Abstract
Populism has become one of the most frequently researched topics in political science and varying conceptualizations and definitions have arisen since the term evolved into an analytical tool in the 1950s. But despite this extensive research agenda, the concept of populism is illusive and contested. Further, it is used in science as well as politics for many regionally different phenomena throughout history. As such, the term is utilized to characterize parties, movements, supporters of certain policies, attitudes and much more. Speaking to the negative normative connotation populism has been ascribed, it is sometimes also used within politics to defame oppositional actors. These normative presumptions—be it positively or negatively—have not escaped science either. We argue that it is high time to re-assess populism, especially in regard to its suitability for and applicability in the scientific debate. To that end, we take a historic perspective, assessing the historic roots of the concept and identifying common conceptual elements as well as elements that are not constitutive from a conceptual point of view. We also discuss the relation between populism and democracy further, especially in terms of the relation between populism and extremism. Finally, we offer an eclectic definition and propose a six-step orientation that should be viewed as an axiom as a means to re-assert the scientific value of the concept of populism as well as populism research writ large.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Andreadis, I., Stavrakakis, Y., & Demertzis, N. (2018). Populism, ethnic nationalism and xenophobia. Επιστήμη Και Κοινωνία: Επιθεώρηση Πολιτικής Και Ηθικής Θεωρίας, 37, 11–40.
Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? Political Studies, 64, 1–16.
Aslanidis, P. (2018), Populism as a collective action master frame for transnational mobilization. Sociological Forum, 33(2), 443–464.
Aslanidis, P. (2020). Major directions in populism studies: Is there room for culture? Partecipazione e Conflitto, 13(1), 59–82.
Axelrod, R. (1967). The structure of public opinion on policy issues. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31(1), 51–60.
Barr, R. R. (2009). Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics. Party Politics, 15(1), 29–48.
Berman, Sheri (2016, November–December). Populism is not fascism: But it could be a harbinger. Foreign Affairs, pp. 39–44.
Betz, H. G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Springer.
Betz, H.-G. (2002). Conditions favouring the success and failure of radical right-wing populist partiesin contemporary democracies. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 197–213). Palgrave Macmillan.
Block, E., & Negrine, R. (2017). The populist communication style: Toward a critical framework. International Journal of Communication Systems, 11, 178–197.
Bonikowski, B., & Gidron, N. (2016). The populist style in American politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952–1996. Social Forces, 94(4), 1593–1621.
Burgoon, B., van Noort, S., Rooduijn, M., & Underhill, G. (2019). Positional deprivation and support for radical right and radical left parties. Economic Policy, 39(97), 49–93.
Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46(5), 357–385.
Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. Junction Books.
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47, 2–16.
Canovan, M. (2002). Taking politics to the people. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 25–44). Palgrave Macmillan.
Canovan, M. (2004). Populism for political theorists? Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 241–252.
Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. The American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54.
Clanton, G. (1984). ‘Hayseed Socialism’ on the Hill: Congressional populism, 1891–1895. Western Historical Quarterly, 15(2), 139–162.
Comaroff, J. (2011). Populism and late liberalism: A special affinity? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 637, 99–111.
Da Silva, F. C., & Vieira, M. B. (2019). Populism as a logic of political action. European Journal of Social Theory, 22(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018762540
De Cleen, B. (2019). The populist political logic and the analysis of the discursive construction of ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’. In Imagining the Peoples of Europe. Populist discourses across the political spectrum (pp. 19–42). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
De Cleen, B., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2017). Distinctions and articulations: A discourse theoretical framework for the study of populism and nationalism. Javnost-the Public, 24(4), 301–319.
Dornbusch, R., & Edwards, S. (1991). The macroeconomics of populism. In The macroeconomics of populism in Latin America (pp. 7–13). University of Chicago Press.
Freeden, M. (2017). After the Brexit referendum: Revisiting populism as an ideology.
Freidel, F. (1973). The old populism and the new. Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society. Third Series 85, 78–90.
Galston, W. (2014). The new challenge to market democracies: The political and social costs of economic stagnation. Brookings Institution Press. Retrieved January 5, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/https://doi.org/10.7864/j.ctt1hfr137.
Galston, W., Hunter, J., & Owen, J. (2018). Anti-pluralism: The populist threat to liberal democracy. Yale University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21668rd.
Hadiz, V. R., & Chryssogelos, A. (2017). Populism in world politics: A comparative cross-regional perspective. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117693908.
Hall, G (1967). Attempt of definition. In D. MacRae, L. Schapiro, F. W. Deakin, H. Seton-Watson, P. Worsley, E. Gellner, & I. Berlin (Eds.), Conference on populism: Verbatim report. London School of Economics and Political Science.
Hawkins, K. A. (2003). Populism in Venezuela: The rise of Chavismo. Third World Quarterly, 24(6), 1137–1160.
Hofstadter, R. (1955). The age of reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. Vintage Books.
Howarth, D., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Introducing discourse theory and political analysis. In D. Howarth, A. J. Norval, & Y. Stavrakakis (Eds.), Discourse theory and political analysis (pp. 1–23). Manchester University Press.
Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2016). Friend or foe? Testing the influence of populism on democratic quality in Latin America. Political Studies, 64(4), 872–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12219.
Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.
Jansen, R. S. (2011). Populist mobilization. Sociological Theory, 29, 75–96.
Judis, J. B. (2016). Rethinking populism. Dissent, 63(4), 116–122.
Kazin, M. (1995). The populist Persuasion. Basic Books.
Laclau, E. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso.
Laclau, E. (2005a). On populist reason. Verso.
Laclau, E. (2005b). Populism: What’s in a name? Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, 48.
Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2000). Par le Peuple, Pour le Peuple. Le Populisme et les Démocraties. Fayard.Mény.
Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002a). Democracies and the populist challenge. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002b). The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge. Palgrave.
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. Verso.
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Penn State University Press.
Nkrumah, B. (2021). Political opportunism: Populism as a new political tactic in South Africa. In Africa’s radicalisms and conservatisms (pp. 117–140). Brill.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
Populism. (2014). Cambridge. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/de/worterbuch/englisch/populism.
Ostiguy, P. (1998). Peronism and anti-Peronism: Class-cultural cleavages and political identity in Argentina (Ph.D. dissertation). Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.
Ostiguy, P. (2009). The high and the low in politics: A two-dimensional political space for comparative analysis and electoral studies (Kellogg Institute Working Paper #360), Notre Dame: Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
Ostiguy, P. (2014). Flaunting ‘low’ appeals: A cultural-relational approach to populism. Paper prepared for the conference “A New Critical Juncture? Changing Patterns of Interest Representation and Regime Politics in Contemporary Latin America”, Kellogg Institute of International Studies, University of Notre Dame.
Ostiguy, P. (2017). Populism: A socio-cultural approach. In C. Rovira, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 73–97). Oxford University Press.
Oswald, M. (2020). Der Populismus in den USA. In C. Lammert, M. Siewert, & B. Vormann (Hrsg.), Handbuch Politik USA (pp. 55–72). Wiesbaden.
Pappas, T. S. (2013). Why Greece failed. Journal of Democracy, 24(2), 31–45.
Pappas, T. S. (2019). On populism, planets, and why concepts should precede definitions and theory-seeking. Sociologica, 13(2), 19–22.
Pettigrew, T. F. (2017). Social psychological perspectives on Trump supporters. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i1.750.
Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against populism (Vol. 34). WH Freeman.
Roberts, K. M. (1995). Neoliberalism and the transformation of populism in Latin America: The Peruvian case. World Politics, 82–116.
Rooduijn, M. (2019). State of the field: How to study populism and adjacent topics? A plea for both more and less focus. European Journal of Political Research, 58, 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12314.
Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2017). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815596514.
Salmela, M., & von Scheve, C. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417734419.
Schmitter, P. C. (2019). The vices and virtues of “populisms.” Sociologica, 13(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/9391.
Shils, E. A. (1954). Populism and the rule of law. University of Chicago.
Shils, E. (1956). The torment of secrecy: The background and consequences of American security policies. Elephant Paperbacks.
Shils, E. (1960). The intellectuals in the political development of the new states. World Politics, 12(3), 329–368.
Sikk, A. (2009). Parties and populism (Centre for European Politics, Security and Integration (CEPSI) Working Papers 1). Centre for European Politics, Security and Integration (CEPSI), SSEES, UCL: London, UK.
Stavrakakis, Y., & Jäger, A. (2018). Accomplishments and limitations of the ‘new’ mainstream in contemporary populism studies. European Journal of Social Theory., 21(4), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017723337.
Taggart, P. (2002). Populism and the pathology of representative politics. In Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 62–80). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Torfing, J. (1995). New theories of discourse. Blackwell.
Van Hauwaert, S. M., & Van Kessel, S. (2018). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 68–92.
Verbeek, B., & Zaslove, A. (2019). Contested issues surrounding populism in public and academic debates. The International Spectator, 54(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2019.1606513.
Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept. Comparative Politics, 34, 1–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oswald, M., Schäfer, M., Broda, E. (2022). The New Age of Populism: Reapproaching a Diffuse Concept. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80802-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80803-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)