Abstract
The vast majority of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease respond adequately to lifestyle modifications and medical therapy. A small percentage of patients, however, are candidates for antireflux surgery due to the following reasons: partial control of symptoms (e.g. regurgitation or cough) with medication, presence of large hiatal hernia, poor patients ‘compliance with medical therapy, refusal to be on long-term medical treatment, or complications related to medical therapy. A careful patient selection, a complete preoperative work-up, and a properly executed operation are key for the success of antireflux surgery.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a frequent disorder worldwide, especially in developed countries. In the United States, it is estimated that around 20% of the adult population is affected by GERD, with increasing incidence rates in the last decades mostly due to the epidemic of obesity [1]. The economic impact of this disease is alarming, with direct health care costs of approximately $10 billion per year (being proton pump inhibitors (PPI) the largest contributors to these expenses) [2, 3].
The main purpose of treatment of GERD is to control symptoms, improve patients’ quality of life, and prevent GERD-related complications such as bleeding, esophageal stenosis, Barrett’s esophagus and/or esophageal adenocarcinoma.The vast majority of patients respond adequately to lifestyle modifications and PPI. A small percentage of patients, however, are candidates for antireflux surgery due to the following reasons: partial control of symptoms (e.g. regurgitation or cough) with medication, presence of large hiatal hernia, poor patients ‘compliance with medical therapy, refusal to be on long-term medical treatment, or complications related to medical therapy [4].
A careful patient selection, a complete preoperative work-up, and a properly executed operation are key for the success of antireflux surgery [5,6,7].
2 Clinical Presentation
Heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia are considered typical symptoms of GERD. In addition to the typical symptoms, patients with GERD can present with atypical symptoms such as cough, wheezing, chest pain or hoarseness. These symptoms represent extraesophageal presentations of the disease, including respiratory disorders such as asthma, as well as ear, nose, and throat abnormalities such as laryngitis. As a clinical diagnosis of GERD based on symptoms is often incorrect, a complete diagnostic work-up is necessary in patients undergoing antireflux surgery.
3 Preoperative Work-up
Besides a complete history and physical evaluation, several tests should be performed preoperatively:
Upper endoscopy: An upper endoscopy is often the first test used to determine the severity of esophagitis (Table 1.1). The endoscopy is also useful for diagnosing GERD-related complications such as strictures, Barrett´s esophagus or cancer, and may exclude other pathologies such as eosinophilic esophagitis, gastritis or peptic ulcer.
Barium esophagram : This test does not provide objective evidence of GERD but rather provides valuable anatomical information (i.e. presence and size of hiatal hernia, degree of esophageal shortening and presence of a diverticulum or strictures).
Esophageal manometry: Although the esophageal manometry has limited valued for the diagnosis of GERD, it plays an important role during the preoperative evaluation of these patients for three reasons: (a) it is necessary for the correct placement of the pH monitoring probe (5 cm above the upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter); (b) rules out primary esophageal motility disorders (mainly achalasia) that present with similar symptoms to those with GERD; (c) helps tailoring the type of fundoplication (total vs. partial) based on the peristaltic coordination and contractile force of the esophageal body.
Ambulatory pH monitoring : This study is the gold standard for the diagnosis of GERD because it objectively determines pathologic acid exposure and correlates specific symptoms with episodes of reflux. Acid suppression medications should be discontinued before the test (H2 blocking agents for 3 days and PPIs for 7 days).
4 Surgical Technique
4.1 Positioning of the Patient and Surgical Team
After induction of general endotracheal anesthesia, an orogastric tube is inserted by the anesthesiologist to keep the stomach decompressed. The patient is positioned supine in low lithotomy position with the lower extremities extended on stirrups, with knees flexed 20°–30°. The surgeon stands between the patient’s legs, and the first and second assistants on the left and right side of the operating table, respectively (Fig. 1.1).
Troubleshooting: Pneumatic compression stockings are always used as prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis because the increased abdominal pressure secondary to the pneumoperitoneum and the steep Trendelenburg position required during the procedure decrease venous return.
4.2 Trocar Placement
A total of five 10 mm ports are used for the operation. The 1st port is placed in the midline or slightly to the left of the midline, about 14 cm below the xiphoid process. This port is used for insertion of the scope. The 2nd and 3rd ports are placed under the right and left costal margins so that their axes and the scope form an angle of about 120° (these ports are used for dissecting and suturing instruments). The 4th port is placed in the right midclavicular line at the same level of the 1st (this port is used for the liver retractor). The 5th port is placed in the left midclavicular line at the same level of the 1st (mainly used by the first assistant) (Fig. 1.2).
Troubleshooting: Care must be taken when introducing the first port in the supraumbilical area because this site is just above the aorta and its bifurcation. We recommend using an optical trocar to obtain access. A common mistake is to place the trocars too low, which can make the operation more difficult.
4.3 Division of the Gastrohepatic Ligament
Once the left segment of the liver is retracted, the gastrohepatic ligament is divided starting above the caudate lobe of the liver towards the right crus (Fig. 1.3). The right crus is then separated from the lateral aspect of the esophagus with blunt maneuvers and the posterior vagus nerve is identified. The right crus should be dissected all the way down towards the junction with the left crus (Fig. 1.4).
Troubleshooting: An accessory left hepatic artery originating from the left gastric artery may be encountered during this step of the procedure. If this vessel limits the exposure, it can usually be safely divided.
4.4 Division of the Phrenoesophageal Membrane
The phrenoesophageal membrane is incised and divided with electrocautery above the esophagus (Fig. 1.5). The anterior vagus is identified and left attached to the esophageal wall. The left pillar of the crus is separated from the esophagus, and dissected bluntly downward toward the junction with the right crus.
Troubleshooting: Leaving the anterior vagus nerve attached to the esophagus while lifting the peritoneum and phrenoesophageal membrane away from the esophagus prevents injuring the nerve.
4.5 Division of Short Gastric Vessels
Starting from a point midway along the greater curvature of the stomach, the short gastric vessels are taken down with a vessel sealing system towards the fundus and all the way to the left pillar of the crus. This will allow performing a tension-free fundoplication afterwards (Fig. 1.6).
Troubleshooting: Excessive traction of the short gastric branches should be avoided to prevent bleeding from the spleen.
4.6 Placement of Penrose Drain and Mediastinal Dissection
A window is opened by blunt dissection under the esophagus, between the gastric fundus, the esophagus, and the left pillar of the crus (Fig. 1.7). The window is then enlarged and a Penrose drain is passed around the esophagus, incorporating both anterior and posterior vagus nerves. Retracting the esophagus away from the hiatus with the Penrose drain will help performing mediastinal dissection in order to obtain at least 3 cm of esophagus below the diaphragm.
Troubleshooting: Secure the Penrose drain with a large clip or a loop suture tie. If the pleura is opened during mediastinal dissection, the anesthesiologist should be promptly notified. Reducing pneumoperitoneum pressure, if needed, is usually enough to avoid respiratory events.
4.7 Closure of the Esophageal Hiatus
A proper exposure of the hiatus is achieved retracting the esophagus upward and toward the patient’s left with the Penrose drain. The closure of the diaphragmatic crura is done with interrupted non-absorbable sutures (e.g. 2-0 silk). The first stitch should be placed just above the junction of the two pillars. Additional stitches are placed 1 cm apart, and a space of about 1 cm is left between the uppermost stitch and the esophagus (Figs. 1.8 and 1.9).
Troubleshooting: When placing the stitches to approximate the crura, care must be taken to avoid injuring the inferior vena cava and the aorta. The closure of the crura should not be too tight, and a close grasper should slide easily between the esophagus and the crura.
4.8 Fundoplication
The fundus is passed behind the gastroesophageal junction and a “shoe-shine” maneuver is performed to verify sufficient fundic mobilization and to avoid having part of the gastric fundus above the wrap (Fig. 1.10). There are two main types of fundoplication during an antireflux operation: total 360° fundoplication (Nissen fundoplication) or partial posterior 240° fundoplication (Toupet fundoplication). Previous studies have shown that both types control abnormal reflux similarly [8, 9]. Therefore, we believe the choice of the type of the wrap should be based on the surgeon’s own training and experience. In patients with severely impaired esophageal motility in the preoperative esophageal manometry, we prefer performing a partial fundoplication.
Total 360° Fundoplication : A bougie is inserted into the esophagus to decrease the risk of postoperative dysphagia. The gastric fundus is pulled under the esophagus, and the left and right sides of the fundus are wrapped with a Babcock above the esophagogastric junction during the placement of the first stitch. We use 3 stitches of non- absorbable material (2-0 silk or polyester) at 1 cm intervals to approximate the right and left side of the fundoplication. The goal is to create a short (about 2 cm in length) and floppy wrap (Figs. 1.11 and 1.12).
Partial Posterior Fundoplication : This wrap is created by placing 6 stitches of non- absorbable material (2-0 silk or polyester). The right and left sides of the fundus are separately sutured to the esophagus, leaving 120° of the anterior esophageal wall uncovered. Three sutures are placed on each side between the muscular layers of the esophageal wall and the gastric fundus (Fig. 1.13).
Troubleshooting: Obtaining a free-tension wrap is critical for the success of the operation.
4.9 Final Inspection
The Penrose drain is cut and passed out of the abdomen. In case a bougie was used for a total fundoplication, it is smoothly removed from the esophagus by the anesthesiologist. After adequate hemostasis is achieved, the liver retractor, instruments and trocars are removed from the abdomen under direct vision. All the port sites should be closed.
5 Postoperative Care
Patients are fed the morning of the first postoperative day with clear liquids and then soft diet. Most patients are discharged within 48 hours with instructions to avoid meat, bread, and carbonated beverages for the following two weeks. Regular activities are usually resumed within two weeks. Acid-reducing medications should be discontinued after 6 weeks at the latest.
References
El-Serag HN, Sweet S, Winchester CC, et al. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63:871–80.
Sandler RS, Everhart JE, Donowitz M, Adams E, Cronin K, Goodman C, Gemmen E, Shah S, Avdic A, Rubin R. The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1500–11.
Shaheen NJ, Hansen RA, Morgan DR, et al. The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(9):2128–38.
Schlottmann F, Herbella FA, Allaix ME, et al. Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Surg. 2017;41(7):1685–90.
Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Patti MG. Antireflux surgery in the USA: influence of surgical volume on perioperative outcomes and costs—Time for centralization? World J Surg. 2018;42(7):2183–9.
Patti MG, Schlottmann F, Farrell TM. Fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: tips for success. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(1):1–5.
Patti MG, Schlottmann F. Recurrence of reflux after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. JAMA. 2018;319(1):82–3.
Booth MI, Stratford J, Jones L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic total (Nissen) versus posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease based on preoperative oesophageal manometry. Br J Surg. 2008;95(1):57–63.
Shan CX, Zhang W, Zheng XM, et al. Evidence-based appraisal in laparoscopic Nissen and Toupetfundoplications for gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(24):3063–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors have no conflict of interest
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schlottmann, F., Nurczyk, K., Patti, M.G. (2021). Laparoscopic Fundoplication. In: Patti, M.G., Zureikat, A.H., Fichera, A., Schlottmann, F. (eds) Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67940-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67940-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67939-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67940-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)