Skip to main content

Relating the Metrics and Indicators of the Living Building Challenge and Urban Ecosystem Services for Regenerative Design

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future

Abstract

Design has great potential in city transformations for human well-being and balanced ecological systems. The urban ecosystem services approach is a benchmark for the highest levels of ecological performance, and the Living Building Challenge is the most demanding architecture certification system. Indeed, these approaches may be a way to integrate ecological processes in cities through regenerative design. Therefore, this chapter aims to quantify environmental strategies and define metrics and indicators to achieve the regenerative pattern for transforming cities. A literature review has been made to identify the state of the art of the urban ecosystem services indicators. In the meantime, the requirements of the Living Building Challenge 4.0 for architectural design were considered. Thereby, an analysis has been made to assess the Living Building Challenge criteria in relation to the urban ecosystem services indicators. The two approaches were correlated in order to identify the urban ecosystem services that are addressed by the Living Building Challenge and how they are quantified. From the synergies among these approaches, eight urban ecosystem services categories were created as a design framework. The proposed framework may support and facilitate the design process as it reduces the number of variables without diminishing the requirements for the provision of ecosystem services. The analysis reveals that both approaches can facilitate the implementation of actions aimed at regenerative design when considered together. The environmental metrics and indicators defined for regenerative projects propose a solution to quantify strategies to improve the human-nature relation in cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht CF (2018) A systemic approach for integrative design of buildings and landscapes: towards ecosystem services provision in urban areas. PhD Dissertation in Architecture, Penn State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmori D, Sanders J (2011) Groundwork: between landscape and architecture. The Monacelli Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63:616–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortinovis C, Geneletti D (2019) A framework to explore the effects of urban planning decisions on regulating ecosystem services in cities. Ecosyst Serv 38:100946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L et al (2017) Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv 28:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Clerici N, de la Barrera F, Eleuterio AA et al (2019) Urban ecosystem services in Latin America: mismatch between global concepts and regional realities? Urban Ecosyst 22(1):173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist T, Setälä H, Handel S, van der Ploeg S, Aronson J et al (2015) Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist T, Andersson E, Frantzeskaki N, McPhearson T, Olsson P et al (2019) Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat Sustain 2(4):267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Gren Å, Barton DN, Langemeyer J, McPhearson et al (2013) Urban ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 175–251

    Google Scholar 

  • International Living Future Institute (ILFI) (2019) Living building challenge 4.0: a visionary path to a regenerative future. International Living Future Institute, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabisch N, Haase D, Elmqvist T, McPhearson T (2018) Cities matter: workspaces in ecosystem-service assessments with decision-support tools in the context of urban systems. Bioscience 68(3):164–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landscape Architecture Foundation (LAF) (2018) Evaluating landscape performance: a guidebook for metrics and methods selection. In: Canfield J, Yang B, Whitlow H et al (Orgs) Landscape performance series

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell ST, Taylor JR (2013) Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States. Landsc Ecol 28(8):1447–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RI, Marcotullio PJ, Güneralp B (2013) Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–52

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhearson T, Andersson E, Elmqvist T, Frantzeskaki N (2015) Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 12:152–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers M (2013) Multivalent landscape: the Salvation Army Kroc Community Center case study. Landsc J 32(2):183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller GT, Spoolman S (2009) Living in the environment. Brooks/Cole, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney P (2014) A systematic approach to incorporating multiple ecosystem services in landscape planning and design. Landsc J 33(2):141–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukhdev P (2013) Foreword. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment. Springer, Dordrecht, pp v–vii

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan PY, Zhang J, Masoudi M, Alemu JB, Edwards PJ et al (2020) A conceptual framework to untangle the concept of urban ecosystem services. Landsc Urban Plan 200:103837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity ecological and economic foundations. In: Kumar P. Earthscan, London/Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the funding from PIBIC 2020-2021 sponsored by CNPq and the support from the Centro de Ciências Exatas and the Departamento de Arquitetura e Urbanismo (DAU) at the Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clara Barbosa Monteiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Monteiro, C.B., Albrecht, C.F. (2022). Relating the Metrics and Indicators of the Living Building Challenge and Urban Ecosystem Services for Regenerative Design. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Doni, F., Salvia, A.L. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_84-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_84-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics