Skip to main content

A Quest for Justice: Recognition and Migrant Interactions with Child Welfare Services in Norway

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Migration, Recognition and Critical Theory

Part of the book series: Studies in Global Justice ((JUST,volume 21))

Abstract

Norwegian Child Welfare Services (NCWS) has faced intense criticism regarding their interactions with migrant families, with international human rights monitoring mechanisms expressing concern regarding ethnic discrimination over the past decade. Our aim is to contribute to the academic discussion around migrant interactions with NCWS through exploring the suitability and relevance of Nancy Fraser’s theory of social justice, with a particular focus on recognition. We utilize the narratives of two migrant parents and two child welfare practitioners supplemented by critiques from international human rights monitoring mechanisms to bridge the gap between the theoretical level, institutions, and daily practices. Three areas regarding the suitability of recognition in the case of NCWS are discussed: misrecognition as institutionalized subordination; equality, sameness, and difference in the Nordic welfare state; and the dynamic nature of culture. While we find recognition to be an essential element to be considered in the case of NCWS, we emphasize recognition must also be considered within Fraser’s larger understanding of social justice, alongside redistribution and representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Migrants from Latin America, Africa, Asia, and Turkey and Eastern European countries that are outside of the EU as well as refugees are overrepresented in voluntary assistance measures (Berg et al. 2017: 44).

  2. 2.

    Some groups that are underrepresented in voluntary assistance measures include migrants from Poland, Russia, and India (Berg et al. 2017: 44).

  3. 3.

    These narratives were collected by Kvalvaag in 2017 and 2018 as part of a larger project.

  4. 4.

    Pseudonyms.

  5. 5.

    See Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Norway (Report No. A/HRC/42/3); Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Norway (Report No. A/HRC/27/3); and Report of the Working Group on the Universal Period Review: Norway. Addendum (Report No. A/HRC/27/3/Add.1).

  6. 6.

    See Concluding Observations on the Combined Fifth and Sixth Periodic Reports of Norway (Report No. CRC/C/NOR/CO/5-6); Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 44 of the Convention (Report No. CRC/C/NOR/CO/4); and Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 44 of the Convention (Report No. CRC/C/NOR/5-6).

  7. 7.

    See Combined Twenty-Third and Twenty-Fourth Periodic Reports Submitted by Norway Under Article 9 of the Convention, Due in 2017 (Report No. CERD/C/NOR/23-24) and Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 9 of the Convention (Report No. CERD/C/NOR/CO/19-20).

  8. 8.

    See Concluding Observations on the Fifth Periodic Report of Norway (Report No. E/C.12/NOR/CO/5).

  9. 9.

    See Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant (Report No. CCPR/C/NOR/CO/6) and Concluding Observations on the Seventh Periodic Report of Norway (Report No. CCPR/C/NOR/CO/7).

  10. 10.

    Five of the ten County Social Welfare Boards began to offer this dialogue process 4 years ago (Andersen 2020).

  11. 11.

    If children are to be placed outside of the home against the wishes of the parent(s), a proposal must be brought before the County Social Welfare Board (Christiansen and Anderssen 2010).

  12. 12.

    For more on participation of the child in child welfare services, see Archard and Skivenes (2009a); Archard and Skivenes (2009b); Havnen et al. (2020); Kosher and Ben-Arieh (2020); Skivenes and Strandbu (2004, 2006); Steinrem et al. (2018); Strandbu and Vis (2008); van Bijleveld et al. (2015); Vis (2014); Vis et al. (2012); Vis and Thomas (2009).

  13. 13.

    This definition of participation is established in §3 of the 2014 Regulations on Participation and Child’s Advocate (Norwegian: Forskrift om medvirkning og tillitsperson).

  14. 14.

    See the Human Rights Act (Lov om styrking av. menneskerettighetenes stilling i norsk rett (Menneskerettsloven)), §2(4) and §3.

  15. 15.

    See the Norwegian Nationality Act (Lov om norsk statsborgerskap (statsborgerloven)), Chapter 3 §7(e).

References

  • Ahmed, Sara. 2014. Not in the Mood. New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics 82: 13–28. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.82.01.2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, Barbro. 2020. Ny løsning i barnevernssaker: – Slipper grufulle beskrivelser av familien. NRK Nordland, June 08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, Floya. 2001. The concept of ‘social division’ and theorizing social stratification: Looking at ethnicity and class. Sociology 35 (4): 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038501035004003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archard, David, and Marit Skivenes. 2009a. Balancing a child’s best interests and a child’s views. International Journal of Children’s Rights 17: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181808X358276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009b. Hearing the child. Child & Family Social Work 14 (4): 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00606.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendixsen, Synnøve, Mary Bente Bringslid, and Halvard Vike, eds. 2018. Egalitarianism in Scandinavia: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, Berit, Veronika Paulsen, Turid Midjo, Gry Mette D. Haugen, Marianne Garvik, and Jan Tøssebro. 2017. Myter og Realiteter: Innvandreres Møter Med Barnevernet. NTNU Samfunnsforskning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, Helena, Clary Corander, Christian Kroll, Anna Meeuwisse, Robeto Scaramuzzino, and Hans Swärd. 2011. A Nordic Model in Child Welfare? In Social Work and Child Welfare Politics Through Nordic Lenses, ed. Hannele Forsberg and Teppo Kröger, 29–45. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bø, Bente Puntervold. 2015. Social Work in a Multicultural Society: New Challenges and Needs for Competence. International Social Work 58 (4): 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872814550114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredal, Anja. 2009. Barnevernet og minoritetsjenters opprør: Mellom det generelle og det spesielle. In Over profesjonelle barrierer – Et minoritetsperspektiv på sosialt arbeid med barn og unge, ed. Ketil Eide, Nausahd A. Qureshi, Marianne Rugkåsa, and Halvard Vike. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, Øivin, and Norman Anderssen. 2010. From Concerned to Convinced: Reaching Decisions About Out-of-Home Care in Norwegian Child Welfare Services. Child & Family Social Work 15 (1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00635.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, Øivin, Karen J. Skaale Havnen, Anette C. Iversen, Marte Knag Fylkesnes, Camilla Lauritzen, Reidunn Håøy Nygård, Fredrikke Jarlby, and Svein Arild Vis. 2019. Når barnevernet undersøker. Delrapport 4. Tromsø: UiT, RKBU Nord.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyrhaug, Tone, and Vibeke Sky. 2015. Barn og unge med innvandrerbakgrunn i barnevernet 2012. Oslo-Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewick, Patricia, and Susan S. Silbey. 1995. Subversive Stories and Hegemonic tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative. Law and Society Review 29 (2): 197–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauske, Halvor, Bente Heggem Kojan, and Anita Skårstad Storhaug. 2018. Social Class and Child Welfare: Intertwining Issues of Redistribution and Recognition. Social Sciences 7 (9). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7090143.

  • Fitzsimmons, Kevin. 1997. Is There an Inherent Bias in the Tradition of Helping Professions That Can Negatively Impact Multicultural Clients? In Controversial Issues in Multiculturalism, ed. Diane De Anda, 135–157. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesø, Reidun, and Kate Mevik. 2011. In the Best Interest of the Child? Contradictions and Tensions in Social Work. In Social Work and Child Welfare Politics: Through Nordic Lenses, ed. Hannele Forsberg and Teppo Kröger, 97–111. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, Hannele, and Teppo Kröger. 2011. Introduction. In Social Work and Child Welfare Politics Through Nordic Lenses, ed. Hannele Forsberg and Teppo Kröger, 29–45. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 2000. Rethinking Recognition. New Left Review 3 (3): 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Recognition Without Ethics? Theory, Culture and Society 18 (2–3): 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Institutionalizing Democratic Justice: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation. In Pragmatism, Critique, Judgment: Essays for Richard J. Bernstein, ed. Seyla Benhabib and Nancy Fraser, 125–148. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Identity, Exclusion, and Critique: A Response to Four Critics. European Journal of Political Theory 6 (3): 305–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107077319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008a. Abnormal Justice. Critical Inquiry 34 (3): 393–422. https://doi.org/10.1086/589478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b. Scales of Justice: Reimaging Political Space in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Who Counts? Dilemmas of Justice in a Postwestphalian World. Antipode 41 (1): 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00726.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy, and Axel Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo. 2003. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fylkesnes, Marte Knag, Anette C. Iversen, Ragnhild Bjørknes, and Lennart Nygren. 2015. Frykten for barnevernet – En undersøkelse av etniske minoritetsforeldres oppfatninger. Tidsskriftet Norges Barevern 92: 80–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fylkesnes, Marte Knag, Anette Christine Iversen, and Lennart Nygren. 2018. Negotiating Deficiency: Exploring Ethnic Minority Parents’ Narratives About Encountering Child Welfare Services in Norway. Child & Family Social Work 23: 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullestad, Marianne. 2002a. Invisible Fences: Egalitarianism, Nationalism, and Racism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8 (1): 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b. Det norske sett med nye øyne. Kritisk analyse av norsk innvandringsdebatt. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havnen, Karen J. Skaale, Øivin Christiansen, Eirinn Hesvik Ljones, Camilla Lauritzen, Veronika Paulsen, Frederikke Jarlby, and Svein Arild Vis. 2020. Å medvirke når barnevernet undersøker: En studie av barn og foreldres medvirkning i barnevernets undersøkelsesarbeid. In Delrapport 5. Tromsø: UiT, RKBU Nord.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennum, Nicole. 2011. Controlling Children’s Lives: Covert Messages in Child Protection Service Reports. Child & Family Social Work 16 (3): 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00744.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ipsos. 2017. Tillit til barnevernet blant personer med innvandrerbakgrunn. Oslo: Ipsos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesen, Berit Overå, and Lily Appoh. 2016. ‘My Children Are Norwegian But I Am a Foreigner’: Experiences of African Immigrant Parents within Norwegian Welfare Society. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 6 (3): 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1515/njmr-2016-0017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskinen, Suvi, Unnur Dís Skaptadóttir, and Mari Toivanen, eds. 2019. Undoing Homogeneity in the Nordic region: Migration, Difference and the Politics of Solidarity. Milton Park/Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojan, Bente Heggem. 2011. Norwegian Child Welfare Services: A Successful Program for Protecting and Supporting Vulnerable Children and Parents? Australian Social Work 64 (4): 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2010.538069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korzeniewska, Lubomiła, Marta Bivand Erdal, Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka, and Magdalena Żadkowska. 2019. Trust Across Boarders: A Review of the Literature on Trust, Migration and Child Welfare Services. Gdańsk: PRIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosher, Hanita, and Asher Ben-Arieh. 2020. Children’s Participation: A New Role for Children in the Field of Child Maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104429.

  • Krommendijk, Jasper. 2015. The Domestic Effectiveness of International Human Rights Monitoring in Established Democracies. The Case of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies. The Review of International Organizations 10: 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9213-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, Malcolm, and Johan Karlsson Schaffer. 2015. The Nordic Human Rights Paradox: Moving Beyond Exceptionalism. University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2013-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeri, Christian. 2009. Recognition and Redistribution: Rethinking N. Fraser’s Dualistic Model. Critical Horizons 10 (3): 307–340. https://doi.org/10.1558/crit.v10i3.307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Gro Saltnes. 2007. Minoritetsperspektiver på norsk familievern. Klienters erfaringer fra møtet med familievernkontoret. Nova: Oslo.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maboloc, Christopher Ryan. 2019. What Is Structural Justice? Philosophia 47: 1185–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-0025-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezzanotti, Gabriela. 2018. Entre non-entrée e non-refoulement: Uma análise crítica do discurso norueguês em sua atual gestão migratória (Between non-entree and non-refoulement: A critical analysis of the Norwegian discourse in its current migration governance). In Migrantes forçados: conceitos e contextos, eds. Liliana Lyra Jubilut, Fernanda de Magalhães Dias Frinhani, and Rachel de Oliveira Lopes, 507–531. Boa Vista: Editora da UFRR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morondo Taramundi, Dolores. 2018. Minorities-Within-Minorities Frameworks, Intersectionality and Human Rights: Overlapping Concerns or Ships Passing in the Night? In Ethno-Cultural Diversity and Human Rights, ed. Gaetano Pentassuglia, 256–285. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004328785_010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • NOAS. 2019. Norway’s Asylum Freeze. https://www.noas.no/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Storskog-rapport-februar-2019.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2020.

  • OECD. 2019. OECD Economic Surveys Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Kevin, ed. 2008. Adding Insult to Injury: Nancy Fraser Debates Her Critics. Brooklyn: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osler, Audrey, and Lena Lybæk. 2014. Educating ‘The New Norwegian We’: An Examination of National and Cosmopolitan Education Policy Discourses in the Context of Extremism and Islamophobia. Oxford Review of Education 40 (5): 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.946896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Øverlien, Carolina. 2012. Vold i hjemmet – barns strategier. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, Deirdre. 1999. Fostering in a Minority Community – Travellers in Ireland. In Fostering kinship: An International Perspective on Kinship in Foster Care, ed. Roger Greeff, 167–180. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentassuglia, Gaetano. 2009. Minority Groups and Judicial Discourse in International Law: A Comparative Perspective, International Studies in Human Rights. Leiden: Brill | Nijohff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piña, Darlene L., and Laura Canty-Swapp. 1999. Melting Multiculturalism? Legacies of Assimilation Pressures in Human Service Organizations. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 26 (4): 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi, Naushad A. 2009. Kultursensitivitet i profesjonell yrkesutøvelse. In Over Profesjonelle Barrierer – Et minoritetsperspektiv på sosialt arbeid med barn og unge, ed. Ketil Eide, Nausahd A. Qureshi, Marianne Rugkåsa, and Halvard Vike. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi, Naushad A., and Halvor Fauske. 2010. Barnevernfaglig arbeid med minoritetsetniske familier. In Integrasjon og mangfold. Utfordringer for sosialarbeideren, ed. Mehmed S. Kaya, Asle Høgmo, and Halvor Fauske. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugkåsa, Marianne, Signe Ylvisaker, and Ketil Eide. 2017. Barnevern i et minoritetsperspektiv – Sosialt arbeid med barn og familier. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skivenes, Marit. 2014. How the Norwegian Child Welfare System Approaches Migrant Children. In Child Welfare Systems and Migrant Children: A Cross Country Study of Policies and Practice, ed. Marit Skivenes, Ravinder Barn, Katrin Kriz, and Tarja Pösö, 39–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skivenes, Marit, and Astrid Strandbu. 2004. Barn og Familieråd. En analyse av det organisatoriske rammeverket for barns medvirkning i barnevernet. Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning 7 (4): 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. A Child Perspective and Children’s Participation. Child, Youth and Environments 16 (2): 10–27. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.16.2.0010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staer, Trine, and Ragnhild Bjørknes. 2015. Ethnic Disproportionality in the Child Welfare System: A Norwegian National Cohort Study. Child and Youth Services Review 56: 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.06.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Norway. 2019a. Innvandrere og stortingsvalget 2017. https://www.ssb.no/valg/artikler-og-publikasjoner/innvandrere-og-stortingsvalget-2017. Accessed 17 Apr 2020.

  • ———. 2019b. Langt flere unge stemte i årets lokalvalg. https://www.ssb.no/valg/artikler-og-publikasjoner/langt-flere-unge-stemte-i-arets-lokalvalg. Accessed 17 Apr 2020.

  • Steinrem, Ida, Gunnar Toresen, Glorija Proff, and Alexander Proff, eds. 2018. Barnas barnevern: Trygt, nyttig og samarbeidende for barn. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strandbu, Astrid, and Svein Arild Vis. 2008. Barns deltakelse i barnevernssaker. Tromsø: Barnevernets Utviklingssenter i Nord-Norge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorud, Espen. 2019. Immigration and integration 2017–2018: Report for Norway to the OECD. Oslo: Norwegian Ministries.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Immigration and Integration 2018–2019: Report for Norway to the OECD. Oslo: Norwegian Ministries.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. 2017. Combined Twenty-Third and Twenty-Fourth Periodic Reports Submitted by Norway Under Article 9 of the Convention, Due in 2017. (Report No. CERD/C/NOR/23-24).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Concluding Observations on the Combined Twenty-Third and Twenty-Fourth Periodic Reports of Norway. (Report No. CERD/C/NOR/CO/23-24).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. 2010. Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 44 of the Convention. (Report No. CRC/C/NOR/CO/4).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Concluding Observations on the Combined Fifth and Sixth Periodic Reports of Norway. (Report No. CRC/C/NOR/CO/5-6).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Human Rights Council. 2019. Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Norway. (Report No. A/HRC/42/3).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1989. Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vagli, Åse. 2009. Behind Closed Doors: Exploring the Institutional Logic of Child Protection Work. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bijleveld, Ganna G., Christine W.M. Dedding, and Joske F.G. Bunders-Aelen. 2015. Children’s and Young People’s Participation Within Child Welfare and Child Protection Services: A State-of-the-Art Review. Child & Family Social Work 20 (2): 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vis, Svein Arild. 2014. Factors That Determine Children’s Participation in Child Welfare Decision Making: From Consultation to Collaboration. PhD dissertation, UiT The Arctic University of Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vis, Svein Arild, and Nigel Thomas. 2009. Beyond Talking – Children’s Participation in Norwegian Care and Protection Cases. European Journal of Social Work 12 (2): 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691450802567465.

  • Vis, Svein Arild, Amy Holtan, and Nigel Thomas. 2012. Obstacles for Child Participation in Care and Protection Cases – Why Norwegian Social Workers Find It Difficult. Child Abuse Review 21 (1): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1155.

  • Wahlbeck, Östen. 2016. True Finns and Non-True Finns: The Minority Rights Discourse of Populist Politics in Finland. Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (6): 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2016.1235020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, Ruth. 2008. ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion and Exclusion – Discrimination Via Discourse. In Identity, Belonging and Migration, ed. Gerard Delanty, Ruth Wodak, and Paul Jones, 54–77. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ylvisaker, Signe, Marianne Rugkåsa, and Ketil Eide. 2015. Silenced Stories of Social Work with Minority Ethnic Families in Norway. Critical and Radical Social Work 3 (2): 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986015X14331614908951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavirsek, Darja. 2001. Lost in Public Care: The Ethnic Rights of Ethnic Minority Children. In Beyond Racial Divides, ed. Lena Dominelli, Walter Lorenz, and Halur Soydan, 171–188. Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our deepest gratitude to the editor, the research group Human Rights and Diversities at the University of South-Eastern Norway, and fellow participants at the Workshop on Recognition, Migration, and Critical Theory at the Centre for Ethics and Poverty Research (CEPR), University of Salzburg, for their thoughtful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. The development of this chapter was enhanced through their critical engagement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alyssa Marie Kvalvaag .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kvalvaag, A.M., Mezzanotti, G. (2021). A Quest for Justice: Recognition and Migrant Interactions with Child Welfare Services in Norway. In: Schweiger, G. (eds) Migration, Recognition and Critical Theory. Studies in Global Justice, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72732-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics