Abstract
Populism is looming large on the agenda of the social sciences. In most cases the literature deals with related phenomena in the context of liberal and representative democracies, often defining populism as an anti-pluralist “exclusionary form of identity politics” (Müller,.What is populism?, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016: 3) or as an authoritarian “cultural backlash” (Norris and Inglehart,.Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism, Cambridge University Press, 2019). In this chapter, we try to shift the focus away from populist actors, parties and governments and address instead the political, economic and social contexts in which populism can become successful in mobilizing electoral majorities in the first place. We are less interested in a normative discussion of populism nor do we explore the type of programs populists might pursue once in office (see Lammert, C. (2020). The Crisis of Democracy: The United States in Perspective. In: The Emergence of Illiberalism: Understanding a Global Phenomenon, eds. B. Vormann and M. Weinman, Routledge, 124–139.; Vormann, B. & M. Weinman (2020). “From a Politics of No Alternative to a Politics of Fear: The Emergence of Illiberalism and its Variants”, in: The Emergence of Illiberalism: Understanding a Global Phenomenon, eds. Boris Vormann and Michael Weinman, Routledge, 3–26. for such analyses). Rather, we focus on the contexts and scenarios in which populists thrive and to which they vow to offer political and economic alternatives.
In brief, we see populism as the result of specific political and economic developments that dovetail with dynamics of cultural backlash and white resentment. It produces crisis tendencies of its own once populist leaders take office, but is itself not the root cause of democracy’s ailment in the West. We contend that the recent success of populism across so many different country contexts needs to be viewed as a global phenomenon which has produced specific effects in particular institutional and historical contexts. For this chapter, our main focus lies on these developments in the United States.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
APSA. (1950). Toward a more responsible two-party system: A report of the committee on political parties of the American Political Science Association. American Political Science Review, 44, 1–99.
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Majlesi, K. (2017). A note on the effect of rising trade exposure on the 2016 presidential election. Appendix to Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Majlesi, K. (2016). Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure (No. w22637). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Autor, D., & M. Wasserman. (2013). Wayward sons: The emerging gender gap in labor markets and education. Third Way, available at http://economics.mit.edu/files/8754.
Barber, M., & N. McCarty. (2013). Causes and consequences of polarization. In J. Mansbridge & C. J. Martin. (Eds.), Negotiating agreement in politics, American Political Science Association. Available at https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/dtingley/files/negotiating_agreement_in_politics.pdf.
Blau, F. D., & L. M. Kahn. (2016). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations (Discussion Paper 965). IZA Institute of Labor Economics, available at http://ftp.iza.org/dp9656.pdf.
Blyth, M., & J. Hopkin. 2020. Global Trumpism: Understanding anti-system politics in western democracies. In B. Vormann & M. Weinman (Eds.), The emergence of illiberalism: Understanding a global phenomenon (pp. 101–123).
Bonica, A., et. al. (2013), Why hasn’t democracy slowed rising inequality? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 103–124. Available at https://legacy.voteview.com/pdf/jep_BMPR.pdf.
Brooks, A. C. (2017). The dignity deficit. Foreign Affairs, March–April, available at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2017-02-13/dignity-deficit.
Case, A., & Deaton, S. A. (2020). Deaths of despair and the future of capitalism. Princeton University Press.
CNN Politics. (2018). Exit Polls. Available at http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls, Last accessed May 2018.
Darvas, Z., & K. Efstathio. (2016). Income inequality boosted Trump vote. Bruegel. Available at http://bruegel.org/2016/11/income-inequality-boosted-trump-vote/.
Dionne, E. J., Jr., Ornstein, N.-J., & Mann, T. E. (2017). One nation after Trump: A guide for the perplexed, the disillusioned, the desperate, and the not-yet deported. St. Martin’s Press.
Eberstadt, N. (2016). Men without work: America’s invisible crisis. Templeton Press.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2019). Democracy index 2018: Me too? Political participation, protest and democracy. Retrieved from http://www.eiu.com/.
Edsall, T. B. (2018, October 7). How did the democrats become favorites of the rich? The New York Times. Accessed February 04, 2018. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/opinion/how-did-the-democrats-become-favorites-of-the-rich.html.
Lammert, C. (2018). Einkommens- und Wohlstandsungleichheit und der Zustand der Demokratie in den USA. In W. Gellner & M. Oswald (Eds.), Die gespaltenen Staaten von Amerika (pp. 209–222). Springer Verlag.
Lammert, C. (2020). The crisis of democracy: The United States in perspective. In B. Vormann & M. Weinman (Eds.), The emergence of illiberalism: Understanding a global phenomenon (pp. 124–139).
Lammert, C., & Vormann, B. (2018). The heavenly chorus sings with a strong upper-class accent. In P. Horst, P. Adorf, & F. Decker (Eds.), Die USA - eine scheiternde Demokratie? (pp. 235–252). Campus Verlag.
Lammert, C., & Vormann, B. (2020). When inequalities matter most: The crisis of democracy as a crisis of trust. In T. Michael (Ed.), Mobilization, representation, and responsiveness in the American democracy (pp. 139–156). Palgrave Macmillan.
Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110.
Lee, F. E. (2009). Beyond ideology: Politics, principles, and partisanship in the U.S. senate. University of Chicago.
Levy, P. (1952). Toward a more responsible two-party system. A Report of the Committee on Political Parties of the American Political Science Association.
Lindsey, B., & Teles, S. (2017). The captured economy: How the powerful enrich themselves, slow down growth, and increase Inequality. Oxford University Press.
Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2016). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. Basic Books.
Müller, J. W. (2016). What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
Page, B. I. & M. Gilens (2017). Democracy in America? What has gone wrong and what we can do about it. University of Chicago Press.
Pew (2017). Public trust in government: 1958–2017. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2017/05/03/public-trust-in-government-1958-2017/.
Pew (2018). The public, the political system and American democracy. Pew. Retrieved from https://www.people-press.org/2018/04/26/the-public-the-political-system-and-american-democracy/.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (p. 2014). Harvard University Press.
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2013). The unheavenly chorus. Princeton University Press.
Vormann, B., & Lammert, C. (2019). Democracy in crisis. Pennsylvania University Press.
Vormann, B. & M. Weinman (2020). From a politics of no alternative to a politics of fear: The Emergence of illiberalism and its variants. In Boris Vormann & Michael Weinman (Eds.). The emergence of illiberalism: Understanding a global phenomenon (pp. 3–26).
World Bank. (2018). All the ginis dataset, available at https://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/all-the-ginis. Last accessed May 2018.
Zingales, L. (2012). A capitalism for the people: Recapturing the lost genius of American prosperity. Basic books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lammert, C., Vormann, B. (2022). Populist Mobilization in the United States: Adding Political Economy to Cultural Explanations. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80802-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80803-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)