Abstract
Microbial communities are key players in regulating ecosystem processes. Climate change factors such as CO2 and temperature alter the microbial composition which in turn influenced the activities of microbial communities in the ecosystem’s settings. As a result of their activities in the ecosystems and their resultant effect, changes to climate do occur. The effects of global warming, extreme weather conditions and other biotic and abiotic factors on microbial community functioning and richness still remain unclear. The present study aimed to review the influential roles of climate change on structural composition and functionality of microbiomes in their ecological niche. We also discussed the impacts of climate change on microbial environments and how microbial communities are capable of responding to extreme climate changes. It is believed that knowledge of the interaction of climate change and microbiomes, including their adaptation, would play a major role in mitigation and combating of climate changes in different ways.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Climate change
- Microbial communities
- Ecosystems’ sustainability
- Global warming
- Niche
- Mitigation
- Alterations
1 Introduction
Microbial communities are ubiquitous in nature and the major contributors and mediators of biogeochemical cycles and sustainability of the earth. As a result, they have great influence on the ecosystem and climate. That notwithstanding, climate changes affect microbial diversity either directly or indirectly (Nie et al. 2013). Microbial communities develop survival strategies in order to adapt to changes in climate, which increases their chances of survival in any ecosystems. Survival strategies by these microorganisms could be an alteration in microbial community (i.e. outcompeting of other species and primary succession of new species) or sudden changes in the physiology of individual species (Fierer et al. 2007; Philippot et al. 2010; Placella et al. 2012; Zimmerman et al. 2013).
Alteration in microbial community influenced changes of ecological features of microbial communities (Kvitek et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2011). For instance, microbes that have experienced harsh drought and rewetting during rainy season have higher chances of becoming more resistant in this type of unfavourable conditions than microbial species that are inexperienced to climate change challenges (Fierer et al. 2003; Bouskill et al. 2013; Evans and Wallenstein 2014). The composition of microbial communities in soil is very diverse, making them exposed to all sort of climate change factors such as high temperature, moisture fluctuations and nutrient availability (Bardgett and van der Putten 2014).
The variation in the functions and structures of the ecosphere leads to major climate changes like floods, drought, greenhouse gas emissions, ozone depletion and heat waves (Smith 2011; Reichstein et al. 2013). These have consequential effect on resistance and resilience of different microorganisms and their ability to recover from ecological changes that could have negative effects (Nimmo et al. 2015; Oliver et al. 2015; Ingrisch and Bahn 2018). Studies on climate changes in relation with alterations of microbial communities, especially the impact of climate changes in the transition of microbial diversity and population, are still limited. Therefore, there is need for holistic understanding of climate changes, and we need to understand their effect on microbial community variability, diversity and contributions as well as impacts of these microbial alterations to the ecosystems. The motivation behind this chapter is to shed light on the effects of climate change on microbial community composition and functions. We discussed adaptations of microbial communities to such effects.
1.1 Extreme Effects of Climate Change on Microbial Communities
Extreme conditions such as drought, high temperature and greenhouse gases can alter the structure of microbial distributions and growth in a specific ecological niche (Zhou et al. 2012). The microbial communities include virus, fungi, protista, archaea and bacteria that are inhabitants of different parts of ecosystems. These organisms play a vital role in carbon and nitrogen cycles which help in sustaining the ecosystem’s processes (Bardgett and van der Putten 2014). Although studies on the transitional alteration of microbial communities are limited. proofs are beginning to unveil themselves that climate change could play a role in these transitions. Moreover, the reaction to transitional changes that occurred in microbial communities is unmeasurable. For instance, the reaction of soil microbial communities to greenhouse gas could either be positive or negative (Janus et al. 2005; Lipson et al. 2005, 2006; Lesaulnier et al. 2008; Austin et al. 2009). Furthermore, reduction in soil water retention, increase in carbon production and extreme drought could lead to alteration of microbial colonization of a particular habitat (Robinson et al. 2016).
Recent studies showed that drought serves as a key factor of climate change and has a stronger impact on bacterial community than fungi (Bapiri et al. 2010; Vries et al. 2012; Barnard et al. 2013; de Vries et al. 2018). The possible reason could be fungi hyphae penetrate deeper into soil profile for more access to water during drought. Therefore, they are able to resist drought condition than bacteria. Soil microbial community could also be altered in its functionality and compositions from their original state to a new transitional state when there is nutrient enrichment of a particular soil causing the elevated production of greenhouse gas especially CO2 (Allison and Martiny 2008; Zhou et al. 2012; Leff et al. 2015). This effect could lead to increase in atmospheric CO2 with concomitant occurrences of global warming. Then, the atmospheric CO2 could also change the structure and composition of microbial communities and distributions in a given environment (Zhou et al. 2011).
Furthermore, a major trait for high resistivity to climate change had been traced back to fungi. This is characterized by high genomic potential. With this, they are able to withstand different forms of harsh conditions and weather (Egidi et al. 2019). Another important factor that also affects alteration of microbial community is nutrient availability. Nutrient availability also plays a very important role in microbial growth and population. Nutrient enrichment due to agricultural practices could have impacts on total mass of bacteria within a specific area and could bring about elevated population of bacteria (De Vries and Shade 2013; Bardgett and van der Putten 2014). Elevated population of bacteria affects the energy flow in the soil which have been connected with carbon and nitrogen cycling (Gordon et al. 2008; Vries et al. 2012).
1.2 Influence of Climate Change on Microbial Community’s Functions and Compositions
1.2.1 Soil Microbial Communities
Soil microbial communities include all forms of microorganism found in the soil and terrestrial environments. The soil contains a large group of microbes making them the most complex diversified communities on earth (Flemming and Wuertz 2019). They mostly include soil pathogens, symbionts, mutualists, producers, decomposers etc. Soil microbes play an essential role in shaping and regulating the amount of organic carbon stored in soil which is released back to the atmosphere in the ecosystem (Singh et al. 2010; Bardgett and van der Putten 2014). Climate changes play a vital role in the alteration of soil microbiome diversity and also their interaction with other organisms especially with plant. Plant interaction with soil fungi (mycorrhizae) is involved in plants’ acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen (Fellbaum et al. 2012). Various studies have shown how various climate extremes such as drought, flood and ice impact on the soil microbes.
The activities and the metabolic processes that are been carried out by soil microbes are of paramount importance because they help balance the elemental and chemical compounds within the earth’s crust (Singh et al. 2010). Climate changes on soil microbiomes could have a positive impact when soil microbes enhance plant performance, for example, biomass production, organic matter decomposition and survival as in the case of legumes and nitrogen-fixing bacteria (NFB), and it could lead to negative impact within the microbial communities and even to plant when their effects are pathogenic, greenhouse gas production (Smith 2011).
Most soil bacteria and archaea are the major facilitators of biogeochemical cycling of essential elements such as nitrogen and carbon (de Vries et al. 2018). Organic matter decomposition is carried by soil fungi and bacteria, which plays a major role in carbon cycle and release of CO2 into the atmosphere. Another important role played by soil microbes is the fixing of nitrogen by nitrogen-fixing bacteria (NFB) in the soil and plant during mutualistic relationship with leguminous plants (Fig. 2.1) (Hurd et al. 2018).
1.2.2 Marine Microbial Communities
The earth itself is made up of 70% waterbodies. Climatic factors such as temperatures affect the rate of biological and metabolic process, nutrient availability and marine microbiome dispersal (Jørgensen and Boetius 2007). Negative consequences of climate change such as shift in marine food webs and carbon export buried into the sea bed have been associated with the increase of greenhouse gas concentration on ocean acidification, nutrient supply, temperature and irradiation (Gao et al. 2012; Rintoul et al. 2018; Hurd et al. 2018). Marine phytoplanktons like cyanobacteria and algae are important in marine food chain and have been found out to perform half of the global photosynthesis CO2 fixation and half of the oxygen production (Behrenfeld et al. 2016). Apart from marine phytoplanktons, chemolithoautotrophic (Fig. 2.1), marine archaea and bacteria could fix CO2 under dark conditions in deep ocean waters (Pachiadaki et al. 2017). Cycling of elements is also contributed by marine archaea and bacteria (Bunse et al. 2016). A group of cyanobacteria known as Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus are very abundant photosynthetic microbes in the ocean that removed about 10 billion tons of carbon each year which is about two-thirds of carbon fixation in ocean (Blount et al. 2008; Mariadassou et al. 2015; Youssef et al. 2015).
Thermal and latitudinal gradients and oceanic current are important factors for marine microbiome distributions (Wilkins et al. 2013; Cavicchioli 2015). These distributions could be affected by low pH which may lead marine archaea and bacteria to alter their gene expression to support cell maintenance (Bunse et al. 2016). Moreover, environmental and other factors influence the overall response and activities of marine microbes. For instance, reduction in cellular ribosomal concentration and increase in synthesis of protein in eukaryotic phytoplanktons occur in the presence of elevated temperature (Toseland et al. 2013).
1.3 Adaptation of Microbial Communities to Climate Change
Due to harmful environmental climate conditions, microorganisms have devised so many ways to adapt to unfavourable changes. These adaptations could be direct adaptation, which involves structural and functional changes of their organelles or metabolisms, or indirect adaptation, which involves changes of their environments to suit their habitation. For instance, the presence of high content of peptidoglycan and the ability to form spores make gram-positive bacteria to withstand unfavourable drought conditions than gram-negative bacteria (Potts 1994). Researches from 2013 to 2016 had shown that the population of gram-positive bacteria such as Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Chloroflexi elevated more than that of gram-negative bacteria such as Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria and Verrucomicrobia. Osmotic stress was observed to play a role due to the fact that in 2015 it was rainier (Cruz-Martínez et al. 2012). The same gram-positive bacteria had been found to contain genes for producing amino sugar, alcohol and simple carbohydrate metabolic pathways which help them to tolerate stress (Borken and Matzner 2009).
Enzymatic activity is another approach used by microorganisms to survive harsh conditions. As we know, most metabolic reactions occur in the presence of enzymes. Therefore, enzyme productions could be increased by allocating more nutrients to their production in maintenance of the microbes (Wang et al. 2011). Enzymatic activity is very important for microbial survival in the ecosystems. This is because some enzyme production has been triggered when certain extreme climate changes occur such as high temperature or low moisture. For instance, bacteria produce spore to prevent desiccation during low moisture condition. Production of these spores is done with the activation of inert enzymes that help bacteria to survive unfavourable conditions. Despite all these, temperature and moisture fluctuation have impacts on enzyme productions and activities (Allison and Vitousek 2005).
Bacteria use two strategies for survival. The first is copiotrophic strategies involving the use of low resources or nutrients efficiently but with high growth which enable them to recover quickly from unfavourable conditions (resilience). The second is known as oligotrophic strategies that utilize high nutrients efficiently but have low growth rates making them to withstand unfavourable conditions (resistance) (Fierer et al. 2007; De Vries and Shade 2013). ‘Ecological networking’ has been shown as another approach that the microbial community could use for survival. This ecological networking involves interaction of a particular species with another which could affect their response to unconducive climate change (de Vries et al. 2018; Ramirez et al. 2018). Finally, some microbial community are known to possess ‘traits’. These traits give them a special feature for survival during climate change. Some of these traits include dormancy genes (resuscitation promoting factors and sporulation) and operon count (Nemergut et al. 2016; Kearns and Shade 2018).
2 Contributors of Climate Change and Their Impacts on Microbial Community
2.1 Temperature
Temperature is one of the top contributors affecting the rate of metabolisms. Temperature plays a critical role for the success of metabolic processes. Instability of temperature in microbial metabolisms could bring about transitional alterations to the microbial community compositions. Moreover, high temperature contributes to the emission of atmospheric greenhouse gases that affect the survival of microbial community in many environmental settings (Fig. 2.2). Atmospheric greenhouse gas increments could be brought about by metabolic functionality changes in decomposers due to increase in temperature (Schindlbacher et al. 2011).
However, fungi play a crucial role in degradation of organic matters in the absence of nitrogen content in the soil, and temperature could cause warming which affects the amount of high nitrogen in the soil. Occurrence of this situation affects the activities of nitrogen bacteria such as nitrifying bacteria as they oxidize nitrogen and other nitrogen compounds due to high temperature that support their metabolism. Fungal decomposition is not only affected by sudden changes in the temperature but is also affected by other microbes that decompose organic matters and their diversity. Microbial community in water is also known to be affected by temperature change. High temperature change does not only affect their diversity or growth, but also it affects their metabolisms, population and resistivity. Algae species distribution all over the marine water bodies in the world especially the cyanobacteria is being affected by temperature (Beardall and Raven 2004). In the present twenty-first century, scientists have estimated that there may be continues temperature rise of surface of marine waters caused by global warming (Sarmento et al. 2010). Therefore, increase in temperature could bring about negative impact on water chemistry which in turn influences microbial diversity, growth and populations (The USGS water science school 2015).
2.2 Water Content
Water is indispensable means of sustenance and functionality for all forms of life. Microbial community needs water to carry out their day-to-day metabolism and activities. The absence or availability of water affects the alteration or changes of microbes in the ecological systems. Microbial activities and composition are being affected by the presence of water. Furthermore, it stimulates these microbes to respond to soil respiration in regard to moisture and temperature (Aanderud et al. 2011). Changes in moisture content of terrestrial and soil niches determine the nature of microbial community in a particular ecological niche and also decomposition of organic materials (Fierer et al. 2003; Singh et al. 2010). The most intense consequence of different climate changes or any other forms of climate extremes on fungi, bacteria and any other microbial community is much higher when there is an alteration in water precipitation (Fig. 2.2). Therefore, increase or decrease in water precipitation regulates the microbial community of the ecosystem, their functions and structures and most importantly their metabolic processes (Schimel et al. 1999; Williams 2007; Castro et al. 2010).
Microbial activities could also be suppressed in environments such as soil and saltwater when there is low water availability and reduced enzymatic activity and hydration in the microbes. CO2 emissions and productions to the atmosphere and the ecosphere could also be affected by soil moisture as it regulates soil respiration (Aanderud et al. 2011). Change in moisture and ecological factors is crucial for microbial lives, and processes depend on the regulation of these ecological factors (Smith et al. 2008).
2.3 Plant
Plant interaction with microbial community has been observed as the factor that alters microbial community diversity. One of the mechanisms is the distribution of plant–root absorbed carbon to soil microbial communities when plants are responding to climate changes. For instance, during dry weather conditions, there is reduction of photosynthetic processes due to the absence of water required for photosynthesis. This in turn reduces carbon allocation to soil microbes from plant which will result in low substrate for these microorganisms to carry out metabolisms. Fungi living in mutualistic association with plants are normally affected, for example, mycorrhizae (Hasibeder et al. 2015; Canarini and Dijkstra 2015; Fuchslueger et al. 2016; Bakhshandeh et al. 2019; Chomel et al. 2019).
Furthermore, bacteria community in the soil could also be affected by plant activities. Carbon emissions by plants to soil bacteria during rainy season increase population and growth of these microbes. Plant–soil relationship is able to be sustained by these bacteria due to the activities that they carry out in the soil such as soil organic matter decomposition or degradation, plant–microbial mutualistic relationships (nitrifying bacteria in legume) and oxidation of toxic compounds to nontoxic compounds which the plant could absorb and utilize (Karlowsky et al. 2018). Bacteria soil community could increase its size when there is increase in microbial activities and respiration which support decomposition of soil organic carbon. Drought-induced changes may trigger this process especially in the root exudates of plants (Chomel et al. 2019).
Plant association with soil microbes especially with fungi (mycorrhizae) and some mutualistic bacteria is a very important factor that needs to be studied as it affects alterations or transitions of microbial communities in the soil. Studies have shown that these mutualistic relationships could support some microbes living on a drought-tolerant plant where they could derive water, shelter and nutrients. Also, plant types and compositions could affect microbial community from recovery due to drought when there is low moisture content in the soil. These could cause nitrogen competition between plants and microbes (Orwin and Wardle 2005; Bloor and Bardgett 2012). Therefore, more researches should continue to be conducted in this area to understand plant interaction with microbes, their impacts on each other, their roles in climate changes and influence of plant alteration to microbial diversity.
3 Alteration of Microbial Community due to Climate Change in Other Aspects
3.1 Agriculture
Agriculture cannot be fully discussed without mentioning the roles of microorganisms. Microorganisms play an important role in the development and sustainability of crop growth and development as well as animal productions. Agriculture practices and methods and farmer activities also have an impact on microbial diversity (Table 2.1) and the ecosystem as well. Fertilizer applications have really contributed to the pollution of the environments, increase in nitrogen and distortion of biogeochemical cycles leading to threatening of the ecosystem (Steffen et al. 2015; Greaver et al. 2016). Microorganisms’ oxidation and reduction of nitrogen compounds especially N2O have made the agriculture sector as the highest emitter of greenhouse gas. Nitrogenous transformations such as ammonification, nitrification, nitrogen fixation and denitrification are different ways in which N2O gas could be released into the atmosphere by these microbial communities (Greaver et al. 2016). Moreover, fertilizer applications could bring about microbial competitions and diversity. For instance, soil enrichment with elemental nutrients could result to unwanted algae bloom (Posch et al. 2012).
Rice cultivation and farm ruminant animals as other aspects of agriculture have also played a significant role in climate change and microbial biodiversity. Based on data from the World Bank, agricultural land, it has been estimated that 40% of terrestrial land has been devoted for crop production and animal rearing (Lanz et al. 2018). Natural CH4 emissions that contribute to global warming are released by agricultural practices. CH4 emissions from ruminant animals are the largest single source of this gas with the help of microbial community of intestinal tract of ruminant animals (Ripple et al. 2014). A total of 20% of agricultural CH4 emissions by rice paddling contributes to CH4 greenhouse gas. Scientific prediction has shown that by the end of this century, they may be doubling of CH4 emissions only from rice paddling and cultivation (Groenigen et al. 2013). Thus, there is an urgent need for more researches and studies on agricultural practices in relationship with microbial activities.
3.2 Infections
Susceptibility of vectors and pathogens could be due to climate changes (McIntyre et al. 2017). The dispersion of microbial vector-borne disease and their virulence factors depend on climate change (Table 2.1). Changes in the ecosystems could affect the functionality of human health and food availability in ways where these microbial communities especially fungal, bacteria and virus cannot adapt to abiotic and biotic factors (Giraud et al. 2017; Cavicchioli et al. 2019). Fluctuation of rainfall and temperature due to climate variability is strongly attributed to many communicable diseases such as vector-borne and waterborne diseases and other forms of diseases such as Zika virus disease, plague, cholera and many more (Bouma and Dye 1997; Baylis et al. 1999; Rohani 2009; Kreppel et al. 2014; Caminade et al. 2017). For instance, the distribution of dengue fever and malaria which are known to be climate dependent often shifts in response to climate change (Bhatt et al. 2013; Pecl et al. 2017). Shift in host response and parasite adaptation to host are health risks that could be caused by climate change (Raffel et al. 2013). Antibiotic resistance of human bacterial pathogen has been predicted that climate change could also be another contributing factor (MacFadden et al. 2018).
Lower salinity and high temperature in estuaries’ habitat caused by increase in precipitation could be associated with the spread of Vibrio cholerae infections which promote their growth. This has been observed in Bangladesh, Baltic Sea Region, North Atlanta and North Sea including human pathogen of Vibrio spp. (Pascual et al. 2000; Baker-Austin et al. 2013; Vezzulli et al. 2016). Transport and introduction of pathogens are influenced by effects of weather dispersal, and growth of the environmental conditions contributes to the spread and emergence of diseases (Bebber et al. 2013). Global environmental changes on pathogens, ecology of pathogens and host relationships with pathogens are basic knowledge that must be understood for strategic and effective control and spread of diseases (Johnson et al. 2017).
4 Microbial Mitigation to Climate Change
To combat climate change, we need to understand microbial efficacy and functionality towards mitigation of climate change. These involve harnessing of microbial biochemical molecules and processes and inducing of advantageous genetic sequences or genes into a potential microbe. For instance, the roles of microbes in agriculture could be supported when fertilizers are used with reduced nitrification inhibitors. This will help support soil bacteria especially nitrifying bacteria to produce more nitrates for plants and prevent subsequent leaching. Another approach could be the use of considerable amount of fertilizers which will reduce the availability of elemental nitrogen to soil microbes and less production of nitrous oxide. This will help reduce the impact of global warming (Smith et al. 2008). Carbon sequestration could be a very important approach in reducing atmospheric CO2 (Prosser et al. 2007). Forest soils have been considered as effective for carbon stroage due to abundance of bacteria and fungi and favorable environmental conditions that support the growth of microbial communities (Bailey et al. 2002; De Deyn et al. 2008; Busse et al. 2009; Castro et al. 2010).
Methane flux emission is mostly caused by microbes. It is theoretically possible to control microbial activities in a considerable amount of CH4 emissions from terrestrial ecosystem. Ninety percent of CH4 emissions in the soil are oxidized by methanotrophs before escaping into the atmosphere (Tate et al. 2007; Smith et al. 2008). With these studies, rice cultivation has improved flood management and could reduce net emission of CH4 by increasing oxygen availability in soils when methanotrophs absorb a proportion of the CH4 produced. Also, quality feed and use of antibiotics, vaccines and other forms of electron acceptors are ways that could be employed to reduce methane emissions in ruminant animals (Smith et al. 2008).
The use of biochar could be a mitigation option in the treatment of climate change. Microbes play a role in breaking down organic matters that support the growth of plants. This organic matter decomposition by soil microbes could be mixed with biochar which will help in organic matter retention and preventing other microbes from carrying out ammonification and releasing of carbon (Weng et al. 2017). Finally, the use and development of non-greenhouse gas emission technologies and biotechnologies could be a lasting solution to global warming and climate change. These will surely solve the crisis of clean energy, clean water and industrial waste management treatment (Timmis et al. 2017).
5 Conclusion
The role of microbes in the ecosystem is of utmost importance in the regulation of the abiotic and biotic factors affecting the ecosystem. Microbial communities are the major regulators of all life processes and occurrence of the global climatic changes. Other factors also contribute to climate change such as human activities and industrial revolutions. These regulations could one way affect the alteration of microbial community and diversity. The alterations of these microbiomes could bring about positive or negative feedback to the environment and the ecosystem at large. The feedback could result in either direct impacts to the microbial community and other macro-organisms or indirect impacts to the environment. There is an urgent need for more researches to link climate change and microbial community and to understand the consequential impacts of transitions of microbial community after and before the processes do occur.
References
Aanderud ZT, Schoolmaster DR, Lennon JT (2011) Plants mediate the sensitivity of soil respiration to rainfall variability. Ecosystems 14:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9401-y
Allison SD, Martiny JBH (2008) Colloquium paper: resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(Suppl 1):11512–11519. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801925105
Allison S, Vitousek P (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2004.09.014
Austin EE, Castro HF, Sides KE et al (2009) Assessment of 10 years of CO2 fumigation on soil microbial communities and function in a sweetgum plantation. Soil Biol Biochem 41:514–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.010
Bailey VL, Smith JL, Bolton H (2002) Fungal-to-bacterial ratios in soils investigated for enhanced C sequestration. Soil Biol Biochem 34:997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00033-0
Baker-Austin C, Trinanes JA, Taylor NGH et al (2013) Emerging Vibrio risk at high latitudes in response to ocean warming. Nat Clim Chang 3:73–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1628
Bakhshandeh S, Corneo PE, Yin L, Dijkstra FA (2019) Drought and heat stress reduce yield and alter carbon rhizodeposition of different wheat genotypes. J Agron Crop Sci 205:157–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12314
Bapiri A, Bååth E, Rousk J (2010) Drying–rewetting cycles affect fungal and bacterial growth differently in an arable soil. Microb Ecol 60:419–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9723-5
Bardgett RD, van der Putten WH (2014) Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13855
Barnard RL, Osborne CA, Firestone MK (2013) Responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to extreme desiccation and rewetting. ISME J 7:2229–2241. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.104
Baylis M, Mellor PS, Meiswinkel R (1999) Horse sickness and ENSO in South Africa. Nature 397:574. https://doi.org/10.1038/17512
Beardall J, Raven JA (2004) The potential effects of global climate change on microalgal photosynthesis, growth and ecology. Phycologia 43:26–40. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-43-1-26.1
Bebber DP, Ramotowski MAT, Gurr SJ (2013) Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nat Clim Chang 3:985–988. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1990
Behrenfeld MJ, O’Malley RT, Boss E et al (2016) Revaluating ocean warming impacts on global phytoplankton. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2838
Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ et al (2013) The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496:504–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12060
Bloor JMG, Bardgett RD (2012) Stability of above-ground and below-ground processes to extreme drought in model grassland ecosystems: interactions with plant species diversity and soil nitrogen availability. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 14:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2011.12.001
Blount ZD, Borland CZ, Lenski RE (2008) Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:7899–7906. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803151105
Borken W, Matzner E (2009) Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C and N mineralization and fluxes in soils. Glob Chang Biol 15:808–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01681.x
Bouma MJ, Dye C (1997) Cycles of malaria associated with El Niño in Venezuela. JAMA 278:1772–1774
Bouskill NJ, Lim HC, Borglin S et al (2013) Pre-exposure to drought increases the resistance of tropical forest soil bacterial communities to extended drought. ISME J 7:384–394. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.113
Bunse C, Lundin D, Karlsson CMG et al (2016) Response of marine bacterioplankton pH homeostasis gene expression to elevated CO2. Nat Clim Chang 6:483–487. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2914
Busse MD, Sanchez FG, Ratcliff AW et al (2009) Soil carbon sequestration and changes in fungal and bacterial biomass following incorporation of forest residues. Soil Biol Biochem 41:220–227
Caminade C, Turner J, Metelmann S et al (2017) Global risk model for vector-borne transmission of Zika virus reveals the role of El Niño 2015. PNAS 114:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614303114
Canarini A, Dijkstra FA (2015) Dry-rewetting cycles regulate wheat carbon rhizodeposition, stabilization and nitrogen cycling. Soil Biol Biochem 81:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.014
Castro HF, Classen AT, Austin EE et al (2010) Soil microbial community responses to multiple experimental climate change drivers. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02874-09
Cavicchioli R (2015) Microbial ecology of Antarctic aquatic systems. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:691–706. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3549
Cavicchioli R, Ripple WJ, Timmis KN et al (2019) Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:569–586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5
Chomel M, Lavallee JM, Alvarez-Segura N et al (2019) Drought decreases incorporation of recent plant photosynthate into soil food webs regardless of their trophic complexity. Glob Chang Biol 25:3549–3561. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14754
Cruz-Martínez K, Rosling A, Zhang Y et al (2012) Effect of rainfall-induced soil geochemistry dynamics on grassland soil microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:7587–7595. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00203-12
De Deyn GB, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD (2008) Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecol Lett 11:516–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01164.x
De Vries FT, Shade A (2013) Controls on soil microbial community stability under climate change. Front Microbiol 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00265
de Vries FT, Griffiths RI, Bailey M et al (2018) Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought than fungal networks. Nat Commun 9:3033. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05516-7
Egidi E, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Plett JM et al (2019) A few Ascomycota taxa dominate soil fungal communities worldwide. Nat Commun 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10373-z
Eisenberg JNS, Desai MA, Levy K et al (2007) Environmental determinants of infectious disease: a framework for tracking causal links and guiding public health research. Environ Health Perspect 115:1216–1223. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9806
Evans SE, Wallenstein MD (2014) Climate change alters ecological strategies of soil bacteria. Ecol Lett 17:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12206
Fellbaum CR, Mensah JA, Pfeffer PE et al (2012) The role of carbon in fungal nutrient uptake and transport. Plant Signal Behav 7:1509–1512. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.22015
Fierer N, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2003) Influence of drying-rewetting frequency on soil bacterial community structure. Microb Ecol 45:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-002-1007-2
Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-1839
Flemming HC, Wuertz S (2019) Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:247–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0158-9
Fuchslueger L, Bahn M, Hasibeder R et al (2016) Drought history affects grassland plant and microbial carbon turnover during and after a subsequent drought event. J Ecol 104:1453–1465. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12593
Gao K, Xu J, Gao G et al (2012) Rising CO2 and increased light exposure synergistically reduce marine primary productivity. Nat Clim Chang 2:519–523. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1507
Giraud T, Koskella B, Laine A-L (2017) Introduction: microbial local adaptation: insights from natural populations, genomics and experimental evolution. Mol Ecol 26:1703–1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14091
Gordon H, Haygarth PM, Bardgett RD (2008) Drying and rewetting effects on soil microbial community composition and nutrient leaching. Soil Biol Biochem 40:302–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.08.008
Greaver TL, Clark CM, Compton JE et al (2016) Key ecological responses to nitrogen are altered by climate change. Nat Clim Chang 6:836–843. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3088
Groenigen KJV, Kessel CV, Hungate BA (2013) Increased greenhouse-gas intensity of rice production under future atmospheric conditions. Nat Clim Chang 3:288–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1712
Hasibeder R, Fuchslueger L, Richter A, Bahn M (2015) Summer drought alters carbon allocation to roots and root respiration in mountain grassland. New Phytol 205:1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13146
Hurd CL, Lenton A, Tilbrook B, Boyd PW (2018) Current understanding and challenges for oceans in a higher-CO2 world. Nat Clim Chang 8:686–694. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0211-0
Ingrisch J, Bahn M (2018) Towards a comparable quantification of resilience. Trends Ecol Evol 33:251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.01.013
Janus LR, Angeloni NL, McCormack J et al (2005) Elevated atmospheric CO2 alters soil microbial communities associated with trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) roots. Microb Ecol 50:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-004-0120-9
Johnson CN, Balmford A, Brook BW et al (2017) Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science 356:270–275. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9317
Jørgensen BB, Boetius A (2007) Feast and famine — microbial life in the deep-sea bed. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:770–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1745
Karlowsky S, Augusti A, Ingrisch J et al (2018) Drought-induced accumulation of root exudates supports post-drought recovery of microbes in Mountain Grassland. Front Plant Sci 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01593
Kearns PJ, Shade A (2018) Trait-based patterns of microbial dynamics in dormancy potential and heterotrophic strategy: case studies of resource-based and post-press succession. ISME J 12:2575–2581. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0194-x
Kreppel KS, Caminade C, Telfer S et al (2014) A non-stationary relationship between global climate phenomena and human plague incidence in Madagascar. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8:e3155. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003155
Kvitek DJ, Will JL, Gasch AP (2008) Variations in stress sensitivity and genomic expression in diverse S. cerevisiae isolates. PLoS Genet 4:e1000223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000223
Lanz B, Dietz S, Swanson T (2018) The expansion of modern agriculture and global biodiversity decline: an integrated assessment. Ecol Econ 144:260–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.018
Leff JW, Jones SE, Prober SM et al (2015) Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe. PNAS 112:10967–10972. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508382112
Lesaulnier C, Papamichail D, McCorkle S et al (2008) Elevated atmospheric CO2 affects soil microbial diversity associated with trembling aspen. Environ Microbiol 10:926–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01512.x
Lipson DA, Wilson RF, Oechel WC (2005) Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on soil microbial biomass, activity, and diversity in a chaparral ecosystem. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8573–8580. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.8573-8580.2005
Lipson DA, Blair M, Barron-Gafford G et al (2006) Relationships between microbial community structure and soil processes under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Microb Ecol 51:302–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9032-1
MacFadden DR, McGough SF, Fisman D et al (2018) Antibiotic resistance increases with local temperature. Nat Clim Chang 8:510–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0161-6
Mariadassou M, Pichon S, Ebert D (2015) Microbial ecosystems are dominated by specialist taxa. Ecol Lett 18:974–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12478
McIntyre KM, Setzkorn C, Hepworth PJ et al (2017) Systematic assessment of the climate sensitivity of important human and domestic animals pathogens in Europe. Sci Rep 7:7134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06948-9
Nemergut DR, Knelman JE, Ferrenberg S et al (2016) Decreases in average bacterial community rRNA operon copy number during succession. ISME J 10:1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.191
Nie M, Pendall E, Bell C et al (2013) Positive climate feedbacks of soil microbial communities in a semi-arid grassland. Ecol Lett 16:234–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12034
Nimmo DG, Mac Nally R, Cunningham SC et al (2015) Vive la résistance: reviving resistance for 21st century conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 30:516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.07.008
Oliver TH, Heard MS, Isaac NJB et al (2015) Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol Evol 30:673–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.009
Orwin KH, Wardle DA (2005) Plant species composition effects on belowground properties and the resistance and resilience of the soil microflora to a drying disturbance. Plant Soil 278:205–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-8424-1
Pachiadaki MG, Sintes E, Bergauer K et al (2017) Major role of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in dark ocean carbon fixation. Science 358:1046–1051. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8260
Pascual M, Rodó X, Ellner SP et al (2000) Cholera dynamics and El Niño-southern oscillation. Science 289:1766–1769. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5485.1766
Pecl GT, Araújo MB, Bell JD et al (2017) Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai9214
Philippot L, Andersson SGE, Battin TJ et al (2010) The ecological coherence of high bacterial taxonomic ranks. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:523–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2367
Placella SA, Brodie EL, Firestone MK (2012) Rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses result from sequential resuscitation of phylogenetically clustered microbial groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:10931–10936. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204306109
Posch T, Koster O, Salcher M, Pernthaler J (2012) Harmful filamentous cyanobacteria favoured by reduced water turnover with lake warming. Nat Clim Chang 2:5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1581
Potts M (1994) Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes. Microbiol Rev 58:755–805
Prosser JI, Bohannan BJM, Curtis TP et al (2007) The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:384–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1643
Raffel TR, Romansic JM, Halstead NT et al (2013) Disease and thermal acclimation in a more variable and unpredictable climate. Nat Clim Chang 3:146–151. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1659
Ramirez KS, Geisen S, Morriën E et al (2018) Network analyses can advance above-belowground ecology. Trends Plant Sci 23:759–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.06.009
Reichstein M, Bahn M, Ciais P et al (2013) Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature 500:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12350
Rintoul SR, Chown SL, DeConto RM et al (2018) Choosing the future of Antarctica. Nature 558:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0173-4
Ripple WJ, Smith P, Haberl H et al (2014) Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nat Clim Chang 4:2–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2081
Robinson DA, Jones SB, Lebron I et al (2016) Experimental evidence for drought induced alternative stable states of soil moisture. Sci Rep 6:20018. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20018
Rohani P (2009) The link between dengue incidence and El Niño southern oscillation. PLoS Med 6:e1000185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000185
Sarmento H, Montoya JM, Vázquez-Domínguez E et al (2010) Warming effects on marine microbial food web processes: how far can we go when it comes to predictions? Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 365:2137–2149. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0045
Schimel JP, Gulledge JM, Clein-Curley JS et al (1999) Moisture effects on microbial activity and community structure in decomposing birch litter in the Alaskan taiga. Soil Biol Biochem 31:831–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00182-5
Schindlbacher A, Rodler A, Kuffner M et al (2011) Experimental warming effects on the microbial community of a temperate mountain forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1417–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.03.005
Singh BK, Bardgett RD, Smith P, Reay DS (2010) Microorganisms and climate change: terrestrial feedbacks and mitigation options. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:779–790. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2439
Smith MD (2011) An ecological perspective on extreme climatic events: a synthetic definition and framework to guide future research. J Ecol 99:656–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01798.x
Smith P, Fang C, Dawson JJC, Moncrieff JB (2008) Impact of global warming on soil organic carbon. Adv Agron 97:1–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(07)00001-6
Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J et al (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Tate KR, Ross DJ, Saggar S et al (2007) Methane uptake in soils from Pinus radiata plantations, a reverting shrubland and adjacent pastures: effects of land-use change, and soil texture, water and mineral nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1437–1449
The USGS Water Science School (2015) Water and temperature. https://www.usgs.gov/special-topic/water-science-school/science/temperature-and-water?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects Accessed 18th October, 2020
Timmis K, de Vos WM, Ramos JL, et al (2017) The contribution of microbial biotechnology to sustainable development goals. Microb Biotechnol 10:984–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12818
Toseland A, Daines SJ, Clark JR et al (2013) The impact of temperature on marine phytoplankton resource allocation and metabolism. Nat Clim Chang 3:979–984. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1989
Vezzulli L, Grande C, Reid PC et al (2016) Climate influence on Vibrio and associated human diseases during the past half-century in the coastal North Atlantic. PNAS 113:E5062–E5071. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609157113
Vries FTD, Liiri ME, Bjørnlund L et al (2012) Land use alters the resistance and resilience of soil food webs to drought. Nat Clim Chang 2:276–280. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1368
Wang S, Spor A, Nidelet T et al (2011) Switch between life history strategies due to changes in glycolytic enzyme gene dosage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:452–459. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00808-10
Weng Z (Han), van Zwieten L, Singh BP, et al (2017) Biochar built soil carbon over a decade by stabilizing rhizodeposits. Nat Clim Chang 7:371–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3276
Wilkins D, Lauro FM, Williams TJ et al (2013) Biogeographic partitioning of Southern Ocean microorganisms revealed by metagenomics. Environ Microbiol 15:1318–1333. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12035
Williams MA (2007) Response of microbial communities to water stress in irrigated and drought-prone tallgrass prairie soils. Soil Biol Biochem 39(11):2750–2757
Youssef NH, Couger MB, McCully AL et al (2015) Assessing the global phylum level diversity within the bacterial domain: a review. J Adv Res 6:269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2014.10.005
Zhou J, Deng Y, Luo F et al (2011) Phylogenetic molecular ecological network of soil microbial communities in response to elevated CO2. mBio 2. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00122-11
Zhou J, Xue K, Xie J et al (2012) Microbial mediation of carbon-cycle feedbacks to climate warming. Nat Clim Chang 2:106–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1331
Zimmerman AE, Martiny AC, Allison SD (2013) Microdiversity of extracellular enzyme genes among sequenced prokaryotic genomes. ISME J 7:1187–1199. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.176
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ibrahim, A.D., Uhuami, A.O., Abdulkadir, N., Uzoh, I.M. (2021). Climate Change Alters Microbial Communities. In: Choudhary, D.K., Mishra, A., Varma, A. (eds) Climate Change and the Microbiome. Soil Biology, vol 63. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76863-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76863-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76862-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76863-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)