Abstract
This chapter examines the rationale for the international regime governing access and benefit-sharing (ABS) in relation to genetic resources, offering an overview of the regime and looking at future prospects. After emphasizing the value of genetic resources for biological diversity, the chapter turns to the rationale for regulating access to natural resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their use, from the perspective of international law. This approach leads on to an analysis of the scope and limits of the ABS system in the international biodiversity regime and the specific multilateral ABS regime on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. In a prospective review, the analysis looks at the digitization of genetic sequence information, which is currently one of the main challenges facing the internationally established ABS mechanism, and then explores ongoing work on an ABS mechanisms for a future agreement on marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Attention must also be paid to respecting and maintaining the knowledge, innovations and practices of indigenous and local communities (ILCs). In this respect, there is an important dimension of intra-state benefit-sharing that is covered by provisions of international law. However, this study deals exclusively with the dimension of inter-state benefit-sharing.
References
Aubry, S. (2019). The future of digital sequence information for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01046/full
Bouza, N., García, C., & Rodrigo, A. J., (dirs.). (2015). In La gobernanza del interés público global. Madrid: Tecnos.
Broggiato, A., Dedeurwaerdere, T., Batur, F., & Coolsaet, B. (2015). Introduction. Access benefit-sharing and the Nagoya Protocol: The confluence of Abiding Legal Doctrines. In B. Coolsaet et al. (Eds.), Implementing the Nagoya Protocol: Comparing access and benefit-sharing regimes in Europe. Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff.
CBD. (2002). Access and benefit-sharing as related to genetic resources. A. Bonn Guidelines on Access to Genetic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing of the Benefits Arising out of their Utilization, Decision VI/24 A COP. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.cbd.int/decisions/?id=7198
CBD. (2016a). Review of progress towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 16 on the Nagoya Protocol, Decision 2/1 COP-MOP. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/np-mop-02/np-mop-02-dec-01-en.pdf
CBD. (2016b). Digital sequence information on genetic resources, Decision 2/14 COP-MOP. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/np-mop-02/np-mop-02-dec-14-en.pdf
CBD. (2016c). Progress in the implementation of the Convention and the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and towards the achievement of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, Decision XIII/1 COP. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-13/cop-13-dec-01-en.doc
CBD. (2018a). Assessment and review of the effectiveness of the Protocol (Article 31), Decision 3/1 COP-MOP. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/np-mop-03/np-mop-03-dec-01-en.pdf
CBD. (2018b). Global multilateral benefit-sharing mechanism (Article 10), Decision 3/13 COP-MOP. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/np-mop-03/np-mop-03-dec-13-en.pdf
CBD. (2018c). Digital sequence information on genetic resources, Decision 14/20 COP. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-14/cop-14-dec-20-en.docx
CBD. (2018d). A Fact-Finding and Scoping Study on Digital Sequence Information on Genetic Resources in the Context of the CBD and the Nagoya Protocol, S.A. Laird and R.P. Wynberg, with contributions from A. Iranzadeh and A. Sliva Kooser, CBD/DSI/AHTEG/2018/1/3.
CBD. (2018e). Digital sequence information on genetic resources Digital sequence information on genetic resources, Decision 3/12 COP-MOP. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from http://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/np-mop-03/np-mop-03-dec-12-en.pdf
CBD. (2019). Including Access and Benefit-sharing in the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, CBD/SBSTTA/23/INF/10.
CGIAR et al. (2020). Including Access and Benefit Sharing in the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/106248/http://ABI-1.pdf
Collins, J. E., Vanagh, Th., & Huys, I. (2020). Stakeholder perspectives on access and benefit-sharing for areas beyond national jurisdiction. Frontiers in Marine Science. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00265/full
EJIL. (2012). Symposium: Global Public Goods and the Plurality of Legal Orders, Issue Vol. 23 (2012) 3, 643–791.
FAO. (1983). International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources, Resolution 8/83 FAO Conference.
FAO. (2001). Adoption of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and Interim Arrangements for its Implementation, Resolution 3/2001 FAO Conference.
FAO. (2013). Report of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, IT/GB-5/13/Report.
FAO. (2017). Report of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, IT/GB-7/17/Report, Resolution 13/2017.
FAO. (2018a). Exploratory Fact-Finding Scoping Study on ‘Digital Sequence Information’ on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, by J.A. Heinemann, D.S. Cray and D.S. Thaler, Background Study paper No. 68.
FAO. (2018b). Report of the Fourth Session of the Team of Technical and Legal Experts on Access and Benefit-sharing, CGRFA/TTLE-ABS-4/18/Report.
FAO. (2019a). Report of the Governing Body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, IT/GB-8/19/Report, Resolution 4/2019.
FAO. (2019b). Report of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Appendix B, Elements to Facilitate Domestic Implementation of Access and Benefit-sharing for Different Subsectors of Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, with explanatory notes (ABS Elements), CGRFA-17/19/Report.
Karger, E., Plessis, P., & Meyer, H. (2019). Digital sequence information on genetic resources. Eschborn: ABS Initiative.
Kate, K., & Laid, S. A. (2000). The commercial use of biodiversity. Access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing. London: Earthscan.
Laird, S., Wynberg, R., Rourke, M., Humphries, F., Ruiz Muller, M., & Lawson, C. (2020). Rethink the expansion of access and benefit sharing. Science, 367(6483), 1200–1202.
Morgera, E. (2016). The need for an international legal concept of fair and equitable benefit sharing. European Journal of International Law, 27(2), 353–383.
Morgera, E. (2018). Fair and equitable benefit-sharing. In L. Krämer & E. Orlando (Eds.), Principles of environmental law (pp. 323–337). Cheltenham: Ewdard Elgar Publishing.
Morgera, E., Buck, M., & Tsiounami, E. (2010). The 2010 Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit-sharing in perspective: Implications for international law and implementation challenges. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Morgera, E., Tsiounami, E., & Buck, M. (2014). Unravelling the Nagoya Protocol: Commentary on the protocol on access and benefit-sharing to the CBD. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Pérez Salom, J. R. (2002). Recursos Genéticos, Biotecnología y Derecho Internacional. La distribución justa y equitativa de beneficios en el Convenio sobre Biodiversidad. Cizur Menor: Aranzadi/Thomson.
Salamanca Aguado, E. (2006). El régimen jurídico aplicable a la bioprospección de los recursos genéticos de los fondos marinos fuera de los límites de la jurisdicción nacional. Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, 52(2), 1072–1078.
Scovazzi, T. (2020). The rights to genetic resources beyond national jurisdiction: Challenges for the ongoing negotiations at the UN. In C. Barret (Ed.), The law of the seabed: Access, users and protection of seabed resources (pp. 213–237). Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff.
Sirakaya, A. (2019). Balanced options to access and benefit-sharing: Stakeholder insights on provider country legislation. Frontiers in Plant Science. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01175
Tvedt, M. W., & Jørem, A. E. (2013). Bioprospecting in the high seas: Regulatory options for benefit sharing. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 16(3–4), 150–167.
UNGA. (1962). Permanent sovereignty over natural resources, Resolution 1803 (XVII), of 14 December 1962, of General Assembly.
UNGA. (1970). Declaration of Principles Governing the Seabed and the Ocean Floor, and the Subsoil Thereof, beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction, Resolution 2749 (XXV), of 17 December 1970, of General Assembly.
UNGA. (1974a). Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order and Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order, Resolutions 3201 (S-VI) and 3202 (S-VI), of 1 May 1974, of General Assembly.
UNGA. (1974b). Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, Resolution 3281 (XXIX), of 12 December 1974, of General Assembly.
UNGA. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Resolution 217 (III) A, of 10 December 1948, of General Assembly.
UNGA. (1986). Declaration on the right to development, Resolution 41/128, of 4 December 1986, of General Assembly.
UNGA. (2004). Oceans and the law of the sea, Resolution 59/24, of 17 November 2004, of General Assembly.
UNGA. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Resolution 61/295, of 13 September 2007, of General Assembly.
UNGA. (2015a). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution 70/1, of 25 September 2015, of General Assembly.
UNGA. (2015b). Development of an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction, Resolution 69/292, of 19 June 2015, of General Assembly.
UNGA. (2017). International legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction, Resolution 72/249, of 24 December 2017, of General Assembly.
United Nations. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, A/42/427.
United Nations. (1992). Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, A/CONF.151/26/Rev.1 (Vol. I).
United Nations. (2002). Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, A/CONF.199/20.
United Nations. (2011). Letter dated 30 June 2011 from the Co-Chairs of the Ad Hoc Open-ended Informal Working Group to the President of the General Assembly, A/66/119.
United Nations. (2017). Report of the Preparatory Committee established by General Assembly resolution 69/292: Development of an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction, A/AC.287/2017/PC.4/2.
United Nations. (2019). Revised draft text of an agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction, A/CONF.232/2020/3.
United Nations. (2020). Textual proposals submitted by delegations by 20 February 2020, for consideration at the fourth session of the Intergovernmental conference on an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (the Conference), in response to the invitation by the President of the Conference in her Note of 18 November 2019. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.un.org/bbnj/sites/www.un.org.bbnj/files/textual_proposals_compilation_-_15_april_2020.pdf
Vázquez Gómez, E. (2019). La protección de la diversidad biológica marina más allá de la jurisdicción nacional. Hacia un nuevo acuerdo de aplicación de la Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Derecho del Mar. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales. 37. http://www.reei.org/index.php/revista/num37/articulos/proteccion-diversidad-biologica-marina-mas-alla-jurisdiccion-nacional-hacia-nuevo-acuerdo-aplicacion-convencion-naciones-unidas-sobre-derecho-mar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pons Rafols, X. (2021). Access to and Benefit-Sharing of Genetic Resources: Rationale, Review and Prospects. In: Campins Eritja, M., Fajardo del Castillo, T. (eds) Biological Diversity and International Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72961-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72961-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72960-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72961-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)