Skip to main content

Populist Mobilization in the United States: Adding Political Economy to Cultural Explanations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Populism

Abstract

Populism is looming large on the agenda of the social sciences. In most cases the literature deals with related phenomena in the context of liberal and representative democracies, often defining populism as an anti-pluralist “exclusionary form of identity politics” (Müller,.What is populism?, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016: 3) or as an authoritarian “cultural backlash” (Norris and Inglehart,.Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism, Cambridge University Press, 2019). In this chapter, we try to shift the focus away from populist actors, parties and governments and address instead the political, economic and social contexts in which populism can become successful in mobilizing electoral majorities in the first place. We are less interested in a normative discussion of populism nor do we explore the type of programs populists might pursue once in office (see Lammert, C. (2020). The Crisis of Democracy: The United States in Perspective. In: The Emergence of Illiberalism: Understanding a Global Phenomenon, eds. B. Vormann and M. Weinman, Routledge, 124–139.; Vormann, B. & M. Weinman (2020). “From a Politics of No Alternative to a Politics of Fear: The Emergence of Illiberalism and its Variants”, in: The Emergence of Illiberalism: Understanding a Global Phenomenon, eds. Boris Vormann and Michael Weinman, Routledge, 3–26. for such analyses). Rather, we focus on the contexts and scenarios in which populists thrive and to which they vow to offer political and economic alternatives.

In brief, we see populism as the result of specific political and economic developments that dovetail with dynamics of cultural backlash and white resentment. It produces crisis tendencies of its own once populist leaders take office, but is itself not the root cause of democracy’s ailment in the West. We contend that the recent success of populism across so many different country contexts needs to be viewed as a global phenomenon which has produced specific effects in particular institutional and historical contexts. For this chapter, our main focus lies on these developments in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • APSA. (1950). Toward a more responsible two-party system: A report of the committee on political parties of the American Political Science Association. American Political Science Review, 44, 1–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Majlesi, K. (2017). A note on the effect of rising trade exposure on the 2016 presidential election. Appendix to Dorn, D., Hanson, G., & Majlesi, K. (2016). Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure (No. w22637). National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D., & M. Wasserman. (2013). Wayward sons: The emerging gender gap in labor markets and education. Third Way, available at http://economics.mit.edu/files/8754.

  • Barber, M., & N. McCarty. (2013). Causes and consequences of polarization. In J. Mansbridge & C. J. Martin. (Eds.), Negotiating agreement in politics, American Political Science Association. Available at https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/dtingley/files/negotiating_agreement_in_politics.pdf.

  • Blau, F. D., & L. M. Kahn. (2016). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations (Discussion Paper 965). IZA Institute of Labor Economics, available at http://ftp.iza.org/dp9656.pdf.

  • Blyth, M., & J. Hopkin. 2020. Global Trumpism: Understanding anti-system politics in western democracies. In B. Vormann & M. Weinman (Eds.), The emergence of illiberalism: Understanding a global phenomenon (pp. 101–123).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonica, A., et. al. (2013), Why hasn’t democracy slowed rising inequality? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 103–124. Available at https://legacy.voteview.com/pdf/jep_BMPR.pdf.

  • Brooks, A. C. (2017). The dignity deficit. Foreign Affairs, March–April, available at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2017-02-13/dignity-deficit.

  • Case, A., & Deaton, S. A. (2020). Deaths of despair and the future of capitalism. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CNN Politics. (2018). Exit Polls. Available at http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls, Last accessed May 2018.

  • Darvas, Z., & K. Efstathio. (2016). Income inequality boosted Trump vote. Bruegel. Available at http://bruegel.org/2016/11/income-inequality-boosted-trump-vote/.

  • Dionne, E. J., Jr., Ornstein, N.-J., & Mann, T. E. (2017). One nation after Trump: A guide for the perplexed, the disillusioned, the desperate, and the not-yet deported. St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberstadt, N. (2016). Men without work: America’s invisible crisis. Templeton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit. (2019). Democracy index 2018: Me too? Political participation, protest and democracy. Retrieved from http://www.eiu.com/.

  • Edsall, T. B. (2018, October 7). How did the democrats become favorites of the rich? The New York Times. Accessed February 04, 2018. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/opinion/how-did-the-democrats-become-favorites-of-the-rich.html.

  • Lammert, C. (2018). Einkommens- und Wohlstandsungleichheit und der Zustand der Demokratie in den USA. In W. Gellner & M. Oswald (Eds.), Die gespaltenen Staaten von Amerika (pp. 209–222). Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, C. (2020). The crisis of democracy: The United States in perspective. In B. Vormann & M. Weinman (Eds.), The emergence of illiberalism: Understanding a global phenomenon (pp. 124–139).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, C., & Vormann, B. (2018). The heavenly chorus sings with a strong upper-class accent. In P. Horst, P. Adorf, & F. Decker (Eds.), Die USA - eine scheiternde Demokratie? (pp. 235–252). Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, C., & Vormann, B. (2020). When inequalities matter most: The crisis of democracy as a crisis of trust. In T. Michael (Ed.), Mobilization, representation, and responsiveness in the American democracy (pp. 139–156). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, F. E. (2009). Beyond ideology: Politics, principles, and partisanship in the U.S. senate. University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (1952). Toward a more responsible two-party system. A Report of the Committee on Political Parties of the American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, B., & Teles, S. (2017). The captured economy: How the powerful enrich themselves, slow down growth, and increase Inequality. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2016). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. W. (2016). What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Page, B. I. & M. Gilens (2017). Democracy in America? What has gone wrong and what we can do about it. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew (2017). Public trust in government: 1958–2017. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2017/05/03/public-trust-in-government-1958-2017/.

  • Pew (2018). The public, the political system and American democracy. Pew. Retrieved from https://www.people-press.org/2018/04/26/the-public-the-political-system-and-american-democracy/.

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (p. 2014). Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2013). The unheavenly chorus. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vormann, B., & Lammert, C. (2019). Democracy in crisis. Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vormann, B. & M. Weinman (2020). From a politics of no alternative to a politics of fear: The Emergence of illiberalism and its variants. In Boris Vormann & Michael Weinman (Eds.). The emergence of illiberalism: Understanding a global phenomenon (pp. 3–26).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2018). All the ginis dataset, available at https://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/all-the-ginis. Last accessed May 2018.

  • Zingales, L. (2012). A capitalism for the people: Recapturing the lost genius of American prosperity. Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Lammert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lammert, C., Vormann, B. (2022). Populist Mobilization in the United States: Adding Political Economy to Cultural Explanations. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics