Abstract
Classification is required for any disease so that the disease can be graded both for its severity or complexity. Moreover, a treatment guideline could be provided according to the grades of the classification. The process of classifying anal fistulas started in 1934, and since then, it has evolved a lot. The initial classifications categorized anal fistulas broadly as fistulas above the anorectal sling or the fistulas below the anorectal sling. However, in 1950s, the role of intersphincteric space in the pathogenesis and spread of fistulas was discovered. Since then, a major change came in the direction of classifying fistulas. All the subsequent classifications categorized fistulas primarily as either intersphincteric or transsphincteric. These included commonly used Parks and St James’s University Hospital classifications. However, the main drawback of these classifications was that they did not guide the management of the disease. In the last decade, a new classification known as Garg classification tried to remove this major drawback. This classification divided fistulas primarily as low (involving less than one-thirds of the external sphincter) and high (involving more than one-thirds of the external sphincter). Apart from being the most comprehensive classification to be proposed, Garg classification seems to have optimally addressed both the issues, classifying fistulas on the basis of their complexity and acting as a guide regarding the management of the disease. Among all classifications, the three most relevant classifications, Parks, St James’s University Hospital, and Garg classifications, would be discussed in detail.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eisenhammer S (1958) A new approach to the anorectal fistulous abscess based on the high intermuscular lesion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 106(5):595–599
Ferguson EF Jr, Houston CH (1978) Iatrogenic supralevator fistula. South Med J 71(5):490–495
Garg P (2016) Supralevator extension in fistula-in-ano is almost always in the intersphincteric plane: easy solution for a complex disease. Dis Colon Rectum 59(5):e41–e42
Garg P (2017a) Comparing existing classifications of fistula-in-ano in 440 operated patients: is it time for a new classification? Int J Surg 42:34–40
Garg P (2017b) Supralevator extrasphincteric fistula-in-ano are rare as supralevator extension is almost always in the intersphincteric plane. World J Surg 41(9):2409–2410
Garg P (2017c) Transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS) – a new procedure to treat high complex anal fistula. Int J Surg 40:130–134
Garg P (2018a) Garg classification for anal fistulas: is it better than existing classifications? – a review. Indian J Surg 80(6):606–608
Garg P (2018b) Is fistulotomy still the gold standard in present era and is it highly underutilized?: an audit of 675 operated cases. Int J Surg 56:26–30
Garg P (2018c) Understanding and treating supralevator fistula-in-ano: MRI analysis of 51 cases and a review of literature. Dis Colon Rectum 61(5):612–621
Garg P (2019a) Anal fistula and pilonidal sinus disease coexisting simultaneously: an audit in a cohort of 1284 patients. Int Wound J 16(5):1199–1205
Garg P (2019b) Comparison of preoperative and postoperative MRI after fistula-in-ano surgery: lessons learnt from an audit of 1323 MRI at a single centre. World J Surg 43(6):1612–1622
Garg P (2020) Assessing validity of existing fistula-in-ano classifications in a cohort of 848 operated and MRI assessed anal fistula patients – cohort study. Ann Med Surg 59:122–126
Garg P (2021) Transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS): a novel sphincter-sparing procedure to treat 325 high complex anal fistulas with long-term follow-up. Colorectal Dis 23(5):1213–1224
Garg P, Garg M, Das BR, Khadapkar R, Menon GR (2019) Perianal tuberculosis: lessons learned in 57 patients from 743 samples of histopathology and polymerase chain reaction and a systematic review of literature. Dis Colon Rectum 62(11):1390–1400
Goligher JC (1961) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Cassell, London, p 180
Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S (2007) Principles and practice of surgery for the colon, rectum and anus, 3rd edn. Informa Healthcare, New York
Lilius H (1968) Fistula-in-ano, an investigation of human foetal anal ducts and intramuscular glands and a clinical study of 150 patients. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 383:7–88
Milligan F, Morgan C (1934) Surgical anatomy of the anal canal with special reference to ano-rectal fistulae. Lancet 2:1150–1213
Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS (2000) MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics 20(3):623–635. Discussion 635–637
Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63(1):1–12
Steltzner F (1959) Die Atlorectalen Fisteln. Springer, Berlin
Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J III, Hyman N, Buie WD, Cohen J, Orsay C, Dunn G, Perry WB, Ellis CN, Rakinic J, Gregorcyk S, Shellito P, Nelson R, Tjandra JJ, Newstead G (2005) Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48(7):1337–1342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Garg, P. (2022). Classification of Anal Fistula and Abscess. In: Ratto, C., Parello, A., Litta, F., De Simone, V., Campennì, P. (eds) Anal Fistula and Abscess. Coloproctology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76670-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76670-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76669-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76670-2
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine