Abstract
The engineering profession is often defined by the phrase ‘engineers are problem solvers.’ This is so common that it has become a normative ontology for engineers. We dispute the view that engineers are normatively problem solvers. We do agree that much of what engineers do can be considered problem solving but it is an insufficient characterization of the profession. Stated quite simply, if engineers solved problems, they would go away but clearly the areas engineering addresses continue to be issues long after they are ‘solved.’ Instead, engineers should focus on the management of challenges because as complex social systems evolve, the technological response must evolve, as well.
In this chapter we propose a shift from problem solving to managing problems through appropriate responses. A taxonomy of response types is presented. This taxonomy is then connected to the nature of the issue of sustainability. Finally, this leads to a new view of interdisciplinary pedagogy that can be the basis for future engineering curricula.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A reviewer commented that our use of the word ‘ontology’ of engineering can at times be interchanged with ‘definition’ of engineering.
References
ABET. (2017). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2017–2018. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2017-2018/
Allenby, B. R., & Sarewitz, D. R. (2011). The techno-human condition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bloomberg, M., & Pope, C. (2017). Climate of hope: How cities, businesses, and citizens can save the planet (1st ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Downey, G., & Lucena, J. (2005). Teaching for global competency: The engineer as problem definer. Paper presented at the CASEE Annual Colliquium, Indinapolis, IN.
Goodell, J. (2010). How to cool the planet: Geoengineering and the audacious quest to fix Earth’s climate. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin Hardcourt.
Hess, J. L., Brownell, S. A., & Dale, A. T. (2014). The Wicked Problems in Sustainable Engineering (WPSE) initiative: Pilot results of a cross-institutional project-based course offering. Paper presented at the 121st ASEE annual conference & exposition, Indianopolis, IN.
Jonassen, D. H., Cheng, P. C.-H., & Salas, E. (2007). Research agenda for the future: What we need to learn about complex, scientific problem solving. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Learning to solve complex scientific problems (pp. 341–361). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Koen, B. V. (1985). Definition of the engineering method. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Loch, C. H., Sengupta, K., & Ahmad, M. G. (2013). The microevolution of routines: How problem solving and social preferences interact. Organization Science, 24(1), 99–115.
Maher, M. L., Poon, J., & Boulanger, S. (1996). Formalising design exploration as co-evolution: A combined gene approach. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Advances in formal design methods for CAD (pp. 3–30). Dordrecht: Springer.
Michelfelder, D. P., et al. (2013). Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
NASA. (2018). NASA study: First direct proof of ozone hole recovery due to chemicals ban. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2018/nasa-study-first-direct-proof-of-ozone-hole-recovery-due-to-chemicals-ban
Oandasan, I., & Reeves, S. (2005a). Key elements for interprofessional education. Part 1: The learner, the educator and the learning context. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(S1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820500083550.
Oandasan, I., & Reeves, S. (2005b). Key elements of interprofessional education. Part 2: Factors, processes and outcomes. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(S1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820500081703.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, Perseus.
Siller, T., & Johnson, G. (2018). Just technology: The quest for cultural, economic, environmental, and technical sustainability. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.
Siller, T., Johnson, G., & Korte, R. (2016a). Is there a role for interprofessional education (IPE) in the future of engineering education for sustainable engineering? Paper presented at the Engineering Education for Sustainable Development, Bruges, Belgium.
Siller, T. J., Johnson, G. R., & Troxell, W. O. (2016b). What do sustaining life and sustainable engineering have in common? In W. L. Filho & S. Nesbit (Eds.), New developments in engineering education for sustainable development (pp. 273–282). Cham: Springer.
Siller, T., Johnson, G., & Korte, R. (2018). Engineering as problem solving: A need for a different approach. Paper presented at the fPET 2018.
Simon, H. A. (2001). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
UNESCO. (2000). Millennium Development Goals. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
UNESCO. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
United Nations. (2015a). Millennium Development Goals: 2015 progress chart. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%202015%20PC%20final.pdf
United Nations. (2015b). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siller, T., Johnson, G., Korte, R. (2021). Broadening Engineering Identity: Moving beyond Problem Solving. In: Pirtle, Z., Tomblin, D., Madhavan, G. (eds) Engineering and Philosophy. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70099-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70099-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70098-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70099-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)