Skip to main content

The Syrian Crisis and Its Contribution to Authoritarian Transformation of Turkish Domestic and Foreign Policy Identities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Turkey, Russia and Iran in the Middle East

Abstract

Soon to be a century old, the Republic of Turkey has faced several major crises in its regional environment; however, none of them has affected it to the same extent as the Syrian conflict, which still continues to be the major concern for the current political power. Indeed, as a country close and similar to Turkey in many respects, Syria, via its crisis, has had a transformative effect on Turkey, that changes its identity, its ethnic and religious composition and, of course, its foreign policy, and even its place in the international order. The main objective of this chapter is to demonstrate that it is through the Syrian crisis that Turkey is marking a real break with its traditional geopolitical family, i.e., the Western camp, to move closer to a Russia that is historically anything but Turkey’s friend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Interview with Lakdhar Brahimi, in Paris, July 2014.

  2. 2.

    The Friends of Syria Group is an international diplomatic collective of countries and bodies meeting periodically outside the UN Security Council to discuss the Syrian question. The collective was set up in response to the vetoes and blockages made by Russia and China who refused to condemn Syria. At the instigation of President Nicolas Sarkozy, the group tried to find a solution to the Syrian crisis after the Russian and Chinese vote on February 4, 2012. The group met at least four times in different capitals and then broke up following the worsening situation and the diverging opinions which appeared among members from 2013 onwards. See Lund, Aron. “Riyadh, Rumeilan, and Damascus: All You Need to Know About Syria’s Opposition Conferences.” Carnegie, December 9, 2015. https://carnegie-mec.org/diwan/62239?lang=en.

  3. 3.

    This initiative was not totally free from underlying political thoughts for Erdoğan's aim was also, if not above all, to discredit the main opposition party, the Republican Peoples’ Party (CHP), heir to the party founded by Atatürk which had been in power at the time of the Alevi massacres.

References

  • Aras, Bülent, and Hakan Fidan. 2009. “Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographic Imagination.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40: 193, 215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras, Bülent, and Rabia Karakaya Polat. 2008. “From Conflict to Cooperation: Desecuritization of Turkey’s Relations with Syria and Iran.” Security Dialogue 39 (5): 495–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azeri, Siyaves. 2016. “The July 15 Coup Attempt in Turkey: The Erdogan–Gülen Confrontation and the Fall of ‘Moderate’ Political Islam.” Critique 44 (4): 465-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkey, Henry J. 2014. “Turkey’s Syria Predicament.” Survival 56 (6): 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkey, Henry J. 2016. “Syria’s Dark Shadow Over US-Turkey Relations.” Turkish Policy Quarterly, March 7. http://turkishpolicy.com/article/782/syrias-dark-shadow-over-us-turkey-relations. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • Bishku, Michael B. 2012. “Turkish-Syrian Relations: A Checkered History.” Middle East Policy 19 (3, Fall): 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosker, Maarten, and Joppe de Ree. 2014. “Ethnicity and the Spread of Civil War.” Journal of Development Economics 108: 206–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarslan, Hamit. 2021. “Entretien avec Hamit Bozarslan – Le nouvel autoritarisme turc et ses répercussions sur la scène politique international.” Interview by Nicolas Hautemanière. Les clés du Moyen-Orient, February 27, 2020, https://www.lesclesdumoyenorient.com/Entretien-avec-Hamit-Bozarslan-Le-nouvel-autoritarisme-turc-et-ses. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • Browning, Christopher S., and Pertti Joenniemi. 2017. “Ontological Security, Self-Articulation and Securitization of Identity.” Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1, March): 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Can, Şule. 2017. “The Syrian Civil War, Sectarianism and Political Change at the Turkish-Syrian Border: The Syrian Civil War.” Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 25 (2): 174–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charap, Samuel, Elina Treyger, and Edward Geist. 2019. Understanding Russia's Intervention in Syria. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3180.html. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • Courbage, Youssef. 2012. “Ce que la démographie nous dit du conflit syrien.” Slate, October 15. http://www.slate.fr/story/62969/syrie-guerre-demographie-minorites. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • Çakmak, Cenap. 2016. “Turkish–Syrian Relations in the Wake of the Syrian Conflict: Back to Securitization?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (2): 695–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çevik, Senem B. 2019. “Reassessing Turkey’s Soft Power: The Rules of Attraction.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 44 (1, February): 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dag, Rahman. 2018. “The Spillover Effect of the Syrian Crisis on the Peace Process in Turkey.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 53 (8): 1251–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daoudy, Marwa. 2016. “The Structure-Identity Nexus: Syria and Turkey’s Collapse.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (3): 1074–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, David R., and Will H. Moore. 1997. “Ethnicity Matters: Transnational Ethnic Alliances and Foreign Policy Behavior.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (1): 171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, Jackson. 2012. “Lines in the Sand, Assad Plays the Sectarian Card.” World Affairs 175 (1): 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran, Burhanettin, and Nuh Yılmaz. 2011. “Whose Model? Which Turkey?” Foreign Policy, February 8. https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/02/08/whose-model-which-turkey/. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • Erşen, Emre. 2011. “Turkey and Russia: An Emerging ‘Strategic Axis’ in Eurasia?” Eur-Orient (35–36): 263–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, Erika. 2016. “Transnational Dimensions of Civil Wars: Clustering, Contagion and Connectedness.” In What Do We Know About Civil Wars? edited by T. David Mason, and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, 75–90. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2007. “Transnational Dimensions of Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research 44 (3): 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Idean Salehyan. 2008. “Civil Wars and Interstate Disputes.” In Resources, Governance and Civil Conflict, edited by Magnus Oberg, and Kaare Strom, 58–76. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gökay, Bülent. 1994. “The Turkish Independence War and Bolshevik Russia: Some New Aspects in the Light of Soviet Documents.” Turkish Studies Association Bulletin 18 (2): 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, Michael M. 2013. “The Turkish-Kurdish Peace Process.” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 14 (1): 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinnebusch, Raymond, and Omar Imady, eds. 2018. The Syrian Uprising, Domestic Origins and Early Trajectory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 2016. Silencing Turkey’s Media: The Government’s Deepening Assault on Critical Journalism. New York: Human Rights Watch. Accessed May 21, 2020. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/turkey1216_web.pdf. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • International Crisis Group. 2014. “Flight of Icarus? The PYD’s Precarious Rise in Syria.” Middle East Report N°151, May 8. https://www.crisisgroup.org/middle-east-north-africa/eastern-mediterranean/syria/flight-icarus-pyd-s-precarious-rise-syria. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • International Crisis Group. 2015. “A Sisyphean Task? Resuming Turkey-PKK Peace Talks.” Crisis Group Europe Briefing N°77, December 17. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/5672b0ed4.pdf. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • Jenkins, Celia, Suavi Aydin, and Umit Cetin, eds. 2020. Alevism as an Ethno-Religious Identity: Contested Boundaries, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongerden, Joost. 2019. “Governing Kurdistan: Self-Administration in the Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq and the Democratic Federation of Northern Syria.” Ethnopolitics 18 (1): 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koçan, Gürcan, and Ahmet Öncü. 2004. “Citizen Alevi in Turkey: Beyond Confirmation and Denial.” Journal of Historical Sociology 17 (4, December): 464–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köse, Talha. 2010. “The AKP and the ‘Alevi Opening’: Understanding the Dynamics of the Rapprochement.” Insight Turkey 12 (2): 143–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köstem, Seçkin. 2020. “Russian-Turkish Cooperation in Syria: Geopolitical Alignment with Limits.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Fred H. 2016. “Explaining the Spread of Ethnosectarian Conflict: Syria’s Civil War and the Resurgence of Kurdish Militancy in Turkey.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 22 (4): 478–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, Ceren. 2017. “Rethinking the Justice and Development Party’s ‘Alevi Openings’.” Turkish Studies 18 (2): 278–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mango, Andrew. 1993. “The Turkish Model.” Middle Eastern Studies 29 (4): 726–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massicard, Élise. 2005. L’Autre Turquie. Le mouvement aléviste et ses territoires. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkrtich, Karapetyan. 2018. “The Alevi/Alawite Factor in Turkey—Syria Relations in the Light of the Syrian Crisis.” Journal of Liberty and International Affairs 4 (3): 24–40. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-61756-8. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • Onat, İsmail, and Suat Çubukçu. 2019. “Unresolved Conflict, Urban Insurgency and Devastating Consequences in Turkey Between 2015 and 2016.” Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism 14 (2): 164–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özel, Soli. 2019. “At the End of the Day, Where Will Turkey Stand?” Report Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlar Dal, Emel. 2016. “Impact of the Transnationalization of the Syrian Civil War on Turkey: Conflict Spillover Cases of ISIS and PYD-YPG/PKK.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (4): 1396–1420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Chris. 2009. “Turkey, Syria’s New Best Friend.” The Guardian, October 1, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/oct/01/turkey-syria-friendship. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • Reynolds, Michael. 2019. “Turkey and Russia: A Remarkable Rapprochement.” War on the Rocks, October 24, https://warontherocks.com/2019/10/turkey-and-russia-a-remarkable-rapprochement/. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • Sambanis, Nicholas. 2002. “A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War.” Defence and Peace Economics 13 (3): 215–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandal, Nükhet A. 2019. “Solidarity Theologies and the (Re)definition of Ethnoreligious Identities: The Case of the Alevis of Turkey and Alawites of Syria.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svarin, David. 2015. “Towards a Eurasian Axis? Russia and Turkey Between Cooperation and Competition.” Global Affairs 1 (4–5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tejel, Jordi. 2009. Syria’s Kurds: History, Politics and Society. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsvetkova, Tsvetelina. 2018. “Turkish National Movement and Soviet Russia in Caucasus (1919–1922).” Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies 1 (1): 77–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Paul J., and Joost Jongerden, eds. 2003. Turkey’s Alevi Enigma: A Comprehensive Overview. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeğen, Mesut. 2015. “The Kurdish Peace Process in Turkey: Genesis, Evolution and Prospects.” Istitutto Affari Internationali Working Papers no. 11, May 2015, https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/gte_wp_11.pdf. Accessed on April 23, 2021.

  • Yılmaz, İhsan. 2020. “The AKP’s De-securitization and Re-securitization of a Minority Community: The Alevi Opening and Closing.” Turkish Studies 21 (2): 231–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, Rahmouni Fatima. 2017. “Securitization and De-securitization: Turkey-Syria Relations Since the Syrian Crisis.” Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies 11 (2): 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarcone, Thierry. 2018. “La confrontation Sunnites-Alevis en Turquie: l’impossible reconnaissance.” Confluences Méditerranée 2 (105): 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balci, B. (2021). The Syrian Crisis and Its Contribution to Authoritarian Transformation of Turkish Domestic and Foreign Policy Identities. In: Balci, B., Monceau, N. (eds) Turkey, Russia and Iran in the Middle East. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80291-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics