Skip to main content

Circular Economy in the Built Environment of North America: Toward Housing Affordability and Sustainability

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future

Abstract

Current modes of planning and construction, with their wide-ranging negative effects on the economy, society, and environment, necessitate a crucial reassessment of conventional building practices. One promising approach in rethinking such practices is that of circular economy (CE) which envisions a sustainable future where waste is eliminated in the built environment and the lifespan of construction products, materials, and buildings are extended as much as possible. Such an approach encourages a paradigm shift away from the current status quo throughput economy that facilitates a culture of take-make-waste. Emerging literature in the area of circular materials management outline effective zero waste strategies toward significantly curbing global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and meeting the Paris Agreement goals. However, a CE approach to housing can go beyond solely waste recovery. By promoting flexibility and designing for efficient assembly and dismantling along with mechanisms for upcycling of construction, renovation, and demolition (CRD) waste in the early design phases, buildings can be kept in use for as long as possible while making housing more cost effective. By introducing a new housing prototype of a circular multi-family home, this chapter highlights how cost reduction using CE principles can result in both monetary savings and environmental impact reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya D, Boyd R, Finch O (2018) From principles to practices: first steps towards a circular built environment. Arup, Ellen McArthur Foundation/3XN Architects and GXN Innovation

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa F, Woetzel J, Mischke J, Ribeirinho MJ, Sridhar M, Parsons M, …Brown S (2017) Reinventing construction: a route to higher productivity. McKinsey Global Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia N, Steinmuller A (2018) Spatial models for the domestic commons: communes, co-living and cooperatives. Archit Des 88(4):120–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Brais H, Maurer K (2022) Inside the open door: considerations of inclusivity among women accessing an open door housing Service in Canada. Int J Homelessness 2(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland GH (1987) Report of the World Commission on environment and development: our common future. United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland GH, Khalid M, Agnelli S, Al-Athel S, Chidzero B (1987) Our common future. New York, United Nations (UN)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz RA (1993) Principles of environmental management: the greening of business. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Building Transparency (2021) Embodied carbon in construction calculator (EC3). https://www.buildingtransparency.org/ec3-resources/terms-use/. Accessed 21 July 2021

  • CABA (2019) Connected home roadmap. Continental Automated Buildings Association, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Amsterdam (2019) Building blocks for the new strategy Amsterdam circular 2020–2025. Directions for a thriving city within planetary boundaries. City of Amsterdam, Circle Economy and Kate Raworth, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Claveau J (2020) The Canadian housing survey, 2018: Core housing need of renter households living in social and affordable housing income. Research paper series. Statistics Canada, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • CMHC (1993) Years of innovation 1943–1993 in the Canadian housing industry, vol 50. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Durmisevic E (2019) Circular economy in construction design strategies for reversible buildings. University of Twente, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson A*, Keena N*, Organschi A, Gray L, Novelli N, Bradford K, … Radka M (2020) Built environment ecosystems framework towards sustainable urban housing infrastructure. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science, vol 588, no 4. IOP Publishing, p 042027 * denotes co-first authorship and equal contribution

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2017) Cities in the circular economy: an initial exploration. Ellen MacArthur Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman A (2001) The grow home. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman A (2002) The adaptable house: designing for choice and change. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman A (2020) Prefab living. Thames & Hudson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman A, Krawitz D (2002) Peeking through the keyhole. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Chen H, Hazen BT, Kaur S, Gonzalez ED (2019) Circular economy and big data analytics: a stakeholder perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 144:466–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas W, Krausmann F, Wiedenhofer D, Hein M (2015) How circular is the global economy? An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. J Ind Ecol 19(5):765–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydro Québec (2021) Estimate the electricity cost of a home. https://session.hydroquebec.com/portail/en/web/clientele/estimation-consommation. Accessed 10 July 2021

  • International Resource Panel (2017) Assessing global resource use: a systems approach to resource efficiency and pollution reduction. A report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • International Resource Panel (2020) In: Hertwich E, Lifset R, Pauliuk S, Heeren N (eds) Resource efficiency and climate change: material efficiency strategies for a low-carbon future. A report of the International Resource Panel, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones C, Hammond G (2019) ICE database. https://circularecology.com/embodied-carbon-footprintdatabase.html. Accessed 9 Feb 2021

  • Keena N, Dyson A (2017) Qualifying the quantitative in the construction of built ecologies. In: Benjamin D (ed) Embodied energy and design. Columbia University GSAPP Lars Müller, New York, pp 196–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Keena N, Dyson A (2020) State of play for circular built environment in North America. Yale Center for Ecoystems in Architecture, Yale University and United Nations One Planet Network Sustainable Buildings and Construction Programme (SBC), USA and France

    Google Scholar 

  • Keena N, Aly Etman M, Dyson A (2020) Mapping the built environment process (BEP) ecosystem via a data to knowledge framework. In: Proceedings of the 2020 AIA/ACSA intersections research conference: carbon. Pennsylvania State University, virtual conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibert CJ (1999) The promises and limits of sustainability. In: Kibert CJ (ed) Reshaping the built environment: ecology, ethics and economics. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 9–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein D (2020) Co-living assessed in a time of Covid-19: critical intervention or millennial fad? Univ St Thomas J Law Public Policy 14:158

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy P, Rutqvist J (2016) Waste to wealth: the circular economy advantage. Springer, Palgrave Macmillan London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miflin C, Spertus J, Miller B, Grace C (2017) Zero waste design guidelines: design strategies and case studies for a zero waste city. AIA Center for Architecture, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bank of Canada (2021) Housing affordability monitor. https://www.nbc.ca/content/dam/bnc/en/rates-and-analysis/economic-analysis/housingaffordability.pdf. NBF economics and strategy (data via statistics Canada, Teranet-NBC). Accessed 22 July 2021

  • National Bank of Canada (2022) Housing affordability monitor: economics and strategy. Retrieved from https://www.nbc.ca/content/dam/bnc/en/rates-and-analysis/economic-analysis/housingaffordability.pdf

  • National Research Council Canada (2021). Low-carbon assets through life cycle assessment initiative. Retrieved August 5, 2022 from https://nrc.canada.ca/en/researchdevelopment/research-collaboration/programs/lowcarbon-assets-through-life-cycle-assessment-initiative

  • Nebraska Energy Office (2006). http://www.neo.state.ne.us/home_const/factsheets/min_use_lumber.htm. Accessed May 2006

  • OECD (2019) Global material resources outlook to 2060: economic drivers and environmental consequences. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pagoropoulos A, Pigosso DC, McAloone TC (2017) The emergent role of digital technologies in the circular economy: a review. Procedia CIRP 64:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raugei M, Keena N, Novelli N, Aly Etman M, Dyson A (2021) Life cycle assessment of an ecological living module equipped with conventional rooftop or integrated concentrating photovoltaics. J Ind Ecol:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • REIC Ltd. And Associates (1991) Residential water conservation: a review of products, processes and practices. Canadian Housing and Mortgage Corporation, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonen K, Rodriguez BX, De Wolf C (2017) Benchmarking the embodied carbon of buildings. Technol Archit Des 1(2):208–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Tally (2021) Tally for revit. https://choosetally.com/. Accessed 15 May 2021

  • Thelen D, Van Acoleyen M, Huurman W, Tom T, van Brunschot C, Edgerton B, Ben K (2018) Scaling the circular built environment: pathways for business and government. World Business Council for Sustainable Development & Circle Economy, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EIA (2021) Use of energy explained: energy use in homes. U. S. Energy Information Administration: Independent Statistics and Analysis, Washington, DC, USA. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/use-ofenergy/homes.php. Accessed 16 Nov 2021

  • UNECE UN (2019) Forest products annual market review 2018–2019. United Nations Publication, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • US DOE (2008) Building technologies program, planned program activities for 2008–2012. Department Of Energy, US, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman B, Huang M, Simonen K (2020) Embodied carbon in construction materials: a framework for quantifying data quality in EPDs. Build Cities 1(1):625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeheyis M, Hewage K, Alam MS, Eskicioglu C, Sadiq R (2013) An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability. Clean Techn Environ Policy 15(1):81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Kone Foundation, 202006340.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi Keena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Keena, N., Friedman, A. (2022). Circular Economy in the Built Environment of North America: Toward Housing Affordability and Sustainability. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Doni, F., Salvia, A.L. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability Science in the Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_144-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68074-9_144-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68074-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics