Abstract
Russia has always been perceived as a historical outlier in terms of its relationship to the rule of law and the western legal tradition. The pursuit of legal aid, however, demonstrates that Russia has faced many of the same challenges that have beset other legal systems. Russia has had to confront how to deliver legal assistance to the most vulnerable parts of the population, how to deal with non-licensed and other lay attorneys, and how to endow the legal profession with a sense of public service that sees providing affordable (and often free) legal advice as an essential part of a lawyer’s calling. What separates Russia from other countries is the high degree of politicisation that has accompanied the expansion of legal aid. Imperial, Soviet, and post-Soviet lawyers have provided free or low-cost representation in a wide variety of controversial, high profile cases, challenging the state’s authoritarian practices and invariably provoking a backlash against the bar and leading lawyers. The Russian state has never embraced the challenges that accompany an independent system of legal aid, thereby raising the perennial question of how much legal assistance—and assertion of individual, political, economic, and social rights—is the Russian government willing to tolerate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Belikov (1865), pp. 274–275.
- 2.
Rosenshield (2005), p. 53.
- 3.
Pomeranz (1996), pp. 588–589.
- 4.
Chernomordik (1916), pp. 32–36.
- 5.
Pomeranz (1999), pp. 257–262.
- 6.
- 7.
Russia was not the only country to voice concern about the proliferation of unlicensed lawyers. See the chapters in this book by Hiroki Kawamura and Marianne Vasara-Aaltonen.
- 8.
Berenshtam (1903), pp. 1–33.
- 9.
Berenshtam (1903), pp. 32–33.
- 10.
- 11.
Pomeranz (1999), pp. 251–252.
- 12.
Pomeranz (1996), pp. 593–596.
- 13.
Berenshtam (1906), p. 5.
- 14.
Berenshtam (1906), p. 84.
- 15.
Otchet (1910), pp. 347–348.
- 16.
Otchet (1915), pp. 227–340.
- 17.
Pomeranz (1996), pp. 600–604, 606–608.
- 18.
Ugrimova and Volkov (2004), pp. 14–17.
- 19.
Mandel’shtam (1931), pp. 51–53.
- 20.
Kel’ner (2015), pp. 43–46.
- 21.
- 22.
Khvostov (1916), pp. 913–914.
- 23.
Jordan (2005), p. 32.
- 24.
Jordan (2005), p. 35.
- 25.
Jordan (2005), pp. 39–40.
- 26.
Feifer ([1964] 2000), p. 252.
- 27.
Feifer ([1964] 2000), p. 154.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
Feifer ([1964] 2000), p. 105.
- 31.
Smith (1978), p. 105.
- 32.
Smith (1978), pp. 64–65, 72.
- 33.
Kaminskaya (1982), pp. 31–32.
- 34.
Kaminskaya (1982), pp. 313–319.
- 35.
Hendley (1996), pp. 134–135.
- 36.
Hendley (1996), p. 135.
- 37.
Rand (1991), p. 9.
- 38.
Rand (1991), p. 13.
- 39.
Jordan (2005), p. 66.
- 40.
Jordan (2005), p. 67.
- 41.
Bocharov and Moiseeva (2016), pp. 183–184.
- 42.
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.
Informatsionnaia spravka (2017), pp. 5–6.
- 46.
Bocharov and Moiseeva (2016), p. 61.
- 47.
Burmitskaya (2012), p. 55.
- 48.
Rekomendatsii Soveta (2019).
- 49.
- 50.
- 51.
Kornia (2017).
- 52.
Bocharov and Moiseeva (2016), pp. 124–127.
- 53.
Borot’sia … (2018).
- 54.
Pavlov (2019).
- 55.
Bolee … (2019).
- 56.
- 57.
Hendley (2017), pp. 195–196.
- 58.
Kornia (2016).
- 59.
Jordan (2005), pp. 127–195.
- 60.
Different law offices within the advokatura conduct pro bono activities as well. According to a 2017 survey, advocates provided pro bono advice to 227,835 citizens. Informatsionnaia spravka (2017), p. 7.
- 61.
See Free Legal Advice (2021).
- 62.
- 63.
A general description about the Association’s legal aid services can be found at the Association of Lawyers of Russia (2021).
- 64.
Liudi … (2019).
- 65.
Chumakova (2019), pp. 267–271.
- 66.
- 67.
Law on Free Legal Assistance (2011), art. 24.
- 68.
Informatsionnaia spravka (2017), p. 6.
- 69.
- 70.
Chumakova (2019), p. 153. For regional breakdowns of participating advocates in the state system of free legal aid, see ibid., pp. 145–153.
- 71.
Chumakova (2019), pp. 168–175, 177–179.
- 72.
- 73.
Khodzhaev (2015).
- 74.
- 75.
- 76.
- 77.
Vladimir Pligin … (2020).
- 78.
Glikin (2020).
- 79.
Pavlova (2020).
- 80.
Raiskii and Zanina (2017); Roman (2019). The bar’s legal status as a provider of qualified legal assistance—instead of an enterprise—at least initially excluded advocates from receiving any financial help from the anti-crisis measures taken by the government during the corona virus; see Sergeev and Boronov (2020).
- 81.
Sergeev and Boronov (2020).
- 82.
- 83.
Carle et al. (2018), p. 299.
Bibliography
Legislation and Proposed Regulation
Concept paper for the regulation of the market of professional legal assistance [“Kontseptsiia regulirovaniia rynka professional’noi iuridicheskoi pomoshi”], Ministry of Justice. 2017. https://minjust.ru/deyatelnost-v-sfere-advokatury/koncepciya-regulirovaniya-rynka-professionalnoy-yuridicheskoy. Accessed 28 Mar 2021.
Law on advocate activities and the advokatura of the Russian Federation. 2002. [Ob advokatskoi deiatel’nosti i advokature Rossiiskoi Federatsii (2002), Federaln’nyi zakon ot 31 Maia 2002 g. N 63-FZ.] https://rg.ru/2002/06/05/advokatzakon-dok.html. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Law on Free Legal Assistance in the Russian Federation. 2011. [O besplatnoi iurdicheskoi pomoshchi v Rossiiiskoi Federatsii. Federaln’nyi zakon ot 21 noiabria 2011 g. N 324-FZ.] The President of Russia. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/34292/page/1. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Online Sources
Association of Lawyers of Russia: Free Legal Assistance [“Assotsiatsiia iuristov Rossii: Besplatnaia Iuridichesakaia Pomoshch’”]. 2021. https://alrf.ru/activities/besplatnaya-yuridicheskaya-pomoshch/. Accessed 28 Mar 2021.
General Procuracy’s Office, The Results of the Procuracy’s Activities [“Osnovnye rezul’tatu prokurorskoi deiatel’nosti”], The Russian Federation. 2019. https://genproc.gov.ru/upload/iblock/5fb/0112_2019.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2021
Free Legal Advice [“Besplatnaia iuridichdskaia konsul’tatsiia”]. 2021. Rossiiskaia gazeta, https://pravo.rg.ru/. Accessed 28 Mar 2021.
Printed Sources
Aleksandrov, Alexandr. 2018. Advokatam povyshaiut stavki: Zashchitnikam po naznacheniiu uvelichat gonorary. Kommersant, October 12. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3766792?from=doc_vrez. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Belikov, S. 1865. Advokatura v Rossii. Zhurnal’ Ministerstva Iustitsii 23 (February): 265–314.
Berenshtam, Mikhail. 1903. Iuridishiskiia konsul’tatsii v Rossii i rabochie sekretariaty v Germanii. Russkoe bogatstvo 3 (March): 1–32.
Berenshtam, Vladimir. 1906. Za pravo! St. Petersburg: O.N. Popovoi.
Bocharov, Timur, and Ekaterina Moiseeva. 2016. Byt’ advokatom v Rossii: sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie professii. St. Petersburg: Evropekskii universitet v Sankt-Peterburge.
Bolee 14 tys. grazhdan za odin den’ poluchili besplatnuiiu iuridicheskuiu pomoshch’ ot advokatov. 2019. Advokatskaia gazeta, December 20. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/bolee-14-tys-grazhdan-za-odin-den-poluchili-besplatnuyu-yuridicheskuyu-pomoshch-ot-advokatov/. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Borot’sia s ‘karmannymi advokatami’ putem tekhnologii. 2018. Novosti FPA, April 10. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/borotsya-s-karmannymi-advokatami-putem-tekhnologiy/. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Carle, Susan, Gayane Davidyan, Thomas McDonald, and Delphine Nougayrede. 2018. The Reform of the Russian Legal Profession: Three Varying Perspectives. Fordham International Law Journal 42 (3): 271–323.
Chernomordik, E. 1916. Uchrezhdeniia, zameniaiushchiia Sovety prisiazhnykh poverennykh. In Istoriia russkoi advokatury: soslovnaia organizatsiia advokatura: 1864–1914, ed. M.N. Gernet, vol. 3, 1–64. Moscow: Sovet prisazhnykh poverennykh.
Chumakova, O.V. 2019. Deiatel’nost’ organov ispolnitel’noi vlasti po okazaniiu besplantnoi iuridicheskoi pomoshchi. Moscow: Prospekt.
Feifer, George. (1964) 2000. Justice in Moscow. Lincoln, NE: Authors Guild Backprint.Com Edition.
Gessen, I.V. 1904. Iuridicheskaia pomoshch’ naseleniiu. Obrazovanie 1 (January): 95–116.
Glikin, Konstantin. 2020. Intersy kompanii v arbitrazhnom sude vprave zashchishchat’liudi bezy iuridicheskogo obrazovaniia. Vedomosti, July 20. https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2020/07/19/834913-arbitrazhnom-sude. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Iamshanov, Boris. 2012. Tri dnia bez zashchity; Advokaty reshili provesti protestnuiu aktsiiu. Rossiiskaia gazeta, April 12. https://rg.ru/2012/04/26/advokat.html. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Informatsionnaia spravka o sostoianii advokaturury i advokatskoi deiatel’nosti v 2017 g. 2017. Federal Chamber of Advocates. https://fparf.ru/practical-information/statistics/information-on-the-state-of-the-legal-profession-and-legal-practice-in-2017/. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Kaminskaya, Dina. 1982. Final Judgment: My Life as a Soviet Defense Attorney. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Karel’skim zashchitnikam po naznacheniiu dolzhny bolee 7 mln rub. 2017. FPA Novosti, November 21. https://fparf.ru/news/fpa/karelskim-zashchitnikam-po-naznacheniyu-dolzhny-bolee-7-mln-rub/. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Kel’ner, Victor. 2015. ‘Biuro zashchity’: K istorii pervoi evreiskoi pravozashchitnoi organizatsii v Rossii. Rossiskaia istoriia 4: 35–51.
Khodzhaeva, Ekaterina. 2015. Advokatskaia monopoliia – za i protiv. Vedomosti, February 11. https://www.vedomosti.ru/newspaper/articles/2015/02/12/extra-jus-advokatskaya-monopoliya%2D%2D-za-i-protiv. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Khvostov, A. 1916. Ob’iasnitel’naia zapiska k proektu ministra iustitsii ob uchrezhdenii konsul’tatsii prisiazhnykh poverennykh. Vestnik Prava 38: 911–914.
Kirovskie advokaty ustroili ‘zabastovku’ v sfere okazaniia BIUP. 2018. Advokatskaia gazeta, September 18. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/kirovskie-advokaty-ustroili-zabastovku-v-sfere-okazaniya-byup/?sphrase_id=70894. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Kornia, Anastasiia. 2016. Nastoiashchie advokaty izbaviat iuridicheskii rynok ot nenastoiashchikh. Vedomosti, April 24. https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2016/04/25/638927-nastoyaschie-advokati-izbavyat-yuridicheskii-rinok-nenastoyaschih. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
———. 2017. Nasha sudebnaia vlast’ ne khuzhe zakonodatel’noi i ispolnitel’noi. Vedomosti, December 11. https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/characters/2017/12/11/744828-vlast-ne-huzhe-zakonodatelnoi. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
———. 2019. Besplatnogo advokata nel’zia naviazyvat’, no mozhno ne uvol’niat’. Vedomosti, July 19. https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2019/07/19/806843-besplatnogo-advokata-nelzya-navyazivat. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Kuznetsova, Tat’iana. 2019. KS zapretil sudam naviazyvat’ obveniaemomu zashchetnika po naznacheniiu ot kotorogo tot otkazalsia. Advokatskaia gazeta, July 18. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/ks-zapretil-sudam-navyazyvat-obvinyaemomu-zashchitnika-po-naznacheniyu-ot-kotorogo-tot-otkazalsya/?sphrase_id=70622. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Kuznetsova, Tat’iana, and Marina Nagornaia. 2018. Genri Reznik rasskazal, pochemu iuristy ne khotiat stanovit’sia advokatami. Advokatskaia gazeta, November 22. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/genri-reznik-rasskazal-pochemu-yuristy-ne-khotyat-stanovitsya-advokatami/?sphrase_id=69024. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Lindenmeyr, Adele. 2019. Citizen Countess: Sofia Panina and the Fate of Revolutionary Russia. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Liudi ne veriat, chto v nashei strane mozhno poluchit chto-to kachestvennoe prosto tak … 2019. Advokatskaia gazeta, May 16. https://www.advgazeta.ru/obzory-i-analitika/lyudi-ne-veryat-chto-v-nashey-strane-mozhno-poluchit-chto-to-kachestvennoe-prosto-tak/?sphrase_id=72248. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Mandel’shtam, M.L. 1931. 1905 god v politicheskikh protsessakh: zapiski zashchitika. Moscow: Politkatorzhan.
Mazaev, V.D. 2010. Besplatnaia iuridicheskaia pomoshch’ v Rossii kak konstitutsionnaia tsennost’: zakonodatel’naia model. In Besplatnaia iuridicheskaia pomoshch’ i obespechenie dostupa k pravosudiiu v Rossii. Moscow: Institut prava i publichnoi politiki.
Ministr iustitsii obsudil s advokatami proekt Kontseptsii. 2019. Advokatskaia gazeta, July 12. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/ministr-yustitsii-obsudil-s-advokatami-proekt-kontseptsii/?sphrase_id=72365. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Otchet Kommissii pomoshchnikov prisiazhnykh poverennykh okruga S-Peterburgskoi sudebnoi palaty za 1909 god. 1910. St. Petersburg.
Otchet Kommissii pomoshchnikov prisiazhnykh poverennykh okruga Petrogradskoi sudebnoi palaty za 1914 god. 1915. Petrograd.
Pavlov, Ivan. 2019. Advokatura – poslednii forpost nezavisimykh institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva v strane. Advokatskaia gazeta, March 6. https://www.advgazeta.ru/mneniya/advokatura-posledniy-forpost-nezavisimykh-institutov-grazhdanskogo-obshchestva/. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Pavlova, Zinaida. 2020. Mintrud predstavil proekt profstandarta dlia iuristov. Advokatskaia gazeta, April 2, https://www.advgazeta.ru/obzory-i-analitika/mintrud-predstavil-proekt-profstandarta-dlya-yuristov/. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Rand, Robert. 1991. Comrade Lawyer: Inside Soviet Justice in an Era of Reform. Boulder: Westview Press.
Raiskii, Andrei, and Anna Zanina. 2017. Total’naia advokatura: Rynok iuridicheskikh uslug prelagaetsia zachistit’ ot iuristov. Kommersant, November 5. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3448650. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Rekomendatsii Soveta FPA RF ob obespechenii nepreryvnosti zashchity po naznacheniiu. 2019. Dokumenty FPA RF, November 28. https://fparf.ru/documents/fpa-rf/the-documents-of-the-council/recommendation-of-the-board-of-fpa-of-the-russian-federation-on-ensuring-the-continuity-of-protectio/?sphrase_id=36445. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Roman, Voronin. 2019. Baza formirovaniia rynka iurpomoshchi – advokatura. Advokatskaia gazeta, July 12. https://www.advgazeta.ru/mneniya/baza-formirovaniya-rynka-yurpomoshchi-advokatura/. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Semeniako, Evgenii. 2018. Nado li boiat’sia reform advokatury. Vedomosti, September 24. https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2018/09/24/781877-nado-li-boyatsya-reformi-advokaturi. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Sergeev, Sergei, and Aleksandr Boronov. 2020. Zashchitniki zaprosili zashchity. Kommersant, April 30. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4334721. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
‘Uproshchentsy’ poluchat dostup k ugolovnoi zashchite po naznacheniiu ne srazu. 2017. Advokatskaia gazeta, December 22. https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/uproshchentsy-poluchat-dostup-k-ugolovnoy-zashchite-po-naznacheniyu-ne-srazu/. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Vladimir Pligin: S 2025 goda v Rossii planiruetsia advokatskaia monopolii. 2020. Ekho Moskvy, February 19. https://echo.msk.ru/blog/legalreport/2591088-echo/. Accessed 17 Feb 2021.
Secondary Literature
Burmitskaya, Elena. 2012. World’s Models of State-Funded Legal Aid in Criminal Cases: What Can Russia Borrow? Lambert Academic Publishing. https://www.pilnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Legal-Aid-Russia-Book.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2021.
Hendley, Kathryn. 1996. Trying to Make Law Matter: Legal Reform and Labor Law in the Soviet Union. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
———. 2017. Everyday Law in Russia. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
Jordan, Pamela A. 2005. Defending Rights in Russia: Lawyers, the State, and Legal Reform in the Post-Soviet Era. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Neuberger, Joan. 1996. ‘Shysters’ or Public Servants? Uncertified Lawyers and Legal Aid for the Poor in Late Imperial Russia. Russian History 23 (1–4): 295–310.
Pomeranz, William E. 1993. Justice from Underground. The History of the Underground Advokatura. Russian Review 52 (3): 321–340.
———. 1996. Legal Assistance in Tsarist Russia: The St. Petersburg Consultation Bureaus. Wisconsin International Law Journal 14 (3): 586–610.
———. 1999. ‘Profession or Estate’? The Case of the Russian Pre-Revolutionary Advokatura. Slavonic and East European Review 77 (2): 240–268.
Rosenshield, Gary. 2005. Western Law, Russian Justice: Dostoevsky, the Jury Trial, and the Law. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Smith, Gordon B. 1978. The Soviet Procuracy and the Supervision of Administration. Leiden: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
Ugrimova, T.A., and A.G. Volkov. 2004. “Stoi v zavete svoem…” Nikolai Konstantinovich Murav’ev: Advokat i obshchestvennyi deiatel’. Moscow: AMA Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pomeranz, W.E. (2021). The Persistent Question of Legal Aid in the Professional Development of Russian Lawyers. In: Batlan, F., Vasara-Aaltonen, M. (eds) Histories of Legal Aid. World Histories of Crime, Culture and Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80271-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80271-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80270-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80271-4
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)