Abstract
Sinonasal anatomy is complex and well assessed on imaging, particularly using CT and MRI. Coronal imaging is the preferred clinically applicable plane, allowing assessment synonymous to clinical evaluation whilst sagittal views also provide useful anatomical information. Possible surgical hazards including anatomical variants must be addressed in the radiology report. CT imaging is commonly utilised in the evaluation of chronic rhinosinusitis, where the use of the ‘CLOSED’ acronym can provide a checklist for radiologists in sinonasal assessment in order to aid in surgical planning. Complications of sinusitis, namely infection including intracranial involvement and non-infective aetiologies such as a mucocele can also be assessed on imaging. Unilateral nasal mass lesions must also be carefully interrogated radiologically, often warranting both CT and MRI evaluation. This chapter aims to highlight the optimum use of radiological investigations, provide an overview of radiological anatomy and review the most common pathologies of the sinonasal tract.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- CT
- MRI
- Subperiosteal abscess
- Chronic rhinosinusitis
- CLOSED acronym
- Anatomical variants
- Mucocele
- Unilateral mass
- Surgical planning
Introduction
Advances in sinonasal imaging have transformed our understanding of the highly variable sinonasal anatomy and have supported progress in endoscopic sinus surgery. Enhanced resolution, lowered radiation dosages and increasing use of image guidance have meant that radiological imaging is central to the planning of sinonasal surgery.
Imaging Techniques and Investigations
Unenhanced CT is the primary imaging investigation in the setting of inflammatory sinonasal disease. Sinonasal imaging focuses on the delineation of bony, soft tissue and air-filled structures, which have inherent high contrast on CT and are easily differentiated. This enables the identification of disease extent, delineation of variant sinonasal anatomy and provides a roadmap for surgery. CT is also particularly helpful for the demonstration of calcific or ossific elements (e.g. mycetoma or osteoma) and sinonasal bony changes (e.g. inflammatory or neoplastic bony sclerosis, fungal or neoplastic bony destruction and bony remodelling with polyps or low-grade tumours).
Sinonasal multidetector CT is rapidly performed with a single axial volume acquired at sub-millimetric slice collimation, 180 mm field of view and a low dose (<50 mAS). This provides a volume of reconstructed isotropic data that may be reformatted in any plane (typically at 1 mm slice thickness) without any loss of spatial resolution. Sinonasal anatomy is initially best evaluated in the coronal plane (Fig. 9.1) and this well delineates the ostiomeatal complex (OMC) as well as simulating the sinonasal appearances at endoscopy. The sagittal plane is also useful for assessing the frontal sinus outflows, lamella and sphenoethmoidal recess anatomy (Fig. 9.2). Most modern imaging workstations incorporate multiplanar reformatting functionality, which is ideal for analysing the CT volume of data. The images should be routinely viewed with a bone algorithm and intermediate window widths (e.g. 2500:250 window width:level), however, a standard algorithm and soft tissue window width (e.g. 450:50), as well as a wider window width (e.g. 4000:400), may also be useful to fully assess the soft tissue and bony structures.
In the context of complex infectious or neoplastic pathology (and if a concurrent MRI is not available) an increased mA (radiation dose) study with intravenous contrast and 3 mm thick reconstructions helps optimise the soft tissue appearances. If only bone detail is required, then CBCT is evolving as a low dose technique to evaluate the sinonasal bony structures. CT angiography (for demonstration of the arterial system) or CT cisternography (to evaluate CSF rhinorrhoea) are additional but rarely used CT-based techniques.
MRI is complementary to CT for characterising and demonstrating the extent of complex infectious or neoplastic processes within the sinonasal region, particularly when there is extra-sinus extension of pathology. The superior contrast resolution of MRI allows tumour to be distinguished from inflammatory processes, and hence the intra-sinus extent of tumours is better delineated. There is also a more accurate assessment of perineural, skull base, intracranial and orbital extension of disease. Occasionally MRI is used to assess the presence or extent of sinonasal inflammatory disease (e.g. when CT assessment of bony anatomy is already available or surgery is not anticipated). MRI also provides a combined evaluation of sinonasal and intracranial structures in the setting of olfactory dysfunction, developmental nasofrontal lesions and CSF rhinorrhoea or potential cephalocele.
MRI requires a combination of coronal and axial T1 weighted (T1W), T2 weighted (T2W) and gadolinium-enhanced T1W images, with sagittal sequences added for the assessment of midline pathology. Imaging is generally performed with 3–4 mm slice thickness and no inter-slice gap, with an optimal field of view of 16–18 cm. Supplementary volumetric sequences may be used for image-guided surgery, radiotherapy planning and (with 3D heavily T2W sequences) to demonstrate a CSF leak or cephalocele. Higher resolution (e.g. 512 × 512 matrix) sequences are also useful to evaluate the integrity of bone and periosteum at the anterior skull base or to assess for perineural spread. Fat suppressed sequences are often included for imaging the extra-sinus facial structures and the central skull base. In the setting of uncomplicated inflammatory disease or olfactory dysfunction, a simple MRI protocol is utilised without the need for gadolinium-enhanced imaging.
Sinonasal Anatomy
A full description of sinonasal anatomy is beyond the scope of this text, and readers are encouraged to read an anatomical text for the basic anatomy [1] and the European Position Paper on the Anatomical Terminology of the Nose and Paranasal Sinuses for an excellent description of current terminology and common anatomical variants [2]. Clinical anatomy teaching traditionally describes nasal anatomy in the parasagittal plane, describing the lateral nasal wall of the nose in terms of the space relating to the inferior, middle and superior turbinate, termed the inferior, middle and superior meatus, respectively. The middle meatus, the area of lateral wall covered medially by the middle turbinate is functionally the most important, enclosing the drainage pathways of frontal, maxillary and anterior ethmoid sinuses.
In clinical practice and surgical approaches, the nose is viewed in the coronal plane, and it is cross-sectional imaging in this plane that is most useful for interpretation. We, therefore, describe a full coronal series below with relevant anatomical features (Fig. 9.3).
Clinical Applications of Sinonasal Radiology
Inflammatory Sinus Disease
Acute Rhinosinusitis and Its Complications
Radiological imaging is rarely required in uncomplicated acute sinusitis, and indeed may not be helpful in making the diagnosis, as diffuse mucosal opacification is also found in the common cold [3]. However, a contrast-enhanced CT should be performed expeditiously when orbital or intracranial complications are suspected.
Orbital Complications
Orbital complications are the most common infective complication of sinusitis.
Patients with preseptal signs only (lid swelling but no ophthalmoplegia or chemosis) may be treated with initial medical therapy and close observations. A CT scan should be organised without delay if there is no clinical resolution after 24 h or at the earliest indication of deteriorating orbital, visual and/or intracranial signs. The CT scan should be contrast enhanced—this must be specifically requested as it is not routinely part of a standard CT sinus series and is often missed as many such requests are made out of regular clinical hours. Contrast-enhanced CT effectively distinguishes between a pre and post-septal orbital infection and between inflammatory cellulitis/phlegmon versus abscess.
The presence, location and volume of periorbital, orbital and intracranial collections must be clearly defined to facilitate surgical drainage. Figure 9.4a demonstrates a medially placed and Fig. 9.4b demonstrates a superiorly placed subperiosteal abscess.
Cavernous Sinus Thrombosis
Cavernous sinus thrombosis (CST) is a rare complication of sinusitis with a high morbidity and mortality. Clinical features include bilateral proptosis, chemosis, ophthalmoplegia, high fever and retro-orbital pain. The condition advances rapidly due to the absence of valves in the orbital veins allowing blood to flow towards and away from the cavernous sinuses. Early and aggressive intravenous antibiotic administration is recommended. Although S. aureus is the cause in the majority of cases, broad-spectrum coverage for Gram-positive, Gram-negative and anaerobic organisms should be instituted pending cultures. Surgical intervention, provided the patient is fit for anaesthesia, may involve drainage of the sinuses and any associated orbital or intracranial abscess and optic nerve/orbital decompression if visual acuity is threatened. Debate surrounds the role of anticoagulation in the treatment of CST, but a recent Cochrane review of two small trials suggests a beneficial tendency [4] and should be considered to prevent further thrombosis. The cavernous sinuses may be imaged with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI, with characteristic features of CST including expansion, filling defects, narrowing of the cavernous carotid arteries and dilated superior ophthalmic veins.
Intracranial Complications
Intracranial extension occurs in approximately 4–5% of patients admitted with acute or acute-on-chronic sinusitis [5]. Intracranial complications are potentially life threatening and include meningitis, extradural or subdural abscesses, venous sinus thrombosis and intraparenchymal brain abscess, the latter of which are single in the majority of cases.
Infection can gain access to the intracranial compartment by several mechanisms:
-
Haematogenous spread is thought to be the main mechanism for the development of an intracranial intraparenchymal brain abscess with the majority located in the frontal lobes.
-
Retrograde thrombophlebitis in the valveless venous system, principally via the ophthalmic veins.
-
Direct extension through a dehiscence in the wall of adjacent sinus cells.
-
Brain abscesses may form secondary to venous obstruction causing ischaemia and necrosis.
The commonest responsible micro-organisms are anaerobic (isolated in over two-thirds of cases), aerobes (most commonly S. Aureus and H. Influenzae) and microaerophilic streptococci. Studies have shown a good correlation in the microbiological findings between the sinus and intracranial abscess [6]. Early and aggressive management with intravenous antibiotics can prevent conversion of cerebritis to abscess formation. Once an abscess forms, surgical drainage with prolonged antibiotic therapy is recommended. The role of steroid therapy is controversial, balancing the risk of immune suppression and progression with the need to reduce cerebral oedema. Contrast-enhanced CT may be appropriate in the emergency setting, however, the superior contrast resolution of a contrast-enhanced MRI helps define intracranial sepsis when an epidural abscess, subdural abscess, cerebritis, intracerebral abscess or venous sinus thrombosis may be demonstrated.
Pott’s Puffy Tumour
Purulent frontal sinusitis which causes osteomyelitis of the anterior bony table and a subperiosteal abscess has previously been described as Pott’s puffy tumour. Sequestration and necrosis of the underlying bone may occur, with fistula formation over the forehead and into the upper lid. Diagnosis is easily confirmed on CT scanning. Intravenous antibiotics, whilst essential, are often not sufficient to eradicate the severe infection and surgical drainage is usually required.
Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Diagnosis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
The major symptoms of sinusitis (nasal obstruction, mucopurulent nasal discharge, facial pain, anosmia) are not specific, and only 40% of patients meeting a symptomatic definition of Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) have supporting evidence of disease on CT imaging [7]. The CT scan must be interpreted with caution as limited mucosal abnormalities are common in the healthy population, who have been shown to have a mean Lund-Mackay score of 4.3 [8]. Mucosal thickening, polyps, fluid levels and obstruction of the ostiomeatal complex would be supportive of a diagnosis of CRS.
For those with no abnormal endoscopic findings, 70% will also have a normal CT. CT imaging is usually reserved for patients with CRS who have failed a trial of appropriate medical therapy, but in those with negative endoscopy there is a role for upfront CT imaging to avoid unnecessary medical treatment and delays in the correct diagnosis (such as rhinitis or atypical facial pain) [9], and has been shown to be more cost-effective than empirical management in this setting.
Caution should be exercised before proceeding with surgery in a patient with a near normal scan, although there may be times when isolated sinus opacification or limited disease can be correlated with localised symptoms. Surgery in the presence of a normal CT scan is almost never justified, except perhaps in cases of recurrent acute rhinosinusitis with normal intervening episodes in which there might be no positive clinical or radiological signs, or in cases of sinus barotrauma.
Sinus Barotrauma
Case Study 1:
A 40-year-old male who was required to fly on a weekly basis for business presented with a clear history of sinus barotrauma on plane descent. CT imaging revealed large agger nasi cells and limited associated bilateral frontal sinus mucosal thickening (Fig. 9.5).
The patient was treated with balloon sinuplasty under local anaesthesia with excellent symptomatic improvement.
Learning Point
This patient was essentially asymptomatic in-between episodes of barotrauma. With minimal disease on the CT scan, a minimally invasive surgical approach to deal with the large agger cells and frontal narrowing can strike the right balance between adequate disease management and risk reduction.
Mucous Retention Cysts
Case Study 2:
A 45-year-old male presenting with severe bilateral facial pain (5/5) but mild nasal obstruction (1/5) and nasal discharge (1/5) underwent endoscopic sinus surgery. He had very limited left ethmoid opacification, patent OMCs and a large right maxillary sinus cyst (Fig. 9.6), which was thought to be the cause of his symptoms. There was no response to surgery but the patient improved significantly after a course of nortriptyline supporting the diagnosis of neuropathic pain.
Isolated mucosal retention cysts are prevalent in patients in the absence of sinus or dental disease and are usually asymptomatic. A study of 257 patients undergoing ophthalmological imaging found maxillary mucosal cysts in 35% [10]. Surgery is not normally indicated; indeed these can often be confusing in the setting of atypical facial pain or other sinonasal symptoms.
Learning Point
Facial pain in the absence of nasal obstruction or mucopurulent rhinorrhoea is unlikely to be due to sinonasal disease. Treatment of the mucous retention cyst would not be predicted to improve symptoms and surgery should therefore be avoided.
Odontogenic Sinusitis
Case Study 3:
A 56-year-old male presented with heavy purulent discharge from the left nostril.
Signs of dental disease were identified on CT (Fig. 9.7) and appropriate treatment provided. Nasal purulence settled with conservative management and surgery was not required.
As this case demonstrates, imaging can detect alternative underlying causes. The dentition should be included within the imaging field and inspected for signs of disease—in particular, apical lucency is a common finding. Dental disease should be fully treated before embarking on sinus surgery, except in the case where complete obstruction of the sinus occurs and when an extraction is required, where a combined approach is advised.
Learning Point
Primary treatment of associated dental disease should precede sinus surgery.
Allergic Fungal Sinusitis
Allergic fungal sinusitis is a type 1 and 3 mediated hypersensitivity reaction in immunocompetent patients. The diagnosis is often made on the basis of characteristic image findings in association with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP), a positive skin prick test result to fungi and isolation of fungal hyphae within nasal mucin. The majority of affected sinuses show near complete opacification, although the disease can be unilateral. Non-contrast enhanced imaging typically demonstrates hyperdense central material with a peripheral rim of hypodense mucosa. There is expansion, remodelling and thinning of the sinus bony walls with focal dehiscence in some cases. MRI can have variable T1W signal appearances and often a low (dark signal void) T2W signal is characteristic (Fig. 9.8). This latter finding is thought to be due to high concentration of metals such as iron, magnesium and manganese (concentrated by fungi) as well as highly proteinaceous desiccated mucin. Surgery is usually required in these patients as the sinuses must be cleared of all secretions.
Preoperative Planning
A CT scan is mandatory prior to undertaking endoscopic sinus surgery for CRS, with the aims of reducing surgical complications through the identification of anatomical variations, and to plan the surgical approach required. Complications arising in the absence of pre-operative imaging would be difficult to defend medicolegally.
Preoperative Checklist
The pneumonic CLOSED provides a framework with which to systematically review the pre-operative CT scan.
C | Cribriform | Depth, asymmetry |
L | Lamina | Areas of dehiscence |
O | Onodi | Presence of a sphenoethmoidal cell |
S | Sphenoid/skull base | Septations, dehiscence of carotid or optic nerves |
E | Ethmoid arteries | Position in relation to the skull base |
D | Dentition may be overlooked | Reminder that odontogenic disease frequently causes maxillary sinusitis |
C—Cribriform
Much is made of the Keros classification, which measures the depth of the cribriform niche (Type 1: 1–3 mm; Type 2: 4–8 mm, Type 3: >9 mm), but in reality, it has little clinical value. What is of more relevance is the presence of significant asymmetry in the height and slope of the niche (Fig. 9.9), with the lower side presenting a greater risk of penetration during surgery, particularly if the contralateral side has been addressed first.
L—Lamina papyracea
The lamina papyracea may be dehiscent congenitally or as a result of previous orbital trauma or mucoceles, allowing the orbital contents to be displaced into the surgical cavity (Fig. 9.10). It is also important to examine the relationship between the uncinate process and the lamina papyracea. Uncinectomy in the presence of a lateralised uncinate process, for example in cases of silent sinus syndrome, places the orbit at risk unless performed in a retrograde manner.
O—Onodi (Sphenoethmoidal) Cell
These are thought to arise from posterior ethmoid cells which have pneumatised above and lateral to the sphenoid sinus. They are of particular relevance if the sphenoid is approached through the posterior ethmoid cells, as failure to recognise their presence may risk damage to the optic nerve (Fig. 9.11). They appear as a horizontal bar dividing the sphenoid in the coronal plane (Fig. 9.12), but inspection in the parasagittal plane will reveal their true relation with the sphenoid sitting below.
S—Sphenoid Sinus and Skull Base
The sphenoid sinus is examined for dehiscence in the superolateral walls that may expose the optic nerve or carotid arteries (Figs. 9.13 and 9.14), for asymmetry in size and for the insertion of bony septae (as these commonly insert over the carotid arteries, and avulsion of which may therefore risk a severe bleed).
Depending upon the degree of pneumatisation, there may also be lateral sphenoid extensions separating the vidian and pterygopalatine canals.
The skull base should be examined generally for asymmetry or bony dehiscence, which can be found following previous surgery or in the setting of inflammatory or malignant disease (Fig. 9.15).
E—Ethmoid Arteries
The ethmoid arteries are branches of the ophthalmic artery that traverse the roof of the ethmoid air cells before re-entering the anterior cranial fossa. The posterior ethmoid artery almost always crosses within the ethmoid roof, but the anterior ethmoid artery may cross as much as 5 mm below the roof in a mesentery, exposing it to risk of avulsion during surgery. Retraction of the arterial stump into the orbit may cause an orbital haematoma and irretrievable loss of vision. It is therefore essential to identify the artery on pre-operative CT and remain vigilant during surgery. The artery is frequently exposed within a supraorbital ethmoid cell (Fig. 9.16), where it can be found in its posterior margin. It may be identified on CT by finding ‘Kennedy’s nipple’; the only well-defined corticated break in the lamina papyracea where the artery emerges between the medial rectus and superior oblique muscles (Fig. 9.17).
Surgical Planning
Once the checklist has been performed, attention progresses to planning the surgical approach. Disease extent should be assessed, and usually matched by the extent of surgery. Most inflammatory disease is accessible endoscopically, but when disease progresses beyond the mid-pupillary line in the coronal plane in the frontal sinus access is increasingly difficult, and consideration should be given to external approaches in these cases. The need for specialised instrumentation (angled debriders, burrs, fluorescein for occult CSF fistulae) can normally be anticipated by careful preoperative review of the radiology.
The anatomy of the frontal sinus should be studied, paying close attention to the presence and anatomical relationships of frontoethmoidal cells located in or below the frontal recess. It may useful to try to map the relationship between the cells in the frontal and ethmoid region as a series of building blocks to help with surgical planning. Multiplanar software and augmented reality image guidance can facilitate orientation.
In the presence of complex anatomy (Fig. 9.18), or when previous surgery or disease has eroded natural landmarks, intra-operative image guidance may be used to aid real-time localisation of surgical tools. A tracking system (e.g. optical or electromagnetic) simultaneously references a sensor on a surgical instrument with the patient and a preoperative or intraoperative imaging data set (using volumetric CT or MRI). Whilst image guidance is no substitute for sound anatomical knowledge, it may confirm correct identification, and there is some evidence that this may reduce the risk of complications [11].
Assessment of Recalcitrant FESS
When surgery has failed to improve inflammatory disease, and CT imaging has identified remedial technical failures, such as a retained uncinate (Fig. 9.19), restenosis, adhesions or incomplete dissection, image guidance can be of particular assistance, particularly in the vicinity of critical anatomical boundaries or structures.
Non-infective Complications of Sinusitis
Mucocele
A mucocele is a chronic cystic lesion arising from the paranasal sinuses. Owing to the presence of pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium containing goblet cells, mucus build up results in progressive expansion over the course of many years. Likely aetiologies include obstruction of the sinus ostium, often caused by previous surgical procedures (particularly in the case of the frontal sinus), or obstruction of a minor salivary gland (either secondary to trauma or infection/inflammation) which subsequently leads to accumulation of mucus. It is unusual for mucoceles to be accompanied by symptoms of acute or chronic sinusitis although pyoceles may develop secondarily.
Frontoethmoidal mucoceles are the most common type, likely due to the tight anatomical boundaries of the frontal recess which is more prone to obstruction following a minor traumatic or infective insult. Symptoms include frontal headache, proptosis and inferolateral displacement of the orbit, although the degree of diplopia that ensues correlates more closely with the rapidity with which the mucocele develops rather than its eventual size.
Sphenoid and sphenoethmoidal mucoceles are associated with headache and pain in the occipital, vertex and retro-orbital areas. Visual field disturbances are more likely than diplopia and globe displacement, although the latter do occur with larger lesions. Owing to expansion occurring in an anatomically restricted area and in proximity to the optic nerves, surgical removal with wide extirpation into the nasal cavity is usually recommended.
Synonymous with mucous retention cysts, mucoceles of the maxillary sinus are remarkably common yet rarely cause any notable symptoms. They are frequently detected as incidental findings on MRI scans performed for other reasons (e.g. MRI brain scans for headache). They rarely require surgical treatment unless of sufficient size to cause obstruction of the maxillary sinus ostium or where diagnostic doubt remains.
Radiological features of mucoceles include sinus opacification on CT scanning together with expansion and wall thinning. Sphenoid mucoceles may have a more aggressive pattern of bony erosion. MRI imaging is often requested when there is any bony dehiscence of the posterior table of the frontal sinus, skull base or orbital margin to define the extent (Fig. 9.20).
Unilateral Nasal Lesions
Careful assessment of unilateral nasal lesions is important to identify malignant disease, even though the majority of such lesions are likely to be benign. Discrimination between benign and potentially malignant lesions is on the basis of clinical and radiological parameters, with biopsy for histological confirmation (Table 9.1).
Clinical Factors
-
Unilateral symptoms: If a patient with a unilateral polyp or lesion has symptoms exclusively restricted to the ipsilateral nose, there should be a low index of suspicion for further investigation. A straightforward unilateral pyogenic granuloma should be easily identified and diagnosed clinically, and simple excision should suffice. A benign looking inflammatory unilateral polyp with ipsilateral epistaxis and nasal block where its origins and extent cannot be conclusively demonstrated clinically merits further investigation to exclude an underlying inverted papilloma or malignant pathology. Note that anosmia is not a specific clinical symptom as it may accompany a variety of different pathologies. Even in cases of olfactory neuroblastoma, anosmia may only occur in the presence of intracranial extension when the presentation is late [12].
-
Symptoms of malignant disease: Extra-nasal symptoms may indicate a malignant process in the presence of a unilateral nasal mass. These include ocular symptoms (diplopia, displacement of the eye), ear symptoms (unilateral glue ear and hearing loss) and dental symptoms (teeth loosening or change in dental bite). Such clinical features merit urgent investigation.
Radiological Features
A patient with a unilateral nasal mass and a sufficient weight of corroborating clinical features will require further investigation, usually in the form of a CT scan although a MRI scan may also be required. High-resolution CT scanning of the nose and paranasal sinuses may demonstrate features of bony erosion in the presence of aggressive pathology and invasion of the mass into adjacent structures. A slower growing benign growth is more likely to demonstrate bony remodelling although there may be deficient bone due to pressure deossification. This requires an additional MRI to characterise the lesion and define extent within the sinonasal region. MRI is occasionally helpful in diagnosing lesions (e.g. ‘cerebrose’ appearance of an inverted papilloma) and in suggesting features such as hypervascularity, however, the MRI appearances are generally non-specific. MRI is, however, particularly useful to exclude a cephalocele as a presentation of a nasoethmoid mass, since the associated anterior skull base defect may be subtle on CT. Most malignant masses are cellular and of T2W intermediate signal, and hence they are easy to separate from T2W high signal inflammatory changes in the paranasal sinuses. MRI is very useful in defining anterior skull base, orbital, infratemporal and perineural extension of tumour.
Sinonasal Tumours
CT and MRI have a complementary role in the evaluation and staging of sinonasal malignancy, which are demonstrated in the following images of an olfactory neuroblastoma (Fig. 9.21a–c).
Learning Points
-
Sinonasal anatomy is complex and best evaluated in the coronal plane, synonymous to clinical assessment.
-
Anatomical variants should be reported to guide intervention.
-
Infective and non-infective complications of sinus disease should be evaluated on imaging.
-
The CLOSED criteria should be reported to minimise surgical complications when treating CRS.
-
Unilateral nasal masses should be addressed with suspicion and a tumour excluded.
References
S. Gray’s Anatomy; the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Elsevier; 2015.
Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Fokkens WJ, et al. European position paper on the anatomical terminology of the internal nose and paranasal sinuses. Rhinol Suppl. 2014:1–34.
Gwaltney JM Jr, Phillips CD, Miller RD, Riker DK. Computed tomographic study of the common cold. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:25–30.
Coutinho J, de Bruijn SF, Deveber G, Stam J. Anticoagulation for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011:CD002005.
Clayman GL, Adams GL, Paugh DR, Koopmann CF Jr. Intracranial complications of paranasal sinusitis: a combined institutional review. Laryngoscope. 1991;101:234–9.
Brook I. Microbiology of intracranial abscesses associated with sinusitis of odontogenic origin. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115:917–20.
Bhattacharyya N, Lee LN. Evaluating the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis based on clinical guidelines and endoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143:147–51.
Ashraf N, Bhattacharyya N. Determination of the “incidental” Lund score for the staging of chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;125:483–6.
Leung R, Kern R, Jordan N, et al. Upfront computed tomography scanning is more cost-beneficial than empiric medical therapy in the initial management of chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1:471–80.
Kanagalingam J, Bhatia K, Georgalas C, Fokkens W, Miszkiel K, Lund VJ. Maxillary mucosal cyst is not a manifestation of rhinosinusitis: results of a prospective three-dimensional CT study of ophthalmic patients. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:8–12.
Dalgorf DM, Sacks R, Wormald PJ, et al. Image-guided surgery influences perioperative morbidity from endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149:17–29.
Connor SE, Umaria N, Chavda SV. Imaging of giant tumours involving the anterior skull base. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:662–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hopkins, C., Connor, S. (2021). Sinonasal Radiology. In: Tatla, T.S., Manjaly, J., Kumar, R., Weller, A. (eds) Head and Neck Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80897-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80897-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80895-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80897-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)