Abstract
The elbow is a complex joint, formed by the distal humerus and the proximal radius and ulna. It is a composite joint, comprising the humero-radial joint, humero-ulnar joint and proximal radio-ulnar joint.The joints are stabilized by the joint capsule and the medial and lateral collateral ligaments [1,2,3]. The main movements achieved at the elbow level are flexion-extension and supination-pronation. The elbow is a joint well suitable for ultrasound evaluation, due to its accessibility by the transducer, and its easy manipulation by the examiner. It is usually involved in inflammatory diseases (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies), crystal arthropathies, degenerative disease and trauma. The anterior joint capsule inserts proximally in front of the medial epicondyle and above the coronoid and radial fossa and distally to the edge of the ulnar coronoid process and annular ligament. The posterior capsule inserts proximally in the superior part of the humeral capitulum, the posterior aspect of the medial epicondyle and the olecranon fossa and distally to superior and lateral edges of the olecranon. The elbow fibrous capsule is thinner in its posterior aspect.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Anterior Elbow
For the evaluation of the anterior elbow (Illustration 1), the patient is seating facing the examiner, the elbow is extended and resting on the examination table, with the forearm supinated (Fig. 1). In some cases the elbow can be supported by a pillow.
The principal structures that can be evaluated on the anterior elbow are the radial, the coronoid and the annular recesses, the distal biceps brachii tendon and the joint cartilage.
For the evaluation of the anterior elbow, we need a linear probe with a frequency between 10 and 15 MHz.
The evaluation of the anterior elbow starts with the longitudinal view of the radial recess. The starting point is with the probe in longitudinal, just proximal to the capitellum (Fig. 2). Then the probe is swiped from medial to lateral and from proximal to distal to evaluate the radial and the annular recesses. To evaluate the coronoid recess, the probe is swiped from medial to lateral (Figs. 3 and 4). Then the probe is moved to transverse view and swiped from proximal to distal. In this scan, the radial and the coronoid recesses, the annular recess and the joint cartilage are evaluated (Figs. 5 and 6) [4].
For the evaluation of the distal biceps brachii tendon (Illustration 2), there are three approaches suggested, i.e. from anterior aspect, from medial aspect and from posterior aspect. We will discuss each approach on the corresponding aspect of the elbow. From the anterior aspect, the patient’s position is the same as for the evaluation of the three anterior recesses. The probe is initially placed in longitudinal, slightly oblique, over the brachialis muscle and the radial tubercle. Slightly more pressure should be put on the distal edge of the probe (Figs. 7 and 8) [4].
Other structures that can be evaluated from the anterior part are the median nerve and the radial nerve. The median nerve lies medial to the brachial artery and the radial nerve lies between the brachialis medially and brachioradialis and extensor carpi radials longus laterally.
Medial Elbow
For the evaluation of the medial elbow, the patient is seating facing the examiner, the elbow is slightly flexed and resting on the examination table with the arm in external rotation and forearm supinated (Fig. 9) [4].
The principal structures that can be evaluated on the medial elbow are the common flexor tendon and enthesis and the ulnar (medial) collateral ligament (Illustration 3).
For the evaluation of the common flexor tendon, a high frequency, liner probe is needed (e.g. frequency more than 15 MHz).
The evaluation of the medial elbow starts with the longitudinal view of the common flexor tendon. The starting point is with the probe in longitudinal with the proximal part over the medial epicondyle and the distal part over the ulna (Fig. 10) [4]. Then the probe is swiped from medial to lateral to evaluate the entire aspect of the tendon. For the evaluation of the common flexor enthesis the probe should be moved distally, avoiding the anisotropy.
For the evaluation of biceps tendon from the medial aspect, the patient’s position remains the same as for the anterior evaluation, adding that the examiner holds the patient’s wrist with her/his free hand in order to perform a slightly forced external rotation (Fig. 11). The starting point is with the probe longitudinally and parallel to the distal humerus, with the proximal aspect of the probe over the medial epicondyle. From this point, the probe is moved distally over the pronator teres muscle, until the radial head and then the radial tuberosity is found.
The ulnar (medial) collateral ligament is a triangular ligament arising from the medial epicondyle of the humerus and inserting on to the coronoid process and olecranon of the ulna. It is formed from three bands, anterior, posterior and oblique, the anterior band being the strongest one (Fig. 12) [4].
Lateral Elbow
For the evaluation of the lateral elbow, the patient is seating facing the examiner, the elbow is slightly flexed and resting on the examination table with shoulder in internal rotation (Fig. 13) [4].
The principal structures that can be evaluated on the lateral elbow are the common extensor tendon and enthesis and the radial (lateral) collateral ligament (Illustration 4).
Due to the superficial localization of the extensor tendons, a high frequency, liner probe is needed (e.g. frequency more than 15 MHz).
The evaluation of the lateral elbow starts with the longitudinal view of the common extensor tendon.
The starting point is with the probe in longitudinal with the proximal part over the lateral epicondyle and the distal part over the radius. Then the probe is swiped from medial to lateral to evaluate the entire aspect of the tendon. For the evaluation of the common extensor enthesis, the probe should be moved distally, avoiding the anisotropy (Fig. 14) [4].
The radial (lateral) collateral ligament is weaker than the ulnar collateral ligament. It arises from the lateral epicondyle of the humerus and inserts on to the radial notch of ulna and annular ligament. For the evaluation of the radial collateral ligament, the probe is placed in the same position as for the evaluation of the extensor tendons and swiped slightly posterior (Fig. 15) [4].
Posterior Elbow
For the evaluation of the posterior elbow, the patient is seating facing the examiner, elbow flexed and arm internally rotated, with forearm and palm resting on the examination table (Fig. 16). An alternative position is with the patient supine and the forearm and palm resting on the patient’s chest [4].
The principal structures that can be evaluated on the posterior elbow are the posterior joint recess and the triceps brachii tendon and enthesis (Illustrations 5 and 6).
For the evaluation of the triceps enthesis, a high frequency, liner probe is needed (e.g. frequency more than 15 MHz). On the contrary, for the evaluation of the posterior joint recess, a low frequency is needed (e.g. 10 MHz).
The starting point is with the probe placed longitudinal over the midline of the posterior proximal elbow. Then the probe is swiped from medial to lateral and from proximal to distal in order to evaluate the structures on their entire length (Figs. 17 and 18). Then the probe is moved to transverse view and swiped from proximal to distal to evaluate the posterior recess and the triceps tendon (Figs. 19 and 20) [4].
For the posterior approach for the evaluation of the biceps tendon, the patient’s position is with the elbow flexed at 90 degrees, resting on the examination table, the forearm is elevated and the hand in neutral position. The starting point is with the probe transverse over the olecranon (Figs. 21 and 22). From this point, the probe is moved distally along the posterior aspect of the forearm. Dynamic manoeuvres of prono-supination are needed in order to identify the distal part of the biceps tendon and its insertion [4].
The annular ligament is the principal stabilizer of the joint and it surrounds the radial head and radial notch of the ulnar. For the evaluation of the annular ligament, the patient’s elbow is flexed and resting on the examination table, hand is pronated and palmar flexed (cobra position). The probe is placed transverse to the radial shaft over the radial head. In this position a longitudinal view of the ligament is obtained (Fig. 23).
Other structures that can be evaluated on the posterior aspect of the elbow are the ulnar nerve and the Osborne’s ligament. For the evaluation of the ulnar nerve in transverse view the probe is placed transverse between the olecranon and the medial epicondyle (Figs. 24 and 25). The ulnar nerve passes in a grove, behind the medial epicondyle. The grove is covered by the Osborne ligament, forming the cubital tunnel. For the evaluation of the ulnar nerve subluxation dynamic maneuvers of flexion-extension of the elbow are useful.
Pathology
Ultrasound is useful in detecting several elbow pathologies. The evaluation of the four recesses (i.e. the radial, the coronoid, the annular and the posterior recesses) can detect effusion, synovitis or intraarticular bodies. The evaluation of tendons and ligaments may detect tendinosis, enthesopathy or tears. Nerves can also be assessed by ultrasound for entrapment, subluxation or tumours. An added value of the ultrasound is the possibility of dynamic manoeuvres with a better characterisation of the pathology [5, 6]. If pathological finding, ultrasound has the advantage of guiding invasive procedures.
Synovitis is seen as an abnormal hypoechoic intra-articular tissue that is not displaceable and poorly compressible and which can exhibit Doppler sign (Fig. 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31) [7]. It can be observed in several pathological settings, like rheumatoid arthritis, spondilarthropathies, crystal arthropathies and trauma. The posterior recess is the most sensitive area for the assessment of synovitis and/or joint effusion. Pathologies associated with elbow synovitis are inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthrosis, crystal arthopathies, infections, pigmented villonodular synovitis or osteochrondomatosis.
Epicondylitis is mostly characterised on ultrasound by the presence of tendinopathy and/or enthesopathy. It could be caused by mechanical overuse or trauma, or by persistent inflammation. Tendinopathy appears on ultrasound as focal or generalized hypoechogenicity with or without Doppler sign. In mechanical pathologies, the presence of Doppler sign is due to regenerative tendon response (Fig. 32a,b). Mechanical tendinopathy is more frequent at the extensor tendons levels, compared to medial flexor tendons.
Entesopathy is defined as an abnormal hyperechoic (loss of normal fibrillary architecture) and/or thickened tendon at its bony attachment. Others findings, like enthesophytes, erosions or calcifications can be observed. Ultrasound enthesitis is defined by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) group as “hypoechoic and/or thickened insertion of the tendon close to the bone (within 2 mm from the bony cortex), which exhibits Doppler signal if active and that may show erosions, enthesophytes/calcifications as a sign of structural damage” (Fig. 33) [8]. According to this definition, the presence of inflammatory signs (i.e. Doppler sign and/or hypoechoic and/or thickened tendon insertion) is mandatory to define enthesitis in spondilarthropathies (i.e. spondyloarthtitis and psoriatic arthritis).
Clinically, it may be difficult to differentiate between tendinopathy/entesopathy and enthesitis. Thus, ultrasound may be used to identify the presence of enthesitis, features more specific for espondilarthropathy. On the other hand, ultrasound it is also useful to assess the severity and the extent of tendon/enthesis involvement.
At the elbow level, the most frequently involved bursae are the olecranon and bicipital bursae. The normal bursae are not visible, but in some pathological situations, like crystal arthopathies, infections, repetitive trauma or inflammatory arthritis, they are distended and can be easily observed (Fig. 34). For a better visualization of this bursitis, it is important not to put too much pressure on the probe, especially for the olecranon bursitis. The bicipital bursitis is frequently due to chronic mechanical friction and is associated with distal biceps tendinopathy (Figs. 35 and 36a,b).
Although it is not the most symptomatic joint in crystal arthropaties, crystal deposits of uric acid and calcium pyrophosphate can be observed at the elbow joint. For uric acid deposits, the most frequent finding is the presence of tophi at the olecranon burse or within the triceps tendon (Fig. 37); the double contour sign may be also observed. Calcium pyrophosphate deposits may be observed as hyperechoic images within the joint cartilage (Fig. 38).
Tendon and ligament tears may be observed as an anechoic or hypoechoic discontinuity of the fibrillary pattern with or without retraction and, in recent cases, with surrounding hypoechoic fluid. The most frequent tendon tears at the elbow level are those involving the distal biceps brachii tendon, although, these tears are much less common than the proximal biceps brachii tears. Regarding the elbow ligaments, the ulnar collateral ligament is most frequently involved.
References
Elbow and forearm. Susan Standring MBE. In: Gray’s anatomy, Chapter 49. p. 837–61.e3.
Hansen JT. Upper limb. In: Netter’s clinical anatomy, Chapter 7. p. 367–435.
Paulsen F. Upper extremity. In: Sobotta atlas of human anatomy, vol. 1, no. 3. p. 127–242.
Moller I, Janta I, Backhaus M, et al. The 2017 EULAR standardized procedures for ultrasound imaging in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(12):1974–9.
Draghi F, et al. Ultrasound of the elbow: examination techniques and US appearance of the normal and pathologic joint. J Ultrasound. 2007;10:76–84.
Konin GP, Nazarian LN, Walz DM. US of the elbow: indications, technique, normal anatomy, and pathologic conditions. Radiographics. 2013;33(4):E125–47.
Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M et al. OMERACT 7 Special Interest Group. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(12):2485–87.
Terslev L, Naredo E, Iagnocco A, et al. Defining enthesitis in spondyloarthritis by ultrasound: results of a Delphi process and of a reliability reading exercise, Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Ultrasound Task Force. Arthritis Care Res. 2004;66:741–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Janţă, I. (2021). The Elbow. In: Akram, Q., Basu, S. (eds) Ultrasound in Rheumatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68659-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68659-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68658-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68659-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)