Abstract
With the aim to facilitate a debate between social and political theory for a better understanding of the societal totality, this chapter probes the ways to understand power, regulation, and social order. It starts from the morally laden conceptions of political theory in the Antiquity and then proceeds from the political theory of early modernity to the emergence of the three basic social sciences, i.e., sociology, political science, and economics. It turns out that most power conceptions have been negative and centered on influence but there are some rare exceptions of which the chapter discusses on those of Marx, Parsons, Foucault, and Mann. The canon of current social theory, i.e., Habermas, Giddens, and Bourdieu is also discussed from the perspective of positive power. A section with two examples of substantive study of power and regulation in the intersection of political and social theory dealing with the notions of hegemony and governance follows. Finally, the Conclusion lists what has been achieved thus far in the attempt to build a bridge between political and social theory and ends up with a call for continuation of the debate to overcome fragmentation in the study of society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For the moment we leave aside the issue of whether Strauss’s usage of notions like “society,” “social,” and “human being” are anachronistic. For the argument that that these notions are specifically modern and lack reference in the Ancient context, see Delanty (2009, p. 20), Foucault (1970), Taylor (1989).
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
There are others, which we do not have space to more than mention here such as the following two coming from the direction of sociology. One is the rector/actor/other model by Isaac Ariail Reed (2017, 2019). What makes this model curios in the sociological literature is that it is explicated with expressions, which follow almost word by word those of Thomas Hobbes’ description of the relationship of “AUTHOR” and “actor” in Chap. 16 of his Leviathan. Reed thus repeats the institutional definition of the ruler or rector and the agent or actor. Yet he does not stop there and stay in the sphere of political theory but steps over to the terrain of social theory by adding to the model the third party of “other”. That makes it possible to commit sociological analyses of the destiny of victims of war and other innocent bystanders of chains of powerful agency. It also makes it possible to contextualize chains of agency by framing the agency in question according to its role in the wider society. Ultimately that kind of a study opens to a wide field of the study of “projects” (Reed and Weinstein 2019). A different example is Risto Heiskala’s hexagon model (presented in Heiskala 2018 as the NACEVP model). It is an attempt to continue Michael Mann’s theorizing with an interest to really take theorizing to the terrain of reconstruction of historical materialism in a new situation. With this reconstructive purpose in mind Heiskala extends the focus of the theory from Mann’s interest to tell narrations on power on state level to all social objects, transforms the IEMP model to a CEVP model where the letters stand for cultural, economic, violence-related and political power, and adds two new forms of causation called natural power (N) and artefactual power (A). The emerging NACEVP or hexagon model is meant to be better suited than the prevailing sociological conceptions for the analysis of such timely problems in which nature, technostructures and social forms of power are intertwined in the cases of the environmental crisis or gender issues, for example.
- 5.
- 6.
In fact, even earlier, see for instance Laclau’s paper “The impossibility of Society,” which was originally published in 1983 and later printed as part of his most influential collection of essays (Laclau 1990).
- 7.
Cf. this to Laclau’s later statement: “A free society is not one where a social order has been established that is better adapted to human nature, but one which is more aware of the contingency and historicity of any order” (Laclau 1990, p. 211).
References
Alexander, J.C. 1995. Fin de Sciècle Social Theory. Relativism, reduction, and the problem of reason. London: Verso.
Althusser, L. 1995. On the reproduction of capitalism. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. London: Verso, 2014.
Arendt, H. 1958. The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bachrach, P., and M. Baratz. 1962. Two faces of power. American Political Science Review 56 (04): 947–952.
Bachrach, P., and M.S. Baratz. 1963. Decisions and nondecisions: an analytical framework. American Political Science Review 57 (3): 632–642.
Bachrach, P., and M. Baratz. 1970. Power and poverty: theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Badiou, A. 2005. Metapolitics. London: Verso.
Baudrillard, J. 1975. The mirror of production. St. Louis: Telos Press.
Benhabib, S. 1986. Critique, norm and utopia. A study of the foundations of critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Berger, P.L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.
Berlin, I. 1962. Does political theory still exist? In Philosophy, politics and society: a collection, second series, ed. W.G. Runciman and P. Laslett, 1–33. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bevir, M. 2010. Democratic governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bevir, M., and R. Rhodes. 2006. Governance stories. New York: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of the theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1984. Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
———. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2000. Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P., and L.J. Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chase-Dunn, C., and B. Lerro. 2016. Social change. Globalization from the stone age to the present. New York: Routledge.
Clarke, S. 1991. Marx, Marginalism and modern sociology: from Adam Smith to Max Weber. Hampshire: Palgrave.
Clegg, S.R., and M. Haugaard. 2009. The Sage handbook of power. London: Sage.
Dahl, R. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2 (3): 201–215.
Dahl, Robert A. 1968. Power as the control of behaviour. In International encyclopedia of the social sciences, ed. David L. Shills, vol. 12. New York: Macmillan.
———. 1961. Who governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.
———. 1968. Power. In International Encyclopedia of the social sciences, ed. D.L. Sills, vol. XII, 405–415. New York.
Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
Delanty, G. 2009. The foundations of social theory. In The new Blackwell companion to social theory, ed. B.S. Turner, 19–37. New York: Blackwell.
Dreyfus, H.L., and P. Rabinow. 1993. Can there be science of existential structure and social meaning. In Bourdieu: critical persopectives, ed. Graig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone. Cambridge: Polity.
Eagleton, T. 2011. Why Marx was right? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Eder, K. 1980. Die Entstehung staatlich organisierter Gesellschaften. In Ein Betrag zu einer Theorie sozialer Evolution. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Foucault, M. 2005 [1970]. The order of things. New York: Routledge.
———. 1976. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books, 1995.
———. 1978. The history of sexuality. Volume I: an introduction. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
———. 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
———. 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–795.
———. 1991. On governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: studies in governmentality, ed. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Frank, A.G. 1998. ReOrient. Global economy in the Asian age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1976. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Vintage Books, 1995.
Foucault, M. 1978. The history of sexuality. Volume I: an introduction. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
French, J., and B. Raven. 1959. The bases of social power. In Studies in social power, ed. D. Cartwright, 150–167. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Fukuyama, F. 2016. Governance: what do we know, and how do we know it? Annual Review of Political Science 19: 89–105.
Gaventa, J. 1982. Power and powerlessness: quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Giddens, A. 1973. The class structure of the advanced societies. London: Hutchinson.
———. 1976. The new rules of sociological method. A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. London: Hutchinson.
———. 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
———. 1981. A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Volume 1: power, property, and the state. London: Macmillan.
———. 1984. The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1987. The nation-state and violence. Volume 2 of a Contemporary critique of historical materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1991. Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
———. 1994a. Beyond left and right: the future of radical politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
———. 1994b. Living in a post-traditional society. In Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, ed. U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash, 56–109. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glynos, J., and D. Howarth. 2007. Logics of critical explanation. New York: Routledge.
Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishardt Ltd, 2005.
Habermas, J. 1962. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity.
———. 1973. Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.
———. 1975. Towards a reconstruction of historical materialism. Theory and Society 2 (3): 287–300.
———. 1981a. Theory of communicative action, Volume One: reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
———. 1981b. Theory of communicative action, Volume Two: lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press, 1986.
Habermas, J., and T. McCarthy. 1977. Hannah Arendt’s communications concept of power. Social Research 44 (1): 3–24.
Hall, J.A., and R. Schroeder. 2006. An anatomy of power. The social theory of Michael Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, A., J. Madison, and J. Jay 2008 [1788]. The federalist papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hardin, R. 2008. Normative methodology. In The Oxford handbook of political methodology, ed. J. Box-Steffensmeier, H. Brady, and D. Collier, 35–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haug, W.F. 1986. Critique of commodity aesthetics. Appearances, sexuality and advertising in capitalist society. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Haugaard, M. 2003. Reflections on seven ways of creating power. European Journal of Social Theory 6 (1): 87–113.
Heiskala, R. 1986. Marx, the modern world, and the problem of social regulation. Acta Sociologica 29 (4): 311–323.
———. 2001. Theorizing power. Weber, Parsons, Foucault and neostructuralism. Social Science Information 40 (2): 241–264.
———. 2003. Society as semiosis. In Neostructuralist theory of culture and society. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Peter Lang.
———. 2007. Economy and society. From Parsons through Habermas to semiotic institutionalism. Social Science Information 46 (2): 243–271.
———. 2018. For a holistic social science: the NACEVP model applied to the environment, gender and populism. Journal of Political Power 11 (3): 322–340.
Heiskala, R. 2021. Semiotic sociology. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Helliwell, C., and B. Hindess. 2006. Political theory and social theory. In The Oxfrod handbook of political theory, ed. J. Dryzek, B. Honig, and A. Phillips, 810–822. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hobbes, T. 1651. Leviathan. London: A&C Black.
———. 1839. De Corpore. In English Works. London: Molesworth.
Hunter, F. 1953. Community power structure: a study of decision makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Jessop, B. 2003. Governance and metagovernance: on reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In, ed. H. Bang, 101–116. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Governance, as social and political communication
———. 2011. Metagovernance. In The sage handbook of governance, ed. M. Bevir, 106–123. London: Sage.
———. 2016. The state: past, present, future. Cambridge: Polity.
Joas, H., and W. Knöbl. 2009. Social theory. Twenty introductory lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kooiman, J. 2003. Governing as governance. London: Sage.
Kooiman, J., and S. Jentoft. 2009. Meta-governance: values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration 87 (4): 818–836.
Laclau, E. 1990. New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
———. 1994. Introduction. In The making of political identities, ed. E. Laclau, 1–8. London: Verso.
———. 2001. Democracy and the question of power. Constellations 8: 3–14.
———. 2005. On populist reason. New York: Verso.
Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
———. 1987. Post-Marxism without apologies. New Left Review I (166): 79–106.
———. 2001. Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. 2nd ed. London: Verso.
Laclau, E., and L. Zac. 1994. Minding the gap: the subject of politics. In The making of political identities, ed. E. Laclau, 11–39. London: Verso.
Lamont, M. 1994. Money, morals, and manners. In The culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Lefort, C. 1988. Democracy and political theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.
Locke, J. 2014 [1690]. Second treatise of government: an essay concerning the true original, extent and end of civil government. Boca Raton, FL. Wiley.
Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and power. Boca Raton, FL: Wiley.
Lukes, S. 1974. Power: a radical view. London: Macmillan.
———. 2005. Power: a radical view. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Machiavelli, N. 2008 [1513]. The Prince. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Mann, M. 1986. The sources of social power: volume 1, A history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1993. The sources of social power: volume 2, the rise of classes and nation-states, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2012. The sources of social power: volume 3, Global empires and revolution, 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2013. The sources of social power: volume 4, Globalizations, 1945–2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marchart, O. 2007. Post-foundational political thought: political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. In Political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Marx, K. 1867. Capital. A critique of political economy. Vol. 1. London: Penguin Books & New Left Review, 1976.
———. 1971. Capital. A critique of political economy. Volume Three. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
———. 1974. Grundrisse. Foundations of the critique of political economy (rough draft). New York: Penguin Books.
Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1848. The communist manifesto. Mumbai: Jaico Publishing House.
McNeill, J.R., and William H. McNeill. 2003. The human web. A bird’s eye view of world history. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Mill J. S. 1966 [1859]. On liberty. In A selection of his works, ed. John Stuart Mill, 1–147. London: Palgrave.
Mills, C.W. 1956. The power elite. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
Mouffe, C. 1993. The return of the political. London: Verso.
———. 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
———. 2005. On the political. New York: Routldege.
———. 2013. Agonistics: thinking the world politically. London: Verso Books.
Newman, J. 2001. Modernizing governance: new labour, policy and society. New York: Sage.
North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Parsons, T. 1937. The structure of social action. In A study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers. Volumes I and II. London: The Free Press & Collier Macmillan Publishers, 1968.
———. 1960. The distribution of power in American society. In Structure and process in modern societies, ed. T. Parsons, 199–225. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Pocock, J.G.A. 1975. The Machiavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.
Polsby, N. 1960a. How to study community power: the pluralist alternative. The Journal of Politics 22 (3): 474–484.
———. 1960b. Power in Middletown: fact and value in community research. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 26 (4): 592–603.
Rancière, J. 1999. Disagreement: politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reed, I.A. 2017. Chains of power and their representation. Sociological Theory 35 (2): 87–117.
———. 2019. Performative state-formation in the early American Republic. American Sociological Review 84 (2): 334–367.
Reed, I.A., and M. Weinman. 2019. Agency, power, modernity: a manifesto for social theory. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 6 (1): 6–50.
Rehmann, J. 2013. Theories of ideology. The powers of alienation and subjection. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Ricardo, D. 1817. On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: Penguin Books, 1971.
Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. 1999. Powers of freedom. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sandel, M. 1982. Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sartori, G. 1973. What is “politics”. Political Theory 1 (1): 5–26.
Schmitt, Carl. 1996. The concept of the political. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.
Schroeder, R., ed. 2016. Global powers: Mann’s anatomy of the twentieth century and beyond. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Schutz, A. 1932. Phenomenology of the social World. London: Heineman Edicational Books, 1980.
Selg, P. 2012. Justice and liberal strategy: towards a radical democratic reading of Rawls. Social Theory and Practice 38 (1): 83–114.
———. 2018. Power and relational sociology. In The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology, ed. Francois Dépelteau, 539–557. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2019. Causation is not everything: on constitution and trans-actional view of social science methodology. In John Dewey and the notion of trans-action, ed. C. Morgner, 31–53. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Selg, P. and Ventsel, A. 2020. Introducing Relational Political Analysis: Political Semiotics as a Theory and Method. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Simon, H.A. 1957. Models of man. New York: Wiley.
Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1979.
Sørensen, E. 2006. Metagovernance: the changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration 36 (1): 98–114.
Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing, eds. 2007. Theories of democratic network governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2009. Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration 87 (2): 234–258.
Strauss, L. 1988. What is political philosophy? And other studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, C. 1989. The sources of the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Therborn, G. 1976. Class, science and society. In On the formation of sociology and historical materialism. London: NLB.
Torfing, J., G. Peters, J. Pierre, and E. Sørensen. 2012. Interactive governance: advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tribe, K. 2019 Appendix A: Translation appendix. In Economy and Society. A New Translation, ed. Weber, M. Trans. K. Tribe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.
Varoufakis, Y. 1998. Foundations of modern economics. London: Routledge.
Wallerstein, I. 1991. Unthinking social science: the limits of nineteenth century paradigms. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.
Weber, M. (1922) Economy and Society. A New Translation. Trans. K. Tribe. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 2019.
Wolfinger, R. 1960. Reputation and reality in the study of ‘community power’. American Sociological Review 25 (5): 636–644.
Wolfinger, R.E. 1971. Nondecisions and the study of local politics. American Political Science Review 65 (4): 1063–1080.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heiskala, R., Selg, P. (2021). Power, Regulation, and Social Order in the Intersection of Political and Social Theory. In: Abrutyn, S., Lizardo, O. (eds) Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78204-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78205-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)