Abstract
Forgiveness is a serious and significant issue in both the secular and religious worlds. It remains one of the most critical social aspects which most world religions have found legitimate spaces in their theological arenas to attend to. In spite of the socio-centric nature of forgiveness in practice, scholars seem to have paid only diminutive attention to it beyond being an aspect of religion. As a result, there has been very insignificant theorising into it as a concept, theory or practice. Most scholars who interrogate forgiveness mostly do so from the point of view of religion and theology until a renewed attention was drawn to it in recent time by scholars such as Arendt, Derrida and Kasper who even considers it criminally neglected. Though this discussion is motivated particularly by three disciplines: philosophy, theology and psychology towards interrogating the existing dominant theory of forgiveness; it nevertheless problematised the concept of forgiveness mainly from philosophical and theological perspectives. It is argued that true and sincere apology is not just saying ‘sorry’ but entails following some prerequisites including contrite, confession, remorse, and responsibility. Employing the illustrative example of the incident of the ‘Reitz Four’ the paper explored the theoretical blend of hermeneutics, phenomenology, and logic towards interrogating previous conceptions of forgiveness and suggesting an alternative theoretical approach.
‘The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.’ (Mahatma Gandhi)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The International Conference on Black Theology was held at University of South Africa (UNISA) on the 11th–13th August 2015.
- 2.
The term ‘catharsis’ is used in both its philosophical and psychological sense. It may be useful to briefly indicate what these are.
- 3.
The International Conference on Black Theology was held at Unisa on the 11th–13th August 2015.
References
Accattoli, L. (2005). When the Pope asks for forgiveness: The mea culpa of John Paul II. New York: Daughters of St. Paul.
Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. 2nd edition ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, J. (2000). On forgiveness. Studies in Practical Philosophy, 2(2), 81–102.
Derrida, J. (2001). On forgiveness. In On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness (pp. 27–58). New York: Routledge.
Derrida, J. (2002). Negotiations. Stanford: University Press.
Estes, C. P. (2003). Women who ran with the wolf: Myths and stories of the wild woman archetype. New York: Ballantine.
Gallagher, J. (1985). The basis for Christian ethics. New York: Paulist Press.
Garcia, E. (2011). Bishop Butler on forgiveness and resentment. Philosopher’s Imprint, 11(10), 1–19.
Griswold, C. L. (2012). In D. Konstan (Ed.), Ancient forgiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jansen, J. (2009). Why we’re withdrawing charges against the Reitz Four. www.politicsweb.co.za/news-and-analysis/why-we’re-withdrawing-charges-against0reitz-four-j (accessed 15 April 2010).
Kasper, W. (2016). Mercy: The essence of Gospel and the key to Christian life. Ibadan: St. Paul Publications.
Kolnai, A. (1973). Forgiveness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 74, 91–106.
Konstan, D. (2010). Before forgiveness: The origin of moral idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krog, A. (2008). ‘This thing called reconciliation…’ forgiveness as part of an interconnectedness-towards-wholeness. South African Journal of Philosophy, 27(14), 353–366.
Meek, C. R. (2001). The science of forgiveness. The Center for Christian Ethics at Baylon University, 89–94.
Moran, K. A. For community’s sake: A (self-respecting) Kantian account of forgiveness. In Proceedings of the XI International Kant-Kongress, Held in Pisa, Italy, 22–26 May 2010.
Murphy, J. (2011). Punishment and the moral emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Novitz, D. (1998). Forgiveness and self-respect. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 8(2), 299–315.
Oelofsen, R. (2013). Afro-communitarianism and the nature of reconciliation, Unpublished thesis submitted for doctoral degree at Rhodes University.
Richards, N. (1988). Forgiveness. Ethics, 99(1), 77–97.
Ricoeur, P. (2004). In K. Blamey & D. Pellauer (Eds.), Memory, history, forgetting, transl. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Roberts, R. (1995). Forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 32(4), 289–306.
The Holy Bible. (1966). Revised standard version – Catholic edition. London: The Catholic Truth Society Publishers.
Thomason, K. K. (2015). Forgiveness or fairness? Philosophical Papers, 14(2), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.20151056962.
Tutu, M. D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York: Random House.
Zaibert, L. (2009). The paradox of forgiveness. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 6, 365–393.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koenane, M.L.J., Olatunji, CM.P. (2022). The Struggle to Forgive: Some Philosophical and Theological Reflections. In: Chimakonam, J.O., Etieyibo, E., Odimegwu, I. (eds) Essays on Contemporary Issues in African Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70436-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70436-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70435-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70436-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)