Skip to main content

A Novel Mathematical Model to Design UAV Trajectory for Search and Rescue Operations in Disaster

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Aviation 4.0

Abstract

In mass casualty incidents, whether natural or human-made, Search and Rescue Operations (SAR) have a critical role in humanitarian problems. Time and information are crucial in victims’ survival. The high success rate in SAR operations depends on achieving reliable data about the number of victims, the severity of the failure, access status, and location status, etc. as soon as possible. Nowadays, the technology of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) presents an opportunity to help the rescue teams with avoiding wasting time and accessing areas where searching by rescue teams are costly and impossible to go there. In this study, we design a mathematical model to get an optimal path planning to steer the UAVs based on the potential risk degree (PRD) of the candidate location in the affected area. The proposed model is inspired by the Travel Salesman Problem (TSP) that selects the optimal tour giving priority to districts with high PRDs obtained using the concept of similarity measure in the spherical fuzzy environment, considering the power limitation of UAVs. The priority of candidate locations is evaluated by Jaccard, exponential, and square root cosine similarity measures. The applicability of the proposed model is demonstrated by applying it to an earthquake case. A sensitivity analysis is performed to approve the validity of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. San Juan, V., Santos, M., Andújar, J.M.: Intelligent UAV map generation and discrete path planning for search and rescue operations. Complexity 2018, 1–17 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, S.W., Li, Y.Z., Xing, S.Q., Wang, X.S., Sato, M.: Urban damage evaluation using polarimetric SAR data. In International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), pp. 2754–2757 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, Z., et al.: Development of an UAS for post-earthquake disaster surveying and its application in Ms7.0 Lushan Earthquake, Sichuan, China. Comput. Geosci. 68(2014), 22–30 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, J., et al.: Damage degree evaluation of earthquake area using UAV aerial image. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2016, 1–10 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Waharte, S., Trigoni, N.: Supporting search and rescue operations with UAVs. In 2010 International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies, pp. 142–147 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jun, M., Andrea, R.D’.: Path planning for unmanned aerial vehicles in uncertain and adversarial environments. In Butenko, S., Murphey, R., Pardalos, P.M. (eds.) Cooperative Control: Models, Applications and Algorithms, pp. 95–110. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodrich, M.A., et al.: Supporting wilderness search and rescue using a camera-equipped mini UAV: research articles. J. Field Robot. 25(1–2), 89–110 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Półka, M., Ptak, S., Kuziora, Ł., Kuczyńska, A.: The use of unmanned aerial vehicles by urban search and rescue groups. In Drones—Applications, pp. 83–95 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bebis, G., et al. (eds.): Advances in Visual Computing, vol. 9474. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Silvagni, M., et al.: Multipurpose UAV for search and rescue operations in mountain avalanche events avalanche events, vol. 5705 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Avezum, M., Seitz, A., Bruegge, B.: MODCAP : a platform for cooperative search and rescue missions (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. K. B et al.: Towards highly reliable autonomy for urban search and rescue robots. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 118–129 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghazali, S.N.A.M., Anuar, H.A., Alsagoff, S.N.S.Z., Yusoff, Z.: Determining position of target subjects in maritime search and rescue (MSAR) operations using rotary wing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). In 2016 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICICTM), pp. 1–4 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rahmes, M., Chester, D., Hunt, J., Chiasson, B.: Optimizing cooperative cognitive search and rescue UAVs. In Autonomous Systems: Sensors, Vehicles, Security and the Internet of Everything (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cui, J.Q., et al.: Drones for cooperative search and rescue in post-disaster situation. In 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) and IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (RAM), pp. 167–174 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Phung, M.D., Quach, C.H., Dinh, T.H., Ha, Q.: Enhanced discrete particle swarm optimization path planning for UAV vision-based surface inspection. Autom. Construct. 81, 25–33 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kallmann, M., Kapadia, M.: Geometric and discrete path planning for interactive virtual worlds. Synth. Lect. Vis. Comput. 8(1), 1–201 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sujit, P.B., Saripalli, S., Sousa, J.B.: An evaluation of UAV path following algorithms. In 2013 European Control Conference (ECC), pp. 3332–3337 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hernandez-Martinez, E.G., Ferreira-Vazquez, E.D., Fernandez-Anaya, G., Flores-Godoy, J.J.: Formation tracking of heterogeneous mobile agents using distance and area constraints. Complexity 2017, 1–13 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamrani, F., Ayani, R.: UAV path planning in search operations. In Aerial Vehicles, InTech (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Besada-Portas, E., de la Torre, L., Moreno, A., Risco-Martín, J.L.: On the performance comparison of multi-objective evolutionary UAV path planners. Inf. Sci. 238, 111–125 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Auñón, P.G., Peñas, M.S.: Use of genetic algorithms for unmanned aerial systems path planning. In Decision Making and Soft Computing—Proceedings of the 11th International FLINS Conference, FLINS 2014, pp. 430–435 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davoodi, M., Panahi, F., Mohades, A., Hashemi, S.N.: Multi-objective path planning in discrete space. Appl. Soft Comput. 13(1), 709–720 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Izzo, D.: Optimization of interplanetary trajectories for impulsive and continuous asteroid deflection. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30(2), 401–408 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, P., Tang, K., Lozano, J.A.: Estimation of distribution algorithms based unmanned aerial vehicle path planner using a new coordinate system. In 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1469–1476 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ruz, J.J., Pajares, G., Jesus, M., Arevalo, O.: UAV trajectory planning for static and dynamic environments. INTECH Open Access Publisher (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seyfi-Shishavan, S.A., Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Farrokhizadeh, E., Donyatalab, Y., Kahraman, C.: Novel similarity measures in spherical fuzzy environment and their applications. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 94, 103837 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gündoǧdu, F.K., Kahraman, C.: Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 36(1), 337–352 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chiclana, F., Tapia García, J.M., del Moral, M.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Inf. Sci. 221, 110–123 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Garcia-Aunon, P., Peñas, M.S., de la Cruz García, J.M.: Parameter selection based on fuzzy logic to improve UAV path-following algorithms. J. Appl. Logic 24, 62–75 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Valavanis, K.P., Vachtsevanos, G.J.: UAV mission and path planning: ıntroduction. In Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, pp. 1443–1446. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Huang, C., et al.: A new dynamic path planning approach for unmanned aerial vehicles. Complexity 2018, 1–17 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fu, Z., Yu, J., Xie, G., Chen, Y., Mao, Y.: A heuristic evolutionary algorithm of UAV path planning. Wirel. Commun. Mobile Comput. 2018, 1–11 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kamranzad, F., Memarian, H., Zare, M.: Earthquake risk assessment for Tehran, Iran. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9(7), 430 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Salman, F.S., Gül, S.: Deployment of field hospitals in mass casualty incidents. Comput. Ind. Eng. 74(1), 37–51 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatma Kutlu Gündoğdu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Seyfi-Shishavan, S.A., Farrokhizadeh, E., Kutlu Gündoğdu, F. (2022). A Novel Mathematical Model to Design UAV Trajectory for Search and Rescue Operations in Disaster. In: Kahraman, C., Aydın, S. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Aviation 4.0. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 372. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75067-1_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics