Skip to main content

Approaches to Investing in Innovations and Ensuring Ecological Safety in the Regions of Russia: Cluster Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Natural, Human-Made, and Coupled Human-Natural Systems Research

Abstract

The research aims to identify the fundamental approaches of different groups of regions to investing in innovation and improving environmental security to achieve sustainable development goals. We used Ward’s Hierarchical Clustering method to classify the regions performed in the IBM SPSS Statistics program. We obtained the data for the study of 58 Russian regions from the database of the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation, n.d.). Besides, we selected the following indicators: (1) the share of organizations that implemented innovations increasing ecological security in the production of goods, works, and services (in six areas); (2) the share of organizations that implemented organizational innovations; (3) the cost of technological innovation of organizations; (3) special costs associated with ecological innovations; and (4) the volume of innovative goods, works, and services. The research results showed that the regions were grouped into five clusters. Each cluster has its particular approach to solving ecological security issues, considering (1) the level of activity of organizations in the ecological field of the region; and (2) innovative investment costs in certain areas of reducing the negative impact on the environment. It is necessary to conduct a comparative analysis of the regions within each cluster to (1) disclose the regional policy of ecological regulation, (2) determine the level of development of innovative projects, (3) compare the level of implementation of ecological and technological innovations in industries with associated costs, and (4) identify the presence of monotowns in the regions. This analysis will allow us to identify the obstacles to implementing sustainable strategies in the regions and assess the innovation processes in the region in terms of the cost effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation (2018) National project ecology identification summary. Retrieved from http://www.mnr.gov.ru/activity/directions/natsionalnyy_proekt_ekologiya/

  2. Russian Ecological Society (2020) Retrieved from https://map.ecosociety.ru/

  3. Ministry of Construction, Housing and Utilities of the Russian Federation (2020) Retrieved from https://www.minstroyrf.ru/docs/11870

  4. Sputnik news (2020) Innovative integration: how CIS countries plan to help each other. Retrieved from https://sptnkne.ws/CqYm

  5. Consultant Plus (2019) Federal Law “On environmental protection”, 10 Jan 2002, No. 7-FZ. Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34823/fcce24aae8e498498727d9e137e26654fe7b8cf2/

  6. Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation (2017) General information about the special investment contract mechanism. Retrieved from http://minpromtorg.gov.ru/activities/vgpp/vgpp2/info/

  7. Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation (n.d.) Cluster map of industrial parks and clusters. Retrieved from https://www.gisip.ru/#!ru/

  8. Larionova EI, Salin VN, Chinaeva TI (2018) Analysis of structural changes of capital expenditures in the Russian Federation. In: Bulletin of the Department of Statistics of the Plekhanov Russian University of economics, statistical research of socio-economic development of Russia, and prospects for sustainable growth. PRUE, Moscow, pp 163–167

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation (2017) Practical experience in supporting green finance (June). Retrieved from https://www.minfin.ru/common/upload/library/2018/06/main/2017_analityc.pdf

  10. Atkinson G, Dietz S, Neumayer E (2014) Handbook of sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. De Laurentis PP, Pearson P, Eames M (2016) Renewable energy innovation systems at the regional level: a conceptual framework to address materiality and spatial scale. Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu Y, Zhu J, Li EY, Meng Z, Song Y (2020) Environmental regulation, green technological innovation, and eco-efficiency: the case of Yangtze River economic belt in China. Technol Forecast Soc Change 155:119993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119993.Retrieved from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Environmental-regulation%2C-green-technological-and-Liu-Zhu/9b8ffde581f5bd809636ba02095087d459909eef

  13. Ouyang X, Li Q, Du K (2020) How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy 139:111310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu J, Xie J (2020) Environmental regulation, technological innovation, and export competitiveness: An empirical study based on China’s manufacturing industry. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(4):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041427. Retrieved from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1427

  15. Tsenina T, Tsenina E, Tsou T (2019) State regulation of logistics processes in accordance with the concept of sustainable development based on digital technologies. In: Ilin IV (ed) Proceedings of ICDTLI 2019: The international conference on digital technologies in logistics and infrastructure, pp 213–224. https://doi.org/10.2991/icdtli-19.2019.39.Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icdtli-19/125918510

  16. Federal State Statistics Service (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.gks.ru/folder/10705

  17. Korolyova EV (2014) The impact of technology and innovation support centers on the development of innovations in Russian regions. Bull NE Fed Univ (MK Ammosov) 11(2):70–80. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-tsentrov-podderzhki-tehnologiy-i-innovatsiy-na-innovatsionnoe-razvitie-regionov-rossii

  18. Information Portal “Future of Russia. National Projects.” (2019) The best experience of implementing lean technologies in three regions of the Russian Federation will be set as an example for others. Retrieved from https://futurerussia.gov.ru/nacionalnye-proekty/luchshiy-opyt-vnedreniya-berezhlivykh-tekhnologiy-trekh-regionov-rf-postavyat-v-primer-ostalnym

  19. Analytical Center for the Development of the Russian Federation (2019) Principles of lean management. The implementation of the project “Efficient region.” Retrieved from https://ac.gov.ru/files/content/25788/davydova-n-pdf.pdf

  20. All-Russian Public Organization Green Patrol (2020) National environmental rating of regions for the period of 01.12.2019–29.02.2020. Retrieved from https://greenpatrol.ru/sites/default/files/pictures/prilozhenie_1._ekologicheskiy_reyting_regionov._zima_2020_2.pdf

  21. All-Russian Public Organization Green Patrol (2020) National environmental rating of regions: ideology, conceptual model, and methodology for calculating the rating. Retrieved from https://greenpatrol.ru/sites/default/files/banners/reyting_prezentaciya_web.pdf

  22. RIA news (2020) Outsider regions of the environmental rating were named. Retrieved from https://ria.ru/20200313/1568528741.html

  23. Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge HSE University (2020) Rating of innovative development of the subjects of the Russian Federation, Issue 6. Retrieved from https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/315338500

  24. Association of Innovative Regions of Russia (2018) Rating of innovative regions of Russia. Retrieved from http://i-regions.org/images/files/airr18.pdf

  25. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation (2019) Kazan received the right to host the TCI network global cluster conference. Retrieved from https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/news/kazan_poluchila_pravo_provedeniya_globalnoy_konferencii_klasterov_tci_network.html

  26. Association of clusters and technology parks (n.d.) Retrieved from http://akitrf.ru/clusters/about/

  27. Atkinson G, Groom B, Hanley N, Mourato S (2018) Environmental valuation and benefit-cost analysis in UK policy. J Benefit-Cost Anal 9(1):97–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2018.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Davankov AY, Krasutsky BV, Dvinin DY, Postnikov EA, Kocherov AV (2019) Formation of a model of management of economic activity, providing the state of socio-ecological and economic environment of the region within the boundaries of stability of the biosphere. Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dubina IN, Campbell DFJ, Carayannis EG, Chub AA, Grigoroudis E, Kozhevina OV (2017) The balanced development of the spatial innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem based on principles of the systems compromise: A conceptual framework. J Knowl Econ 8(2):438–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Federal Institute of Industrial Property (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www1.fips.ru/

  31. Glazyrina IP, Zabelina IA (2018) Spatial heterogeneity of Russia in the light of the concept of a green economy: the social context. Geogr Nat Resour 39(2):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Glotko AV, Sycheva IN, Dunets AN, Poltarykhin AL, Zhuravlev PV, Tubalets AA (2019) Integration processes in the agro-industrial complex of the regions: development and environmental problems. J Environ Manag Tourism 10(3):613–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gurman VI, Ryumina YV (2016) Search for the trajectory of environmentally sustainable development of the region. In: Danilov IP (ed) Problems and prospects of development of social and economic potential of Russian regions: Proceedings of the V all-Russian electronic scientific and practical conference. Chuvash State University, Cheboksary, pp. 292–295

    Google Scholar 

  34. Guseva IS, Nasatueva SN (2014) Assessment of the effectiveness of innovation processes in the socio-ecological-economic system of the region. In: Vasiliev SN (ed) XII All-Russian meeting on management issues. Institute of Control Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, pp 5637–5642

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hoekstra A, Steinbuch M, Verbong G (2017) Creating agent-based energy transition management models that can uncover profitable pathways to climate change mitigation. Complexity 2:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1967645

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Morrison TH, Adger WN, Brown K, Lemos MC, Huitema D, Phelps J, Hughes TP et al. (2019) The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance. Glob Environ Change 57:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101934

  37. Potravny IM, Novoselov AL, Gengut IB (2016) Formalization of the general model of the green economy at the regional level. Econ Reg 12(2):438–450

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schröder P, Anantharaman M, Anggraeni K, Foxon TJ (2019) The circular economy and the global south: sustainable lifestyles and green industrial development. Taylor and Francis, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429434006

  39. Tolkamp J, Huijben JCCM, Mourik RM, Verbong GPJ, Bouwknegt R (2018) User-centered sustainable business model design: The case of energy efficiency services in the Netherlands. J Clean Prod 182:755–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsenina E, Danko T, Ekimova K, Sekerin V, Gorohova A (2016) Indication of competitiveness of the potential of the region through Hurwitz and Wald criteria. Glob J Pure Appl Math 12(1):325–335

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekaterina V. Tsenina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tsenina, E.V., Voronina, V.M. (2023). Approaches to Investing in Innovations and Ensuring Ecological Safety in the Regions of Russia: Cluster Analysis. In: Maximova, S.G., Raikin, R.I., Chibilev, A.A., Silantyeva, M.M. (eds) Advances in Natural, Human-Made, and Coupled Human-Natural Systems Research. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 252. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78105-7_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics