Abstract
In the past decades, promotion of active citizenship and citizens’ engagement and opening of governance to citizens and civil society organizations (CSOs) have become prominent topics, both in scholarly literature and in policy agendas. Active citizens and stronger civil society have been envisaged as part of the solution to social exclusion, weakening social cohesion, rising social needs and other pressing societal problems. They are also attributed with potential for production of social innovations. Accordingly, the role and potentials of ‘community’ in dealing with different social issues have been rediscovered. The notions of civic engagement, co-production and social innovations have been particularly advocated for in deprived local communities, dealing with manifold social problems. However, research points to certain pitfalls and obstacles for effective citizens’ involvement in community projects, co-production and production of social innovations in deprived local communities. Hence, the importance and the role of professionals in these processes have been particularly stressed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aigner, S. M., Flora, C. B., & Hernandez, J. M. (2001). The premise and promise of citizenship and civil Society for Renewing Democracies and Empowering Sustainable Communities. Sociological Inquiry, 71(4), 439–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2001.tb01129.x.
Bežovan, G. (2004). Civilno društvo (Civil society). Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Globus.
Bežovan, G., & Matančević, J. (2017). Civilno društvo i pozitivne promjene (Civil society and positive changes). Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
Bežovan, G., Matančević, J. & Baturina, D. (2014). Varaždin, Croatia. In: Evers, A., Ewert, B. & Brandsen, T. (eds.) Social innovations for social cohesion. Transnational patterns and approaches from 20 European cities. Liege: EMES European Research Network asbl. Accessed 15 June 2020. http://www.wilcoproject.eu/downloads/WILCO-project-eReader.pdf
Bežovan, G., Matančević, J., & Baturina, D. (2016). Social innovations as a contribution to strengthening social cohesion and mitigating social crisis in European urban social programs (in Croatian). Croatian Journal of Social Policy, 23(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v23i1.1279.
Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6.
Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2008). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. In V. Pestoff & T. Brandsen (Eds.), Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services (pp. 493–501). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Brandsen, T., Dekker, P., & Evers, A. (2010). Civicness in the governance and delivery of social services. In T. Brandsen, P. Dekker, & A. Evers (Eds.), Civicness in the governance and delivery of social services (pp. 9–17). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B., & Trommel, W. (2014). Manufacturing civil society: An introduction. In T. Brandsen, W. Trommel, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Manufacturing civil society: Principles, practices and effects (pp. 1–14). Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brandsen, T., Evers, A., Cattacin, S., & Zimmer, A. (2016). Social innovation: A sympathetic and critical interpretation. In T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Social innovations in the urban context (pp. 3–18). Cham/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer.
Brown, D. (1998). Creating social capital: Nongovernmental development organizations and intersectoral prolem solving. In W. W. Powell & E. S. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good. New Haven/London: Yale university press.
Bureau of European Policy Advisers (BEPA). (2010). Empowering people, driving change. Social innovation in European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4e23d6b8-5c0c-4d38-bd9d-3a202e6f1e81. Accessed 15 Apr 2020.
Cattacin, S., & Zimmer, A. (2016). Urban governance and social Innovaitons. In T. Brandsen, S. Cattacin, A. Evers, & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Social innovations in the urban context (pp. 21–40). Cham/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer.
De Graaf, L., van Hulst, M., & Michels, A. (2015). Enhancing participation in disadvantaged urban Neighbourhoods. Local Government Studies, 41(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2014.908771.
Durose, C. (2011). Revisiting Lipsky: Front-line work in UK local governance. Political Studies, 59, 978–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00886.x.
Evers, A., & Ewert, B. (2014). Introduction: Social innovations for social cohesion: 77 cases from 20 European cities. In A. Evers, B. Ewert, & T. Brandsen (Eds.), Social innovations for social cohesion. Transnational patterns and approaches from 20 European cities. Liege: EMES European Research Network asbl.
Evers, A., & Guillemard, A.-M. (2013). Introduction: Marshall’s concept of citizenship and contemporary welfare reconfiguration. In A. Evers & A.-M. Guillemard (Eds.), Social policy and citizenship: The changing landscape. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Freise, M., Pyykkönen, M., & Vaidelyte, E. (Eds.). (2010). A panacea for all seasons? Civil society and governance in Europe. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Gerometta, J., Häussermann, H., & Longo, G. (2005). Social innovation and civil Society in Urban Governance: Strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2007–2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279851.
Goodlad, R., Burton, P., & Croft, J. (2005). Effectiveness at what? The processes and impact of community involvement in area-based initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23(6), 923–938. https://doi.org/10.1068/c45m.
Henderson, P., & Vercseg, I. (2010). Community development and civil society. Making connections in the European context. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Howaldt, J., Butzin, A., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (2014). Theoretical approaches to social innovation – a critical literature review. A deliverable of the project: Social innovation: Driving force of social change (SI-DRIVE). Dortmund: Sozialforschungsste. http://www.si-drive.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/D1_1-Critical-Literature-Review.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2020.
Kamerāde, D. (2015). Third sector impacts on human resources and community, TSI Working Paper No. 3, Seventh Framework Programme (grant agreement 613034), European Union. Brussels: Third Sector Impact.
Mayo, M. (1997). Partnership for regeneration and community development: Some opportunities, challenges and constraints. Critical Social Policy, 17(52), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101839701705201.
Michels, A., & de Graaf, L. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 447–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2010.494101.
Mohan, J., & Bennett M.R. (2016). Community-level impacts of the third sector: does the local distribution of voluntary organisations influence the likelihood of volunteering?, TSI Working Paper Series No. 7, Seventh Framework Programme (grant agreement 613034), European Union. Brussels: Third Sector Impact.
Neumayr, M., & Meyer, M. (2010). In search of civicness: An empirical investigation of service delivery, public advocacy, and community building by civil society organizations. In T. Brandsen, P. Dekker, & A. Evers (Eds.), Civicness in the governance and delivery of social services (pp. 201–226). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Pestoff, V. (2009). A democratic architecture for the welfare state. Oxon/New York: Routledge.
Pestoff, V. (2010). Civicness and the co-production of social services in Sweden. In T. Brandsen, P. Dekker, & A. Evers (Eds.), Civicness in the governance and delivery of social services (pp. 99–112). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social Services in Europe: Some crucial conceptual issues. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production. Oxon/New York: Routledge.
Petrella, F. (2009). Civil society and new forms of governance: The case of childcare services in a european perspective. In B. Enjolras & K. H. Sivesind (Eds.), Civil society in comparative perspective. Comparative social research (A research annual, Vol. 26) (pp. 25–48). Bingley: Emerald Books.
Powell, F., & Geoghegan, M. (2006). Beyond political zoology: Community development, civil society, and strong democracy. Community Development Journal, 41(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi062.
Ranci, C., Brandsen, T., & Sabatinelli, S. (Eds.). (2014). Social vulnerability in European cities: The role of local welfare in times of crisis. Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Steen, T., & Tuurnas, S. (2018). The role of the professional in co-production and co-creation process. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services (pp. 198–207). New York/Abingdon: Routledge.
Taylor, M. (2007). Community participation in the real world: Opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces. Urban Studies, 44(2), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601074987.
van Meerkerk, I., Boonstra, B., & Edelenbos, J. (2013). Self-organization in urban regeneration: A two-case comparative research. European Planning Studies, 21(10), 1630–1652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722963.
Vanleene, D., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-production in community development. In T. Brandsen, T. Steen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services (pp. 198–207). New York/Abingdon: Routledge.
Vanleene, D., Voets, J., & Verschuere, B. (2017). Co-producing a nicer neighbourhood: Why do people participate in local community development projects? Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 15(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.4335/15.1.111-132(2017).
Vanleene, D., Voets, J., & Verschuere, B. (2018). The co-production of a community: Engaging citizens in derelict neighbourhoods. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(1), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9903-8.
Wells, R., & Anasti, T. (2019). Hybrid models for social change: Legitimacy among community-based nonprofit organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00126-3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matančević, J. (2021). Searching for Local Answers to Societal Challenges: The Contribution of Civil Society Organizations and Social Innovations to Community Development. In: Opačić, A. (eds) Practicing Social Work in Deprived Communities. European Social Work Education and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65987-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65987-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-65986-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-65987-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)