Abstract
In today’s world we are surrounded by various types of technologies on which the dependency of humans has increased because these technologies help humans to connect and reduce their workload. In this paper, we have discussed two technologies that are cloud services and Internet of things (IoT). We have combined these two technologies as one technology. Google Cloud Platform and Microsoft Azure are the two cloud service providers along with the role of the Internet of things in Healthcare. The role of the Internet of things in healthcare rapidly increased the use of application services in a cloud-based IT infrastructure. So, according to the definition of the Internet of things, devices are connected to one another through network and data exchange with the help of this network. An Introduction to the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and Microsoft Azure, moving to the comparison between the two along with the growth of Google Cloud Service and Microsoft Azure with respect to time. This paper attempts to show last 5 years’ growth of these two cloud-based technologies. Then we have described the architecture of the Internet of things (IoT) in the Healthcare domain. Internet of things (IoT) uses cloud-based technology, so the paper discusses Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure cloud and explores Google healthcare service. In Google Healthcare, factors considered in pricing scheme along with request plan offered by Google cloud Healthcare service, applications of the internet of things (IoT), its merits and demerits. The future of this technology in the healthcare sector is also studied.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Google Cloud Platform (GCP)
- Microsoft Azure
- Healthcare
- Internet of Things (IoT)
- eHealth
- Virtual machines (VMs)
1 Introduction
During the last few years, cloud computing and IoT has become an emerging field in the industry. In earlier days it was very difficult to trace and manage the patient and its related records nowadays with the help of advanced Technologies and applications, it has become convenient easy and efficient to trace patient geography and excess records from previous databases. Due to the advancement in the technological field, the advancement in the architecture of cloud based applications has also changed the way user and client communicates with each other. This has a rapidly changed the models and the components related along with functionality, storage, exchange, manage information. Why IoT for Healthcare is becoming important with respect to time? There are various reasons for growth of the internet of things (IoT) in Healthcare. One of the main reason is the people who live in rural areas are unable to avail Health Services due to distance so in order to bring them closer to the health facilities applications are being developed for the Healthcare [1], so that they can avail health facilities quickly and can be stayed connected. This problem is not limited to rural areas, but it has rapidly increased in Metropolitan cities if anyone needs an emergency service for health related services then it is very difficult for a person to connect to a right health service which is nearest to its place. With the development of the Healthcare monitoring ecosystem system [2], the current health of a patient can be monitored and related measures can be taken.
2 Literature Review
In 1997, Cloud computing was described by Professor Ramnath Chellappa as the current computing model where the lines of computing will be complete with commercial rationale rather than technical limits alone. Google provides cloud services as Google Cloud Platform (GCP). Google gains a powerful game in the world of cloud services. Google cloud platform was launched in the year 2008. Google cloud platform offers so many features. In this one feature is the use of managed VMs (virtual machines). Google enters in the cloud services in 2008 with the viewing of Google App Engine [3]. In this paper PaaS service that enabled purchaser to use Google’s platform to develop and host their applications. Problems with Google App Engine were the lack of outstanding developer languages, it supported and the absence of Storage solution. Planners of Google Cloud Platform (GCP) [4] were mandatory write their functions using Python. In 2009, Google achieved more benefits after the extension of multiple services like Google compute engine and to manipulate functions like DNS and data analyst. Java is included as a supported language (Table 1).
Google Cloud Platform is available in 200+ countries across the globe. Google Cloud Platform enables a user to build, deploy, and manage Virtual Machines (VMs) to run workloads in the cloud. Google Cloud Platform offers a free tier that includes a micro instance per month for up to 12 months. It is the easiest way to run your code in the cloud. Also, it is highly available and fault-tolerant [6]. The unified object storage for live or archived data provided for Google Cloud Platform (GCP) . This service is used to store and access data in GCP infrastructure. The Google Cloud Platform provides storage that can be attached to instances running in either Google Computer Engine or Google Kubernetes Engine. GCP does not have any disaster recovery service. GCP offers high performance and scalability. Also, it helps in maintaining relational MYSQL, and SQL Server databases in the cloud. GCP provides better pricing than competitors, live migration of Virtual Machines (VMs), improved performance, redundant backups. Some disadvantages Google Cloud Platform support fee is quite hefty, it has a complex pricing schema, downloading data from GCS is expensive (i.e., it’s 0.12 per GB). Companies using the Google Cloud Platform are Netflix, Unilever, Kellogg’s, Samsung, Spotify, HSBC, Snapchat, etc. [7] (Fig. 1).
In February 2010 Microsoft Azure was launched, and promises to deliver services as infrastructure-as-a-service and service and platform as a service [8]. Microsoft Azure cloud structure the oldest cloud service provider in the industry. It consists of following features.
-
Compute
-
Networking
-
Storage
-
Web
-
Mobile
-
Containers
-
Databases
-
Analytics
-
Al + Machine Learning
-
Internet of things
-
Integration
-
Identity
Microsoft Azure has a good market value since last more than 10 years, now it is present in more than 140 countries and has the second [9] highest number of customers around the globe after Amazon Web Services; it is the second best Cloud Service Provider in the market after Amazon Web Services.
Microsoft provides many services to its clients, which includes computing services, functional services, networking services, VPN services, etc., on the other hand it also helps its clients to increase or decrease VPN Service according to the usability [10]. Microsoft Azure has various clients from Netflix, Kellogg’s, Samsung eBay Pixar Unilever etc. Microsoft Azure provides better development operations strong security profile, cost effective solutions, etc. Some disadvantages of Microsoft Azure are different codebase for cloud and premise, the PaaS ecosystem is not as efficient as IaaS, poor management of GUI and tools, no integrated backup. Azure has a free tier for a year with 750 h per month of Windows or Linux Virtual Machines. Azure functions allow users to build an application using the server less, simple function with a programming language of their choice. Blob Storage offers large amounts of storage and scalability. It stores the object in the tiers; depending on how often the data is being accessed. Microsoft Azure managed disk will allow you to create up to 10,000 VM disks in a subscription. Microsoft Azure is a strategy that allows site recovery by orchestrating and automating the replication process of Azure Virtual Machines (VMs) between regions. Azure eases the migration of SQL server databases without changing the user’s applications [11].
Google Cloud Platform (GCP) is one of the leaders among cloud API (Application Programming Interface). Microsoft Azure is the second leading cloud provider after the Google Cloud Platform. We have compared compare in-depth the features of Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform deemed to provide security with a particular focus on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data. Comparatively Google Cloud Platform gives better pricing than competitors. Azure functions allow users to build an application using the server less, simple function with a programming language of their choice [12]. The Google Cloud Platform provides unified object storage for live or archived data. Google Cloud Platform (GCP) offers high performance and scalability (Table 2).
Internet of things (IoT) is a technology to synthesize several devices on the internet and permits them to share and transfer information, data and resources among them. There are embedded sensors in all the devices we come across like mobile phones, traffic lights, and electrical appliances, etc., these sensors help them to integrate over the internet [13]. This sensor ceaselessly radiates data and helps us track them as well as knowing their proper working. IoT connects all physical devices like microphones, cameras, speakers display screens etc. This technology helps to blend their data and provide a common language to communicate with each other (Fig. 2).
In healthcare, IoT helps the hospital management system to make comprehensive patient records, test results and treatment reports [14].
Although there still are some challenges like
-
Unavailability of real time data
-
Insufficient smart devices
Internet of things (IoT) could be the solution of all these issues. It can provide real time data and make devices smarter so that they can provide analytics. Internet of things (IoT) [15, 16] makes devices smarter. Internet of things (IoT) empowers healthcare and improves the quality of care. In the end, it directs the un-sustainability rising cost of medical devices.
4 Applications of Internet of Things (IoT) in Health Cloud
Health Tracking App
These types’ of software help to track the health of the patient and generate quality of information which can be helpful for the doctor to take necessary steps. These types of apps can track heartbeat [17, 18], blood pressure, pulse rate diabetes, irregular breathing, fever, weight etc.
Internet of Things (IoT) for Patients
Internet of things (IoT) has changed the patient’s lifestyles, by keeping track of their condition [19]. Wearable devices like fitness bands and some wireless devices like blood pressure and heart rate to monitor the situation of a patient.
Internet of Things (IoT) for Nutrition
Nutrition is a very important for individuals to be healthy and to live a happy life. Fooducate is nutrition app. App provide service of comparing various types of food for individual and recommends the best result among all. This app also tracks the food intake, exercise, sleeping time, sleeping hours etc.
Internet of Things (IoT) for Meditation
Nowadays, mental health is very important aspect of our real life, due to a busy life, excessive workload and hectic schedule result in mental stress and mental illness. In the field of Internet of things (IoT) [20] meditation app becomes more important in our daily life by reducing our stress by providing peace of mind. Headspace application is a software which is designed in such a manner which provide guided meditations provide SMS alerts, time to chill out and many other functions.
Internet of Things (IoT) for Physicians
Physicians can easily track the current situation of a patient using wearable and other devices embedded with Internet of things (IoT) [21]. Doctors are helped by Internet of things (IoT) in healthcare as doctors can identify best suited treatment for the patients.
Internet of Things (IoT) in Hospitals
In case of an emergency, the doctor can immediately check the patient’s situation and can communicate easily with mobile apps. Patient care is improved by Internet of things (IoT). Internet of things (IoT) [22, 23] devices provides accurate data of a patient and support some features such as monitoring, tracking and real-time alerting. As the Internet of things (IoT) devices help the doctors to get the analysis of the patient’s health it also helps [5] the hospitals to keep real time tracking of the various equipment’s such as Wheelchairs, Oxygen Pumps, defibrillators, nebulizers and much more. Internet of things (IoT) Devices is Hospitals also helps to manage the assets like pharmacy [24], Health monitoring, Doctor Connectivity, patient monitoring etc.
Internet of Things (IoT) for Hospital Information System
Such types of devices are used to collect the information regarding services available in the hospital like number of vacant beds, number of reserved beds, number of patients admitted [25], number of doctors on duty, available emergency services, availability of ambulance service, doctor on call service, doctors appointment, OPD timing, charges of OPD etc.
5 Merits of Internet of Things (IoT) in Healthcare
-
Using Internet of things (IoT) reduces data wastage by giving reliable and accurate data with less percentage of error in expensive imaging, mapping and [26, 27] testing which also in one way save cost and resources.
-
Continuous monitoring of patients is possible with the help of the Internet of things (IoT) which enables real-time diagnosis and reporting of diseases before it spreads [28] further.
-
Internet of things (IoT) promotes research in the healthcare sector because it can effectively collect colossal data about a single case or type of patients, which would otherwise be both difficult and costly if collected in person [29, 30].
-
Internet of things (IoT) also helps the large scale policy makers and government decisions by collecting real time data about urbanization, pollution, population, market trends, shopping behaviors etc. [31].
-
Internet of things (IoT) technology has the potential to change everything which involves user interaction and generates data for improvements in business, innovations, goal-setting and efficient working of a system [32, 33].
6 Demerits of Internet of Things (IoT) in Healthcare
-
Using Internet of things (IoT) for collecting data to help reduce wastage such as testing and expensive imaging and reliable and accurate data gives us less error [34, 35].
-
Internet of things (IoT) enables continuously monitor patients, which provide real time data that helps in diagnosis the diseases before it spreads [36].
-
Internet of things (IoT) for healthcare can help in research work also as Internet of things enable us to collect massive amounts of data [37, 38] which if collected by a person could cost more.
-
As the population is increasing, pollution is also increasing to control the pollution we need real time data and air pattern which is collected by using Internet of things (IoT) device. This helps the policy makers to take decisions and make cities healthier.
7 Conclusion
In this paper, we have reviewed Internet of things (IoT) in healthcare along with Microsoft and Google cloud platform, These are the two big technological [39] competitors, both are there in the market for ages since the introduction of cloud based services now days, till date the competition have reach to the next level. The use of the Internet of things (IoT) with cloud based platform has various domains. All Apps are using cloud based services. One of the domains we covered in this paper is Healthcare. Healthcare is a serious and complex task. Despite 24 h of patients, monitoring doctor is unable to find out the exact medical issue and sometimes in emergency situation doctors couldn’t be alerted on time. At this point Internet of things (IoT) [40] comes in the race and fulfills the needs of doctors. Internet of things (IoT) has launched various wearable devices like Hearable which is like a miracle for those who suffer from hearing problems, monitoring machine, smart watches for depression, ingestible sensors and heart rate monitoring. All the Internet of things (IoT) devices are reliable and [38] help us to get medical condition for every minute and whole day long and these devices automatically notify the doctor about the condition and emergency situation. The most common Internet of things (IoT) technology in health care is patient monitors, energy meters and x-rays and imaging devices. Internet of things (IoT) collects accurate data [41], decreases costs as there is no need for visiting doctors, Offer 24 h service at home. However Internet of things (IoT)) enter with some issues. Security is a major issue as sensitive information is shared; data is stored in huge amount, human errors are also determined [39]. According to some prediction till the end of 2020, 90% of the hospitals and organization will implement Internet of things (IoT). So the future of the Internet of things (IoT) is bright and will improve and will implement more devices. We have talked about the Amazon cloud architecture and services provided by both Google and Microsoft, Google is open source [42], provide discount and customer friendly contracts, less data centers while Microsoft can integrate with office tools with a broad feature set, supports [43] hybrid cloud, more data centers etc. As this paper differentiate and review about same technology provided by two different companies along with differences, compatibility and customer demand.
References
MacDermott, Á., Kendrick, P., Idowu, I., Ashall, M., & Shi, Q. (2019). Securing Things in the Healthcare Internet of Things. In 2019 Global IoT Summit (GIoTS) (pp. 1–6).
Saha, G., Singh, R., & Saini, S. (2019). A survey paper on the impact of ‘Internet of Things’ in healthcare. In 2019 3rd International conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA) (pp. 331–334).
Mufti, T., Sami, N., & Sohail, S. S. (2019). A review paper on Internet of Things (IOT). Indian Journal of Applied Research, 9(8), 27.
Sami, N., Mufti, T., Sohail, S. S., Siddiqui, J., & Kumar, D. (2020). Future Internet of Things (IOT) from Cloud perspective: Aspects, applications and challenges. In Internet of Things (IoT) (pp. 515–532). Springer.
Moosavi, S. R., Gia, T. N., Rahmani, A.-M., Nigussie, E., Virtanen, S., Isoaho, J., et al. (2015). SEA: A secure and efficient authentication and authorization architecture for IoT-based healthcare using smart gateways. Procedia Computer Science, 52, 452–459.
Bui, N., & Zorzi, M. (2011). Health care applications: A solution based on the internet of things. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (p. 131).
Farooq, M., Waseem, M., Mazhar, S., Khairi, A., & Kamal, T. (2015). A review on Internet of Things (IoT). International Journal of Computer Applications, 113, 1–7.
Hassanalieragh, M., Page, A., Soyata, T., Sharma, G., Aktas, M., Mateos, G., et al. (2015). Health monitoring and management using internet-of-things (iot) sensing with cloud-based processing: Opportunities and challenges. In Services Computing (SCC), 2015 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 285–292).
Abie, H., & Balasingham, I. (2012). Risk-based adaptive security for smart IoT in eHealth. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Body Area Networks (pp. 269–275).
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54, 2787–2805.
Koreshoff, T. L., Robertson, T., & Leong, T. W. (2013). Internet of things: A review of literature and products. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian computer-human interaction conference: Augmentation, application, innovation, collaboration (pp. 335–344).
Zhao, K., & Ge, L. (2013). A survey on the internet of things security. In Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS), 2013 9th International Conference on (pp. 663–667).
Lee, B. (2014). “Healthcare framework on the IoT open platform,” service model, architecture. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 9, 29783–29792.
Kulkarni, A., & Sathe, S. (2014). Healthcare applications of the internet of things: A review. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5, 6229–6232.
Govinda, K., & Saravanaguru, R. (2016). Review on IOT technologies. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11, 2848–2853.
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29, 1645–1660.
Madakam, S., Ramaswamy, R., & Tripathi, S. (2015). Internet of things (IoT): A literature review. Journal of Computer and Communications, 3, 164.
Suresh, P., Daniel, J. V., Parthasarathy, V., & Aswathy, R. (2014). A state of the art review on the Internet of Things (IoT) history, technology and fields of deployment. In Science Engineering and Management Research (ICSEMR), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 1–8).
Zhang, Z.-K., Cho, M. C. Y., Wang, C.-W., Hsu, C.-W., Chen, C.-K., & Shieh, S. (2014). IoT security: Ongoing challenges and research opportunities. In 2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (pp. 230–234).
Khoo, B. (2011). RFID as an enabler of the Internet of Things: Issues of security and privacy in Internet of Things (iThings/CPSCom). In 2011 International conference on and 4th International Conference on cyber, physical and social computing (pp. 709–712).
Jing, Q., Vasilakos, A. V., Wan, J., Lu, J., & Qiu, D. (2014). Security of the internet of things: Perspectives and challenges. Wireless Networks, 20, 2481–2501.
Yang, J.-C., Hao, P., & Zhang, X. (2013). Enhanced mutual authentication model of IoT. Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 20, 69–74.
Liu, J., Xiao, Y., & Chen, C. P. (2012). Authentication and access control in the Internet of Things. In ICDCS workshops (pp. 588–592).
Agarwal, P., Chopra, K., Kashif, M., & Kumari, V. (2018). Implementing ALPR for detection of traffic violations: A step towards sustainability, 2018. In Proceedia: Computer science (pp. 738–743). Elsevier Journal Publication. ISSN: 1877-0509.
Jan, M. A., Nanda, P., He, X., Tan, Z., & Liu, R. P. (2014). A robust authentication scheme for observing resources in the internet of things environment. In Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom), 2014 IEEE 13th International Conference on (pp. 205–211).
Mietz, R., Abraham, P., & Römer, K. (2014). High-level states with CoAP: Giving meaning to raw sensor values to support IoT applications. In Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on (pp. 1–6).
Laplante, P. A., & Laplante, N. (2016). A structured approach for describing healthcare applications for the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things.
Catarinucci, L., et al. (2015). An IoT-aware architecture for smart healthcare systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2(6), 515–526.
“Nurses Rank as Most Honest, Ethical Profession for 14th Straight Year,” Press release. American Nurses Association (ANA), 2015; www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nurses-rank-as-most-honest-ethical-profession-for-14th-straight-year-300195781.html.
Skiba, D. (2013). Emerging technologies: The Internet of Things (IoT). Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(1), 63–64.
Sami, N., Mufti, T., Sohail, S. S., Siddiqui, J., Kumar, D., & Neha. (2020). Future internet of things (IOT) from cloud perspective: Aspects, applications and challenges. In M. Alam, K. Shakil, & S. Khan (Eds.), Internet of things (IoT). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37468-6_27
Al-Hamadi, H., & Chen, R. (2017). Trust-based decision making for health IoT systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(5), 1408–1419.
De Michele, R., & Furini, M. (2019). Iot healthcare: Benefits, issues and challenges. In Proceedings of the 5th EAI International Conference on smart objects and technologies for social good (pp. 160–164).
Pang, Z. (2013). Technologies and architectures of the internet-of-things (IoT) for health and well-being (Doctoral dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology).
Butt, S. A., Diaz-Martinez, J. L., Jamal, T., Ali, A., De-La-Hoz-Franco, E., & Shoaib, M. (2019). IoT smart health security threats. In 2019 19th International Conference on computational science and its applications (ICCSA) (pp. 26–31). IEEE.
Ullah, K., Shah, M. A., & Zhang, S. (2016). Effective ways to use internet of things in the field of medical and smart health care. In 2016 International Conference on intelligent systems engineering (ICISE) (pp. 372–379). IEEE.
Ding, D., Conti, M., & Solanas, A. (2016). A smart health application and its related privacy issues. In 2016 Smart city security and privacy workshop (SCSP-W) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Kalarthi, Z. M. (2016). A review paper on smart health care system using internet of things. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 5(03), 8084.
Zhang, Y., Deng, R. H., Han, G., & Zheng, D. (2018). Secure smart health with privacy-aware aggregate authentication and access control in internet of things. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 123, 89–100.
Hammi, B., Khatoun, R., Zeadally, S., Fayad, A., & Khoukhi, L. (2017). IoT technologies for smart cities. IET Networks, 7(1), 1–13.
Vippalapalli, V., & Ananthula, S. (2016). Internet of things (IoT) based smart health care system. In 2016 International Conference on signal processing, communication, power and embedded system (SCOPES) (pp. 1229–1233). IEEE.
Agarwal, P., Hassan, S. I., Mustafa, S. K., & Ahmad, J. (2020). An effective diagnostic model for personalized healthcare using deep learning techniques. In Applications of deep learning and big IoT on personalized healthcare services (pp. 70–88). IGI Global.
Weber, R. H. (2010). Internet of things—New security and privacy challenges. Computer Law and Security Review, 26, 23–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mufti, T., Sohail, S.S., Gupta, B., Agarwal, P. (2022). Sustainable Approach for Cloud-Based Framework Using IoT in Healthcare. In: Agarwal, P., Mittal, M., Ahmed, J., Idrees, S.M. (eds) Smart Technologies for Energy and Environmental Sustainability. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80702-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80702-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80701-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80702-3
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)