Skip to main content

From Specific Worries to Generalized Anger: The Emotional Dynamics of Right-Wing Political Populism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Populism

Abstract

Right-wing populist parties have transformed the political landscape across many advanced, democratic economies. Their continued strength has been linked to an increasing sense of both economic and cultural insecurity, driven by the conjunction of economic deregulation, globalization, and increased socio-cultural competition. However, socioeconomic factors alone do not fully capture the dynamics of populist activation and support. In this chapter, we argue that emotional processes are a fundamental component that underpins support for right-wing populist parties. We argue that one ignored mechanism of ‘“ressentiment’” explains how support for right-wing populists can transform specific and targeted negative emotions, such as insecurity and worries, into generalized anger and resentment. We furthermore propose that this generalized anger does not only create a new political identity of shared grievance, it also furthers political polarization and leads to further strengthening of a newly found right-wing populist lifeworld.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    To check the robustness of these models, we also replicated these models for center-right CDU, the social democratic SPD, the Green party, and the market-liberal FDP. None of these parties show comparable relationships.

Literature

  • Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J., & De Vreese, C. (Eds.). (2017). Populist political communication in Europe. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1S), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berezin, M. (2009). Illiberal politics in neoliberal times. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, H. G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Betz, H.-G. (2002). Conditions favouring the success and failure of radical right-wing populist parties in contemporary democracies. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 197–213). Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonikowski, B. (2017). Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. British Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 181–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breeze, R. (2019). Emotion in politics: Affective-discursive practices in UKIP and Labour. Discourse & Society, 30(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518801074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theoretical sociology, 46, 357–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. (2016). The politics of resentment. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. The International Journal of Press/politics, 23(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218790035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eatwell, R. (2003). Ten theories of extreme right. In P. H. Merkl & L. Weinberg (Eds.), Right-wing extremism in the twenty-first century (pp. 47–73). Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekström, M., Patrona, M., & Thornborrow, J. (2018). Right-wing populism and the dynamics of style: A discourse-analytic perspective on mediated political performances. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0132-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flecker, J., Hentges, G., & Balazs, G. (2007). Potentials of political subjectivity and the various approaches to the extreme right: Findings of the qualitative research. In J. Flecker (Ed.), Changing working life and the appeal of the extreme right (pp. 35–62). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the collège de France 1978–79 (Trans. G. Burchell). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F. (2007). Invitation to terror. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesselmann, M., Bohmann, S., Goebel, J., Krause, P., Liebau, E., Richter, D., Schacht, D., Schröder, C., Schupp, J., & Liebig, S. (2019). The individual in context (s): Research potentials of the Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) in sociology. European Sociological Review, 35(5), 738–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Gross, J. J. (2011). Emotion and emotion regulation in intergroup conflict: An appraisal-based framework. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology. Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 83–103). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). “They did it”: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land. Anger and mourning on the American right. New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnvall, C. (2013). Trauma and the politics of fear: Europe at the crossroads. In N. Demertzis (Ed.), Emotions in politics (pp. 143–166). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1980). Populist rupture and discourse. Screen Education, 34(99), 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, P. (2020). Anti‐elite politics and emotional reactions to socio‐economic problems: Experimental evidence on “pocketbook anger” from France, Germany, and the United States. British Journal of Sociology, 608–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, J., & Schmuck, D. (2017). The effects of anti-immigrant right-wing populist ads on implicit and explicit attitudes: A moderated mediation model. Communication Research, 44(4), 556–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215577859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkenberg, M. (2000). Renewal of the radical right: Between modernity and anti-modernity. Government and Opposition, 35, 170–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvqsdsd8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mols, F., & Jetten, J. (2016). Explaining the appeal of populist right-wing parties in times of economic prosperity. Political Psychology, 37(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nai, A. (2018). Fear and loathing in populist campaigns? Comparing the communication style of populists and non-populists in elections worldwide. Journal of Political Marketing, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1491439.

  • Nussbaum, M. (2018). Monarchy of fear. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, F. (2005). Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 1–31). Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackow, K., Schupp, J., & von Scheve, C. (2012). Angst und Ärger. Zur Relevanz emotionaler Dimensionen sozialer Ungleichheit. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 41(5), 391–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico, G., Guinjoan, M., & Anduiza, E. (2017). The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M. (2018). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2018). Emotional dynamics of right- and left-wing political populism. Humanity and Society, 42(4), 434–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmuck, D., & Hameleers, M. (2020). Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre-and post-election periods. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1531–1548. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1588909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Y. (2004). Antinomies of formalism: Laclau’s theory of populism and the lessons from religious populism in Greece. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirz, D. (2018). Persuasion through emotion? An experimental test of the emotion-eliciting nature of populist communication. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1114–1138. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-149959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Giang Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nguyen, C.G., Salmela, M., von Scheve, C. (2022). From Specific Worries to Generalized Anger: The Emotional Dynamics of Right-Wing Political Populism. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics