Skip to main content

Work in Progress: The Effectiveness of Using Blended Learning on Developing Egyptian EFL Learners’ Language Skills

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0 (ICBL 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1314))

Abstract

Blended learning (BL) is the integration of traditional classroom instruction with computer-mediated instruction. It has become a common approach in educational systems all over the world, and recently it has become a matter of considerable interest in teaching English as a foreign language (EFL). As opposed to online learning, BL complements face to face instruction with a wide variety of technologies that makes learning easier in the 21st century. This paper investigates the effectiveness of the BL approach on the learning outcomes and satisfaction of undergraduate students, taking an English language course in a private university in Egypt. A quasi-experimental research design will be implemented and sixty students will be chosen as the sample of participants. All students will receive the same instructional topics with regards to the reading and writing skills; forty students represent the study groups who receive BL through the flipped classroom method, e-learning and the use of an interactive e-book, while twenty students represent the control group who will only receive face to face instruction. The effectiveness of the BL approach will be measured by examining the development of the students’ reading and writing skills. The study groups will fill out a 21-item likert scale satisfaction questionnaire to evaluate the content of the course, the usefulness of e-learning, the instructor and interaction. Data of students’ pre-test and posttest will be analyzed, and a t-test will be used to find out the significant differences of the learning outcomes between the study groups and the control group. The t-test will also be conducted to identify learners’ satisfaction of the BL environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi, M.: The use of technology in English language learning: a literature review. Int. J. Engl. Res. Engl. Educ. 3(2), 116–125 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Albiladi, S., Alshareef, W.: Blended learning in English teaching and learning: a review of the current literature. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 10(2), 232 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AlKhaleel, A.: The advantages of using blended learning in studying English as a foreign language in the University of Tabuk. Mod. Lang. J. Lang. Teach. Methods 9, 1–7 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Banados, E.: A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO J. 23(3), 533–550 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.: Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Prentice Hall Regents, Englewood Cliffs (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.: Principles of Language Teaching and Learning, 5th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang-Tik, C.: Impact of leaning styles on the community of inquiry presences in multi-disciplinary blended learning environments. Interact. Learn. Environ. 26(6), 827–838 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Chiou, H.: Learning style, sense of community and learning effectiveness in hybrid learning environment. Interact. Learn. Environ. 22(4), 485–496 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education, 5th edn. Routledge Falmer, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., Bannan-Ritland, B.: Online Learning: Concepts, Strategies, and Application. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuyakor, J.: Coronovirus (COVID-19) and online learning in higher institutions of education: a survey of the perceptions of Ghanaian international students in China. Online J. Commun. Media Technol. 10(3), 1–9 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockstader, J.: Teachers of 21st century know the what, why and how of technology integration. Technol. Horiz. Educ. 26(6), 73–74 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakhir, Z.: The impact of blended learning on the achievement of English language students; and their attitudes towards it (Master’s thesis). Middle East University (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D., Vaughan, N.: Blended learning in higher education: framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, S., Mei, S.: Perceptions and practices of blended learning in foreign language at USIM. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Educ. Res. 12(1), 170–176 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kizil, A.: Blended instruction for EFL learners: engagement, learning and course satisfaction. JALT CALL J. 10, 175–188 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lungu, I.: The increasing need of blended learning models in courses of English for specific ppurposes. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 70(2013), 470 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, A., Peglar, C.: Preparing for blended e-learning. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 39(4), 749–469 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma’arop, A., Embi, M.: Implementation of blended learning in higher learning institutions: a review of literature. Int. Educ. Stud. 9(3), 41–52 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, J., Albright, Z.: College Writing Skills with Readings, 10th edn. Mc-Grew-Hill Connect (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarenko, A.: Blended learning versus traditional learning: what works? (A case study research). Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 200(2015), 77–82 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumeier, P.: A closer look at blended learning: parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. Recall 17(2), 163–178 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, K.: Blended learning: How to integrate online and traditional learning. Kogan Page, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciano, A.: Blending with purpose: the multimodal model. J. Asynchronous Learn. Netw. 13(1), 7–18 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M.: The use of blended learning approach in EFL education. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 8(5), 2249–8958 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyer, B.: Quasi Experimental Research Designs. Oxford University Press, New York (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B., Whittaker, C.: Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation. British Council, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wichadee, S.: Significant predictors for blended learning effectiveness in a language course. JALT CALL J. 14(1), 25–42 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yapici, I.: Effectiveness of blended cooperative learning environment in biology teaching: classroom community sense, academic achievement and satisfaction. J. Educ. Train. 4(4), 269–280 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Zhu, C.: Comparing learning outcomes of blended learning and traditional face-to-face learning of university students in ESL courses. Int. J. E-Learn. 17(2), 251–273 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wesam Khairy Morsi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Student Satisfaction Questionnaire of Blended Learning

  1. A.

    Students’ Satisfaction with Blended Course Content

    1. 1.

      The course content delivered in the face-to-face sessions is suitable for me to learn.

    2. 2.

      I understand the concept of the flipped classroom method and find it effective in learning and improving my language skills.

    3. 3.

      The materials designed in the flipped mode (Pre-class quizzes) and after class (interactive quizzes) are appropriate and relevant to the course content.

    4. 4.

      The assessment criteria for each assignment are clear.

    5. 5.

      Duration of doing each assignment is appropriate.

    6. 6.

      The use of e-learning allows me to participate at times that are convenient for me.

    7. 7.

      The ability to access course information and content through e-learning is important.

    8. 8.

      In terms of technology, I feel comfortable using e-learning.

    9. 9.

      Using e-learning has been difficult for me.

    10. 10.

      Using an interactive e-book is very effective to improve my skills.

    11. 11.

      Using the interactive e-book is not necessary in this course.

    12. 12.

      In terms of technology, an interactive e-book is difficult for me to use.

    13. 13.

      The use of e-learning provides me with options that meet my learning needs and learning style.

  2. B.

    Satisfaction with instructor

    1. 14.

      The instructor is able to explain the content clearly.

    2. 15.

      The supplementary interactive quizzes provided in the e-book are clear and helps in reinforcing the course content.

    3. 16.

      Classroom assignments are clearly communicated to me.

    4. 17.

      Feedback on assignments is given in a timely manner.

    5. 18.

      The instructor is able to use blended learning technology.

  3. C.

    Satisfaction with interactivity

    1. 19.

      Teacher-student interaction is appropriately maintained in online and face to face sessions.

    2. 20.

      I am satisfied in the way I interact with other students in online and face to face sessions.

    3. 21.

      I am satisfied with my peer collaboration in groups to complete assigned tasks.

  4. D.

    Please answer the following questions:

    1. 1.

      What do you think are the benefits of teaching the EAP course using the blended learning environment?....................................................................................................

    2. 2.

      What do you think are the disadvantages of teaching the EAP course using the blended learning environment?......................................................................................

    3. 3.

      What are your suggestions for improvement of the EAP course?.........................

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Morsi, W.K. (2021). Work in Progress: The Effectiveness of Using Blended Learning on Developing Egyptian EFL Learners’ Language Skills. In: Auer, M.E., Centea, D. (eds) Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0. ICBL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1314. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67209-6_49

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics