Skip to main content

Everywhere from Copenhagen: Method, Storytelling, and Comparison in the Globalization of Public Space Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Professional Service Firms and Politics in a Global Era

Abstract

Focusing on Jan Gehl, a Danish architect, and Gehl Architects, the firm he co-founded, this chapter explores the role of research methods in the production of credibility in the work of “placemaking” urban policy consultants. Gehl’s clients include cities across the world. His firm advises on how to implement a model of public space design based on the notion of people-centeredness. We argue that Gehl’s story of himself as a careful, grounded methodologist who studies everyday life in public spaces in order to better design those spaces is a key narrative and product that the firm sells and an important force in its circulation among cities. Thus, our chapter contributes both to understandings of “placemaking” as a contemporary movement in urban planning and design and also to the ongoing development of policy mobilities studies by focusing on a private firm that influences public policies and spaces.

We would like to thank Chris Hurl and Anne Vogelpohl for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adscheid, T. and Schmitt, P. (2019) ‘Mobilising post-political environments: tracing the selective geographies of Swedish sustainable urban development’, Urban Research and Practice, https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1589564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., Cook, I.R., McCann, E., Temenos, C. and Ward, K. (2016) ‘Policies on the move: The transatlantic travels of tax increment financing’, Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106(2): 459–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodnar, J. (2015) ‘Reclaiming public space’, Urban Studies 52(12): 2090–2104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, R. and Coe, N.M. (2017) ‘Geographies of policy knowledge: The state and corporate dimensions of contemporary policy mobilities’, Cities 63: 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catungal, J.P. and McCann, E.J. (2010) ‘Governing sexuality and park space: Acts of regulation in Vancouver, BC’, Social and Cultural Geography 11(1): 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, I.C.C. (2017) ‘Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(8): 1719–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of Melbourne (2015) Places for people: Establishing a platform of evidence to share Melbourne’s future, October, https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/hdp.au.prod.app.com-participate.files/1114/4618/1290/Places_for_People_Strategy_pt1.pdf, accessed 30 September 2020.

  • Colville-Andersen, M. (2018) Copenhagenize: The definitive guide to global bicycle urbanism, Washington: Island Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forester, J. (1993) ‘Practice stories: The priority of practical judgment’, in F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, London: Duke University Press, pp. 186–210.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, I.D. and Ortiz, C. (2020) ‘Medellín in the headlines: The role of the media in the dissemination of urban models’, Cities 96: 102431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1990) ‘Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy’, Social Text 25/26: 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehl Architects (2019) Benefits of working with Gehl. Archived (June 2016–October 2019) on the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, https://web.archive.org/web/20191024054445/https://gehlpeople.com/work/services/, accessed 11 August 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-a) Our approach, https://gehlpeople.com/approach/, accessed 11 August 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-b) Change making, https://gehlpeople.com/services/process-facilitation/, accessed 10 August 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-c) 1965: Observing people in Italy, https://gehlpeople.com/story-article/observing-people-in-italy/, accessed 11 August 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-d) 1970: Architecture, psychology and urban planning, https://gehlpeople.com/story-article/architecture-psychology-and-urban-planning/, accessed 11 August 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-e) 1987: ‘Public Space Public Life’ survey in Oslo, https://gehlpeople.com/story-article/public-space-public-life-survey-in-oslo/, accessed 11 August 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-f) Services—Public life, https://gehlpeople.com/services/pilot-projects/, accessed 11 August 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-g) Services—Active engagement and process leadership, https://gehlpeople.com/services/process-facilitation/, accessed 11 August 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-h) 2013: How-to guide book, https://gehlpeople.com/story-article/how-to-guide-book/, accessed 11 August 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-i) The Melbourne miracle, https://gehlpeople.com/projects/melbourne-australia/, accessed 30 September 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-j) A metropolis for people, https://gehlpeople.com/story-article/a-metropolis-for-people/, accessed 30 September 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-k) A people focused national architecture policy, https://gehlpeople.com/story-article/a-people-focused-national-architecture-policy/, accessed 30 September 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-l) New York City ready for change, https://gehlpeople.com/story-article/new-york-city-ready-for-change/, accessed 30 September 2020.

  • Gehl Architects (n.d.-m) Unrolling a welcome mat for the people of New York, https://gehlpeople.com/projects/new-york-usa/, accessed 30 September 2020.

  • Gehl Architects and NYC DOT (2008) World class streets: Remaking New York City’s public realm, https://issuu.com/gehlarchitects/docs/issuu_561_new_york_world_class_stre, accessed 30 September 2020.

  • Gehl, J. (2010) Cities for People, Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (2011) Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space, Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J., & Svarre, B. (2013) How to Study Public Life, Washington: Island press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, C. (2012) ‘Building bridges across city’s Islands’, Toronto Star, 6 July, http://proxy.lib.sfu.ca/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/docview/1023748463?accountid=13800, accessed 30 September 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen, A., Leino, H., Bäcklund, P. and Laine, M. (2018) ‘Strategic planning harnessing urban policy mobilities: The gradual development of local sustainability fix’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 20(5): 551–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kielgast, L.V. (n.d.) Public space public life —Q&A with Louise Vogel Kielgast, https://gehlpeople.com/announcement/public-space-public-life-qa-with-louise-vogel-kielgast/, accessed 11 August 2020.

  • Larner, W. (2002) ‘Globalization, governmentality and expertise: Creating a call centre labour force’, Review of International Political Economy 9(4): 650–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W. and Laurie, N. (2010) ‘Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water’, Geoforum 41(2): 218–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W. and Le Heron, R. (2002) ‘The spaces and subjects of a globalising economy: A situated exploration of method’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20(6): 753–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2005). For Space, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2004) ‘‘Best places’: Interurban competition, quality of life and popular media discourse’, Urban Studies 41(10): 1909–1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2008) ‘Livable city/unequal city: The politics of policy-making in a «creative» boomtown’, Revue Interventions économiques (37), https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.489.

  • McCann, E. (2011) ‘Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101(1): 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2013) ‘Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city’, Urban Geography 34(1): 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2020) ‘Spaces of publicness and the world after the coronavirus crisis’, Society and Space Magazine, https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/spaces-of-publicness, accessed 28 September 2020.

  • Mitchell, D. (1995) ‘The end of public space? People’s Park, definitions of the public, and democracy’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85(1): 108–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2017) ‘People’s Park again: On the end and ends of public space’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(3): 503–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero, S. (2019) ‘Enacting persuasion: Storytelling, emotional artefacts and face-to-face encounters as key actions behind policy circulation’, in T. Baker and C. Walker (eds). Public Policy Circulation, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2007) ‘Artistic activism and agonistic spaces’, Art and Research 1(2): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicka, M. (2020) ‘Fantasy of conviviality: Banalities of multicultural settings and what we do (not) notice when we look at them’, in O. Hemer et al. (eds). Conviviality at the Crossroads, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, J.R. (2013) ‘How is space public? Implications for spatial policy and democracy’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31(4): 682–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2005) ‘Struggling with the creative class’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29(4): 740–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Project for Public Spaces. (2007) What is placemaking? https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-placemaking, accessed 10 August 2020.

  • Rapoport, E. and Hult, A. (2017) ‘The travelling business of sustainable urbanism: International consultants as norm-setters’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(8): 1779–1796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock, L. (2003) ‘Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice’, Planning Theory and Practice 4(1): 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1979) ‘Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy’, Metaphor and Thought 2: 137–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, O., Paasche, T. and Klauser, F. (2014) ‘Smart cities as corporate storytelling’, City 18(3): 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2004) ‘Transfer agents and global networks in the “transnationalization” of policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 11(3): 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2009) ‘The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33(3): 601–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temenos, C., Baker, T. and Cook, I.R. (2019) ‘Inside mobile urbanism: Cities and policy mobilities’, in T. Schwanen and R. van Kempen (eds). Handbook of Urban Geography, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 103–118.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Temenos, C. and McCann, E. (2014) ‘Policies’, in P. Adey et al. (eds). The Routledge Handbook of Mobilities, London: Routledge, pp. 595–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzi, C. and Tonnelat, S. (2017) ‘The publicization of public space’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(3): 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throgmorton, J. A. (2003) ‘Planning as persuasive storytelling in a global-scale web of relationships’, Planning Theory 2(2): 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. (2008) ‘Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter’, Progress in Human Geography 32(3): 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hulst, M. (2012) ‘Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning’, Planning Theory 11(3): 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogelpohl, A. (2019) ‘Global expertise, local convincing power: Management consultants and preserving the entrepreneurial city’, Urban Studies 56(1): 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2020a) ‘Coronavirus is not fuel for urbanist fantasies’, Curbed, 20 May, https://www.curbed.com/2020/5/20/21263319/coronavirus-future-city-urban-covid-19, accessed 8 October 2020.

  • Walker, A. (2020b) ‘Urbanism hasn’t worked for everyone’, Curbed, 16 June, https://www.curbed.com/2020/7/16/21315678/city-racism-urbanism-atlanta-beltline, accessed 8 October 2020.

  • Ward, K. (2018) ‘Policy mobilities, politics and place: The making of financial urban futures’, European Urban and Regional Studies 25(3): 266–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. (2009) ‘Saskatoon has potential: Gehl’, Saskatoon Leader Post, 1 September, http://proxy.lib.sfu.ca/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/docview/350144154?accountid=13800, accessed 30 September 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.H. (1980) The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, New York: Conservation Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasin, A. (2020) ‘Whose streets? Black streets’, The Tyee, 18 June, https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2020/06/18/Whose-Streets-Black-Streets, accessed 8 October 2020.

  • Young, I.M. (1986) ‘The ideal of community and the politics of difference’, Social Theory and Practice 12(1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene McCann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McCann, E., Mahieus, L. (2021). Everywhere from Copenhagen: Method, Storytelling, and Comparison in the Globalization of Public Space Design. In: Hurl, C., Vogelpohl, A. (eds) Professional Service Firms and Politics in a Global Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72128-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics