Abstract
From the 1990s onward, several emigration countries implemented new programs to engage with their diasporas, as part of their public diplomacy efforts. These programs focus mainly on activities that promote conventional social services such as education, health, and labor rights, as well as non-conventional services tailored to the immigrants’ needs, such as labor certifications, remittance investment, and social services to non-migrant relatives. Hence, countries of origin now offer additional protection services to diaspora communities, which are part of the transnational social protection (TSP) framework. This concept accounts for all sorts of practices and actors that intervene in the well-being of people on the move, including origin countries. This comparative case study examines the role of Mexico, Guatemala, Bolivia, and Ecuador in the provision of social rights to their diasporas, emphasizing the role of consular services. It also explains why and how these countries engage their diasporas through TSP.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In Spanish the process was referred as “ciudadanización de la migración.”
- 2.
Figure 2.1. is published with permission of Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México graphic designer Karla Gabriela Contreras Pascual, from the División de Investigación y Posgrado (Division of Research and Graduate Studies).
- 3.
As indicated in the previous footnote, Fig. 2.1. is published with permission of Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México graphic designer Karla Gabriela Contreras Pascual, from the División de Investigación y Posgrado (Division of Research and Graduate Studies).
References
Amiraux, V. (2000). Unexpected biographies. Deconstructing the national welfare state? In M. Bommes & A. Geddes (Eds.), Immigration and welfare: Challenging the borders of the welfare state (pp. 227–247). Routledge.
Babajanian, B., & Hagen-Zanker, J. (2012). Social protection and social exclusion: An analytical framework to assess the links. Overseas Development Institute. https://reletran.org.w0108631.kasserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Social-protection-and-social-exclusion.pdf.
Barrientos, A., & DeJong, J. (2004). Child poverty and cash transfers (Working Paper No. 4). London: Childhood Poverty Research and Policy Centre and Save the Children.
Boccagni, P. (2011). Social protection as a multi-actor process in Ecuadorian migration:Towards a transnationalism of social rights? In R. Sabates-Wheeler & R. Feldman (Eds.), Social protection and migration. Claiming social rights beyond borders. Palgrave Macmillan.
Boccagni, P. (2014). Making the “Fifth Region” a real place? Emigrant policies and the emigration-nation nexus in Ecuador. National Identities, 16(2), 117–137.
Boccagni, P., & Decimo, F. (2013). Mapping social remittances. Migration Letters, 10(1), 1–10.
Bommes, M., & Geddes, A. (2000). Immigration and welfare: Challenging the borders of the welfare state. Routledge.
Bravo, V. (2014). The importance of diaspora communities as key publics for national governments around the world. In G. J. Golan, S. U. Yang, & D. Kinsey (Eds), International public relations and public diplomacy: Communication and engagement. Peter Lang.
Bravo, V., & De Moya, M. (2015). Communicating the homeland’s relationship with its diaspora community: The cases of El Salvador and Colombia. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 10(1), 70–104.
Bravo, V., & De Moya, M. (2018). Mexico’s public diplomacy efforts to engage its diaspora across the border: Case study of the programs, messages and strategies employed by the Mexican Embassy in the United States. Rising Powers Quarterly, 3(3), 173–196. https://risingpowersproject.com/quarterly/mexicos-public-diplomacy-efforts-to-engage-its-diaspora-across-the-border-case-study-of-the-programs-messages-and-strategies-employed-by-the-mexican-embassy-in-the-united-states/.
Chander, A. (2006). Homeward bound. New York University Law Review, 81, 60–89.
Chiarello, L. (2013). Las políticas públicas sobre migraciones y la sociedad civil en América Latina: Los casos de Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay y Perú. Scalabrini International Migration Network.
Conway, T., Hann, A., & Norton, A. (Eds.). (2000). Social protection: New direction for donor agencies. Overseas Development Institute. https://www.odi.org/resources/docs/2233.pdf.
Curillo, J. (2019). Análisis de la nueva Ley Orgánica de Movilidad Humana del Ecuador, en aspectos relacionados con la emigración y la inmigración. Revista AFESE, 65.
De Neubourg, C. (2009). The welfare pentagon and the social management of risks. In R. Sigg & C. Behrendt (Eds.), Social security in the global village (pp. 313–332). Transaction Publishers.
Deeming, C., & Smyth, P. (2015). Social investment after neoliberalism: Policy, paradigms and political platforms. Journal of Social Policy, 44(2), 297–318.
Délano, A., & Yescas, C. (2014). La diplomacia consular Mexicana frente a la migración indígena: Una Agenda Pendiente. Revista Mexicana De Política Exterior, 111, 143–166.
Deere, C., & Alvarado, G. (2016). Asset accumulation through international migration: Gender, remittances, and decision making in Ecuador. Latin American Research Review, 51(4), 249–270.
Délano, A. (2018). From here and there: Diaspora policies, integration, and social rights beyond borders. Oxford University Press.
Díaz de Cossío, R. (2010). Mexicanos en el exterior: trayectorias y perspectivas (1990/2010). México: Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores: Instituto Matías Romero.
Domenech, E. (2008). La ciudadanización de la política migratoria en la región sudamericana: Vicisitudes de la agenda global. In S. Novick (Ed.), Las Migraciones en América Latina. Políticas, Culturas y Estrategias (pp. 423–448). Catálogos / CLACSO.
Ferrás Murcia, M., & Martín Pérez, A. (2019). Asociaciones de inmigrantes y participación política como sociedad civil: Un estudio de caso en Barcelona. Migraciones, 46, 179–204.
Fitzgerald, D. (2009). A nation of emigrants. How Mexico manages its migration. University of California Press.
Gamlen, A. (2008). The emigration state and the modern geopolitical imagination. Political Geography, 27(8), 840–856.
Gamlen, A. (2015). The rise of diaspora institutions. In N. Singona, A. Gamlen, G. Liberatore, & H. Neveu Kringelbach (Eds.), Diasporas reimagined. spaces, practices and belonging. (pp. 166–171). Oxford Diasporas Programme.
Gobierno de México. (n.d.). Centro de Información y Atención a Mexicanos. https://www.gob.mx/ciam.
González Gutiérrez, C. (1999). Fostering identities: Mexico’s relations with its diaspora. The Journal of American History, 86(2), 545–567.
González Gutiérrez, C. (2006). Relaciones Estado Diáspora, vol.1. Instituto de los Mexicanos en el Exterior, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Asociación de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior, Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Government of the Republic of Guatemala. (2019). Política Pública de Protección y Atención a la Persona Migrante 2019–2032. Guatemala City. https://www.minex.gob.gt/Uploads/PoliticaPublicaDeAtencionAlMigrante.pdf.
Government of the State of Guerrero. (2019). Convocatoria Programa 2X1 para Migrantes. https://guerrero.gob.mx/articulos/convocatoria-del-programa-2x1-para-migrantes-2019/.
Government of the State of Zacatecas. (2020). Reitera gobernador apoyo al programa 2X1. Trabajando unidos con los migrantes. https://www.zacatecas.gob.mx/reitera-gobernador-apoyo-al-programa-2x1-trabajando-unidos-con-los-migrantes/.
Hagen, R. (2016, February 14). Mexican, Guatemalan consulates partner with U.S. to share labor info. The Sun. https://www.sbsun.com/social-affairs/20160829/mexican-guatemalan-consulates-partner-with-us-to-share-labor-info.
Hernández Joseph, D. (2015). Protección consular mexicana. Ford Foundation y Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Hernández Joseph‚ J. (2016). Protección consular mexicana. México: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Herrera, V., & Grijalva, D. (2017). Políticas públicas para la población ecuatoriana migrante:¿Hacia una protección social transnacional? GIGAPP Estudios Working Papers, 4(66–71), 255–272.
Hinojosa Gordonava, A. & de la Torre Ávila, L. (2014, December). Bolivia: Diaspora and Emigration Policies. Interact Research Report. Migration Policy Institute Europe. Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, CEDEM.
Hinojosa Gordonava, A., Domenech, E. & Lafleur, J. (2012). El voto de los migrantes Bolivianos en Madrid: Un asunto privado con impacto transnacional. In J. Lafleur (Ed.), Diáspora y Voto en el Exterior. La Participación Política de los Emigrantes Bolivianos en las Elecciones de su País de Origen (pp. 39–64). CIDOB.
Holzmann, R., & Jørgensen, S. (2001). Social risk management: A new conceptual framework for social protection, and beyond. International Tax and Public Finance, 8(4), 529–556.
Institute of Mexicans Abroad. (2020). Semana de Educación Financiera. https://www.gob.mx/ime/articulos/semana-de-educacion-financiera-sef.
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2011) Perfil Migratorio de Bolivia. https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/perfil_migratorio_de_bolivia.pdf.
Iskander, N. (2010). Creative state. Forty years of migration and development policy in Morocco and Mexico. Cornell University Press.
Jonas, S., & Rodriguez, N. (2014). Guatemala-U.S. migration. transforming regions. University of Texas Press.
Levitt, P., & De la Dehesa, R. (2003). Transnational migration and the redefinition of the state: Variations and explanations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 26(4), 587–611.
Levitt, P., Viterna, J., Mueller, A., & Lloyd, C. (2017). Transnational social protection: Setting the agenda. Oxford Development Journal, 45(1), 2–19.
Li Ng, J., Cárdenas Salgado, G., Espinosa, L., & Serrano, C. (2019). México: Anuario de Migración y Remesas 2019. National Council of Population, Fundación BBVA & BBVA Research. https://www.bbvaresearch.com/publicaciones/mexico-anuario-de-migracion-y-remesas-2019/.
Lowell, L., & Findlay, A. (2002). Migration of highly skilled persons from developing countries: Impact and policy responses. Synthesis Report. Geneva: International Labor Organization. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---migrant/documents/publication/wcms_201706.pdf.
Margheritis, A. (2011). “Todos somos migrantes” (We are all migrants): The paradoxes of innovative state-led transnationalism in Ecuador. International Political Sociology, 5(2), 198–217.
Migration Data Portal. (2020). Diasporas. https://www.cancilleria.gob.ec/viceministerio-de-movilidad-humana/.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Bolivia. (n.d). Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores. Breve Reseña Histórica. https://www.cancilleria.gob.bo/webmre/pagina/84.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ecuador. (n.d.). Viceministerio de Movilidad Humana. https://www.cancilleria.gob.ec/viceministerio-de-movilidad-humana/.
Newland, K. (2010). Diasporas. New partners in global development policy. Migration Policy Institute, Washington. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/diasporas-new-partners-global-development-policy.
Parella Rubio, S. (2018). Retorno de migrantes bolivianos desde España: Retos y oportunidades para el desarrollo. En Migraciones Internacionales en Bolivia y Ecuador: Crisis Global, Estado y Desarrollo. Ecuador: FLACSO, 352.
Pedroza, L., & Palop-García, P. (2017). Diaspora policies in comparison: An application of the Emigrant Policies Index (EMIX) for the Latin American and Caribbean region. Political Geography, 60, 165–178.
Pedroza, L., Palop-García-García, P., & Hoffmann, B. (2018). Políticas hacia Emigrantes en América Latina y el Caribe. FLACSO.
Pilati, K. (2012). Network resources and the political engagement of migrant organisations in Milan. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 38(4), 671–688.
Popkin, E. (2004). Transnational migration and development in postwar peripheral states: An examination of Guatemalan and Salvadoran State linkages with their migrant population in Los Angeles. In U. Schuerkens (Ed.), Global forces and local life-worlds. Social transformations (pp. 143–168). Sage.
Portes, A., Escobar, C., & Arana, R. (2008). Bridging the gap: Transnational and ethnic organizations in the political incorporation of immigrants in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(6), 1056–1090.
Price, M. (2017). Constructing the Andean diaspora: State-based and immigrant-led development strategies. In M. Hassankhan, L. Roopnarine, C. White, & R. Mahase (Eds.), Legacy of slavery and indentured labour (pp. 63–86). Routledge.
Ragazzi, F. (2009). Governing diasporas. International Political Sociology, 3(4), 378–397.
Rannveig Agunias, D. (2009). Committed to the diaspora: More developing countries setting up diaspora institutions. Migration Information Source.
Rannveig Agunias, D., & Newland, K. (2012). Developing a roadmap for engaging diasporas in development. A handbook for policy makers and practitioners in home and host countries. International Organization for Migration and Migration Policy Institute.
Rodrigo, F. (2016). La “diplomacia de doble vía” situada. Análisis del Viceconsulado del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia en la ciudad de La Plata. Estudios Sociales del Estado, 2(3), 2422–7803. https://estudiossocialesdelestado.org/index.php/ese/article/view/65/45.
Rodríguez, L. (2000). 4ta Entrega. Guatemaltecos en Estados Unidos sin Derechos Políticos. INCEDES. https://www.incedes.org.gt/Master/notasxrodriguez.pdf.
Rosales Sandoval, I. (2014). Historia reciente de las políticas migratorias en Centroamérica. In P. Galeana (Coord.), Historia Comparada de las Migraciones en las Américas (pp. 201–227). UNAM-IIJ.
Sabates-Wheeler, R., & Devereux, S. (2004). Transformative social protection (IDS Working Paper 232). Institute Development Studies.
Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Mexico. (2016). Ventanilla de Atención Integral para la Mujer. https://www.gob.mx/sre/documentos/material-de-difusion-sobre-la-ventanilla-de-atencion-integral-para-la-mujer?state=published.
Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Mexico. (n.d.). Instituto de los Mexicanos en el Exterior. https://consulmex.sre.gob.mx/austin/index.php/ime-articulo.
Shapaizman, I. (2010). The influence of neo-liberal ideas and political conflict on the privatization process of immigrant policy: A comparison of Israel, Canada and the Netherlands. Centre for International Policy Exchanges.
Schinkel, W. (2018). Against ‘immigrant integration’: For an end to neocolonial knowledge production. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(31), 1–17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327877326_Against_'immigrant_integration'_for_an_end_to_neocolonial_knowledge_production.
Shields, J. (2004). No safe haven: Markets, welfare and migrants. In P. Kretsendemas & A. Aparacio (Eds.), Immigrants, welfare reform and the poverty of policy (pp. 35–60). Praeger.
Smith, R. (2008). Contradictions on diasporic institutionalization in Mexican politics: The 2006 migrant vote and other forms of inclusion and control. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(4), 708–741.
Smith, M., & Bakker, M. (2008). Citizenship across borders. The political transnationalism of El Migrante. Cornell University Press.
Subministry for Salvadorans Abroad. (2018). Experiencia del Espacio de Coordinación Local TRICAMEX, para la Protección Consular. https://www.cepal.org/sites/default/files/events/files/32_tricamex.pdf.
Valenzuela-Moreno, K. (2019). Los consulados mexicanos en Estados Unidos: Una aproximación desde la protección social. INTERdisciplina, 7(18), 59–79. https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/inter/article/view/68460/61387.
Valle, V., Gandoy, W., & Valenzuela-Moreno, K. (2020). Ventanillas de Salud: Defeating challenges in healthcare access for Mexican immigrants in the United States. Estudios Fronterizos, 21(43), 1–26.
Varadarajan, L. (2010). The domestic abroad: Diasporas in international relations. Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Valenzuela-Moreno, K.A. (2021). Transnational Social Protection and the Role of Countries of Origin: The Cases of Mexico, Guatemala, Bolivia, and Ecuador. In: Bravo, V., De Moya, M. (eds) Latin American Diasporas in Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74564-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74564-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74563-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74564-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)