Abstract
For sustainable agricultural production and timely preparations to mitigate the climate change impacts, innovative modern technologies can be used. These technologies have great potential for monitoring agricultural systems and valuable solutions to combat climate change in order to offset the adverse impacts on agricultural production. Farmers need continuous information throughout the crop life cycle for implementing profitable farming decisions. Internet of things (IoT) is one of the advanced technologies in smart agriculture. IoT is the network of Internet connected devices to obtain and transfer real-time data. Now, the manual and conventional procedures are being replaced with automated technologies globally. IoT is becoming popular in agriculture sector as compared to conventional agriculture due to its distinguishing features such as less energy requirement, good global connectivity, and real-time data collection. On the other hand, device compatibility is the major limitation in IoT but now the solutions are being developed with technological advancements. This chapter focuses on the role of information communication technology (ICT) and IoT in agriculture domain and proposes the benefits of these wireless technologies. Use of IoT technology in smart farming can serve as a solution for several management and decision-making for building climate resilience in agriculture.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Nowadays, climate change is becoming one of the most important barriers for agriculture production and sustainability globally. Climate variability has an impact on the number of natural events involved in agriculture such as increased erratic rainfall, temperature rise, more invasive pathogens, heat waves, and floods. (Puranik et al. 2019; Amin et al. 2018; Ashraf et al. 2017; van Ogtrop et al. 2014). Hence, the changing patterns in the trends of environment are compromising the overall success of agriculture along with its sustainability. This global climatic change is predicted to affect global food security by disrupting food production, availability, and quality. For instance, temperature extremes and more erratic rainfalls are dominantly minimizing agricultural production (Malavade and Akulwar 2016; Ali et al. 2019; Ahmed et al. 2014). Increase in the severity and frequency of these climatic events is predicted in the upcoming future. Hence, it indicates more vulnerability to sustainable agriculture (Fig. 21.1). These scenarios lead to the evolution of climate smart agriculture based on smart climate monitoring methods and technologies to increase preparation and sustainability in agriculture (Lipper et al. 2014; Rahman et al. 2020; Jabeen et al. 2017; Ijaz et al. 2017). Therefore, to boost agricultural productivity and sustainability, more innovative techniques and technologies are needed to be utilized in agriculture (Ahmed, 2012, 2020a, b, Ahmed and Ahmad, 2019, 2020; Ahmad and Hasanuzzaman, 2020; Ahmed et al. 2013, 2018, 2020a, b, c, d, e; Ahmed and Stockle, 2016; Ahmed and Hassan, 2011). One of these innovative technologies, the Internet of things (IoT) is rapidly developing as an applied technology in wireless environments. Internet of things technologies have great application potential in the climate, food, and agriculture domain especially in the context of climatic challenges faced in these sectors (Patil and Kale 2016). The IoT technologies can transform the agriculture sector by contributing to food security, monitoring farm environments, increasing preparation, and optimizing the agricultural inputs to reduce wastes. However, the success of these technologies is linked with the remarkable change in the culture (Brewster et al. 2017).
Agriculture informatics is referred to as the use of innovative techniques, ideas, and scientific knowledge to expand the use of computer science in agriculture. Information communication technology (ICT) and IoT are used for management, land use, and analysis of agricultural data. Use of IoT and ICT in agriculture is also known as E-agriculture (Gakuru et al. 2009). E-agriculture focuses on enhancing agricultural development by using advanced information and communication technology. It involves development, application, and evaluation of innovative means to use ICT in agriculture (Dlodlo and Kalezhi 2015; Aslam et al. 2017b). IoT is the framework for connecting physical things (like sensor, devices, etc.) to the Internet that enables the monitoring and controlling of the physical world from remote locations (Kopetz 2011). IoT provides an ICT infrastructure to facilitate exchange of things and the main function is to minimize the gap among things in physical world and their representation in information system technology (Weber and Weber 2010).
IoT consists of software, networks, devices, and different types of sensors. There are many reasons that IoT is an efficient technology including (i) Global connectivity (ii) Less human involvement (iii) Communication (iv) Quick access, and (v) Less time consumption.
In developed countries, representation of real-world in ICT systems has been in practice for the last two decades, but the last decade has shown an unprecedented growth of ICT usage in developing countries. In 2015, there were 13.4 billion devices that were connected to the Internet, and there is an expected increase of up to 38.5 billion by 2020 (Research 2015). Now, public services and information are readily available in remote areas. Use of wireless technology has eradicated the waiting periods to undertake vital decisions. Recent advances in technologies have resulted in easy access to networks and more sophisticated, smaller, and economical sensors. Smart agriculture can serve as a solution for agricultural sector problems; farmers can monitor their agriculture sector individually with the help of IoT devices and networks (Abbasi et al. 2014).
The ICT and IoT drivers in agriculture have the advantage of (i) Connectivity and low cost, (ii) Adaptability and affordability of tools, (iii) Data exchange and storage advances, (iv) Innovative models for business, and (v) Demand of information services in agriculture (Nlerum and Onowu 2014). However, in rural areas, there are some barriers that should be addressed by ICTs broadband. These barriers include (i) Distance barriers, (ii) Economic barriers, and (iii) Social barriers (Stratigea 2011).
IoT in agriculture can be used in various scenarios and can enhance agricultural processes. Cloud enabled systems can be used for agriculture data and its uses in simulated systems. By using IoT technology, farmers can get timely knowledge about the recent trends in agriculture. IoT devices can monitor the soil properties, weather variables, plant characteristics, etc. Therefore, it can play a vital role in timely management of agricultural systems under swiftly occurring climate changing scenarios and boosting agriculture production.
2 IoT System
This section delineates several components of the IoT system, classification, and development trends (Fig. 21.2).
2.1 IoT Platforms, Standards, and Protocols
IoT has the potential to grow in the future and many companies (The Yield, Agrosmart, Fieldin, Cowlar, HerdDogg, etc.) are focusing on this technology that is leading to the emergence of solutions and new platforms. Device compatibility is the main challenge that needs to develop solutions for general use. Single board computer device is the main concept for most IoT devices that have sufficient computing power, use open source solution, and have low energy needs. Advanced Reduced instruction set computing Machine (ARM) processor is commonly used in IoT devices. These devices have operating system for both MS Windows and Linux platforms (Dusadeerungsikul et al. 2020; Bacenetti et al. 2020).
2.2 IoT Networks
For proper operation of IoT devices, Internet connection is a basic need; mostly this connection is wireless. These connection technologies have different standards and parameters. The common characteristics of wireless connections depend on (i) Energy consumption, (ii) Downlink and uplink data rate, (iii) Size of package, (iv) Range, and (v) Frequency. IoT comprises of many technologies and networks primarily designed for IoT (such as SigFox and LoRaWAN), while on the other hand, it also uses technologies that are developed for other purposes (such as Wi-Fi, GSM, and LTE). Lower energy use is the main feature of IoT designed networks. It is assumed that with the advancement in technology, IoT devices will be enabled to operate for years or decades with only a simple battery (Dusadeerungsikul et al. 2020; Bacenetti et al. 2020).
2.3 Classification of IoT Devices
Any Internet connected device falls in the IoT device category. However, there are some other features that are used for further classification of devices, such as (i) Usage purpose, (ii) Internet connection type, (iii) Device or sensor type, and (iv) Energy use (Dusadeerungsikul et al. 2020; Bacenetti et al. 2020).
2.4 Trends in IoT Development
IoT has the potential to be used in each area of human activity. Current trends in IoT development are (i) Specific IoT network development, (ii) Reliable security, (iii) Minimal energy use, (iv) Miniature devices, and (v) User-friendly controls, solutions, and settings (Dusadeerungsikul et al. 2020; Bacenetti et al. 2020).
3 Wireless Technologies in Smart Agriculture
In smart agriculture, several kinds of IoT devices are used (such as wireless sensors) for the purpose of data collection of environmental and physical attributes (Fig. 21.3). In the agriculture domain, sensors are used for the following reasons:
-
(i)
Weather, crop, and soil monitoring and data collection.
-
(ii)
Fertilizer and irrigation management.
-
(iii)
Increased preparedness to respond to abrupt climatic changes.
However, these sensors or IoT devices utilize some network protocols to transmit the data remotely. In this section, common wireless technologies used for data acquisition and transmission in smart agriculture are presented and compared for distinctive features. Weather monitoring and prediction is becoming more challenging under the current climate changing scenarios. Moreover, these extreme climatic events are severely impacting the agricultural environments and making farming practices harder and vulnerable. Therefore, there is a need to put in place the more effective strategies to combat the increasing food demands and climate variability (Ahmed et al. 2017). Several cellular and wireless technologies have been developed to play a vital role in smart agriculture (Andreev et al. 2015). A new IoT system has been developed on the basis of Long-Term Evolution (LTE) features and is known as Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT). The main functions of this system are to increase the coverage area and reduce power consumption (Ratasuk et al. 2016). In the future, NB-IoT technologies like Long Range Radio (LoRa) will be used in agriculture on a larger scale due to its lower energy use and enhanced coverage (Table 21.1).
3.1 Long Range Radio (LoRa)
This protocol was introduced by the LoRa Alliance. It is a system with wide area coverage and less power consumption as compared to other wireless technologies (Pitì et al. 2017). It consists of LoRa end device, gateway device, and a network server. This protocol is used for moisture, humidity, temperature, and light monitoring in greenhouses and fields as well (Ilie-Ablachim et al. 2016).
3.2 SigFox Protocol
SigFox is a narrow band cellular network (Pitì et al. 2017). This protocol was used in a system that was developed for locating animals in pastures and grazing lands. This system is also used for animal tracking in mountains and pastures.
3.3 ZigBee Protocol
ZigBee is a wireless, low-cost IoT network technology (Sarode and Chaudhari 2018). Low cost of this technology allows it to be widely adopted in wireless monitoring applications. As an advanced technology, it has gradually become popular and considered as the best choice for agriculture. This technology identifies and obtains real-time data for crops pests, moisture and drought, and transfers data to remote monitoring centers. With real-time information of field data, automated devices can be used for controlling irrigation, fertilization, and pesticide (Cancela et al. 2015). ZigBee can be used up to 100 m effectively (Jawad et al. 2017).
3.4 4G/3G/GPRS
These are packet data services used for cellular phones. These modules can be coupled with sensors to control the irrigation to crops depending on weather and soil monitoring (Gutiérrez et al. 2014). It is a cost-effective method for monitoring agricultural information.
3.5 Wi-Fi
It is one of the most commonly used wireless technologies in portable devices. Mobile phone applications are connected and used by utilizing Wi-Fi and 3G technologies to monitor and regulate agricultural operations (Chung et al. 2015). However, it requires high cost and power (Mohapatra and Lenka 2016). It can be used up to 20–100 m. This technology can be used in agriculture for weather and soil monitoring in fields and greenhouses.
3.6 GPS and Bluetooth (BT)
BT is used for connection and communication between devices like mobiles, laptops, etc. It is used to satisfy various agricultural operations (Ojha et al. 2015). A system was developed to monitor weather, moisture, and temperature by utilizing Global Positioning System (GPS) and BT technologies. The purpose of this system is to conserve water and increase productivity by controlling irrigation (Kim and Evans 2009; Mubeen et al. 2013). BT can be used up to 10 m only. It has been used in agriculture for its lower energy requirements and ease of use (Vellidis et al. 2016). Using this technology, fertilizer and pesticide use and weather and soil conditions can be monitored while irrigation can be controlled.
3.7 Crop Simulation Modeling
Modeling is the representation of real systems using equations or sets of equations. Crop simulation models mimic the plant growth and development (Oteng-Darko et al. 2013; Mahmood et al. 2017; Aslam et al. 2017a; Mehmood et al. 2017, 2020). These models simulate plants and environment relationship for yield prediction, decision-making, crop management, and studying the climate change impacts on global food security (Kasampalis et al. 2018; Asseng et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2019). The basic purpose of agricultural model development is to increase the scientific understanding of underlying process in crop production and to improve the decision-making based on scientific understanding (Ahmed, 2012, 2020a, b; Ahmed et al. 2013, 2018, 2020a, b, c, d; Ahmed and Stockle, 2016; Ahmed and Ahmad, 2019, 2020). Crop simulation models predict on the basis of weather, soil, fertilizer, genetic, and environment information as well as their interactions (Wallach et al. 2018). Recent advances in crop simulation models have enabled the insects, pests, and diseases prediction as well. Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) (Hoogenboom et al. 2019; Jones et al. 2003), Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) (Keating et al. 2003) and Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) are very well-known crop simulation models worldwide.
3.8 Remote Sensing
It is an art as well as a science to acquire knowledge and information about the object from distance. Information is remotely sensed by sensors through several platforms like satellites, UAVs (Un-manned Aerial Vehicles), airplane, and handheld devices (Bregaglio et al. 2015). Remotely sensed satellite images have very useful application over the last few years (Kasampalis et al. 2018). Remotely sensed data is used to monitor the crops, vegetation type, vegetation indices, vegetation vigor (Silleos et al. 2006), canopy, leaf area index, absorbed photosynthetically active radiations, evapotranspiration, biomass, and yield (Franch et al. 2019; Leroux et al. 2019; Campoy et al. 2020). This data is used to develop primary productivity models and simulation of productivity (Han et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020; Chen and Tao 2020). Remote sensing in combination with crop simulation models can help in yield assessment. Remote sensing can provide the enhanced spatial information and actual field condition that can improve the growth and yield assessment under the anticipated climate change (Kasampalis et al. 2018; Nasim et al. 2011).
3.9 UAVs (Un-manned Aerial Vehicles) and Drones
UAVs and drones are aerial vehicles equipped with multispectral cameras, sensors, and microcontrollers to facilitate the daily work in the fields. In recent years precision agriculture is the main focus of community research (Hassan-Esfahani et al. 2014; Pederi and Cheporniuk 2015). Monitoring the health of crop is essential for yield increase in agriculture (Carbone et al. 2018). For agricultural monitoring use of drones and UAVs are now becoming very common. These are used to monitor the growth and development of crops as well as plant height, soil moisture, pest population, and variations occurring in the field (Potrino et al. 2018). These drones and UAVs help in remote sensing of agricultural crops by taking images of crops and fields. These images are used for analysis by using different kinds of software to improve the understanding. Drones and UAVs have the advantage of providing high-resolution images than satellite images (Carbone et al. 2018). These drones and UAVs are also used for spraying of chemicals like insecticides, pesticides, etc. (Pederi and Cheporniuk 2015).
4 Potential Applications, Opportunities, and Current Usage Trends of IoT System in Agriculture
IoT system has numerous applications in the agriculture sector. It is used for monitoring and management of several processes with the help of modern technology (Fig. 21.4).
For decision support, raw sensor data is processed. Then, information is used for decision-making and performing different farm operations. A variety of sensors used for monitoring and data acquisition in agriculture are described in Table 21.2.
4.1 Weather Forecasting
To reduce agricultural risks associated with climate change, previous weather data can be used for weather forecasting through big data analysis. Environmental conditions can be monitored with the help of different environmental sensors. Depending on the collected data, timely decision-making, and farm management can be done.
4.2 Pest Control
Along with the weather and climate data, pest life cycle can also be monitored. It can play an important role in predicting pest outbreaks. For pest management, data of environmental variables (like humidity, precipitation, leaf wetness, etc.) are collected using different kinds of sensors. A disease known as Phytophthora was monitored and reduced with the help of sensor (TNOdes) in potato production (Baggio 2005).
4.3 On-farm Water Management
Irrigation and water management play a key role in agriculture (Zia et al. 2017). Climate change has resulted in erratic rainfall, water shortage, and health problems (Rasool et al. 2018). Remotely controlled irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and sprinkler irrigation can be opted in water-stressed areas. Linking the data of various variables (like radiation, humidity, temperature, etc.) from different types of sensors can control the amount and placement of water depending on the needs. Website real-time presentation of a river basin can be done. Sensors are used that feed the information into the websites. It enables users to monitor the river basin and react to changing patterns. As flooding is the main problem in river basins, it can be used as risk management strategy in agricultural communities.
4.4 Greenhouse Management
Monitoring the environment in the greenhouse is very critical (Ahmed 2017). Sensors are used in greenhouses for controlling and monitoring the moisture, temperature, humidity, etc. These sensors can be linked to a system, and Internet and can lead to smart agriculture that would help in effective management (Fig. 21.5).
4.5 Forest Management
Forest management can also be done effectively using IoT technology. Forest fires and illegal cuttings are the major issues in forest management. Fire can be detected by satellite technology using photos and heat sensors. Scannable plastic barcodes can be inserted in trees, to prevent illegal cutting. In this way, trees can be tracked from forests to the consumers.
4.6 Pollution Detection
IoT can play a vital role in pollution detection. In massive water bodies, satellite light radiations are used to detect water pollution. This technique would become convenient in aquaculture. By using the radiation wavelength, the type of pollutants can also be identified (Mubarak et al. 2016).
4.7 Livestock Monitoring
Radio frequency identifiers (RFIDs) are attached to animals for tracking animals and preventing theft. The position of animals can be seen in control or data centers where RFID readers are placed. It is helpful in communal grazing systems where animals get lost. GPS is used for location tracking. Similarly, measurements of enteric methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants could be easily monitored by different sensors-based devices (Hammond et al. 2016; Huhtanen et al. 2015; Hill et al. 2016). This could help to design strategies to minimize emission of enteric CH4 which is a significant source of greenhouse gas (Figs. 21.5 and 21.6).
4.8 Marketing
For market prices, data from national markets are filtered out and disseminated through small information centers having Internet access. In more remote areas, radio broadcast can be used. IoT can be used for branchless banking services. Especially in rural communities where farmers have no access to banks within reasonable distance, they can make money transactions and bill payments at retail outlets.
Precision agriculture and smart agriculture are aimed to maximize the net returns on investment. IoT technology can play a vital role in precision agriculture. Decision support systems running on smart devices can assist in better farming management. Mobile applications can help farmers in decision-making in farming operations (irrigation, disease and pest management, etc.) and diagnosing the diseases. IoT technology systems track and monitor animals. Similarly, farm product delivery can also be facilitated by IoT technology. Sensors and mobile Internet cut out the role of middleman and enable farmers to directly contact with consumers. Near Field Communication (NFC) systems can facilitate the purchasing and buying of farm inputs and farm products without using cash. Electronic transactions are replaced with cash and enable branchless banking in remote areas far from banks (Dlodlo and Kalezhi 2015).
Precision agriculture has become a prime focus worldwide (Jiang 2014) and use of modern IoT technologies in smart agriculture has gained importance in recent years (Table 21.3).
5 Scope and Future of IoT
By using smart agriculture technologies, more area can be brought under cultivation to meet the increased demands. Livestock management can be done more effectively with the help of IoT and other modern technologies to improve the quality and cleanliness. However, on the other hand, affordability, sustainability, and scalability are the major obstacles for adoption of these technologies. Farmer literacy and technical education are vital to use modern advanced technologies.
Developing countries are lagging behind the developed countries in the agriculture sector. Therefore, it is a prime necessity to take serious initiatives to promote modern technology to make agriculture more efficient and profitable. Hence, smart agriculture will result in optimizing resources, improving product quality, reducing production losses as well as improving the farmers’ and country’s economic conditions.
6 Benefits of IoT Technology in Agriculture
IoT technology can improve living standards and alleviate the poverty of farmers. For example, a wide range of crops can be grown in organic greenhouses that results in extra income and contribute to country’s gross domestic product (GDP) (Akram et al. 2018). The role of the middleman is lessened with mobile Internet because farmers can directly contact consumers.
Agriculture surveillance programs can be run with IoT that enable farmers to take preventive measures before the economic threshold level is reached. Therefore, even in droughts, bumper harvests can be obtained through precision agriculture. Smart health cards for crops and livestock can facilitate effective and efficient diagnosis and treatment with historic information of affected crops and livestock (Alonso et al. 2020).
IoT facilitates farm product tracking. Buyer can know where the product is and when it will be delivered. It can also empower transporters by providing information about farmers who require transport. Near Field Communication (NFC) system use facilitates the seller and buyer in paperless transactions and minimizes theft and fraud. It is also beneficial for rural area people who do not have bank access. Satellite transmissions can serve as means to obtain information in remote areas about markets, prices, government services, facilities, etc. The major advantages of IoT in agriculture are (i) Efficient water management without water wastage (Kumari and Iqbal 2020), (ii) Continuous monitoring and timely management (Shafi et al. 2020), (iii) Minimal labor and time requirements (Panda and Bhatnagar 2020), (iv) Soil and plant management (Othaman et al. 2020), (v) Disease diagnosis in plants and animals (Nayak et al. 2020), and (vi) Global marketing access (Panda and Bhatnagar 2020).
7 Challenges in Wireless Technologies
There are a number of challenges in observing different agricultural climates. Challenges and recommendations are listed below:
7.1 Communication Range
Communication range is a major challenge in wireless technologies. This range is short in agricultural applications. In ZigBee technology, it can be extended up to 100 m. In a farm field, this range can be extended using UAVs and drones.
7.2 Cost
Cost of sensors and monitoring equipment is important. The equipment should have low cost and robust performance. Cost reduction can make these technologies available to be adopted in poor countries.
7.3 Power Consumption
Power consumption of these systems should be minimal. On the other hand, this challenge can be overcome by introducing alternative energy harvesting ways like solar, wind, etc.
7.4 Reliability
Information collected from sensors are directed to farmers and organizations therefore information reliability is essential to deal immediately with dangerous information.
7.5 Real-Time Data
In precision agriculture real-time data is critical. Crops are vulnerable to changing climatic conditions. Therefore, real-time data is required to avoid crop failures and disasters.
7.6 Fault Tolerance
Sensors and systems should be fault tolerant. Communication or sensor fault can lead to serious crop damage. For example, if the sensor controlling irrigation is not working correctly or communicating, it can cause water stress damage to plants.
8 Conclusion
This chapter has reviewed the IoT applications in agriculture for sustainable developments and management of agricultural systems. IoT can benefit agriculture in several domains under the changing climate like weather forecasting, drought, crop, livestock, water and disease management, etc. Agricultural and rural development policies influence IoT technology adoption. Regions and sites specific IoT technologies should be developed to target poverty alleviation and economic uplift of farmers. Large number of IoT devices can be classified on the basis of type, usage, connection, place, etc. Instead of developing greater amount and variety of IoT structures, focus must be directed towards the development of reliable, more secure, minimal energy using, and more user-friendly devices. Agriculture is a more suitable area for IoT implementation, and there is room for development. IoT standards, platforms, and protocols should be open source software and evolving solutions for device compatibility issues. These solutions can decrease implementation costs and broaden the implementation of IoT as well.
Markets grow and collapse, disruptive business ideas emerge and die, but the people on the planet always need food for living. Therefore, developments and advancements in food and agriculture will always be a top priority, particularly under the current observed and predicted dynamics of climate extremes on the earth. Hence, application of IoT in agriculture has a promising future in terms of enhanced sustainability, efficiency, and scalability of agricultural systems.
References
Abbasi AZ, Islam N, Shaikh ZA (2014) A review of wireless sensors and networks' applications in agriculture. Computer Standards & Interfaces 36 (2):263-270
Adhikari R, Li C, Kalbaugh K, Nemali K (2020) A low-cost smartphone controlled sensor based on image analysis for estimating whole-plant tissue nitrogen (N) content in floriculture crops. Comput Electron Agric 169:105173
Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman A (2020) Cotton production and uses. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2
Ahmed M, Hassan FU (2011) APSIM and DSSAT models as decision support tools. 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Perth, Australia, 12–16 December 2011,http://mssanz.org.au/modsim2011
Ahmed M (2012) Improving Soil Fertility Recommendations in Africa Using the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT); A Book Review. Exp Agri. 48 (4): 602-603
Ahmed M, Asif M, Hirani AH, Akram MN, Goyal A (2013) Modeling for Agricultural Sustainability: A Review. In Gurbir S. Bhullar GS, Bhullar NK (ed) Agricultural Sustainability Progress and Prospects in Crop Research. Elsevier, 32 Jamestown Road, London NW1 7BY, UK
Ahmed, M., Stockle, C.O. (2016). Quantification of climate variability, adaptation, and mitigation for agricultural sustainability. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.part of Springer Nature.
Ahmed M (2017) Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Variability: An Overview. In: Ahmed M, Stockle CO (eds) Quantification of Climate Variability, Adaptation and Mitigation for Agricultural Sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_1
Ahmed M, Fayyaz-ul-Hassan, Ahmad S (2017) Climate Variability Impact on Rice Production: Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies. In: Ahmed M, Stockle CO (eds) Quantification of Climate Variability, Adaptation and Mitigation for Agricultural Sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 91-111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_5
Ahmed M, Ijaz W, Ahmad S (2018) Adapting and evaluating APSIM-SoilP-Wheat model for response to phosphorus under rainfed conditions of Pakistan. Journal of Plant Nutrition 41, 2069-2084.
Ahmed M, Ahmad S (2019) Carbon Dioxide Enrichment and Crop Productivity. In: Hasanuzzaman M (ed) Agronomic Crops: Volume 2: Management Practices. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 31-46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9783-8_3
Ahmed M (2020a) Introduction to Modern Climate Change. Andrew E. Dessler: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 252 pp, ISBN-10: 0521173159. Sci Total Environ 734, 139397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139397
Ahmed M (2020b) Systems Modeling, Springer Nature Singapore Pvt. Ltd., pp. 409. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4728-7
Ahmed M, Hasanuzzaman M, Raza MA, Malik A, Ahmad S (2020a) Plant Nutrients for Crop Growth, Development and Stress Tolerance. R. Roychowdhury et al. (eds.), Sustainable Agriculture in the Era of Climate Change, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45669-6_3
Ahmed K, Shabbir G, Ahmed M, Shah KN (2020b) Phenotyping for drought resistance in bread wheat using physiological and biochemical traits. Sci Total Environ 729, 139082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139082
Ahmed M, Ahmad S (2020). Systems Modeling. In: Ahmed M (ed.), Systems Modeling, Springer Nature Singapore Pvt. Ltd.. pp. 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4728-7_1
Ahmed M, Raza MA, Hussain T (2020c) Dynamic Modeling. In: Ahmed M (ed.), Systems Modeling, Springer Nature Singapore Pvt. Ltd., pp. 111-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4728-7_4
Ahmed M, Ahmad S, Raza MA, Kumar U, Ansar M, Shah GA, Parsons D, Hoogenboom G, Palosuo T, Seidel S (2020d) Models Calibration and Evaluation. In: Ahmed M (ed.), Systems Modeling, Springer Nature Singapore Pvt. Ltd.. pp. 149-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4728-7_5
Ahmed M, Ahmad S, Waldrip HM, Ramin M, Raza MA (2020e). Whole Farm Modeling: A Systems Approach to Understanding and Managing Livestock for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Economic Viability and Environmental Quality. In Animal Manure (eds H. Waldrip, P. Pagliari and Z. He). doi:https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub67.c25
Ahmed M, Fayyaz-ul-Hassan, Van Ogtrop FF (2014) Can models help to forecast rainwater dynamics for rainfed ecosystem? Weather and Climate Extremes 5–6 (0):48-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2014.07.001
Akram R, Turan V, Hammad HM, Ahmad S, Hussain S, Hasnain A, Maqbool MM, Rehmani MIA, Rasool A, Masood N, Mahmood F, Mubeen M, Sultana SR, Fahad S, Amanet K, Saleem M, Abbas Y, Akhtar HM, Hussain S, Waseem F, Murtaza R, Amin A, Zahoor SA, Sami ul Din M, Nasim W (2018) Fate of Organic and Inorganic Pollutants in Paddy Soils. In: Hashmi MZ, Varma A (eds) Environmental Pollution of Paddy Soils. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 197-214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93671-0_13
Ali S, Eum H-I, Cho J, Dan L, Khan F, Dairaku K, Shrestha ML, Hwang S, Nasim W, Khan IA, Fahad S (2019) Assessment of climate extremes in future projections downscaled by multiple statistical downscaling methods over Pakistan. Atmospheric Research 222:114-133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.02.009
Alonso RS, Sittón-Candanedo I, García Ó, Prieto J, Rodríguez-González S (2020) An intelligent Edge-IoT platform for monitoring livestock and crops in a dairy farming scenario. Ad Hoc Networks 98:102047
Amin A, Nasim W, Fahad S, Ali S, Ahmad S, Rasool A, Saleem N, Hammad HM, Sultana SR, Mubeen M, Bakhat HF, Ahmad N, Shah GM, Adnan M, Noor M, Basir A, Saud S, Habib ur Rahman M, Paz JO (2018) Evaluation and analysis of temperature for historical (1996–2015) and projected (2030–2060) climates in Pakistan using SimCLIM climate model: Ensemble application. Atmospheric Research 213:422-436. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.021
Andreev S, Galinina O, Pyattaev A, Gerasimenko M, Tirronen T, Torsner J, Sachs J, Dohler M, Koucheryavy Y (2015) Understanding the IoT connectivity landscape: a contemporary M2M radio technology roadmap. IEEE Communications Magazine 53 (9):32-40
Ashraf R, Fayyaz-ul-Hassan, Ahmed M, Shabbir G (2017) Wheat Physiological Response Under Drought. In: Ahmed M, Stockle CO (eds) Quantification of Climate Variability, Adaptation and Mitigation for Agricultural Sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 211-231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_10
Aslam MU, Shehzad A, Ahmed M, Iqbal M, Asim M, Aslam M (2017a) QTL Modelling: An Adaptation Option in Spring Wheat for Drought Stress. In: Ahmed M, Stockle CO (eds) Quantification of Climate Variability, Adaptation and Mitigation for Agricultural Sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 113-136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_6
Aslam Z, Khattak JZK, Ahmed M, Asif M (2017b) A Role of Bioinformatics in Agriculture. In: Ahmed M, Stockle CO (eds) Quantification of Climate Variability, Adaptation and Mitigation for Agricultural Sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 413-434. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_17
Asseng S, Martre P, Maiorano A, Rötter RP, O’Leary GJ, Fitzgerald GJ, Girousse C, Motzo R, Giunta F, Babar MA, Reynolds MP, Kheir AMS, Thorburn PJ, Waha K, Ruane AC, Aggarwal PK, Ahmed M, Balkovič J, Basso B, Biernath C, Bindi M, Cammarano D, Challinor AJ, De Sanctis G, Dumont B, Eyshi Rezaei E, Fereres E, Ferrise R, Garcia-Vila M, Gayler S, Gao Y, Horan H, Hoogenboom G, Izaurralde RC, Jabloun M, Jones CD, Kassie BT, Kersebaum K-C, Klein C, Koehler A-K, Liu B, Minoli S, Montesino San Martin M, Müller C, Naresh Kumar S, Nendel C, Olesen JE, Palosuo T, Porter JR, Priesack E, Ripoche D, Semenov MA, Stöckle C, Stratonovitch P, Streck T, Supit I, Tao F, Van der Velde M, Wallach D, Wang E, Webber H, Wolf J, Xiao L, Zhang Z, Zhao Z, Zhu Y, Ewert F (2019) Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein. Global Change Biology 25 (1):155-173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14481
Bacenetti J, Paleari L, Tartarini S, Vesely FM, Foi M, Movedi E, Ravasi RA, Bellopede V, Durello S, Ceravolo C, Amicizia F, Confalonieri R (2020) May smart technologies reduce the environmental impact of nitrogen fertilization? A case study for paddy rice. Science of The Total Environment 715:136956. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136956
Baggio A Wireless sensor networks in precision agriculture. In: ACM Workshop on Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks (REALWSN 2005), Stockholm, Sweden, 2005. Citeseer,
Bregaglio S, Frasso N, Pagani V, Stella T, Francone C, Cappelli G, Acutis M, Balaghi R, Ouabbou H, Paleari L (2015) New multi-model approach gives good estimations of wheat yield under semi-arid climate in Morocco. Agronomy for sustainable development 35 (1):157-167
Brewster C, Roussaki I, Kalatzis N, Doolin K, Ellis K (2017) IoT in agriculture: Designing a Europe-wide large-scale pilot. IEEE communications magazine 55 (9):26-33
Campoy J, Campos I, Plaza C, Calera M, Bodas V, Calera A (2020) Estimation of harvest index in wheat crops using a remote sensing-based approach. Field Crops Res 256:107910
Cancela J, Fandiño M, Rey B, Martínez E (2015) Automatic irrigation system based on dual crop coefficient, soil and plant water status for Vitis vinifera (cv Godello and cv Mencía). Agric Water Manage 151:52-63
Carbone C, Garibaldi O, Kurt Z (2018) Swarm robotics as a solution to crops inspection for precision agriculture. KnE Engineering:552-562
Chen Y, Tao F (2020) Improving the practicability of remote sensing data-assimilation-based crop yield estimations over a large area using a spatial assimilation algorithm and ensemble assimilation strategies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 291:108082
Chung S-O, Kang S-W, Bae K-S, Ryu M-J, Kim Y-J (2015) The potential of remote monitoring and control of protected crop production environment using mobile phone under 3G and Wi-Fi communication conditions. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food 8 (4):251-256
Dlodlo N, Kalezhi J The internet of things in agriculture for sustainable rural development. In: 2015 international conference on emerging trends in networks and computer communications (ETNCC), 2015. IEEE, pp 13-18
Dusadeerungsikul PO, Liakos V, Morari F, Nof SY, Bechar A (2020) Chapter 5 - Smart action. In: Castrignanò A, Buttafuoco G, Khosla R, Mouazen AM, Moshou D, Naud O (eds) Agricultural Internet of Things and Decision Support for Precision Smart Farming. Academic Press, pp 225–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818373-1.00005-6
Franch B, Vermote EF, Skakun S, Roger J-C, Becker-Reshef I, Murphy E, Justice C (2019) Remote sensing based yield monitoring: Application to winter wheat in United States and Ukraine. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 76:112-127
Gakuru M, Winters K, Stepman F Inventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ICTs. In 2009. Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA), Accra, GH
Geethanjali B, Muralidhara B (2020) A Wireless Sensor System to Monitor Banana Growth Based on the Temperature. In: Information and Communication Technology for Sustainable Development. Springer, pp 271-278
Guerrero JM, Guijarro M, Montalvo M, Romeo J, Emmi L, Ribeiro A, Pajares G (2013) Automatic expert system based on images for accuracy crop row detection in maize fields. Expert Systems with Applications 40 (2):656-664
Guo J, Yang X, Niu J, Jin Y, Xu B, Shen G, Zhang W, Zhao F, Zhang Y (2019) Remote sensing monitoring of green-up dates in the Xilingol grasslands of northern China and their correlations with meteorological factors. Int J Remote Sens 40 (5-6):2190-2211
Gutiérrez J, Villa-Medina JF, Nieto-Garibay A, Porta-Gándara MÁ (2014) Automated irrigation system using a wireless sensor network and GPRS module. IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement 63 (1):166-176
Hammond KJ, Crompton LA, Bannink A, Dijkstra J, Yáñez-Ruiz DR, O’Kiely P, Kebreab E, Eugène MA, Yu Z, Shingfield KJ, Schwarm A, Hristov AN, Reynolds CK (2016) Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 219:13-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.018
Han C, Zhang B, Chen H, Liu Y, Wei Z (2020) Novel approach of upscaling the FAO AquaCrop model into regional scale by using distributed crop parameters derived from remote sensing data. Agric Water Manage 240:106288
Hassan-Esfahani L, Torres-Rua A, Ticlavilca AM, Jensen A, McKee M Topsoil moisture estimation for precision agriculture using unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral imagery. In: 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2014. IEEE, pp 3263-3266
Hill J, McSweeney C, Wright A-DG, Bishop-Hurley G, Kalantar-zadeh K (2016) Measuring Methane Production from Ruminants. Trends in Biotechnology 34 (1):26-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.10.004
Holman F, Riche A, Michalski A, Castle M, Wooster M, Hawkesford M (2016) High throughput field phenotyping of wheat plant height and growth rate in field plot trials using UAV based remote sensing. Remote Sensing 8 (12):1031
Hoogenboom G, Porter C, Boote K, Shelia V, Wilkens PW. (2019) The DSSAT crop modeling ecosystem. Burleigh dodds Science Publishing. UK
Huhtanen P, Cabezas-Garcia EH, Utsumi S, Zimmerman S (2015) Comparison of methods to determine methane emissions from dairy cows in farm conditions. Journal of Dairy Science 98 (5):3394-3409. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9118
Ijaz W, Ahmed M, Fayyaz-ul-Hassan, Asim M, Aslam M (2017) Models to Study Phosphorous Dynamics Under Changing Climate. In: Ahmed M, Stockle CO (eds) Quantification of Climate Variability, Adaptation and Mitigation for Agricultural Sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 371-386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_15
Ilie-Ablachim D, Pătru GC, Florea I-M, Rosner D Monitoring device for culture substrate growth parameters for precision agriculture: Acronym: MoniSen. In: RoEduNet Conference: Networking in Education and Research, 2016 15th, 2016. IEEE, pp 1-7
Jabeen M, Gabriel HF, Ahmed M, Mahboob MA, Iqbal J (2017) Studying Impact of Climate Change on Wheat Yield by Using DSSAT and GIS: A Case Study of Pothwar Region. In: Ahmed M, Stockle CO (eds) Quantification of Climate Variability, Adaptation and Mitigation for Agricultural Sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 387-411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_16
Jawad H, Nordin R, Gharghan S, Jawad A, Ismail M (2017) Energy-efficient wireless sensor networks for precision agriculture: A review. Sensors 17 (8):1781
Jiang J-A Becoming technologically advanced-IOT applications in smart agriculture. In: 38th meeting of, 2014.
Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy 18 (3):235-265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7.
Kasampalis D, Alexandridis T, Deva C, Challinor A, Moshou D, Zalidis G (2018) Contribution of remote sensing on crop models: a review. Journal of Imaging 4 (4):52
Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL, Probert ME, Robertson MJ, Holzworth D, Huth NI, Hargreaves JNG, Meinke H, Hochman Z, McLean G, Verburg K, Snow V, Dimes JP, Silburn M, Wang E, Brown S, Bristow KL, Asseng S, Chapman S, McCown RL, Freebairn DM, Smith CJ (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 18 (3–4):267–288. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00108-9
Kelman EE, Linker R (2014) Vision-based localisation of mature apples in tree images using convexity. Biosys Eng 118:174-185
Kim Y, Evans R (2009) Software design for wireless sensor-based site-specific irrigation. Comput Electron Agric 66 (2):159-165
Kopetz H (2011) Internet of things. In: Real-time systems. Springer, pp 307-323
Kumari V, Iqbal M (2020) Development of Model for Sustainable Development in Agriculture Using IoT-Based Smart Farming. In: New Paradigm in Decision Science and Management. Springer, pp 303-310
Leroux L, Castets M, Baron C, Escorihuela M-J, Bégué A, Seen DL (2019) Maize yield estimation in West Africa from crop process-induced combinations of multi-domain remote sensing indices. European Journal of Agronomy 108:11-26
Liao G, Wang X, Jin J, Li J Potato size and shape detection using machine vision. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, 2015. EDP Sciences, p 15003
Lipper L, Thornton P, Campbell BM, Baedeker T, Braimoh A, Bwalya M, Caron P, Cattaneo A, Garrity D, Henry K (2014) Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nature climate change 4 (12):1068-1072
Liu B, Martre P, Ewert F, Porter JR, Challinor AJ, Müller C, Ruane AC, Waha K, Thorburn PJ, Aggarwal PK, Ahmed M, Balkovič J, Basso B, Biernath C, Bindi M, Cammarano D, De Sanctis G, Dumont B, Espadafor M, Eyshi Rezaei E, Ferrise R, Garcia-Vila M, Gayler S, Gao Y, Horan H, Hoogenboom G, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Kassie BT, Kersebaum KC, Klein C, Koehler A-K, Maiorano A, Minoli S, Montesino San Martin M, Naresh Kumar S, Nendel C, O’Leary GJ, Palosuo T, Priesack E, Ripoche D, Rötter RP, Semenov MA, Stöckle C, Streck T, Supit I, Tao F, Van der Velde M, Wallach D, Wang E, Webber H, Wolf J, Xiao L, Zhang Z, Zhao Z, Zhu Y, Asseng S (2019) Global wheat production with 1.5 and 2.0 °C above pre-industrial warming. Global Change Biology 25 (4):1428-1444. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14542
Mahmood FH, Belhouchette, W., Nasim, T., Shazad, S., Hussain, O., Therond, S., Fahad, Wery J. (2017) Economic and environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes in farming systems of Midi-Pyrenees region (France): a simulation approach. International Journal of Plant Production 11 (1):65-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.22069/ijpp.2017.3310
Malavade VN, Akulwar PK (2016) Role of IoT in agriculture. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE):56-57
Me C, Balasundram SK, Hanif AHM (2017) Detecting and monitoring plant nutrient stress using remote sensing approaches: A review. Asian J Plant Sci 16:1-8
Mehmood A, Ahmed M, Fayyaz-ul-Hassan, Akmal M, ur Rehman O (2017) Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for Rainfed Wheat Water Productivity. In: Ahmed M, Stockle CO (eds) Quantification of Climate Variability, Adaptation and Mitigation for Agricultural Sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 137-163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32059-5_7
Mehmood MZ, Afzal O, Aslam MA, Riaz H, Raza MA, Ahmed S, Qadir G, Ahmad M, Shaheen FA, Shah ZH (2020) Disease Modeling as a Tool to Assess the Impacts of Climate Variability on Plant Diseases and Health. In: Systems Modeling. Springer, pp 327–351
Mizushima A, Lu R (2013) An image segmentation method for apple sorting and grading using support vector machine and Otsu’s method. Comput Electron Agric 94:29-37
Mohapatra AG, Lenka SK (2016) Neural network pattern classification and weather dependent fuzzy logic model for irrigation control in WSN based precision agriculture. Procedia Computer Science 78:499-506
Mubarak H, Mirza N, Chai L-Y, Yang Z-H, Yong W, Tang C-J, Mahmood Q, Pervez A, Farooq U, Fahad S, Nasim W, Siddique KHM (2016) Biochemical and Metabolic Changes in Arsenic Contaminated Boehmeria nivea L. BioMed Research International 2016:1423828. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1423828
Mubeen M, Ahmad A, Khaliq T, Sultana SR, Hussain S, Ali A, Ali H, Nasim W (2013) Effect of Growth Stage-Based Irrigation Schedules on Biomass Accumulation and Resource Use Efficiency of Wheat Cultivars. American Journal of Plant Sciences Vol. 04 No. 07:8. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.47175
Nasim W, Ahmad A, Wajid A, Akhtar J, Muhammad D (2011) Nitrogen effects on growth and development of sunflower hybrids under agro-climatic conditions of Multan. Pak J Bot 43 (4):2083-2092
Nayak P, Kavitha K, Rao CM (2020) IoT-Enabled Agricultural System Applications, Challenges and Security Issues. In: IoT and Analytics for Agriculture. Springer, pp 139-163
Nlerum F, Onowu E (2014) Information Communication Technologies in Agricultural Extension Delivery of Agricultural Transformation Agenda. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems 4 (4):221-228
Ojha T, Misra S, Raghuwanshi NS (2015) Wireless sensor networks for agriculture: The state-of-the-art in practice and future challenges. Comput Electron Agric 118:66-84
Oteng-Darko P, Yeboah S, Addy S, Amponsah S, Danquah EO (2013) Crop modeling: A tool for agricultural research–A. J Agricultural Res Develop 2 (1):001-006
Othaman NC, Isa MM, Murad S, Harun A, Mohyar S Electrical conductivity (EC) sensing system for paddy plant using the internet of things (IoT) connectivity. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, 2020. vol 1. AIP Publishing LLC, p 020005
Panda CK, Bhatnagar R (2020) Social Internet of Things in Agriculture: An Overview and Future Scope. In: Toward Social Internet of Things (SIoT): Enabling Technologies, Architectures and Applications. Springer, pp 317-334
Pastrana JC, Rath T (2013) Novel image processing approach for solving the overlapping problem in agriculture. Biosys Eng 115 (1):106-115
Patil K, Kale N A model for smart agriculture using IoT. In: 2016 International Conference on Global Trends in Signal Processing, Information Computing and Communication (ICGTSPICC), 2016. IEEE, pp 543-545
Pederi Y, Cheporniuk H Unmanned aerial vehicles and new technological methods of monitoring and crop protection in precision agriculture. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Developments (APUAVD), 2015. IEEE, pp 298-301
Pitì A, Verticale G, Rottondi C, Capone A, Lo Schiavo L (2017) The role of smart meters in enabling real-time energy services for households: The Italian case. Energies 10 (2):199
Potrino G, Palmieri N, Antonello V, Serianni A Drones Support in Precision Agriculture for Fighting Against Parasites. In: 2018 26th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), 2018. IEEE, pp 1-4
Puranik V, Ranjan A, Kumari A Automation in Agriculture and IoT. In: 2019 4th International Conference on Internet of Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU), 2019. IEEE, pp 1-6
Rahman MHu, Ahmad I, Ghaffar A, Haider G, Ahmad A, Ahmad B, Tariq M, Nasim W, Rasul G, Fahad S, Ahmad S, Hoogenboom G (2020) Climate Resilient Cotton Production System: A Case Study in Pakistan. In: Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M (eds) Cotton Production and Uses: Agronomy, Crop Protection, and Postharvest Technologies. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 447-484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_22
Rasool A, Farooqi A, Xiao T, Ali W, Noor S, Abiola O, Ali S, Nasim W (2018) A review of global outlook on fluoride contamination in groundwater with prominence on the Pakistan current situation. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 40 (4):1265-1281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-017-0054-z
Ratasuk R, Vejlgaard B, Mangalvedhe N, Ghosh A NB-IoT system for M2M communication. In: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2016 IEEE, 2016. IEEE, pp 1-5
Reis MJ, Morais R, Peres E, Pereira C, Contente O, Soares S, Valente A, Baptista J, Ferreira PJS, Cruz JB (2012) Automatic detection of bunches of grapes in natural environment from color images. Journal of Applied Logic 10 (4):285-290
Research J (2015) Internet of Things Connected Devices to Almost Triple to Over 38 Billion Units by 2020”, Juniper Research.
Sarode K, Chaudhari P (2018) Zigbee based Agricultural Monitoring and Controlling System. International Journal of Engineering Science 15907
Shafi U, Mumtaz R, Hassan SA, Zaidi SAR, Akhtar A, Malik MM (2020) Crop Health Monitoring Using IoT-Enabled Precision Agriculture. In: IoT Architectures, Models, and Platforms for Smart City Applications. IGI Global, pp 134-154
Silleos NG, Alexandridis TK, Gitas IZ, Perakis K (2006) Vegetation indices: advances made in biomass estimation and vegetation monitoring in the last 30 years. Geocarto International 21 (4):21-28
Sivarajan S, Maharlooei M, Kandel H, Buetow RR, Nowatzki J, Bajwa SG (2020) Evaluation of OptRx™ active optical sensor to monitor soybean response to nitrogen inputs. J Sci Food Agric 100 (1):154-160
Stratigea A (2011) ICTs for rural development: potential applications and barriers involved. Netcom Réseaux, communication et territoires (25-3/4):179-204
Sun S, Li C, Paterson AH, Jiang Y, Xu R, Robertson JS, Snider JL, Chee PW (2018) In-field high throughput phenotyping and cotton plant growth analysis using LiDAR. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:16
Umeda H, Mochizuki Y, Saito T, Higashide T, Iwasaki Y Diagnosing method for plant growth using a 3D depth sensor. In: International Symposium on New Technologies for Environment Control, Energy-Saving and Crop Production in Greenhouse and Plant 1227, 2017. pp 631-636
van Ogtrop F, Ahmad M, Moeller C (2014) Principal components of sea surface temperatures as predictors of seasonal rainfall in rainfed wheat growing areas of Pakistan. Meteorological Applications 21 (2):431-443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1429
Vellidis G, Liakos V, Andreis J, Perry C, Porter W, Barnes E, Morgan K, Fraisse C, Migliaccio K (2016) Development and assessment of a smartphone application for irrigation scheduling in cotton. Comput Electron Agric 127:249-259
Wallach D, Martre P, Liu B, Asseng S, Ewert F, Thorburn PJ, van Ittersum M, Aggarwal PK, Ahmed M, Basso B, Biernath C, Cammarano D, Challinor AJ, De Sanctis G, Dumont B, Eyshi Rezaei E, Fereres E, Fitzgerald GJ, Gao Y, Garcia-Vila M, Gayler S, Girousse C, Hoogenboom G, Horan H, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Kassie BT, Kersebaum KC, Klein C, Koehler A-K, Maiorano A, Minoli S, Müller C, Naresh Kumar S, Nendel C, O'Leary GJ, Palosuo T, Priesack E, Ripoche D, Rötter RP, Semenov MA, Stöckle C, Stratonovitch P, Streck T, Supit I, Tao F, Wolf J, Zhang Z (2018) Multimodel ensembles improve predictions of crop–environment–management interactions. Global Change Biology 24 (11):5072-5083. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14411
Weber R, Weber R (2010) Internet of Things: Legal Perspectives, vol. 49. Xia, F, Yang, LT, Wang, L, &Vinel, A (2012) Internet of things International Journal of Communication Systems 25 (9):1101
Wu Y, Li D, Li Z, Yang W (2014) Fast processing of foreign fiber images by image blocking. Information Processing in Agriculture 1 (1):2-13
Zhang J, Chen Y, Zhang Z (2020) A remote sensing-based scheme to improve regional crop model calibration at sub-model component level. Agricultural Systems 181:102814
Zia Z, Bakhat HF, Saqib ZA, Shah GM, Fahad S, Ashraf MR, Hammad HM, Naseem W, Shahid M (2017) Effect of water management and silicon on germination, growth, phosphorus and arsenic uptake in rice. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 144:11-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mehmood, M.Z. et al. (2022). Internet of Things (IoT) and Sensors Technologies in Smart Agriculture: Applications, Opportunities, and Current Trends. In: Jatoi, W.N., Mubeen, M., Ahmad, A., Cheema, M.A., Lin, Z., Hashmi, M.Z. (eds) Building Climate Resilience in Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79408-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79408-8_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79407-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79408-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)