Skip to main content

Power, Regulation, and Social Order in the Intersection of Political and Social Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

With the aim to facilitate a debate between social and political theory for a better understanding of the societal totality, this chapter probes the ways to understand power, regulation, and social order. It starts from the morally laden conceptions of political theory in the Antiquity and then proceeds from the political theory of early modernity to the emergence of the three basic social sciences, i.e., sociology, political science, and economics. It turns out that most power conceptions have been negative and centered on influence but there are some rare exceptions of which the chapter discusses on those of Marx, Parsons, Foucault, and Mann. The canon of current social theory, i.e., Habermas, Giddens, and Bourdieu is also discussed from the perspective of positive power. A section with two examples of substantive study of power and regulation in the intersection of political and social theory dealing with the notions of hegemony and governance follows. Finally, the Conclusion lists what has been achieved thus far in the attempt to build a bridge between political and social theory and ends up with a call for continuation of the debate to overcome fragmentation in the study of society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the moment we leave aside the issue of whether Strauss’s usage of notions like “society,” “social,” and “human being” are anachronistic. For the argument that that these notions are specifically modern and lack reference in the Ancient context, see Delanty (2009, p. 20), Foucault (1970), Taylor (1989).

  2. 2.

    The concept is usually translated as domination but here we follow the lead of Keith Tribe in his new translation of the first part of Economy and Society; see Weber (1922) and Tribe (2019, pp. 471–473) in it.

  3. 3.

    See Selg (2019) on the difference between variable-oriented causal analysis on the one hand and constitutive methodology that takes into account strictly relational character of phenomena on the other hand. On the interplay of power and formation of identities, see Heiskala (2001, 2021).

  4. 4.

    There are others, which we do not have space to more than mention here such as the following two coming from the direction of sociology. One is the rector/actor/other model by Isaac Ariail Reed (2017, 2019). What makes this model curios in the sociological literature is that it is explicated with expressions, which follow almost word by word those of Thomas Hobbes’ description of the relationship of “AUTHOR” and “actor” in Chap. 16 of his Leviathan. Reed thus repeats the institutional definition of the ruler or rector and the agent or actor. Yet he does not stop there and stay in the sphere of political theory but steps over to the terrain of social theory by adding to the model the third party of “other”. That makes it possible to commit sociological analyses of the destiny of victims of war and other innocent bystanders of chains of powerful agency. It also makes it possible to contextualize chains of agency by framing the agency in question according to its role in the wider society. Ultimately that kind of a study opens to a wide field of the study of “projects” (Reed and Weinstein 2019). A different example is Risto Heiskala’s hexagon model (presented in Heiskala 2018 as the NACEVP model). It is an attempt to continue Michael Mann’s theorizing with an interest to really take theorizing to the terrain of reconstruction of historical materialism in a new situation. With this reconstructive purpose in mind Heiskala extends the focus of the theory from Mann’s interest to tell narrations on power on state level to all social objects, transforms the IEMP model to a CEVP model where the letters stand for cultural, economic, violence-related and political power, and adds two new forms of causation called natural power (N) and artefactual power (A). The emerging NACEVP or hexagon model is meant to be better suited than the prevailing sociological conceptions for the analysis of such timely problems in which nature, technostructures and social forms of power are intertwined in the cases of the environmental crisis or gender issues, for example.

  5. 5.

    See Laclau and Zac (1994); there is also, of course, a tradition of radical political theory (e.g., Rancière 1999; Badiou 2005; Glynos and Howarth 2007) that sees the political roughly in the same terms.

  6. 6.

    In fact, even earlier, see for instance Laclau’s paper “The impossibility of Society,” which was originally published in 1983 and later printed as part of his most influential collection of essays (Laclau 1990).

  7. 7.

    Cf. this to Laclau’s later statement: “A free society is not one where a social order has been established that is better adapted to human nature, but one which is more aware of the contingency and historicity of any order” (Laclau 1990, p. 211).

References

  • Alexander, J.C. 1995. Fin de Sciècle Social Theory. Relativism, reduction, and the problem of reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. 1995. On the reproduction of capitalism. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. London: Verso, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. 1958. The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., and M. Baratz. 1962. Two faces of power. American Political Science Review 56 (04): 947–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., and M.S. Baratz. 1963. Decisions and nondecisions: an analytical framework. American Political Science Review 57 (3): 632–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., and M. Baratz. 1970. Power and poverty: theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. 2005. Metapolitics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. 1975. The mirror of production. St. Louis: Telos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. 1986. Critique, norm and utopia. A study of the foundations of critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. 1962. Does political theory still exist? In Philosophy, politics and society: a collection, second series, ed. W.G. Runciman and P. Laslett, 1–33. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. 2010. Democratic governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M., and R. Rhodes. 2006. Governance stories. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of the theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., and L.J. Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C., and B. Lerro. 2016. Social change. Globalization from the stone age to the present. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. 1991. Marx, Marginalism and modern sociology: from Adam Smith to Max Weber. Hampshire: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S.R., and M. Haugaard. 2009. The Sage handbook of power. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2 (3): 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. 1968. Power as the control of behaviour. In International encyclopedia of the social sciences, ed. David L. Shills, vol. 12. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1961. Who governs? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1968. Power. In International Encyclopedia of the social sciences, ed. D.L. Sills, vol. XII, 405–415. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. 2009. The foundations of social theory. In The new Blackwell companion to social theory, ed. B.S. Turner, 19–37. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L., and P. Rabinow. 1993. Can there be science of existential structure and social meaning. In Bourdieu: critical persopectives, ed. Graig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. 2011. Why Marx was right? New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, K. 1980. Die Entstehung staatlich organisierter Gesellschaften. In Ein Betrag zu einer Theorie sozialer Evolution. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2005 [1970]. The order of things. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. The history of sexuality. Volume I: an introduction. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. On governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: studies in governmentality, ed. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A.G. 1998. ReOrient. Global economy in the Asian age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Vintage Books, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1978. The history of sexuality. Volume I: an introduction. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J., and B. Raven. 1959. The bases of social power. In Studies in social power, ed. D. Cartwright, 150–167. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 2016. Governance: what do we know, and how do we know it? Annual Review of Political Science 19: 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J. 1982. Power and powerlessness: quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1973. The class structure of the advanced societies. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. The new rules of sociological method. A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. A contemporary critique of historical materialism. Volume 1: power, property, and the state. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. The nation-state and violence. Volume 2 of a Contemporary critique of historical materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994a. Beyond left and right: the future of radical politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994b. Living in a post-traditional society. In Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, ed. U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash, 56–109. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynos, J., and D. Howarth. 2007. Logics of critical explanation. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishardt Ltd, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1962. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1973. Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975. Towards a reconstruction of historical materialism. Theory and Society 2 (3): 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981a. Theory of communicative action, Volume One: reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981b. Theory of communicative action, Volume Two: lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., and T. McCarthy. 1977. Hannah Arendt’s communications concept of power. Social Research 44 (1): 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J.A., and R. Schroeder. 2006. An anatomy of power. The social theory of Michael Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A., J. Madison, and J. Jay 2008 [1788]. The federalist papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. 2008. Normative methodology. In The Oxford handbook of political methodology, ed. J. Box-Steffensmeier, H. Brady, and D. Collier, 35–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, W.F. 1986. Critique of commodity aesthetics. Appearances, sexuality and advertising in capitalist society. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugaard, M. 2003. Reflections on seven ways of creating power. European Journal of Social Theory 6 (1): 87–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiskala, R. 1986. Marx, the modern world, and the problem of social regulation. Acta Sociologica 29 (4): 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Theorizing power. Weber, Parsons, Foucault and neostructuralism. Social Science Information 40 (2): 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Society as semiosis. In Neostructuralist theory of culture and society. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Economy and society. From Parsons through Habermas to semiotic institutionalism. Social Science Information 46 (2): 243–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. For a holistic social science: the NACEVP model applied to the environment, gender and populism. Journal of Political Power 11 (3): 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiskala, R. 2021. Semiotic sociology. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, C., and B. Hindess. 2006. Political theory and social theory. In The Oxfrod handbook of political theory, ed. J. Dryzek, B. Honig, and A. Phillips, 810–822. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. 1651. Leviathan. London: A&C Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1839. De Corpore. In English Works. London: Molesworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, F. 1953. Community power structure: a study of decision makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. 2003. Governance and metagovernance: on reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In, ed. H. Bang, 101–116. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Governance, as social and political communication

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Metagovernance. In The sage handbook of governance, ed. M. Bevir, 106–123. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. The state: past, present, future. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H., and W. Knöbl. 2009. Social theory. Twenty introductory lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. 2003. Governing as governance. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., and S. Jentoft. 2009. Meta-governance: values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration 87 (4): 818–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. 1990. New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Introduction. In The making of political identities, ed. E. Laclau, 1–8. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Democracy and the question of power. Constellations 8: 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. On populist reason. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Post-Marxism without apologies. New Left Review I (166): 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. 2nd ed. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., and L. Zac. 1994. Minding the gap: the subject of politics. In The making of political identities, ed. E. Laclau, 11–39. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. 1994. Money, morals, and manners. In The culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort, C. 1988. Democracy and political theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. 2014 [1690]. Second treatise of government: an essay concerning the true original, extent and end of civil government. Boca Raton, FL. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and power. Boca Raton, FL: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. 1974. Power: a radical view. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Power: a radical view. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. 2008 [1513]. The Prince. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. 1986. The sources of social power: volume 1, A history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The sources of social power: volume 2, the rise of classes and nation-states, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The sources of social power: volume 3, Global empires and revolution, 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The sources of social power: volume 4, Globalizations, 1945–2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchart, O. 2007. Post-foundational political thought: political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. In Political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1867. Capital. A critique of political economy. Vol. 1. London: Penguin Books & New Left Review, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1971. Capital. A critique of political economy. Volume Three. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. Grundrisse. Foundations of the critique of political economy (rough draft). New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1848. The communist manifesto. Mumbai: Jaico Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, J.R., and William H. McNeill. 2003. The human web. A bird’s eye view of world history. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill J. S. 1966 [1859]. On liberty. In A selection of his works, ed. John Stuart Mill, 1–147. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W. 1956. The power elite. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. 1993. The return of the political. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. On the political. New York: Routldege.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Agonistics: thinking the world politically. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. 2001. Modernizing governance: new labour, policy and society. New York: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. 1937. The structure of social action. In A study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers. Volumes I and II. London: The Free Press & Collier Macmillan Publishers, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1960. The distribution of power in American society. In Structure and process in modern societies, ed. T. Parsons, 199–225. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. 1975. The Machiavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, N. 1960a. How to study community power: the pluralist alternative. The Journal of Politics 22 (3): 474–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1960b. Power in Middletown: fact and value in community research. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 26 (4): 592–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. 1999. Disagreement: politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, I.A. 2017. Chains of power and their representation. Sociological Theory 35 (2): 87–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Performative state-formation in the early American Republic. American Sociological Review 84 (2): 334–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, I.A., and M. Weinman. 2019. Agency, power, modernity: a manifesto for social theory. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 6 (1): 6–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehmann, J. 2013. Theories of ideology. The powers of alienation and subjection. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. 1817. On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: Penguin Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 1999. Powers of freedom. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. 1982. Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. 1973. What is “politics”. Political Theory 1 (1): 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 1996. The concept of the political. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, R., ed. 2016. Global powers: Mann’s anatomy of the twentieth century and beyond. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. 1932. Phenomenology of the social World. London: Heineman Edicational Books, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selg, P. 2012. Justice and liberal strategy: towards a radical democratic reading of Rawls. Social Theory and Practice 38 (1): 83–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Power and relational sociology. In The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology, ed. Francois Dépelteau, 539–557. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Causation is not everything: on constitution and trans-actional view of social science methodology. In John Dewey and the notion of trans-action, ed. C. Morgner, 31–53. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selg, P. and Ventsel, A. 2020. Introducing Relational Political Analysis: Political Semiotics as a Theory and Method. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1957. Models of man. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. 2006. Metagovernance: the changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration 36 (1): 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing, eds. 2007. Theories of democratic network governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration 87 (2): 234–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, L. 1988. What is political philosophy? And other studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1989. The sources of the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. 1976. Class, science and society. In On the formation of sociology and historical materialism. London: NLB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J., G. Peters, J. Pierre, and E. Sørensen. 2012. Interactive governance: advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, K. 2019 Appendix A: Translation appendix. In Economy and Society. A New Translation, ed. Weber, M. Trans. K. Tribe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varoufakis, Y. 1998. Foundations of modern economics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. 1991. Unthinking social science: the limits of nineteenth century paradigms. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1922) Economy and Society. A New Translation. Trans. K. Tribe. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R. 1960. Reputation and reality in the study of ‘community power’. American Sociological Review 25 (5): 636–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, R.E. 1971. Nondecisions and the study of local politics. American Political Science Review 65 (4): 1063–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Risto Heiskala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heiskala, R., Selg, P. (2021). Power, Regulation, and Social Order in the Intersection of Political and Social Theory. In: Abrutyn, S., Lizardo, O. (eds) Handbook of Classical Sociological Theory. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78204-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78205-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics