Abstract
Right-wing populist parties have transformed the political landscape across many advanced, democratic economies. Their continued strength has been linked to an increasing sense of both economic and cultural insecurity, driven by the conjunction of economic deregulation, globalization, and increased socio-cultural competition. However, socioeconomic factors alone do not fully capture the dynamics of populist activation and support. In this chapter, we argue that emotional processes are a fundamental component that underpins support for right-wing populist parties. We argue that one ignored mechanism of ‘“ressentiment’” explains how support for right-wing populists can transform specific and targeted negative emotions, such as insecurity and worries, into generalized anger and resentment. We furthermore propose that this generalized anger does not only create a new political identity of shared grievance, it also furthers political polarization and leads to further strengthening of a newly found right-wing populist lifeworld.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
To check the robustness of these models, we also replicated these models for center-right CDU, the social democratic SPD, the Green party, and the market-liberal FDP. None of these parties show comparable relationships.
Literature
Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J., & De Vreese, C. (Eds.). (2017). Populist political communication in Europe. Routledge.
Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1S), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12224.
Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Polity Press.
Berezin, M. (2009). Illiberal politics in neoliberal times. Cambridge University Press.
Betz, H. G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Macmillan.
Betz, H.-G. (2002). Conditions favouring the success and failure of radical right-wing populist parties in contemporary democracies. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 197–213). Palgrave.
Bonikowski, B. (2017). Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. British Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 181–213.
Breeze, R. (2019). Emotion in politics: Affective-discursive practices in UKIP and Labour. Discourse & Society, 30(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518801074.
Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theoretical sociology, 46, 357–385.
Cramer, K. (2016). The politics of resentment. University of Chicago Press.
de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. The International Journal of Press/politics, 23(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218790035.
Eatwell, R. (2003). Ten theories of extreme right. In P. H. Merkl & L. Weinberg (Eds.), Right-wing extremism in the twenty-first century (pp. 47–73). Frank Cass.
Ekström, M., Patrona, M., & Thornborrow, J. (2018). Right-wing populism and the dynamics of style: A discourse-analytic perspective on mediated political performances. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0132-6.
Flecker, J., Hentges, G., & Balazs, G. (2007). Potentials of political subjectivity and the various approaches to the extreme right: Findings of the qualitative research. In J. Flecker (Ed.), Changing working life and the appeal of the extreme right (pp. 35–62). Ashgate.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the collège de France 1978–79 (Trans. G. Burchell). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Furedi, F. (2007). Invitation to terror. Continuum.
Giesselmann, M., Bohmann, S., Goebel, J., Krause, P., Liebau, E., Richter, D., Schacht, D., Schröder, C., Schupp, J., & Liebig, S. (2019). The individual in context (s): Research potentials of the Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) in sociology. European Sociological Review, 35(5), 738–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz029.
Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Gross, J. J. (2011). Emotion and emotion regulation in intergroup conflict: An appraisal-based framework. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology. Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 83–103). Psychology Press.
Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889.
Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). “They did it”: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026.
Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land. Anger and mourning on the American right. New Press.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
Kinnvall, C. (2013). Trauma and the politics of fear: Europe at the crossroads. In N. Demertzis (Ed.), Emotions in politics (pp. 143–166). Palgrave Macmillan.
Laclau, E. (1980). Populist rupture and discourse. Screen Education, 34(99), 87–93.
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
Marx, P. (2020). Anti‐elite politics and emotional reactions to socio‐economic problems: Experimental evidence on “pocketbook anger” from France, Germany, and the United States. British Journal of Sociology, 608–624.
Matthes, J., & Schmuck, D. (2017). The effects of anti-immigrant right-wing populist ads on implicit and explicit attitudes: A moderated mediation model. Communication Research, 44(4), 556–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215577859.
Minkenberg, M. (2000). Renewal of the radical right: Between modernity and anti-modernity. Government and Opposition, 35, 170–188.
Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvqsdsd8.
Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032.
Mols, F., & Jetten, J. (2016). Explaining the appeal of populist right-wing parties in times of economic prosperity. Political Psychology, 37(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12258.
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Nai, A. (2018). Fear and loathing in populist campaigns? Comparing the communication style of populists and non-populists in elections worldwide. Journal of Political Marketing, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1491439.
Nussbaum, M. (2018). Monarchy of fear. Oxford University Press.
Panizza, F. (2005). Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy. In F. Panizza (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 1–31). Verso.
Rackow, K., Schupp, J., & von Scheve, C. (2012). Angst und Ärger. Zur Relevanz emotionaler Dimensionen sozialer Ungleichheit. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 41(5), 391–409.
Rico, G., Guinjoan, M., & Anduiza, E. (2017). The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12261.
Rooduijn, M. (2018). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000145.
Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595.
Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2018). Emotional dynamics of right- and left-wing political populism. Humanity and Society, 42(4), 434–454.
Schmuck, D., & Hameleers, M. (2020). Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre-and post-election periods. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1531–1548. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1588909.
Stavrakakis, Y. (2004). Antinomies of formalism: Laclau’s theory of populism and the lessons from religious populism in Greece. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263519.
Wirz, D. (2018). Persuasion through emotion? An experimental test of the emotion-eliciting nature of populist communication. International Journal of Communication, 12, 1114–1138. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-149959.
Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nguyen, C.G., Salmela, M., von Scheve, C. (2022). From Specific Worries to Generalized Anger: The Emotional Dynamics of Right-Wing Political Populism. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80802-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80803-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)