Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) can have a variety of generators including degenerative disc disease (DDD) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH). DDD is a lifelong condition that will require significant efforts in lifestyle modifications and physical therapy for the best chance of a good outcome. Patients with DDD can have a variable clinical course due to the complexity of treating LBP. On the other hand, patients with LDH with symptoms lasting longer than 6 weeks or with neurological compromise have better outcomes with surgery. These patients have a great chance for a full functional recovery.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Definition
Low back pain (LBP; Chap. 41) can have a variety of generators including degenerative disc disease (DDD) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH; Chap. 46). DDD can be defined as an age accelerated structural failure of the intervertebral disc (IVD), and thus disc degeneration does not necessarily equal DDD. To make a diagnosis of DDD, the clinical picture must be evaluated in addition to the radiographic presence of disc degeneration. LDH can occur in both degenerated and non-degenerated disc segments. LDH occurs when the nucleus pulposus is able to herniate through the annulus fibrosis. LDH can cause back pain, radicular pain, and sensory/motor disturbances.
2 Natural History
LBP is the most common cause of disability in young adults with an indirect loss of >100 billion dollars per year in decreased productivity. Over 80% of young adults will experience an episode of back pain in their lifetime, and an additional 2% to 3% of these patients will get radiculopathy as well. Typically, patients with DDD will have a self-limited course of back pain, with 95% experiencing a recovery in 3 months with appropriate nonoperative treatment modalities. However, chronic back pain is a possibility for these patients. The pathway that leads to DDD is a complex interplay between nutritional, environmental, and genetic factors. Decreased nutritional supply limits the IVD from responding to load (Fig. 45.1), while genetic polymorphisms can affect genes that contribute to IVD structure and upregulate pro-inflammatory pathways (Fig. 45.2). Environmental factors that contribute to DDD include obesity and cigarette smoking. Understanding the degenerative cascade is important for the development of future treatment modalities. For LDH, the vast majority of patients (~75%) will experience relief at 1 year. However, in patients who remain symptomatic beyond 6 weeks, there is a small but statistically significant benefit to undergoing a direct decompression of the affected nerve root.
3 Physical Examination
Observation of behavior, gait, and muscle atrophy is important when evaluating patients with DDD and LDH. Observation of Waddell’s signs is important for this patient population as well. Patients with a large LDH may be very uncomfortable and be unable to sit down. Patients with DDD will present most commonly with back pain. Midline spinous process tenderness is very common. The range of motion will be limited secondary to pain (Appendix N). Pain that worsens with extension is likely facet-oriented, while worsening of pain with lumbar flexion suggests a discogenic mediator of pain. Radicular pain is very common with disc herniation. There are commonly motor, sensory, and reflex deficits along the affected nerve root as well (Video 45.4). The straight leg raise test can reproduce radicular limb pain. A positive contralateral leg raise test usually indicates a massive or extruded disc fragment.
4 Imaging
Radiographs of the lumbar spine should include anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of the affected area (Fig. 45.3). The AP view may show arthritic changes in the facets or osseous bridging between the disc spaces. The lateral view can show a variety of pathology including loss of disc height, spondylolisthesis, and vacuum disc (Fig. 45.4). Computed tomography (CT) scan will clearly show arthritic changes throughout the spine including in the facet joints, end plate sclerosis, and calcified disc herniation. However, a CT scan is not always required for these patients unless it is to address a specific question or if the patient is unable to obtain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
MRI is indicated for patients who fail to recover after 6–12 weeks of proper nonoperative management and for those with any neurological deficit (sensory/motor) in a radicular pattern. Patients with DDD will typically have a loss of signal within the nucleus pulposus and disc space collapse on MRI (Fig. 45.5). Annular tears can be appreciated as high-intensity zones in the posterior annulus on T2-weighted imaging. Some MRI classifications include the Modic system and the Pfirrmann classification (Fig. 45.6; Tables 45.1 and 45.2). The clinical utility of these classification systems is uncertain, but there is evidence to suggest a higher failure of nonoperative treatment in those with Modic changes on MRI.
5 Differential Diagnosis
There is a broad differential diagnosis for DDD and LDH (Table 45.3). Potential pain sources could be viscerogenic (renal/abdominal causes), neoplastic (primary or metastatic bone tumors; Chap. 63), neurogenic (spinal cord tumors/cysts), inflammatory disease (ankylosing spondylitis; Chap. 54), infectious (discitis, osteomyelitis; Chap. 65), psychogenic, and spondylogenic (muscle strains, spinal stenosis, disc disease, facet arthropathy; Chap. 41; Chap. 46). Radiculopathy is most commonly caused by a disc herniation but may be mimicked from peripheral nerve compression (e.g., piriformis syndrome) or intraneural pathology (e.g., peripheral nerve sheath tumor).
6 Treatment Options
The vast majority of patients undergo nonoperative care for DDD. Physical therapy is a mainstay of treatment, along with lifestyle modification (smoking cessations/weight loss/core strengthening/back education). Anti-inflammatory medications are very effective for treating pain related to DDD and LDH. Steroid medications are useful for radiculopathy. Cognitive behavioral therapy is effective at treating back pain in patients with chronic pain. Alternative therapies are frequently attempted as well, including yoga, CBT, chiropractor, CBD oil, and oral CBD with varying success. In patients with radiculopathy, transforaminal epidural injections can be effective in reducing the chemical/inflammatory component of the radiculopathy but do not change the natural history of the disc herniation.
For LDH, in patients who fail conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks, surgical intervention can lead to improved outcomes. For any patient with a progressive neurological deficit or neurological findings (radicular pain/straight leg raise positive), operative management is appropriate (Video 45.4). Any method of lumbar decompression and stabilization is appropriate (open or minimally invasive) for these patients if a direct nerve decompression can be achieved (Video 45.3).
7 Expected Outcomes
The majority of patients recover very well from disc herniation. Patients with DDD can have a more variable clinical course due to the complexity of treating LBP. Nonoperative modalities of treatment can provide significant relief for these patients, but for those with chronic unrelenting pain, surgical treatment without any accompanying neurological symptom is very controversial with no guarantee it will relieve pain.
8 Potential Complications
The major complication risk profile for lumbar decompression surgery is continued symptoms, nerve root injury, dural tear, re-herniation, and infection. However, the complication of nonoperative care for an LDH in a patient with neurological compromise is chronic pain and permanent loss of muscle function.
9 What Should Patient and Family Know?
DDD is a lifelong condition that will require significant efforts in lifestyle modifications and physical therapy for the best chance of a good outcome. Patients with LDH with symptoms lasting longer than 6 weeks or with neurological compromise have better outcomes with surgery. These patients have a great chance for a full functional recovery.
Further Readings
Buller M. MRI degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: a review. J Am Osteopath Coll Radiol. 2018;7(4):11–9.
Jensen RK, Leboeuf-Yde C, Wedderkopp N, Sorensen JS, Manniche C. Rest versus exercise as treatment for patients with low back pain and Modic changes. A randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Med. 2012;10:22.
Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson ANA, Zhao W, Morgan TS, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Weinstein JN. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine. 2014;39(1):3–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
Video 45.1
Thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw fixation (MP4 635137 kb)
Video 45.2
Neurological examination of upper and lower extremities (MOV 232487 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dowdell, J.E., Albert, T.J. (2022). Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease and Lumbar Disc Herniation. In: Şenköylü, A., Canavese, F. (eds) Essentials of Spine Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80356-8_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80356-8_45
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80355-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80356-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)