Skip to main content

Populism and Collective Memory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Populism

Abstract

Populism is a widespread political phenomenon present in countries across the globe. To explain the success of populist actors and discourses, I claim it is essential to consider the long-term impact of authoritarian legacies on national political culture, individual attitudes, and electoral behavior. In the first section, I discuss the importance of collective memories in molding identities and structures of power. I then present the relevant literature on democratization and authoritarian legacies, explaining how to integrate these strands of literature with the study of populism. In the following section, I examine cases from Europe and Latin America that are suitable to study the populist present through the lenses of collective memories of authoritarian regimes. In the conclusions, I discuss possible directions for future research and suggest that other types of memories, including collective memories about colonialism and civil wars, can have a relevant impact on populism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Abts, K., & Rummens, S. (2007). Populism versus democracy. Political Studies, 55(2), 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A., Blackwell, M., & Sen, M. (2016). The political legacy of American Slavery. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), 621–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar, P. (2008). Transitional or post-transitional justice? Recent developments in the Spanish case. South European Society and Politics, 13(4), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar, P., & Humlebaek, C. (2002). Collective memory and national identity in the Spanish democracy. History & Memory, 14(1/2), 121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, S., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2015). Spain: No country for the populist radical right? South European Society and Politics, 20(1), 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Art, D. (2006). The politics of the Nazi past in Germany and Austria. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzheimer, K. (2019). “Don’t Mention the War!” how populist right-wing radicalism became (almost) normal in Germany. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57, 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A. (2010). The Holocaust—A global memory? Extensions and limits of a new memory community. In A. Assmann & S. Conrad (Eds.), Memory in a global age (pp. 97–117). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A. (2014). Transnational memories. European Review, 22(4), 546–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barahona de Brito, A., & Sznajder, M. (2010). The politics of the past: The Southern Cone and Southern Europe in comparative perspective. South European Society and Politics, 15(3), 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2008). Agonistic democracy and the politics of memory. Constellations, 15(1), 148–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, T. (2002). The power of memory and memories of power: The cultural parameters of German policy-making since 1945. In J. W. Müller (Ed.), Memory and power in Post-War Europe: Studies in the presence of the past (pp. 76–99). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, T. (2012). War, guilt, and world politics after World War II. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Betz, H.-G. (1988). New politics of the right: Neo-Populist parties and movements in established democracies. St Martin’s press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borejsza, J. W., & Ziemer, K. (Eds.). (2006). Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes in Europe: Legacies and lessons from the twentieth century. Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, A. C. (2016). The role of memory in populist discourse: The case of the Italian Second Republic. Patterns of Prejudice, 50(3), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustikova, L., & Kitschelt, H. (2009). The radical right in post-communist Europe: Comparative perspectives on legacies and party competition. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42(4), 459–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramani, D., & Manucci, L. (2019). National past and populism: The re-elaboration of fascism and its impact on right-wing populism in Western Europe. West European Politics, 42(6), 1159–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallaro, M. E., & Kornetis, K. (Eds.). (2019). Rethinking democratisation in Spain, Greece and Portugal. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, R. (2015). Transitional justice and changing memories of the past in Central Europe. Government and Opposition, 50(1), 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Brito, A. B., González-Enríquez, C., & Aguilar Fernández, P. (Eds.). (2001). The politics of memory: Transitional justice in democratizing societies. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jonge, L. (2020). The curious case of Belgium: Why is there no right-wing populism in Wallonia? Government and Opposition. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2020.8

  • Dinas, E. (2017). Political socialisation and regime change: How the right Ceased to be wrong in post-1974 Greece. Political Studies, 65(4), 1000–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinas, E., & Northmore-Ball, K. (2020). The ideological shadow of authoritarianism. Comparative Political Studies, 53(12), 1957–1991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019852699

  • Encarnación, O. (2014). Democracy without Justice in Spain: The politics of forgetting. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Filc, D. (2015). Latin American inclusive and European exclusionary populism: Colonialism as an explanation. Journal of Political Ideologies, 20(3), 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finchelstein, F. (2014). The ideological origins of the Dirty War: Fascism, populism, and dictatorship in twentieth century Argentina. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, R. M. (2019). How National histories shaped the politics of crisis: South European Contrasts. In M. E. Cavallaro & K. Kornetis (Eds.), Rethinking democratisation in Spain, Greece and Portugal (pp. 229–247). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Focardi, F. (2013). Il Cattivo Tedesco e il Bravo Italiano: La Rimozione delle Colpe della Seconda Guerra Mondiale. Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogu, C., & Kansteiner, W. (2006). The politics of memory and the poetics of history. In R. N. Lebow, W. Kansteiner, & C. Fogu (Eds.), The politics of memory in Postwar Europe (pp. 284–310). Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Golder, M. (2003). Explaining variation in the success of extreme right parties in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 36(4), 432–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzymała-Busse, A. (2002). Redeeming the communist past: The regeneration of communist parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grzymała-Busse, A. (2006). Authoritarian determinants of democratic party competition: The communist successor parties in East Central Europe. Party Politics, 12(3), 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, R. (2005). Parties and electoral behavior in Southern Europe. Comparative Politics, 37(3), 253–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1925). Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. F. Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halikiopoulou, D., & Vasilopoulou, S. (2018). Breaching the social contract: Crises of democratic representation and patterns of extreme right party support. Government and Opposition, 53(1), 26–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). The ideational approach to populism. Latin American Research Review, 52(4), 513–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herf, J. (1997). Divided memory: The Nazi past in the two Germanys. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, K., & Cesarini, P. (Eds.). (2004). Authoritarian legacies and democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe. University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1983). Introduction: Inventing traditions. In E. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 1–14). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, R. S. (2011). Populist mobilization: A new theoretical approach to populism. Sociological Theory, 29(2), 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (1992). The past is another country: Myth and memory. Daedalus, 121(4), 83–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplonski, C. (2008). Neither truth nor reconciliation: Political violence and the singularity of memory in post-socialist Mongolia. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 9(2–3), 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, A. (2017). Turkish Vergangenheitsbewältigung: The Unbearable Burden of the Past. In M. Gabowitsch (Ed.), Replicating Atonement (pp. 99–127). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H., & McGann, J. A. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Tsfati, Y., & Meyers, O. (2014). Setting the collective memory agenda: Examining mainstream media influence on individuals’ perceptions of the past. Memory Studies, 7(4), 484–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornetis, K. (2019). Public memory of the transitions in Spain and Greece: Toward a change of script? In M. E. Cavallaro & K. Kornetis (Eds.), Rethinking democratisation in Spain, Greece and Portugal (pp. 71–87). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, B. (2018). Populism, media, and the form of society. Communication Theory, 28(4), 444–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies Die. Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, M. C., Pinto, A. C., & Magalhães, P. (2016). Portuguese democratisation 40 years on: Its meaning and enduring legacies. South European Society and Politics, 21(2), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manucci, L. (2020). Populism and collective memory: Comparing fascist legacies in Western Europe. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manucci, L. (2020). The shadow of the authoritarian past in the Iberian Peninsula: Failures and success of radical right populist parties. Relações Internacionais, Special Issue: 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, L. (2017). Populism in the Post-Soviet States. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 214–231). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, M., & Dennison, J. (2020). Explaining the emergence of the radical right in Spain and Portugal: Salience, stigma and supply. West European Politics, 44(4), 752–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1777504

  • Mikucka-Wójtowicz, D. (2019). The Chameleon nature of populist parties: How recurring populism is luring ‘the people’ of Serbia and Croatia. Europe-Asia Studies, 71(3), 450–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, B. (2020). Populism. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, F., Bermejo, F., & Hirst, W. (2016). Argentines’ collective memories of the military Junta of 1976: Differences and similarities across generations and ideology. Memory, 24(7), 990–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. W. (Ed.). (2002). Memory and power in post-war Europe: Studies in the presence of the past. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. W. (2016). What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mungiu-Pippidi, A., & Mindruta, D. (2002). Was Huntington right? Testing cultural legacies and the civilization border. International Politics, 39(2), 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalepa, M. (2010). Skeletons in the closet: Transitional justice in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neiger, M., Meyers, O., & Zandberg, E. (Eds.). (2011). On media memory: Collective memory in a new media age. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neundorf, A. (2010). Democracy in transition: A micro perspective on system change in post-socialist societies. The Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1096–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajnik, M., Kuhar, R., & Šori, I. (2016). Populism in the Slovenian context: Between ethno-nationalism and re-traditionalisation. In G. Lazaridis, G. Campani, & A. Benveniste (Eds.), The rise of the far right in Europe (pp. 137–160). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, E. (2018). Performing the nation: The Janus-faced populist foundations of illiberalism in Hungary. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(3), 308–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankowski, R. (2010). The Populist Radical Right in Poland. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, T. (2014). Populist democracies: Post-Authoritarian Greece and Post-Communist Hungary. Government and Opposition, 49(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinelli, C. (2011). The populist challenge to constitutional democracy. European Constitutional Law Review, 7(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, A. C. (2006). Authoritartian legacies, transitional justice and state crisis in Portugal’s democratization. Democratization, 13(2), 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. (2011). Communism’s shadow: Postcommunist legacies, values, and behavior. Comparative Politics, 43(4), 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. (2020). Communist legacies and left-authoritarianism. Comparative Political Studies, 53(12), 1861–1889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, T., & Zucco, C. (2009). Estimating ideology of Brazilian legislative parties, 1990–2005: A research communication. Latin American Research Review, 44(1), 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, D. (2019). The judicial role in protecting democracy from populism. German Law Journal, 20(2), 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimundo, F., & Generoso de Almeida, C. (2019). The legacy of the Portuguese transition to democracy: April-Warriors versus November-Warriors. In M. E. Cavallaro & K. Kornetis (Eds.), Rethinking Democratisation in Spain, Greece and Portugal (pp. 45–70). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rousso, H. (1990). Le Syndrome de Vichy de 1944 à nos Jours. Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012). The ambivalence of populism: Threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization, 19(2), 184–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, S. (2018). Populism and the erosion of horizontal accountability in Latin America. Political Studies, 66(2), 356–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, H. (2016). From absent to present pasts: Civil society, democracy and the shifting place of memory in Brazil. Journal of Civil Society, 12(2), 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, N. (2011). Impunity in post-authoritarian Brazil: The Supreme Court’s recent verdict on the amnesty law. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 90(April), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöpflin, G. (1993). Politics in Eastern Europe: 1945–92. Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaton, P. A. (2007). Japan’s contested war memories: The ‘memory rifts’ in historical consciousness of World War II. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selçuk, O. (2016). Strong presidents and weak institutions: Populism in Turkey, Venezuela and Ecuador. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 571–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seleny, A. (2007). Communism’s many legacies in East-Central Europe. Journal of Democracy, 18(3), 156–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpser, A., Slater, D., & Wittenberg, J. (2018). Dead but not gone: Contemporary legacies of communism, imperialism, and authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, B. (2016). Confrontation by default and confrontation by design: Strategic and institutional responses to Poland’s populist coalition government. Democratization, 23(2), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanyer, J., Salgado, S., & Strömbäck, J. (2017). Populist actors as communicators or political actors as populist communicators: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication (pp. 353–364). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2019). The populism/anti-populism frontier and its mediation in crisis-ridden Greece: From discursive divide to emerging cleavage? European Political Science, 18, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torcal, M., & Mainwaring, S. (2003). The political recrafting of social bases of party competition: Chile, 1973–95. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 55–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (1998). Democracy and populism. Constellations, 5(1), 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentino, N. A., & Sears, D. O. (2005). Old times there are not forgotten: Race and partisan realignment in the contemporary South. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 672–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verovšek, P. J. (2016). Collective memory, politics, and the influence of the past: The politics of memory as a research paradigm. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(3), 529–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigtländer, N., & Voth, H.-J. (2012). Persecution perpetuated: The medieval origins of anti-Semitic violence in Nazi Germany. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1339–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, A. (1999). Irruptions of memory: Expressive politics in Chile’s transition to democracy. Journal of Latin American Studies, 31(2), 473–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg, J. (2015). Conceptualizing historical legacies. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 29(2), 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Forchtner, B. (2014). Embattled Vienna 1683/2010: Right-wing populism, collective memory and the fictionalisation of politics. Visual Communication, 13(2), 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubrzycki, G., & Woźny, A. (2020). The comparative politics of collective memory. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Manucci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Manucci, L. (2022). Populism and Collective Memory. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics