Abstract
Galileo, in founding modern science, ended up attributing a decisive role to the deductive method by means of which human reason must do violence to sense in order to know the world. This emphasizes, in a highly admirable way, precisely the constitutively counterfactual aspect of modern scientific reasoning, which no longer starts from empirical observation, but rather conjecturally constructs a theory whose mathematically deduced conclusions are then placed in relation to the experimental dimension. This revolutionary approach to scientific research outlined by Galileo has not always been understood. On the contrary, the empiricist image of science has often been superimposed on the very way in which scientists work. Peirce’s elaboration of abduction corrected this empiricist reading of science, emphasizing the need to include abduction itself in a great multiplicity of perspectives, all very open and very broad. The essay retraces this complex knot concerning the most correct epistemological image of scientific knowledge, following and analyzing the contributions provided by both the empiricist and idealist traditions, and then focusing on the contribution of two authors such as Peirce and Vailati who, in two different contexts, grasped the importance of a normativist vision of scientific knowledge and the role of deduction and of Peircean abduction itself. In this way, the critical problematic nature of scientific knowledge is placed at the center of our image of scientific knowledge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agazzi, E. (2014). Scientific Objectivity and Its Contexts. Springer.
Bonfantini, A. M., & Proni, G. (1983). To Guess or not to Guess? (pp. 119–134). Eco-Sebeok.
Christie, A. (1943). Five Little Pigs. Collins.
Descartes, R. (1987). Discors de la méthode. Texte et commentaire par Étienne Gilson, Sixieme édition. Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Descartes, R. (1996). Oeuvres de Descartes. Publiées par Charles Adam & Paul Tannery. Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 11 vols.
Eco, U., & Sebeok, T. A. (1983). The Sign of Three. Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Indiana University Press, Blomington and Indianapolis.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. NLB.
Galilei, G. (1962). Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems – Ptolemaic & Copernican (S. Drake, Trans., A. Einstein, Foreword). University of California Press.
Galilei, G. (1968). Le opere di Galileo Galilei, Edizione Nazionale (A. Favaro, Ed.). G. Barbèra Editore, 20 vols.
Galilei, G. (1992). Il Saggiatore. With an introduction and edited by Libero Sosio, Feltrinelli.
Galilei, G. (2016). The Assayer. Translated from the Italian by Stillman Drake. University of Pennsylvania. (1st ed., 1957).
Geymonat, L. (1970–76). Storia del pensiero filosofico e scientifico. Garzanti, 7 vols.
Husserl, E. (1928). Logiche untersuchungen. Max Niemeyer, 3 vols.
Kant, I. (1786). Metaphysische Anfagsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. Translated and edited by Michael Friedman. Cambridge University Press.
Magnani, L. (2017). The Abductive Structure of Scientific Creativity. An Essay on the Ecology of Cognition. Springer.
Mason S. F., (1962). A History of the Sciences (New Rev. ed.). Macmillan Publishing Company.
Minazzi, F. (1994a). Galileo “filosofo geometra”. Rusconi.
Minazzi, F. (1994b). Il flauto di Popper. Franco Angeli.
Minazzi, F. (2011). Giovanni Vailati epistemologo. Mimesis.
Minazzi, F. (2022). Historical epistemology and European philosophy of science. Rethinking critical rationalism and transcendentalism. Springer. (in print).
Newton, I. (1728). De mundi systemate. Impensis J. Tonson, J. Osborn & T. Longman, Londini.
Peirce, C. S. (1960–1966). Collected Papers (A. W. Burks, Ed.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 8 vols.
Pera, M. (1991). Scienza e retorica. Laterza. (English translation by Clarissa Botsford, The Discourses of Sciences. University of Chicago Press, 1994).
Pollok, K. (2001). Kant “Metaphysische Anfagsgründe der Naturwissenschaft”. Ein Kritischer Kommentar, Felix Meiner Verlag.
Russell, B. (1931). The Scientific Outlook. George Allen & Unwin.
Singer, C. (1959). A Short History of Scientific Ideas to 1900. Clarendon Press.
Vailati, G. (1911). Scritti di G. Vailati (1863–1909) (M. Calderoni, U. Ricci, & G. Vacca, Eds.). Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlagsbuchhandlung- Successori B. Seeber Librai-Editori.
Vailati, G, (2010). Logic and Pragmatism. Selected essays (C. Arrighi, P. Cantù, M. De Zan, & P. Suppes, Eds.). CSLI Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Minazzi, F. (2022). Galilean Methodology and Abductive Inference. In: Magnani, L. (eds) Handbook of Abductive Cognition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68436-5_45-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68436-5_45-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68436-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68436-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering