Abstract
As a vast majority of bladder cancers (over 90% in Western countries) are urothelial carcinoma in histology, non-urothelial carcinomas, such as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma, often present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. SCC can occur in both non-bilharzial- and bilharzial-related bladders; the two subtypes differ in epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinicopathological features. In addition, SCC of the bladder can present as several histological variants including verrucous, basaloid, and sarcomatoid SCCs. Primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder is also an uncommon neoplasm, histologically subdivided into enteric, mucinous, not otherwise specified, and mixed types. These primary adenocarcinomas frequently become a source of diagnostic confusion with adenocarcinomas secondarily involving the bladder from the adjacent organs, such as the colon, prostate, and female genital tract. Urachal adenocarcinoma is usually discussed together with bladder adenocarcinoma, because they share many clinical and histological features. The 2016 World Health Organization classification delineates urachal glandular tumors into two broad categories: mucinous cystic tumors and non-cystic adenocarcinomas. Clear cell carcinoma (tumor of the Müllerian type) primarily arising from the urinary bladder, a distinct form of non-urothelial carcinoma, is also discussed in this chapter.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Urinary bladder
- Urachus
- Squamous cell carcinoma
- Bilharzial infection
- Verrucous carcinoma
- Adenocarcinoma
- Urachal adenocarcinoma
- Clear cell carcinoma
- Immunohistochemistry
- Molecular genetic analysis
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Introduction
The 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification defines urinary bladder squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) as a carcinoma derived from the urothelium with a histologically pure squamous cell phenotype [1]. Therefore, if elements of an invasive or noninvasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) are present, the tumor should be classified as urothelial carcinoma with squamous differentiation. Although there are several potential etiologic factors, such as prolonged catheterization and smoking, which lead to the development of urinary bladder SCC, the most significant factor is chronic bilharzial infection. In Western countries where bilharzial infection is not endemic, pure SCC is an uncommon variant of urinary bladder cancer. In contrast, urinary bladder SCC is the most prevalent histological type of bladder cancer in the Middle Eastern and African countries, where its pathogenesis is linked to an endemic, chronic bilharzial infection. A comparison between non-bilharzial and bilharzial SCC is summarized in Table 7.1.
Epidemiology
Primary SCC in non-bilharzial urinary bladder is uncommon. In Western countries, pure SCC of the bladder represents 2.1–6.7% of all bladder malignancies [2,3,4,5]. The tumors are most often diagnosed in the seventh decade [2, 3, 5]. The male-to-female ratio for non-bilharzial SCC is slightly lower than that reported for UC and varies from 1.3:1 to 1.8:1 [2,3,4].
The incidence of bilharzial bladder SCC is highest in Egypt, yet other countries, including Iraq, parts of Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Sudan, also share a high incidence of this cancer type. In an earlier case series reported by Ghoneim et al., SCC accounts for 608 (59%) of 1026 cystectomy specimens collected in Egypt over a 21-year span [6]. However, a more recent report from Egypt has indicated that UC is currently more common than SCC, which corresponds to a decrease in bilharziasis incidence [7]. The male-to-female ratio is 5:1, and patients with bilharzial SCC are on an average 10–20 years younger than those diagnosed with non-bilharzial SCC, which is most likely related to an increased occupational bilharzial exposure in men who work in the fields infested with these parasites [8, 9].
Etiology
In the United States, SCC of the bladder often occurs in patients with a spinal cord injury who are subjected to prolonged placement of indwelling catheters [10]. In these patients, diagnosis of non-bilharzial SCC is linked to bladder inflammation caused by chronic urinary tract irritation from bacterial infections, foreign bodies, bladder calculi, or chronic bladder outlet obstructions. These recent studies reveal that the declining bladder cancer incidence may be associated with a change in catheterization procedures from chronic indwelling catheters to clean intermittent catheterization [11]. In addition to catheterization-associated bladder SCC, there are several other potential causes that give rise to this cancer. There has been one case report of an SCC of the bladder diagnosed consequently to intravesical immunotherapy with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in a patient with preexisting squamous dysplasia [12].
Bilharzial SCC carcinogenesis is most likely related to the secondary bacterial infections that accompany bilharzial infestation, rather than the parasite itself. This chronic bacterial infection has two distinct sequelae: (1) nitrates and secondary amines in the urine are reduced to carcinogenic nitrosamines through bacterial catalysis, and (2) bacterial infection is implicated in the secretion of the β-glucuronidase enzyme, which may split conjugated carcinogens to yield free carcinogenic products [13, 14]. These carcinogens then act upon the mucosal epithelial cells of the bladder, resulting in irreversible and potentially carcinogenic changes in the DNA. Additionally, mechanical irritation and inflammation of the bladder caused by the parasite’s eggs also appears to be an important tumor-promoting factor [7]. Finally, other contributing factors include liver dysfunction, vitamin A and B deficiency, smoking, chronic irritation due to urinary calculi, and exposure to pesticides [7, 14].
Clinical Features
Principal clinical features of non-bilharzial urinary bladder SCC are similar to those of UC. Hematuria is the most common symptom, seen in 63–100% of patients, and irritative bladder symptoms are seen in two-thirds of these patients. Weight loss, back or pelvic pain, and obstructive symptoms are often suggestive of advanced disease, seen in one-third of patients [2, 3]. At diagnosis, most patients have no previous history of urologic tumors. Finally, the tumor may occupy a diverticulum, and its relationship with bladder calculi has been well described [2, 3].
The clinical presentations of bilharzial SCC are similar to those of chronic cystitis: frequent and painful micturition, hematuria, suprapubic pain, and pyuria [8, 15]. Consequently, symptoms of regular bilharzial cystitis and early SCC significantly overlap, leading to a delay in cancer diagnosis. Therefore, almost all patients with SCC have at least some degree of muscle-invasive disease, and 25–30% of the patients are clinically inoperable at the time of diagnosis [8, 15].
Pathological Features
In terms of gross findings, non-bilharzial SCCs of the bladder are not much different from UC and tend to be ulcerated, infiltrating, and unifocal at the time of diagnosis (Fig. 7.1a), while 60–80% of the bilharzial SCC cases appear as nodular fungating tumors [8, 16]. In a study of 114 patients with non-bilharzial SCC, a predilection for the trigone and lateral wall has been recorded, occurring in 56 and 99 patients (including those with multiple tumors), respectively [3]. The tumor usually arises from the upper part of the urinary bladder at the posterior/lateral wall or vault. In contrast to the non-bilharzial SCC, trigonal tumors are rare. The cut surface usually demonstrates a firm, white tumor that spans the entire wall of the bladder, lamina propria, muscularis propria, and perivesical fat, and sometimes extends to adjacent organs (Fig. 7.1b).
Regardless of the existence of bilharzia, the histological hallmarks of bladder SCCs are polygonal tumors cells with individual keratinization or group keratinization (keratin-pearl formation), intercellular bridges, and keratotic cellular debris. Well-differentiated SCCs show tumor nests with marked squamous differentiation (Fig. 7.2a). In moderately differentiated SCCs, nests are more irregular in outline, and keratotic foci are smaller (Fig. 7.2b). Poorly differentiated SCCs consist of even smaller infiltrative nests, cords, trabeculae, or isolated anaplastic cells (Fig. 7.2c). Tumor necrosis is frequently seen and appears to inversely correlate with tumor differentiation. Keratinization of cells at the stromal interface is a sign of invasion. Most non-bilharzial SCCs are moderately to poorly differentiated, and well-differentiated SCCs comprise less than 10% of all cases [17]. In contrast to non-bilharzial SCC, almost half of the bilharzial SCCs are well-differentiated and show abundant keratinization with keratin pearl formation. Of the remaining tumors, 30–40% and 10–20% are moderately and poorly differentiated, respectively [8, 15, 16]. As shown in Fig. 7.2d, almost all of the bilharzial SCC specimens show histological evidence of bilharzial infection [8]. Active bilharzial granulomas are observed in 10% of the cases, although mature worms of Schistosoma species are rarely seen inside veins.
Both bilharzial and non-bilharzial SCCs are usually diagnosed at a muscle-invasive stage [18, 19]. Compared to pathological staging, clinical understaging has been reported in 30–60% of the cases [8, 19,20,21]. Importantly, in spite of the advanced T stages, the incidence of lymph node metastasis is relatively lower, in the order of 15–25% [8, 15,16,17, 19]. In addition, when compared to UC, SCC has a lower incidence of distant metastasis which is estimated to be present in 8–10% of all cases [1, 22].
Molecular and Genetic Aspects
The molecular data for SCC of the bladder has been compiled based mostly on the bilharziasis-associated cohort analysis. Several cytogenetic and classic molecular studies have showed gains of chromosomal material predominantly at 5p, 6p, 7p, 8q, 11q, 17q, and 20q, while losses are most frequent at 3p, 4q, 5q, 8p, 13q, 17p, and 18q [23,24,25]. Classic cytogenetics and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) have been performed in only a few non-bilharzial SCC cases [26, 27]. Results of a single CGH study of 11 non-bilharzial SCCs show that the predominant chromosomal changes are gains at 1q, 8q, and 20q, as well as losses of 3p, 9p, and 13q [26]. With respect to the differences between SCC and UC, loss of 3p has been demonstrated as a relatively specific genetic aberration for SCC [26, 27].
In a recent mutational analysis for TERT gene, TERT promoter mutation, which is the most common genetic alteration in UC of the urinary tract, is detected in 12/15 (80%) of non-bilharzial SCCs [28]. As with UC, p53 immunopositivity and gene mutation have been observed in a wide range of bilharzial SCCs [29,30,31]. Specifically, TP53 mutations in bilharzial SCC include more base transitions at CpG dinucleotides than those seen in UCs [30]. Other molecular aberrations known to occur in UCs, including HRAS mutations, EGFR overexpression, and HER2 expression, have also been detected in bilharzial SCC at comparable frequencies [31,32,33].
Treatment and Prognosis
Irrespective of the bilharzial status, there are few treatment options available for patients diagnosed with bladder SCC. In most cases, radical cystoprostatectomy or radical cystectomy is recommended as the only viable therapeutic approach, as radiation and chemotherapy offer limited therapeutic benefits [34, 35]. Consequently, the 5-year disease-free survival rate following a radical cystectomy is 43–57%, with poor prognosis attributed to an advanced tumor stage and lymph node involvement at diagnosis [18, 19, 35]. Most bladder SCC patients die due to failure of locoregional tumor control: about 90% of the bladder SCC deaths are caused by a locoregional recurrence within 3 years of diagnosis. As shown by a recent study, the pathologic stage is the most important prognostic parameter for patients diagnosed with the bilharzial SCC of the bladder: in a series of 154 bilharzial SCC cases, the overall 5-year survival rate for patients with pT1 and pT2 tumors was 66.9%, compared to only 19% in those diagnosed with pT3 and pT4 tumors [36].
Histological Variants of Bladder SCC
Verrucous Carcinoma
Verrucous carcinoma is a rare, clinically indolent variant of invasive SCC, more commonly seen in the oral cavity, larynx, anus, and genital areas. Grossly, verrucous carcinoma appears as an exophytic, fungating, or filiform tumor. Microscopically, this tumor is characterized by a broad-pushing tongue-like stromal invasion by large-sized proliferations of very well-differentiated squamous epithelium, frequently associated with a dense infiltration of inflammatory cells at the interface between the atypical squamous proliferation and the underlying stroma [1]. Additionally, verrucous carcinoma tumor cells show lack of anaplastic features and frequent mitoses.
Pathologically, care should be taken to distinguish verrucous carcinomas from verrucous/pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia. Verrucous carcinomas exhibit a downgrowth of the well-differentiated squamous epithelium, which extends to a much wider and deeper extent than that encountered in verrucous/pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia. Therefore, in a superficial biopsy, the differentiation of these two conditions is almost impossible, mandating sampling of deeper tissue for a definitive distinction.
Basaloid SCC
Basaloid SCC is an aggressive and often deeply invasive neoplasm found mainly in the upper aerodigestive tract, penis, vulva, and cervix. The typical microscopic picture comprises of centrally necrotic, solid nests of small, poorly differentiated cells with scant cytoplasm resembling basal cell carcinoma, except that peripheral palisading is not conspicuous and numerous mitoses are often present. Only two cases of basaloid SCC of the bladder have been described [37, 38]. Specifically, Vakar-López et al. described a case of a 60-year-old woman with a bladder tumor that was morphologically characterized by small nests of basaloid cells with numerous mitoses [37]. However, the reported case also had microscopic foci of UC with squamous differentiation and SCC in situ. Neves et al. presented a case of the bladder basaloid SCC with a small amount (5%) of small cell carcinoma component [38]. The authors did not mention whether a concomitant UC component was detected. As seen in penile basaloid SCC, there is one case report suggesting the relationship between bladder basaloid SCC and human papilloma virus infection of the urinary tract [39].
Sarcomatoid SCC
Sarcomatoid SCC is an aggressive variant of SCC predominantly composed of spindle and pleomorphic cells, with at least focal histological or immunohistochemical evidence of squamous differentiation (Fig. 7.3). In a case series of 45 bladder SCCs, 3 tumors showed a prominent focal spindled morphology [18]. However, the percentage of a sarcomatous component in comparison to the total tumor volume was not mentioned in the study. There has been a total of two reported cases of sarcomatoid carcinoma of the urinary bladder with SCC and small cell carcinoma components [40, 41].
Adenocarcinoma and Other Glandular Neoplasms
Introduction
Primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder is derived from the urothelium but represents a pure glandular phenotype. Secondary adenocarcinomas involving the bladder either by direct invasion or by metastasis are more common than primary adenocarcinomas, and sometimes it may be challenging to distinguish each other, even with a comprehensive immunohistochemical study. Most urachal carcinomas are adenocarcinomas. Urachal adenocarcinoma is usually described together with bladder adenocarcinoma as they exhibit similar clinical and histological features. However, a classification system recently proposed delineates urachal glandular tumors into two broad categories: mucinous cystic tumors and non-cystic adenocarcinomas. The clinicopathological features and molecular aspects of these distinct glandular lesions are discussed in this chapter.
Primary Adenocarcinoma
Primary adenocarcinoma is an uncommon malignant neoplasm, accounting 0.5 to 2.0% of all bladder cancers. This neoplasm is usually seen in the patients’ sixth decade of life with a male-to-female ratio of 2.7:1 [42]. Hematuria is the most common symptom, but some patients may present with irritative voiding symptoms and rarely mucusuria [43]. Although the pathogenesis is still unclear, several risk factors for primary bladder adenocarcinoma have been recognized, including bladder exstrophy, bilharziasis, cystocele, and bladder endometriosis [42].
There is no specific gross finding of primary bladder adenocarcinoma, except for a gelatinous appearance on cut surface in some cases. Primary adenocarcinoma can arise anywhere in the urinary bladder but most commonly involves the base (i.e., trigone and posterior wall). Histologically, bladder adenocarcinoma exhibits several different patterns, including enteric, mucinous, not otherwise specified (NOS), and mixed. The enteric type is similar to its gastrointestinal counterpart and is composed of pseudostratified nuclei and tall columnar cytoplasm (Fig. 7.4a). The mucinous type shows nests of infiltrating tumor cells floating in abundant extracellular mucin (Fig. 7.4b). In some cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet ring cells with a large intracellular mucin vacuole that displace the nucleus to the periphery (Fig. 7.4c). Importantly, as carcinomas predominantly composed of signet ring cells without stromal mucin deposition have been reported to have a worse prognosis than do other histological types of adenocarcinoma [44], these are currently classified as plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma [42]. Tumors with a mixture of the enteric and mucinous components are the most common histology of adenocarcinoma [42]. Other cases have nonspecific glandular growth; these are classified as the adenocarcinoma NOS type (Fig. 7.4d). There is no consensus on the grading system for bladder adenocarcinoma. Because immunohistochemistry is usually performed for the differential diagnosis between primary and secondary bladder adenocarcinoma, immunophenotype of the primary adenocarcinoma is integrally discussed in a section of secondary adenocarcinoma.
The molecular and genetic data on primary bladder adenocarcinoma are still limited. In a recent study using targeted next-generation sequencing for 15 primary adenocarcinomas, 11 exhibit at least one genomic alteration in TP53, KRAS, PIK3CA, CTNNB1, APC, TERT, FBXW7, IDH2, and RB1; however, all 3 adenocarcinomas with mucinous features show the distinct lack of genomic alterations across 51 cancer-related genes examined [45]. TERT mutation has also been reported in up to one-third of primary bladder adenocarcinoma [46].
Patients with bladder-invasive adenocarcinoma usually require radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary diversion. In some cases, partial cystectomy can be a treatment option, but a relatively high recurrence rate of the tumor after partial resection has been indicated [47]. Transurethral resection and intravesical BCG/mitomycin C therapy is generally ineffective for bladder adenocarcinoma. If the patient is not a candidate for surgery, radiation and chemotherapy may be considered. The prognosis for primary adenocarcinoma is generally poor, as most patients have advanced disease at diagnosis. The 5-year survival rate has been reported in the range of 40–50% [47, 48].
Secondary Adenocarcinoma
Secondary bladder involvement by adenocarcinoma of adjacent organs through direct extension or metastasis via a lymphovascular route is more common than primary bladder adenocarcinoma. The common primary organs to be considered include the colon, prostate, female genital tract, and breast.
Colorectal adenocarcinoma is the most frequent secondary tumor involving the bladder wall. It is generally difficult to differentiate primary bladder adenocarcinoma from secondary colorectal adenocarcinoma based on morphological features, especially on small biopsy specimens, as they share similar histological features. Immunohistochemistry has limited utility but is often used to help the differential diagnosis. Colorectal adenocarcinomas usually show nuclear and cytoplasmic/membranous staining for β-catenin, while primary bladder adenocarcinomas are negative or show only cytoplasmic/membranous staining [49]. Most bladder adenocarcinomas are immunoreactive for thrombomodulin and cytokeratin (CK) 7, whereas colorectal carcinomas are negative for thrombomodulin and CK7 [50]. CK20, CDX2, villin, and cadherin-17 are not useful, as they are commonly expressed in both colorectal and bladder adenocarcinomas [49]. Importantly, clinical history and colonoscopic findings are essential to identify the correct origin in most cases.
Prostatic adenocarcinoma also commonly invades the bladder, particularly the bladder neck and trigone regions. Because most prostatic adenocarcinomas are acinar type and demonstrate small atypical glands composed of relatively uniform malignant cuboidal cells, it is not difficult to distinguish them from bladder adenocarcinoma. However, a small subset of prostatic adenocarcinomas is ductal type with large tubulopapillary or cribriform gland with focal necrosis, resembling the enteric-type bladder adenocarcinoma. Although immunohistochemical study is extremely valuable in the differential diagnosis, a part of poorly differentiated or previously treated prostatic adenocarcinoma may not be immunoreactive for PSA and PSAP [51]. In this situation, the use of a panel together with additional prostate-specific markers including prostein and NKX3.1 is recommended [51].
Endometrial adenocarcinoma, especially endometrioid carcinoma, shows atypical glandular structures with occasional mucinous and squamous differentiations and may spread to the urinary bladder at advanced stages. Lobular-type breast carcinoma which seems to be more common involves the bladder than ductal type, although both types can involve the bladder. It may be challenging to distinguish these adenocarcinomas with bladder adenocarcinoma on a morphological analysis alone; however, immunohistochemical staining coupled with clinical history generally leads to the correct diagnosis [52]. Endometrioid carcinoma and breast adenocarcinoma are positive for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, whereas bladder adenocarcinomas are negative for these markers.
Urachal Adenocarcinoma
The urachus is a vestigial fibrous structure that connects the urinary bladder to the allantois during early embryogenesis. While the lumen of the urachus begins to be gradually obliterated during fetal development, incomplete obliteration can cause a tubular or cystic structure in the dome and elsewhere along the midline of the bladder in approximately one-third of adults at autopsy [53]. The urachal remnant is usually lined by urothelium; however, a vast majority of the urachal tumors are adenocarcinomas (occasionally UC or SCC). Urachal adenocarcinoma is less common than primary bladder adenocarcinoma, accounting less than 1% of all bladder carcinomas but approximately 10% of primary adenocarcinomas involving the bladder [43]. Most cases occur in the fifth or sixth decade of life, with the mean patient age of 51 years, about 10 years younger than that for bladder adenocarcinoma [43]. A male-to-female ratio of patients is 2:1 to 3:1. Patients may present with hematuria, pain, irritative symptoms, mucusuria, and umbilical discharge.
The clinicopathological criteria for diagnosis of urachal adenocarcinoma includes (1) location of the tumor in the bladder dome and/or anterior wall, (2) epicenter of carcinoma in the bladder wall, (3) absence of mucosal surface changes such as cystitis cystica and/or cystitis glandularis beyond the dome or anterior wall, and (4) absence of a known primary elsewhere [54]. The presence of a related urachal remnant supports the diagnosis, but its absence does not exclude this possibility. The cut surfaces of tumors are typically firm, whitish gray masses but occasionally are discrete, cystic, or cavitary tumors (Fig. 7.5).
A classification system, proposed by Amin et al. [55] and adopted by the 2016 WHO classification, delineates urachal glandular tumors into two broad categories, mucinous cystic tumors and non-cystic adenocarcinomas (Table 7.2). Non-cystic adenocarcinomas (accounting for 83% of cases) are more common than cystic tumors (17% of cases) [54, 55]. Non-cystic urachal adenocarcinomas exhibit a similar histology to primary bladder adenocarcinomas: enteric (Fig. 7.5), mucinous (with or without signet ring cells), and NOS types. On the other hand, mucinous cystic tumors demonstrate a morphological homology with mucinous tumors of the ovary: mucinous cystadenoma, mucinous cystadenoma of low malignant potential (MCTLMP) (with or without intraepithelial carcinoma), and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma with either microscopic or frank invasion [55]. Mucinous cystadenoma is a cystic tumor lined by a single layer of mucinous columnar cells with minimal cytological atypia and structural complexity. MCTLMP constitutes more than 50% of the mucinous cystic tumors and shows areas of epithelial proliferation, including formation of papillae and low-grade cytological atypia, resembling those of mucinous borderline tumor of the ovary (Fig. 7.6a, b and c). In a small subset of tumors, foci of intraepithelial carcinoma characterized by severe atypia, abundant mitoses, and complex architecture may be observed (Fig. 7.6d). For mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, Amin et al. defines lesions showing stromal invasion <2 mm and comprising <5% of the tumor as mucinous cystadenocarcinomas with microinvasion and lesions with more extensive invasion as those with frank invasion [55], although the interobserver reproducibility and clinical significance of this distinction have not been evaluated. Importantly, as the spectrum of atypia or only a small focus of invasive carcinoma may be present in individual cystic lesions (Fig. 7.6), rigorous sampling is necessary particularly when any degree of atypia is detected [56]. Immunohistochemical finding of non-cystic adenocarcinomas is essentially identical to that of mucinous cystic tumors; both types of tumors demonstrate variable (about 50%) CK7 and diffuse CK20 and CDX2 immunoreactivity [54, 55, 57]. There has been no helpful marker to distinguish between primary bladder adenocarcinoma and urachal adenocarcinoma. As with primary bladder adenocarcinoma, the lack of only focal positivity of nuclear β-catenin is potentially valuable in differentiating urachal adenocarcinoma from secondary bladder involvement of colorectal adenocarcinoma [57].
Recent studies using next-generation sequencing for urachal glandular tumors have revealed the molecular characteristics and genetic underpinnings of these rare neoplasms. Primary urachal adenocarcinomas harbor the spectrum of molecular alterations which are similar to those of primary bladder adenocarcinoma and colorectal adenocarcinoma, including KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, APC, TP53, NF1, and/or SMAD4 mutations [58,59,60]. However, they generally lack TERT promoter and PIK3CA mutations, which are common in urothelial carcinoma [59, 61]. Of note, these sequencing studies to date have not subclassified urachal tumors according to the 2016 WHO classification; the molecular differences between urachal mucinous cystic tumors and non-cystic adenocarcinomas remain unclear.
The 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival rates for patients with urachal adenocarcinoma are 40–64% and 31–49%, respectively [43, 62]. Importantly, progression-free survival of noninvasive mucinous cystic tumors is significantly better than that of non-cystic adenocarcinoma [55]. The Sheldon system is the most widely used staging system for urachal neoplasms and divides tumors as follows: confined to the urachal mucosa (pT1); extending into the urachal muscular layer (pT2); locally extending into the urinary bladder, abdominal wall, or other adjacent organs (pT3); and metastatic tumors (pT4) [63]. A variety of other similar staging systems, including Mayo and Ontario systems, have also suggested that clinically localized tumors have a good overall prognosis, whereas locally advanced and/or metastatic tumors have a poor overall prognosis [64, 65]. The current interest in staging for urachal carcinoma is a simplified dichotomous approach to divide tumors: (1) tumors confined to the urachus, bladder, and perivesical tissue and (2) tumors which spread to the peritoneum and other organs [66].
Clear Cell Carcinoma (Tumor of the Müllerian Type)
Clear cell carcinoma is a rare bladder carcinoma arising from preexisting Müllerian-type epithelium, typically endometriosis. Unlike other bladder glandular tumors, clear cell carcinoma occurs more frequently in females, and the mean age of patients is 57 years (ranging from 22 to 83 years) [67]. Patients usually present with hematuria, urinary frequency, or dysuria. Grossly, the tumor typically forms an exophytic and papillary mass. Histology of bladder clear cell carcinoma is similar to that of female genital tract, which is characterized by tubulocystic, papillary, and diffuse solid patterns of cuboidal or columnar tumor cells with clear and eosinophilic cytoplasm (Fig. 7.7). Hobnail cells are frequently observed. The nuclei are large with finely granular chromatin and prominent nucleoli (Fig. 7.7). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are usually positive for CK7, PAX8, AMACR, and CA-125, napsin A, and variably CK20, S100 protein, and PAX2 [67,68,69,70]. Nephrogenic adenoma, which also exhibits the proliferation of cuboidal or hobnail clear cells, should be differentiated from clear cell carcinoma [71]. Nephrogenic adenoma lacks prominent cytoarchitectural atypia and solid growth areas and more frequently affects males [71, 72]. Other differential diagnoses include metastatic clear cell carcinoma from the female genital tract and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Overall, clinicoradiological correlations with careful immunohistochemical study are helpful for the correct diagnosis.
References
Shen SS, Al-Ahmadie H, Mahfouz SM. Squamous cell neoplasms. Tumours of the urinary system. In: Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2016. p. 108–10.
Johnson DE, Schoenwald MB, Ayala AG, Miller LS. Squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 1976;115:542–4.
Rundle JS, Hart AJ, McGeorge A, Smith JS, Malcolm AJ, Smith PM. Squamous cell carcinoma of bladder. A review of 114 patients. Br J Urol. 1982;54:522–6.
Shokeir AA. Squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder: pathology, diagnosis and treatment. BJU Int. 2004;93:216–20.
Gschwend JE, Dahm P, Fair WR. Disease specific survival as endpoint of outcome for bladder cancer patients following radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2002;41:440–8.
Ghoneim MA, el-Mekresh MM, el-Baz MA, el-Attar IA, Ashamallah A. Radical cystectomy for carcinoma of the bladder: critical evaluation of the results in 1,026 cases. J Urol. 1997;158:393–9.
Salem HK, Mahfouz S. Changing patterns (age, incidence, and pathologic types) of schistosoma-associated bladder cancer in Egypt in the past decade. Urology. 2012;79:379–83.
El-Bolkainy MN, Ghoneim MA, Mansour MA. Carcinoma of the bilharzial bladder in Egypt: clinical and pathological features. Br J Urol. 1972;44:561–9.
El-Sebai I, Sherif M, El-Bolkainy MN, Mansour MA, Ghoneim MA. Verrucous squamous carcinoma of bladder. Urology. 1974;4:407–10.
Bejany DE, Lockhart JL, Rhamy RK. Malignant vesical tumors following spinal cord injury. J Urol. 1987;138:1390–2.
Pannek J. Transitional cell carcinoma in patients with spinal cord injury: a high-risk malignancy? Urology. 2002;59:240–4.
Brenner DW, Yore LM, Schellhammer PF. Squamous cell carcinoma of bladder after successful intravesical therapy with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Urology. 1989;34:93–5.
El-Aaser AA, El-Merzabani MM, Higgy NA, Kader MM. A study on the aetiological factors of bilharzial bladder cancer in Egypt. 3. Urinary beta-glucuronidase. Eur J Cancer. 1979;15:573–83.
Khales HM. Bladder cancer and bilharziasis today. Cancer J. 1993;6:65–71.
El-Said A, Omar S, Ibrahim S, Tawfik H, Eissa S, Ali S, et al. Bilharzial bladder cancer in Egypt, a review of 420 cases of radical cystectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1979;9:117–22.
Khafagy MM, El-Bolkainy MN, Mansour MA. Carcinoma of the bilharzial urinary bladder. A study of the associated mucosal lesions in 86 cases. Cancer. 1972;30:150–9.
Serretta V, Pomara G, Piazza F, Gange E. Pure squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder in western countries. Report on 19 consecutive cases. Eur Urol. 2000;37:85–9.
Lagwinski N, Thomas A, Stephenson AJ, Campbell S, Hoschar AP, El-Gabry E, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder: a clinicopathologic analysis of 45 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1777–87.
Khalaf I, Shokeir A, Shalaby M. Urologic complications of genitourinary schistosomiasis. World J Urol. 2012;30:31–8.
Richie JP, Waisman J, Skinner DG, Dretler SP. Squamous carcinoma of the bladder: treatment by radical cystectomy. J Urol. 1976;115:670–2.
Ghomneim MA, Mansour MA, El-Bolkainy MN. Staging of carcinoma of bilharzial bladder. Urology. 1974;3:40–2.
Wishnow KI, Dmochowski R. Pelvic recurrence after radical cystectomy without preoperative radiation. J Urol. 1988;140:42–3.
Aly MS, Khaled HM. Chromosomal aberrations in early stage bilharzial bladder cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2002;132:41–5.
Fadl-Elmula I, Kytola S, Leithy ME, Abdel-Hameed M, Mandahl N, Elagib A, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in benign and malignant bilharzia-associated bladder lesions analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. BMC Cancer. 2002;2:5.
Gonzalez-Zulueta M. Tumor suppressor gene alterations in squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1383–93.
El-Rifai W, Kamel D, Larramendy ML, Shoman S, Gad Y, Baithun S, et al. DNA copy number changes in Schistosoma-associated and non-Schistosoma-associated bladder cancer. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:871–8.
Molitor M, Junker K, Eltze E, Toma M, Denzinger S, Siegert S, et al. Comparison of structural genetics of non-Schistosoma-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:8143–58.
Cowan M, Springer S, Nguyen D, Taheri D, Guner G, Rodriguez MA, et al. High prevalence of TERT promoter mutations in primary squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:511–5.
Ramchurren N, Cooper K, Summerhayes IC. Molecular events underlying schistosomiasis-related bladder cancer. Int J Cancer. 1995;62:237–44.
Warren W, Biggs PJ, el-Baz M, Ghoneim MA, Stratton MR, Venitt S. Mutations in the p53 gene in schistosomal bladder cancer: a study of 92 tumours from Egyptian patients and a comparison between mutational spectra from schistosomal and non-schistosomal urothelial tumours. Carcinogenesis. 1995;16:1181–9.
Abdulamir AS, Hafidh RR, Kadhim HS, Abubakar F. Tumor markers of bladder cancer: the schistosomal bladder tumors versus non-schistosomal bladder tumors. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:27.
Bue P, Wester K, Sjöström A, Holmberg A, Nilsson S, Carlsson J, et al. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in urinary bladder cancer metastases. Int J Cancer. 1998;76:189–93.
Berner A, Jacobsen AB, Fosså SD, Nesland JM. Expression of c-erbB-2 protein, neuron-specific enolase and DNA flow cytometry in locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Histopathology. 1993;22:327–33.
Swanson DA, Liles A, Zagars GK. Preoperative irradiation and radical cystectomy for stages T2 and T3 squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 1990;143:37–40.
Ghoneim MA, Ashamallah AK, Awaad HK, Whitmore WF Jr. Randomized trial of cystectomy with or without preoperative radiotherapy for carcinoma of the bilharzial bladder. J Urol. 1985;134:266–8.
Elsobky E, El-Baz M, Gomha M, Abol-Enein H, Shaaban AA. Prognostic value of angiogenesis in schistosoma-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Urology. 2002;60:69–77.
Vakar-López F, Abrams J. Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma occurring in the urinary bladder. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:455–9.
Neves TR, Soares MJ, Monteiro PG, Lima MS, Monteiro HG. Basaloid squamous cell carcinoma in the urinary bladder with small-cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:440–2.
Ginori A, Barone A, Santopietro R, Barbanti G, Cecconi F, Tripodi SA. Human papillomavirus-related basaloid squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder associated with genital tract human papillomavirus infection. Int J Urol. 2015;22:222–5.
Ishida M, Iwai M, Yoshida K, Kagotani A, Okabe H. Sarcomatoid carcinoma with small cell carcinoma component of the urinary bladder: a case report with review of the literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6:1671–6.
Abrahams NA, Moran C, Reyes AO, Siefker-Radtke A, Ayala AG. Small cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary clinicopathological study of 51 cases. Histopathology. 2005;46:57–63.
Grignon DJ, Cheville J, Ro JY, Tamboli P. Glandular neoplasms. Tumours of the urinary system. In: Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2016. p. 111–2.
Grignon DJ, Ro JY, Ayala AG, Johnson DE, Ordóñez NG. Primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder. A clinicopathologic analysis of 72 cases. Cancer. 1991;67:2165–72.
Grignon DJ, Ro JY, Ayala AG, Johnson DE. Primary signet-ring cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991;95:13–20.
Roy S, Pradhan D, Ernst WL, Mercurio S, Najjar Y, Parikh R, et al. Next-generation sequencing-based molecular characterization of primary urinary bladder adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:1133–43.
Cowan ML, Springer S, Nguyen D, Taheri D, Guner G, Mendoza Rodriguez MA, et al. Detection of TERT promoter mutations in primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder. Hum Pathol. 2016;53:8–13.
Zaghloul MS, Nouh A, Nazmy M, Ramzy S, Zaghloul AS, Sedira MA, et al. Long-term results of primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder: a report on 192 patients. Urol Oncol. 2006;24:13–20.
el-Mekresh MM, el-Baz MA, Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. Primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder: a report of 185 cases. Br J Urol. 1998;82:206–12.
Rao Q, Williamson SR, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Huang W, Eble JN, et al. Distinguishing primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder from secondary involvement by colorectal adenocarcinoma: extended immunohistochemical profiles emphasizing novel markers. Mod Pathol. 2013;26:725–32.
Dadhania V, Czerniak B, Guo CC. Adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2015;3:51–63.
Epstein JI, Egevad L, Humphrey PA, Montironi R, Members of the ISUP Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostic Urologic Pathology Group. Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in the prostate: report from the International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus conference. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:e6–e19.
Morichetti D, Mazzucchelli R, Lopez-Beltran A, Cheng L, Scarpelli M, Kirkali Z, et al. Secondary neoplasms of the urinary system and male genital organs. BJU Int. 2009;104:770–6.
Schubert GE, Pavkovic MB, Bethke-Bedürftig BA. Tubular urachal remnants in adult bladders. J Urol. 1982;127:40–2.
Gopalan A, Sharp DS, Fine SW, Tickoo SK, Herr HW, Reuter VE, et al. Urachal carcinoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 24 cases with outcome correlation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:659–68.
Amin MB, Smith SC, Eble JN, Rao P, Choi WW, Tamboli P, et al. Glandular neoplasms of the urachus: a report of 55 cases emphasizing mucinous cystic tumors with proposed classification. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:1033–45.
Paner GP, Lopez-Beltran A, Sirohi D, Amin MB. Updates in the pathologic diagnosis and classification of epithelial neoplasms of urachal origin. Adv Anat Pathol. 2016;23:71–83.
Paner GP, McKenney JK, Barkan GA, Yao JL, Frankel WL, Sebo TJ, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis in a morphologic spectrum of urachal epithelial neoplasms: diagnostic implications and pitfalls. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:787–98.
Módos O, Reis H, Niedworok C, Rübben H, Szendröi A, Szász MA, et al. Mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, EGFR, and PIK3CA genes in urachal carcinoma: occurrence and prognostic significance. Oncotarget. 2016;7:39293–301.
Lee S, Lee J, Sim SH, Lee Y, Moon KC, Lee C, et al. Comprehensive somatic genome alterations of urachal carcinoma. J Med Genet. 2017;54:572–8.
Singh H, Liu Y, Xiao X, Lin L, Kim J, Van Hummelen P, et al. Whole exome sequencing of urachal adenocarcinoma reveals recurrent NF1 mutations. Oncotarget. 2016;7:29211–5.
Thiem S, Herold T, Krafft U, Bremmer F, Tolkach Y, Szász AM, et al. Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations are rare in urachal cancer. Pathol Int. 2017;67:597–601.
Wright JL, Porter MP, Li CI, Lange PH, Lin DW. Differences in survival among patients with urachal and nonurachal adenocarcinomas of the bladder. Cancer. 2006;107:721–8.
Sheldon CA, Clayman RV, Gonzalez R, Williams RD, Fraley EE. Malignant urachal lesions. J Urol. 1984;131:1–8.
Molina JR, Quevedo JF, Furth AF, Richardson RL, Zincke H, Burch PA. Predictors of survival from urachal cancer: a Mayo Clinic study of 49 cases. Cancer. 2007;110:2434–40.
Pinthus JH, Haddad R, Trachtenberg J, Holowaty E, Bowler J, Herzenberg AM, et al. Population based survival data on urachal tumors. J Urol. 2006;175:2042–7.
Herr HW, Bochner BH, Sharp D, Dalbagni G, Reuter VE. Urachal carcinoma: contemporary surgical outcomes. J Urol. 2007;178:74–8.
Oliva E, Amin MB, Jimenez R, Young RH. Clear cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a report and comparison of four tumors of Mullerian origin and nine of probable urothelial origin with discussion of histogenesis and diagnostic problems. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:190–7.
Gilcrease MZ, Delgado R, Vuitch F, Albores-Saavedra J. Clear cell adenocarcinoma and nephrogenic adenoma of the urethra and urinary bladder: a histopathologic and immunohistochemical comparison. Hum Pathol. 1998;29:1451–6.
Tong GX, Weeden EM, Hamele-Bena D, Huan Y, Unger P, Memeo L, et al. Expression of PAX8 in nephrogenic adenoma and clear cell adenocarcinoma of the lower urinary tract: evidence of related histogenesis? Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:1380–7.
Jassim SH, Khiyami A, Nguyen JK, Ganesan S, Tomashefski J Jr, Sawady J. Concordant clear cell “mesonephric” carcinoma of the bladder and lung adenocarcinoma with clear cell features – multiple primaries versus metastatic neoplasms: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2017;11:133.
Oliva E, Young RH. Nephrogenic adenoma of the urinary tract: a review of the microscopic appearance of 80 cases with emphasis on unusual features. Mod Pathol. 1995;8:722–30.
Young RH. Tumor-like lesions of the urinary bladder. Mod Pathol. 2009;22:S37–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miyai, K., Abu-Farsakh, H., Ro, J.Y. (2021). Other Types of Carcinoma. In: Zhou, H., Guo, C.C., Ro, J.Y. (eds) Urinary Bladder Pathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71509-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71509-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71508-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71509-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)