotechnical principles for system design. Appl Ergon 31:463–477
Clegg C, Shepherd C (2007) ‘The biggest computer programme in the world… ever!’: time for a change in mindset? J Inf Technol 22(3):212–221
Clegg CW, Robinson MA, Davis MC, Bolton L, Pieniazek R, McKay A (2017) Applying organizational psychology as a design science: a method for predicting malfunctions in socio-technical systems (PreMiSTS). Des Sci 3:e6
Coleman R, Hua Dong J.C.E, Cassim J (ed) (2017) Design for Inclusivity: a practical guide to accessible, innovative and user-Centred design (Design for social responsibility). Routledge, London
Conceicao C, Broberg O, Paravizo E, Jensen AR (2019) A four-step model for diagnosing knowledge transfer challenges from operations into engineering design. Int J Ind Ergon 69:163–172
Crowder RM, Robinson MA, Hughes HPN, Sim YW (2012) The development of an agent-based modeling framework for simulating engineering team work. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Hum 42(6):1425–1439
Davis MC, Challenger R, Jayewardene DNW, Clegg CW (2014) Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: a call for bravery. Appl Ergon 45:171–180
DeChurch LA, Mesmer-Magnus JR (2010) Measuring shared team mental models: a meta-analysis. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 14(1):1–14
Dixon A, Liu Y, Setchi R (2016) Computer-aided ethnography in engineering design. Proceedings of the ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, August 21–24
Dorst K (2015a) Frame innovation: create new thinking by design. The MIT Press
Dorst K (2015b) Frame creation and design in the expanded field. J Des Econ Innov 1:22–33
Drain A, Shekar A, Grigg N (2018) Insights, solutions and empowerment: a framework for evaluating participatory design. CoDesign:1–21
Elliot J (2018) Works information study (supply chain quality requirements) [online]. Crossrail learning legacy. Available at: https://learninglegacy.crossrail.co.uk/documents/supply-chain-quality-requirements/. Accessed 28 Oct 2019
Elliot C, Deasley P (eds) (2007) RAEng: creating systems that work. The Royal Academy of Engineering, London
Fairley RE, Thayer RH (1997) The concept of operations: the bridge from operational requirements to technical specifications. Ann Softw Eng 3:417–432
Farrell R, Hooker C (2013) Design, science and wicked problems. Des Stud 34:681–705
Favero PSH, Theuinssen E (2018) With the smartphone as field assistant: designing, making, and testing EthnoAlly, a multimodal tool for conducting serendipitous ethnography in a multisensory world. Am Anthropol 120(1):163–167
Fine CH (1999) Clock speed: winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage. Pursues Books, New York
Grant RM (2013) The development of knowledge management in the oil and gas industry. Universia Business Review 40:92–125
Hamzah I, Nordin AL, Alias H, Rasid N, Baharin H (2018) Game design requirements through ethnography amongst pediatric cancer patients. Adv Sci Lett 24(3):1567–1570
Harrison L, Earl C, Eckert C (2015) Exploratory making: shape, structure and motion. Des Stud 41:51–78
Hekkert P, van Dijk M (2016) VIP vision in design: a guidebook for innovators. Laurence King Publishing
Hughes HPN, Clegg CW, Bolton LE, Machon LC (2017) Systems scenarios: a tool for facilitating the socio-technical design of work systems. Ergonomics 60:1319–1335
Hull E, Jackson K, Dick J (2011) Requirements engineering. Springer, London
IDEO (2020a) [online] History. Available at: https://designthinking.ideo.com/history. Accessed 16 Oct 2020
IDEO (2020b) [online] Design thinking defined. Available at: https://designthinking.ideo.com/. Accessed 16 Oct 2020]
Jun GT, Canham A, Altuna-Palacios A, Ward JR, Bhrama R, Rogers S, Dutt A, Shah P (2018) A participatory systems approach to design for safer integrated medicine management. Ergonomics 6:48–68
Karsh BT, Waterson P, Holden RJ (2014) Crossing levels in systems ergonomics: a framework to support ‘mesoergonomic’ inquiry. Appl Ergon 45:45–54
Kundu S, McKay A, Baker RB, De Pennington A, Thorpe R (2012) Co-creating value across supply networks: towards an agenda for supply chain design engineering capability development. In: Cambridge international manufacturing symposium: capturing value in international manufacturing and supply networks – new models for a changing world. Møller Centre, Cambridge
Larsen J (2017) Bicycle parking and locking: ethnography of designs and practices. Mobilities 12(1):53–75
Lewrick L, Link P, Leifer L (2018) The design thinking playbook. Wiley, Hoboken
Mabogunje A, Sonalkar N, Leifer L (2016) Design thinking: a new foundational science for engineering. Int J Eng Educ 32:1540–1556
Maier A, Eppinger SD (2019) Responsible design: recognising the impact of how we design. Keynote lecture at International Conference of Engineering Design 2019, Delft. Available at: https://www.iced19.org/keynotes/responsible-design-recognising-the-impact-of-how-we-design/. Accessed 19 Oct 2020
McDonald KJ (2015) Beyond requirements: analysis with an agile mindset (Agile software development). Addison-Wesley Professional
McKay A, Raffo D, Trowsdale DB (2008) Sustainable product design: from delivering sustainable products to enabling sustainable lifestyles. In: Cipolla C, Peruccio PP (eds) Changing the change: design, visions, proposals and tools, pp 1031–1039
McKay A, Baker RB, Kundu S, De Pennington A, Thorpe R (2013) Realising design engineering capability across distributed enterprise networks. Proceedings of the ninth international symposium on global manufacturing and China, pp 111–116
McKay A, Davis M, Hughes H, Pieniazek R, Robinson M (2020) Designing socio-technical systems: a multi-team systems case study. In: Metcalf G, Kijima K (eds) Handbook of systems science. Springer, Tokyo
Nemeth (2004) Human factors methods for design: making systems human-centered. CRC Press, London
Norman DA (1986) The design of everyday things. Basic Books, New York
Olechowski AL, Eppinger SD, Joglekar N, Tomaschek K (2020) Technology readiness levels: shortcomings and improvement opportunities. Syst Eng 23(4):395–408
Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J (2006) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer, London
Pugh S (1990) Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering. Prentice Hall
Read GJM, Salmon PM, Goode N, Lenné MG (2018) A sociotechnical design toolkit for bridging the gap between systems-based analyses and system design. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 28:327–341
Robertson T, Simonsen J (2018) Particiatory design: an introduction. In: Simonson J, Robertson T (eds) Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge, London, pp 1–17
Robinson MA, Drury M (2020) How analysis engineers spend their time. NAFEMS Benchmark, pp 46–51
Robinson MA, Sparrow PR, Clegg C, Birdi K (2005) Design engineering competencies: future requirements and predicted changes in the forthcoming decade. Des Stud 26(2):123–153
Schuler DE, Namioka AE (eds) (1993) Participatory design: principles and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Tao F, Qi Q, Liu A, Kusiak A (2018) Data-driven smart manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 48:157–169
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Penguin Books
Tim Brown T (2009) Change by design. HarperCollins Publishers, New York
Tromp N, Hekkert P (2019) Designing for society: products and services for a better world. Bloomsbury, London
Ulrich K, Eppinger S (2004) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill
United Nations (2020) [online] The 17 goals. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals. Accessed 19 Oct 2020
Vermaas PE, Hekkert P, Manders-Huits N, Tromp N (2014) Methods for design for moral values. In: Van den Hoven J (ed) Handbook of ethics, values and technological design. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–19
Wikipedia (2020a) Technology readiness levels. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_readiness_level. Accessed 16 Oct 2020
Wikipedia (2020b) Concept of operations. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept_of_operations. Accessed 16 Oc 2020
Wood AE, Mattson CA (2019) Quantifying the effects of various factors on the utility of design ethnography in the developing world. Res Eng Des 30:317–338
Acknowledgments
The oilrig design project was carried out in collaboration with Dr. Carolina Conceicao, DTU-Technical University of Denmark, Engineering Systems Design Section at the Department of Technology, Management and Economics and was co-funded by the Danish Maritime Fund. The neurosurgery case study was carried out by four students (James Hyson, David Lewis, Stephanie Prince, and Emma Routledge) in response to a brief set by Mr. Nick de Pennington who, at the time, was a neurosurgeon at the Radcliffe Infirmary in Oxford, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
McKay, A., Broberg, O., Robinson, M.A. (2022). Engineering Systems Design Goals and Stakeholder Needs. In: Maier, A., Oehmen, J., Vermaas, P.E. (eds) Handbook of Engineering Systems Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81159-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81159-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81158-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81159-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering