Abstract
In the context of the UK’s impending withdrawal from the European Union, we characterise the 2019 EU election in the UK as a ‘ghost campaign’, which did not have the attention of the major parties, let alone the voter. Such a backdrop may have invited parties to innovate or experiment with Facebook campaigning strategies, but the campaign was largely what one might expect in terms of the exploitation of the affordances of Facebook: cautious. Similarly, it followed the patterns of previous UK European Parliamentary elections by focusing largely on national and domestic politics with the parties offering persuasive communication intended to deliver them votes on election day. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Brexit dominated the topical focus of party Facebook posts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bélanger, É., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 477–491.
Bossetta, M., Dutceac Segesten, A., & Trenz, H.-J. (2017). Engaging with European politics through Twitter and Facebook: Participation beyond the national? In M. Barisione & A. Michailidou (Eds.), Social media and European Politics: Rethinking Power and Legitimacy in the Digital Era (pp. 53–75). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59890-5
Ceron, A., & d’Adda, G. (2016). E-campaigning on Twitter: The effectiveness of distributive promises and negative campaign in the 2013 Italian election. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1935–1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815571915
Cushion, S., & Thomas, R. (2016). Reporting different second order elections: A comparative analysis of the 2009 and 2013 local and EU elections on public and commercial UK television news bulletins. British Politics, 11(2), 164–183.
Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & Grumbkow, J. v. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 842–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.013
Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & Grumbkow, J. v. (2008). Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: Social motives and social context. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.9926
Dommett, K., & Temple, L. (2018). Digital campaigning: The rise of Facebook and satellite campaigns. Parliamentary Affairs, 71(supplement 1), 189–202.
Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2010). Timeless strategy meets new medium: Going negative on congressional campaign web sites, 2002–2006. Political Communication, 27(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600903502607
European Commission. (2015). Eurobarometer: Public Opinion in the European Union, (Report No. 83) Brussels: Directorate-General X.
Gabel, M., & Hix, S. (2005). Understanding public support for British membership of the single currency. Political Studies, 53(1), 65–68.
Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2014). New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter in the 2010 UK and Dutch general election campaigns. New Media and Society, 18(5), 765–783.
Heath, A., McLean, I., Taylor, B., & Curtice, J. (1999). Between first and second order: A comparison of voting behaviour in European and local elections in Britain. European Journal of Political Research, 35(3), 389–414.
Jackson, N., & Lilleker, D. G. (2010). Tentative steps towards interaction: The use of the Internet in the British European Parliament Election 2009. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 20(5), 527–544.
Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (2004). No holds barred: Negativity in U.S. Senate campaigns. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Lilleker, D. G. (2015). Interactivity and political communication: Hypermedia campaigning in the UK. Comunicação Pública, 10(18), 1.
Lilleker, D. G., & Jackson, N. A. (2010). Towards a more participatory style of election campaigning: The impact of Web 2.0 on the UK 2010 general election. Policy & Internet, 2(3), 69–98.
Lilleker, D. G., Koc-Michalska, K., Schweitzer, E. J., Jacunski, M., Jackson, N., & Vedel, T. (2011). Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning. European Journal of Communication, 26(3), 195–213.
Lilleker, D. G., Jackson, N., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2015). Social media in the UK election campaigns 2008-2014: Experimentation, innovation, and convergence. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbo, A. O. Larsson, & C. Christensen (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 325–337). Routledge.
Marsh, M. (1998). Testing the second-order election model after four European elections. British journal of political science, 28(4), 591–607.
McCormick, J. (2014). Voting on Europe: The potential pitfalls of a British referendum. The Political Quarterly, 85(2), 212–219.
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., & Rasmus Kleis Nielsen (2020). Reuters Institute Digital News Report. Available from: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf.
Samuel-Azran, T., Yarchi, M., & Wolfsfeld, G. (2017). Engagement and likeability of negative messages on facebook during Israel’s 2013 elections. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 6(1), 42–68.
Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Valle-Cruz, D. (2018). Facebook impact and sentiment analysis on political campaigns. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, 56, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209328
Schuck, A. R., Xezonakis, G., Elenbaas, M., Banducci, S. A., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Party contestation and Europe on the news agenda: The 2009 European Parliamentary Elections. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 41–52.
Theilmann, J., & Wilhite, A. (1998). Campaign tactics and the decision to attack. Journal of Politics, 60, 1050–1062.
Tian, Y., Galery, T., Dulcinati, G., Molimpakis, E., & Sun, C. (2017). Facebook Sentiment: Reactions and Emojis. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media, 11–16.
Vepsäläinen, T., Li, H., & Suomi, R. (2017). Facebook likes and public opinion: Predicting the 2015 Finnish parliamentary elections. Government Information Quarterly, 34(13), 524–532.
Wall, H. J., Kaye, L. K., & Malone, S. A. (2016). An exploration of psychological factors on emoticon usage and implications for judgement accuracy. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.040
Worcester, R., Mortimore, R., Baines, P., & Gill, M. (2017). Explaining Cameron’s Catastrophe. IndieBooks.
Wring, D., Grill, C., Merkovity, N., & Deacon, D. (2017). Populist politics and the ‘Radical Right’ in 2014 elections. In C. Holtz-Bacha, E. Novelli, & K. Rafter (Eds.), Political Advertising in the 2014 European Parliament Election (pp. 97–118). Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lilleker, D.G., Jackson, D., Veneti, A. (2021). The UK: The Post-Brexit, Ghost Election. In: Haßler, J., Magin, M., Russmann, U., Fenoll, V. (eds) Campaigning on Facebook in the 2019 European Parliament Election. Political Campaigning and Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73851-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73851-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73850-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73851-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)