Skip to main content

Non-contact Technologies and Digital Approaches to (Latent) Fingermark Aging Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technologies for Fingermark Age Estimations: A Step Forward
  • 341 Accesses

Abstract

Significant developments in the field of noncontact, noninvasive surface capturing techniques have unlocked new and exciting possibilities for studying the degradation behavior of latent fingermarks. These novel technologies enable the iterative capture of specimens and thus the design and digital processing of image-based degradation time series. This chapter provides an overview of such noninvasive devices and explains the potential of three of these options: two different high-end surface measurement devices and off-the-shelf flatbed scanners. Going through the four main phases of fingermark capture, preprocessing, feature extraction, and age estimation, the benefits of these digital approaches are highlighted. They include the introduction of novel aging features based on the statistical distribution of image pixels as well as the digital computation of known aging features, such as ridge or pore size. The computation of quantitative age estimation measures provides first approximations of the quality of such approaches. As a result, fingermarks can be referred to as being fresher or older than a selected time threshold with a certain accuracy. In addition, dust deposition is shown to constitute a surprisingly promising aging feature. Although the studies presented herein can, in their current form, not be considered as being practically usable for casework or court, they highlight the potential of the noninvasive capture and digital processing for fingermark age estimations. They furthermore outline possibilities of future inquiry into this topic, by pointing out a freely available data collection as well as showing the general feasibility of off-the-shelf flatbed scanners as economical and widely available alternatives to expensive high-end capturing devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kappa is a classification metric commonly used in the field of machine learning, which removes the influence of chance on the metric. A kappa value of zero represents pure guessing, whereas a kappa value of one represents error-free classification. More information about the kappa measure can be found in [48].

Abbreviations

CWL:

Chromatic white light

FBS:

Flatbed scanner

CLSM:

Confocal laser scanning microscope

UVS:

Ultraviolet spectroscopy

UV:

Ultraviolet

VIS:

Visible light

UVC:

Ultraviolet camera

CCD:

Charge-coupled device

IR:

Infrared

FTIR:

Fourier transform infrared

IRC:

Infrared camera

MPLSM :

Multiphoton laser scanning microscope

SERS:

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

IFM:

Interferometry

AFM:

Atomic force microscopy

SLI:

Structured light illumination

EFM:

Electric field microscopy

GM:

Gloss measurement

DA:

Data acquisition

PP:

Preprocessing

FE:

Feature extraction

AE:

Age estimation

tt:

Time threshold

References

  1. Merkel R (2014) New solutions for an old challenge: chances and limitations of optical, non-invasive acquisition and digital processing techniques for the age estimation of latent fingerprints. Logos, Berlin. Also available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:ma9:1-4875. Last accessed 24 Aug 2019

  2. Kiltz S, Hildebrandt M, Dittmann J, Vielhauer C (2012) Challenges in contact-less latent fingerprint processing in crime scenes: review of sensors and image processing investigations. In: 20th European signal processing conference, Bucharest, Romania

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schott M, Merkel R, Dittmann J (2012) Sequence detection of overlapping latent fingerprints using a short-term aging feature. In: International workshop on information forensics and security, Tenerife, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  4. Qian K, Schott M, Zheng W, Dittmann J (2014) Context-based approach of separating contactless captured high-resolution overlapped latent fingerprints. IET Biometrics 3(2):101–112

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stojanović B, Nešković A, Marques O (2017) A novel neural network based approach to latent overlapped fingerprints separation. Multimed Tools Appl 76(10):12775–12799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Merkel R, Pocs M, Dittmann J, Vielhauer C (2012) Proposal of non-invasive fingerprint age determination to improve data privacy management in police work from a legal perspective using the example of Germany. In: 7th international workshop on data privacy management, Pisa, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hildebrandt M, Merkel R, Leich M, Kiltz S, Dittmann J, Vielhauer C (2011) Benchmarking contact-less surface measurement devices for fingerprint acquisition in forensic investigations: results for a differential scan approach with a chromatic white light sensors. In: 17th IEEE international conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP), Corfu, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hildebrandt M, Makrushin A, Qian K, Dittmann J (2013) Visibility assessment of latent fingerprints on challenging substrates in spectroscopic scans. In: IFIP CMS 2013, LNCS 8099, Magdeburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  9. Egli N, Moret S, Bécue A, Champod C (2013) Fingermarks and other impressions – a review (August 2010 – June 2013). In: 17th interpol forensic science symposium, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cadd S, Islam M, Manson P, Bleay S (2015) Fingerprint composition and aging: a literature review. Sci Justice 55(4):219–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bumbrah G, Sharma R, Jasuja O (2016) Emerging latent fingerprint technologies: a review. Res Report Forensic Med Sci 6:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O'Hagan A, Green S (2018) Crime scene to court: a study on finger-mark aging. Forensic Res Criminol Int J 6(6):491–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorakumbura B (2017) Fundamental studies into the chemical and physical properties of latent fingermarks. Dissertation, Curtin University

    Google Scholar 

  14. Merkel R, Gruhn S, Dittmann J, Vielhauer C, Braeutigam A (2012) On non-invasive 2D and 3D chromatic white light image sensors for age determination of latent fingerprints. Forensic Sci Int 222(1):52–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. FRT GmbH (2019) Fries research & technology (FRT) [Online]. Available: www.frt-gmbh.com/en/, www.frt-gmbh.com/en/microprof-200.aspx. Accessed 25 July 2019

  16. Merkel R (2015) Latent fingerprint aging from a hyperspectral perspective: first qualitative degradation studies using UV/VIS spectroscopy. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on IT security incident management and IT forensics (IMF2015), Magdeburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richards A, Partner OP (2010) Reflected ultraviolet imaging for forensics applications [Online]. Available http://www.uvcorder.com/pdf/Reflected_UV_Imaging_for_Forensics_V2.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2014

  18. Lin SS, Yemelyanov KM, Pugh Jr EN, Engheta N (2006) Polarization- and specular-reflection-based, non-contact latent fingerprint imaging and lifting. J Opt Soc Am A 23(9):2137–2153

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuivalainen K, Oksman A, Peiponen K (2010) Definition and measurement of statistical gloss parameters from curved objects. Appl Opt 49(27):5081–5086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leich M, Kiltz S, Dittmann J, Vielhauer C (2011) Non-destructive forensic latent fingerprint acquisition with chromatic white light sensors. In: Proceedings of SPIE 7880, media watermarking, security, and forensics III, 78800S, San Francisco, USA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keyence Corporation (2019) Keyence color 3D laser scanning microscope[Online]. Available: www.keyence.com, www.keyence.com/products/microscope/laser-microscope/vk-x100_x200/models/vk-x110/index.jsp. Accessed 25 July 2019

  22. Merkel R, Dittmann J, Vielhauer C (2017) A first public research collection of high-resolution latent fingerprint time series for short-and long-term print age estimation. IEEE Trans Information Foren Secur 12(10):2276–2291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Merkel R, Vielhauer C (2012) On using flat bed scanners for the age determination of latent fingerprints: first results for the binary pixel feature. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM workshop on multimedia and security (MM&Sec), Coventry, UK

    Google Scholar 

  24. Merkel R, Dittmann J, Vielhauer C (2016) Resource-efficient latent fingerprint age estimation for Adhoc crime scene forensics: quality assessment of flat bed scans and statistical features. In: The sixth international conference on image processing theory, tools and applications, Oulu, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  25. Seiko Epson Corporation (2019) Epson perfection 1660 Photo [Online]. Available: https://www.epson.de/en/products/scanners/consumer-scanners/epson-perfection-1660-photo. Accessed 25 July 2019

  26. Canon (2016) Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II [Online]. Available http://www.canon.com. Accessed 2016

  27. Crane NC, Bartick EG, Schwartz Perlman R, Huffman S (2007) Infrared spectroscopic imaging for noninvasive detection of latent fingerprints. J Foren Sci 52(1):48–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Antoine KM, Mortazavi S, Miller AD, Miller LM (2010) Chemical differences are observed in children’s versus adults’ latent fingerprints as a function of time. J Foren Sci 55(2):513–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams DK, Brown CJ, Bruker J (2011) Characterization of children’s latent fingerprint residues by infrared microspectroscopy: forensic implications. Forensic Sci Int 206(1–3):161–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin AC, Hsieh HM, Tsai LC, Linacre A, Lee JCI (2007) Forensic applications of infrared imaging for the detection and recording of latent evidence. J Forensic Sci 52(5):1148–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barcikowski S, Bunte J, Ostendorf A, Aehnlich J, Herrmann R (2004) Contribution to the age determination of fingerprint constituents using laser fluorescence spectroscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy. In Proceedings of SPIE 5621, Optical Materials in Defence Systems Technology, London

    Google Scholar 

  32. Saitoh N, Akiba N (2005) Ultraviolet fluorescence spectra of fingerprints. Sci World J 5:355–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dam A, Schwarz J, Vos J, Siebes M, Sijen T, Leeuwen G, Aalders C, Lambrechts S (2014) Oxidation monitoring by fluorescence spectroscopy reveals the age of fingermarks. Angew Chem Int Ed 53(24):6272–6275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Akiba N, Kuroki K, Kurosawa K, Tsuchiya K (2018) Visualization of aged fingerprints with an ultraviolet laser. J Forensic Sci 63(2):556–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Connaster RM, Prokes SM, Glembocki OJ, Schuler RL, Gardner CW, Lewis SA, Lewis LA (2010) Toward surface-enhanced Raman imaging of latent fingerprints. J Foren Sci 55(6):1462–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Andersson P, Lejon C, Mikaelsson T, Landström L (2017) Towards fingermark dating: a Raman spectroscopy proof-of-concept study. ChemistryOpen 6(6):706–709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Dubey SK, Mehta DS, Anand A, Shakher C (2008) Simultaneous topography and tomography of latent fingerprints using full-field swept-source optical coherence tomography. J Opt A Pure Appl Opt 10(1):015307–0153015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. De Alcaraz-Fossoul J, Mancenido M, Soignard E, Silverman N (2019) Application of 3D imaging technology to latent fingermark aging studies. J Forensic Sci 64(2):570–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Watson P, Prance RJ, Beardsmore-Rust ST, Prance H (2011) Imaging electrostatic fingerprints with implications for a forensic timeline. Forensic Sci Int 209(1):41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Srihari SN (2010) Computing the scene of a crime. IEEE Spectr 47(12):38–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hildebrandt M, Kiltz S, Grossmann I, Vielhauer C (2011) Convergence of digital and traditional forensic disciplines: a first exemplary study for digital dactyloscopy. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM workshop on multimedia and security (MM&Sec), New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  42. Merkel R, Braeutigam A, Kraetzer C, Dittmann J, Vielhauer C (2011) Evaluation of binary pixel aging curves of latent fingerprint traces for different surfaces using a chromatic white light (CWL) sensor. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM workshop on multimedia and security (MM&Sec), New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  43. Popa G, Potorac R, Preda N (2010) Method for fingerprints age determination. Roman J Legal Med 18(2):149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Baniuk K (1990) Determination of age of fingerprints. Forensic Sci Int 46(1):133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Barros R, Faria B, Kuckelhaus S (2013) Morphometry of lantent palmprints as a function of time. Sci Justice 53:402–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. De Alcaraz-Fossoul J, Mestres Patris C, Balaciart Muntaner A, Barrot Feixat C, Gené Badia M (2013) Determination of latent fingerprint degradation patterns – a real fieldwork study. Int J Legal Med (4):857–870

    Google Scholar 

  47. De Alcaraz-Fossoul J, Roberts KA, Barrot-Feixat C, Hogrebe G, Gené Badia M (2016) Fingermark ridge drift. Forensic Sci Int 258:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Carletta J (1996) Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Comput Linguist 22(2):249–254

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Merkel, R. (2021). Non-contact Technologies and Digital Approaches to (Latent) Fingermark Aging Studies. In: De Alcaraz-Fossoul, J. (eds) Technologies for Fingermark Age Estimations: A Step Forward. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69337-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69337-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69336-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69337-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics